The Effect of Organizational Identification on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Psychological Well-Being

Öz

The purpose of this research is to determine the role of psychological well-being in the impact of organizational identification that explains the integration of the organization with its goals and objectives on counterproductive work behaviors involving attitudes and behaviors that are undesirable and to be prevented in organizations. Psychological well-being, which represents one of the most important parts of the psychological function, explains the individual's desire for self-realization, autonomy and personal development. In this sense, expectation that the mitigating effect of organizational identification of counterproductivity work behaviors can occur through psychological well-being is the starting point of the research. 290 employees contributed to this research on health-care professionals operating in Nevsehir province. As a result of the research, it has been determined that psychological well-being plays a full mediating role in the relationship between organizational identification and the undesirable counterproductive work behaviors that have a great importance for organizations. In line with this result, it is possible to claim that organizational identification reduces counterproductive work behaviors through psychological well-being.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational identification
• psychological well-being
• counter-productive business behaviors
• healt workers

Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Üzerine Etkisi: Psikolojik İyi Oluşun Aracı Rolü

Öz

Çalışanların örgütün amaç ve hedefleri ile bütünleşmesini ifade eden örgütsel özdeşleşmenin, örgütlerde istenmeyen ve önlenmesi gereken tutum ve davranışları içeren üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları üzerine etkisinde psikolojik iyi oluşun nasıl bir rol üstlendiğinin belirlenmesi araştırmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Psikolojik işlevin en önemli parçalarından birini temsil eden psikolojik iyi oluş bireyin kendini gerçekleştirmeye yönelik isteği, özerkliği ve kişisel gelişimine yönelik çabalarını ifade etmektedir. Bu anlamda örgütsel özdeşleşmenin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları üzerine azaltıcı etkisinin psikolojik iyi oluş üzerinden gerçekleşebileceğine ilişkin beklenti araştırmanın çıkış noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Nevşehir ilinde faaliyet gösteren sağlık kuruluşu çalışanları üzerine yapılan bu araştırmaya 290 çalışan katkı sağlamıştır. Araştırma sonucunda örgütsel özdeşleşme ile örgütler için büyük önem arz eden ve istenmeyen üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki ilişkide çalışanların öz gelişim, kendini gerçekleştirme ve yaşam amaçlarını ifade eden psikolojik iyi oluşun tam aracılık rolü üstlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç doğrultusunda örgütsel özdeşleşmenin psikolojik iyi oluş üzerinden üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarını azalttığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel Özdeşleşme
• Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları
• Psikolojik İyi Oluş
• sağlık çalışanları

Kaynakça

1. Ansari, M. E., Maleki, S. ve Mazraeh, S. (2013). An Analysis of Factors Affected on Employees' Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderating Role of Job Burnout and engagement. Journal of American Science, 9(1), 350-359.
2. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and The Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
3. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Mama, C. ve Morin, E. M. (2009). Counterproductive Behaviors and Psychological Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 351-361.
4. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Morin, E. M. ve Langdeau, P. É. (2006). Les Comportements Contre-Productifs Dans Un Contexte De Travail En Équipe: Développement Et Validation D’une Représentation Multidimensionnelle “Counterproductive Behaviors İn A Teamwork Setting: Development And Validation Of A Multidimensional Framework”, in 14th Conference Of The Association İnternationale De Psychologie Du Travail De Langue Française, Hammamet, Tunisia.
5. Avanzi, L., Van Dick, R., Fraccaroli, F. ve Sarchielli, G. (2012). The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, work holism and well-being. Work & Stress, 26(3), 289-307.
6. Bayram, N., Gursakal, N. ve Bilgel, N. (2009). Counterproductive Work Behaviour Among White‐Collar Employees: A Study from Turkey. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(2), 180-188.
7. Bennett R. J. ve Robinson S. L. (2000). Development of A Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
8. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being, Aldine Publications.

9. Britt, C. ve Ravelo, L. (2006). Organizational Identification, In Merged Companies: A Comparision of a Colombian Govermental and a German Medical Institution. Marburg/Germany: Philipps–Universidad Marburg Doctoral Dissertation.
10. Buchanan Ii, B. (1974). Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
11. Cameron, J. E. (1999). Social Identity and The Pursuit of Possible Selves: Implications for the Psychological Well-Being of University students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 179.
12. Cheney, G. ve Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment. Communication Studies, 38(1), 1-15.
13. Cilasun, A. (2016). Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Pozitif Psikoloji ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Performans Yönetimine Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.
14. Conrad, P. (1988). Health and Fitness at Work: A Participants’ Perspective. Social Science Medicine, 26, 545–550.
15. Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaıne, B. ve Broadnax, S. (1994). Collective Self-Esteem and Psychological Well-Being Among White, Black, And Asian College Students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 503-513.
16. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A Meta-Analysis of The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. (90-6), 1241-1255
17. Danna, K. ve Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and Well-Being in The Workplace: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357-384. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500305
18. Dawson, J., Singh-Dhesi, D. (2010). Educational Psychology Working to Improve Psychological Well-Being: An Example. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 15(4), 295-310, DOI:10.1080/13632752.2010.523213.
19. Demir, M. ve Tütüncü, Ö. (2010). Ağırlama İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Sapma ile İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Anatolia: Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 21(1), 64-74.
20. Diener, E. ve Chan, M. (2011). Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well‐Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(1), 1-43.
21. Diener, E., Oishi, S. ve Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, Culture, And Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425.
22. Diener, E., Scollon, C. N. ve Lucas, R. E. (2009). “The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-Being: The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness”, in Assessing Well-Being. (pp. 67-100). Springer, Dordrecht.
23. Dıttmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Harvester Wheatsheaf and St. Martin's Press.
24. Dunlop, P.D. ve Lee, K. (2004). Workplace Deviance, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Business Unit Performance: The Bad Apples Do Spoil the Whole Barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67–80.
25. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. ve HarquaIL, C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2),239-263.
26. Fatima, A. (2016). Impact of Workplace Ostracism On Counter Productive Work Behaviors: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 388-408.
27. Fodchuk, K. M. (2007). Work Environments That Negate Counterproductive Behaviours and Foster Organizational Citizenship: Research-Based Recommendations for Managers. The Psychologist Manager Journal, (10-1), 27-46.
28. Fox, S., Spector, P. E. ve Miles, D. (2001), Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in Response to Job Stressors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
29. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K. ve Kessler, S. R. (2012). The Deviant Citizen: Measuring Potential Positive Relations Between Counterproductive Work Behaviour And Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 199-220.
30. Güldü, Ö. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşam Doyumu, Duygusal Zekâ ve Ahlaki Olgunluk Düzeylerinin Üretim Karşıtı İş Davranışlarına Etkisi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 48-64.
31. Gruys, M. L. ve Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30-42.
32. Hamurcu, H. (2011). Ergenlerin Yetkinlik İnançları ve Psikolojik İyi Oluşlarını Yordamada Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar. Doktora tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Konya.
33. Hardy, G. E., Woods, D. ve Wall, T. D. (2003). The Impact of Psychological Distress on Absence From Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 306.
34. Harris, G. E. ve Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Identification and Commitment as Predictors of Turnover Intentions and Psychological Well-Being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences Du Comportement, 37(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087253
35. Haslam, S. A. ve Van Dick, R. (2011). A Social Identity Approach to Workplace Stress. Social Psychology and Organizations, 325-352.
36. Hogg, M.A. ve Vaughan, G.M. (2002). Social Psychology (3rd ed.) London: Prentice Hall.
37. İşcan, Ö. F. (2006). Dönüştürücü/Etkileşimci Liderlik Algısı ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisinde Bireysel Farklılıkların Rolü. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 11(6), 160-177.
38. Işık, M. ve Zincirkıran, M. (2016). Kurumsal İtibar Algısının İş Tatminine Etkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracı Rolü: Doğu Anadolu Bölgesindeki Üniversiteler. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8 (3), 89-106. DOİ: 10.20491/isarder.2016.191
39. Jensen, J. M., Opland, R. A. ve Ryan, A. M. (2010). Psychological Contracts and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employee Responses to Transactional and Relational Breach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 555-568.
40. Jones, D.A. (2004). Counterproductive Work Behavior Toward Supervisors & Organizations: Injustice, Revenge, & Context. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, School of Business Administration University of Vermont, Burlington.
41. Jung, H. S. ve Yoon, H. H. (2012). The Effects of Emotional Intelligence On Counterproductive Work Behaviors and Organizational Citizen Behaviors Among Food and Beverage Employees In A Deluxe Hotel. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 369-378.
42. Kanten, P. ve Ulker, F. E. (2013). The Effect of Organizational Climate On Counterproductive Behaviors: An Empirical Study On the Employees of Manufacturing Enterprises. The Macrotheme Review, 2 (4), 144-160.
43. Karabey, C. N. ve İşcan, Ö. F. (2007). Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, Örgütsel İmaj ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi: Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 231-241.
44. Kanter, P. ve Ülker, F. (2014). Yönetim Tarzının Üretkenlik Karşıtı Iş Davranışlarına Etkisinde Işe Yabancılaşmanın Aracılık Rolü. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32,16-40.
45. Kelloway, E. K., L. Francis, M. Prosser and J. E. Cameron. (2010). Counterproductive Work Behavior as Protest, Human Resource Management Review, 20(1),18-25.
46. Keyes, C. L. (2002). The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 207-222.
47. Klotz, A. C. ve Buckley, M. R. (2013). A Historical Perspective of Counterproductive Work Behavior Targeting the Organization. Journal of Management History, 19 (1), 114 -132.
48. Mishra, S. K. ve Bhatnagar, D. (2010). Linking Emotional Dissonance and Organizational Identification to Turnover Intention and Emotional Well‐Being: A Study of Medical Representatives in India). Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 49(3), 401-419.
49. Lavine, H. (2010). A Sketch of Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 1. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d82c/afcdcdc1ec8e0e8592cec783339e9095b852.pdf
50. Le Roy, J., Bastounis, M. ve Minibas-Poussard, J. (2012). Interactional Justice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Emotions. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(8), 1341-1356.
51. Lee, S. M. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification. Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 213-226.
52. Mael, F. A. ve Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Identification in Work, War, Sports, And Religion: Contrasting The Benefits and Risks. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(2), 197-222.
53. Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
54. Mann, S.L., Budworth, M. ve Ismaila, A. S. (2012). Ratings of Counterproductive Performance: The Effect of Source and Rater Behaviour. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61 (2), 142-156.
55. Mariano, J. A., F. Molero, G. Topa ve J.-P. Levy Mangin, (2011). The Influence Of Transformational Leadership And Organizational Identification On Intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10 (1), 103-119.
56. Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J. ve Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an Integrative Theory of Counterproductive Workplace Behavior: A Causal Reasoning Perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1/2), 36-50.
57. Miles, D. E., Borman, W. E., Spector,P. E. ve Fox, S. (2002). Building an Integrative Model of Extra Role Work Behaviors: A Comparison of Counterproductive Work Behavior with Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2), 51-57.
58. Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K. ve Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 626–658.
59. Ogunfowora, B. (2013). When the Abuse Is Unevenly Distributed: The Effects of Abusive Supervision Variability on Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1105-1123.
60. Onraet, E., Van Hiel A. ve Dhont, K. (2013), The Relationship Between Right-wing Ideological Attitudes and Psychological Well-Being. Personalityand Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, (4), 509-522. doi:10.1177/0146167213478199
61. Öz, E. Ü. ve Bulutlar, F. (2009). Algılanan Kurumsal Itibar ve Kurumdan Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki Ilişkide Bir Ara Değişken Olarak Özdeşleşmenin Rolü. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 35-52.
62. Polat, M. (2009). Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Öncülleri ve Ardılları Üzerine Bir Saha Çalışması. Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.
63. Polatçı, S., Özçalık, F. ve Cindiloğlu, M. (2014). Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerinde Kişi-Örgüt Uyumunun Etkileri. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3), 1-12.
64. Pratt, M. G. (1998). Central Questions in Organizational Identification. Identity in organizations, 24(3), 171-207.
65. Robinson, S. L. ve Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572. doi: 10.2307/256693.
66. Roxana, A. C. (2013). Antecedents and Mediators of Employees’ Counterproductive Work Behavior and Intentions to Quit. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 219-224.
67. Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (1), 141-166.
68. Ryff, C. D. ve Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
69. Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond Ponce de Leon and Life Satisfaction: New Directions in Quest of Successful Ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12 (1), 35-55.
70. Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is Everything, or is It? Explorations on The Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069-1081.
71. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in The Science and Practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28.
72. Ryff, C. D. ve Singer, B. H. (2008). Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39.
73. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4 (4), 99-104.
74. Scott, S. G. ve Lane, V.R. (2000). A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 1.
75. Spector, P. E. (2011). The Relationship of Personality to Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB): An Integration of Perspectives. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 342-352.
76. Spector, P. E. ve Fox, S. (2010a). Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Are They Opposite Forms of Active Behavior?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 21-39.
77. Spector, P. E. ve FOX, S. (2010b). Theorizing about the Deviant Citizen: An Attributional Explanation of the Interplay of Organizational Citizenship and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 132-143
78. Spector, P. E. ve Fox, S. (2002). An Emotion-Centered Model of Voluntary Work Behavior: Some Parallels Between Counterproductive Work Behavior ve Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Human resource management review, 12(2), 269-292.
79. Spector, P.E., S. Fox, L. M. Penney, K. Bruursema, A. Goh ve S. Kessler. (2006). The Dimensionality of Counterproductivity: Are All Counterproductive Behaviors Created Equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
80. Tajfel, H. ve J. C. Turner (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. W. G. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47
81. Tak, B. ve Aydemir, B. A. (2004). Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerine İki Görgül Çalışma” 12. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
82. Tang, T. L. ve Gilbert, P. R. (1994). Organization-Based Self-Esteem Among Mental Health Workers: A Replication and Extension. Public Personnel Management, 23, 127-132
83. Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 374-384.
84. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
85. Turner, J. C. (1982). “Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group," in Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, ed. Henri Tajfel, Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
86. Turunç, Ö. (2011). Örgütsel Adaletin Çalışanların Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracılık Rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 13(1), 143-166.
87. Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M. (2010). Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Çalışanların İş-Aile, Aile-İş Çatışması, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Işten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Savunma Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 209-232.
88. Uçar, Z. (2015). Kontrol Algısı-Psikolojik Sahiplenme İlişkisi Üzerinde Algılanan Aşırı Vasıflılığın Düzenleyicilik Etkisi. International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, 1(1), 40-58.
89. Van Dick R., Grojean M. W., Christ O. ve Wieseke J. (2006). Identity and The Tra Mile: Relationships Between Organizational Identification and Organizational Cizenship Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17, 283–301.
90. Van Dick, R. ve Wagner, U. (2002). Social Identification Among School Teachers: Dimensions, Foci, and Correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129-149.
91. Van Dierendonck, D., Haynes, C., Borrill, C. ve Stride, C. (2004). Leadership Behavior And Subordinate Well-Being. Journal of occupational health psychology, 9(2), 165.
92. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions in Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudiamonia) And Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.
93. Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C. ve Moltzen, K. (2006). Work Motivation, Organisational Identification, And Well-Being In Call Centre Work. Work & Stress, 20(1), 60-83.