Does Autotelic Personality Make a Difference in The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Individual Performance?

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of self-efficacy on individual performance and to find out whether autotelic personality differentiates this process. Within this scope, the research data were collected from 308 blue-collar employees working in a private company by survey method. In order to test the hypotheses of the study, direct and moderating effects were investigated by regression analysis. The results showed that self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on employee performance. Moreover, autotelic personality dampened this relationship, particularly low and high level autotelic personality had different effects on individual performance at lower levels of self-efficacy. The findings were discussed in the context of literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-efficacy
• autotelic personality
• individual performance

Ototelik Kişilik, Öz-Yeterliliğin Bireysel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinde Fark Yaratır Mı?

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öz-yeterliliğin bireysel performans üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmesi ve bu sürecin ototelik kişilik açısından farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığının ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Bu kapsamda, özel bir işletmede görev yapan 308 mavi yakalı çalışandan anket tekniğiyle veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için regresyon analizi kullanılarak doğrudan ve düzenleyici etkiler incelenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda öz-yeterliliğin çalışan performansı üzerinde aynı yönlü anlamlı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca ototelik kişiliğin bu ilişkiyi zayıflattığı ve özellikle düşük öz-yeterlilik seviyelerinde yüksek ve düşük seviyedeki ototelik kişiliğin bireysel performans üzerinde farklı etkileri olduğu bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular yazın bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz-yeterlilik
• ototelik kişilik
• bireysel performans

Kaynakça

1. Aşçı, F. H., Çağlar, E., Eklund, R. C., Altıntaş A., ve Jackson, S. (2007). Durumluk ve Sürekli Optimal Performans Duygu Durum-2 Ölçeklerinin Uyarlama Çalışması. Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18 (4), 182-196.
2. Bakker, A. B. (2008). The Work-Related Flow Inventory: Construction and Initial Validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400-414.
3. Bakker, A. B., ve Demerouti, E. (2014). Job Demands-Resources Theory, Work and Wellbeing. Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide (Eds. P. Y. Chen, C. L. Cooper). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 37-64.
4. Bandura, A. (1977a). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
7. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.

9. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
10. Bandura, A. (2013). Social Cognitive Theory. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Ed. E. H. Kessler). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 710-715.
11. Bandura, A., ve Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of Self-Efficacy Theory of Behavioral Change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287-310.
12. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., ve Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children's Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.
13. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., ve Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of Affective Self-Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769-782.
14. Bandura, A., ve Cervone, D. (1983). Self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017-1028.
15. Bandura, A., ve Locke, E, A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99.
16. Bandura S., ve Simon, K. M. (1977). The Role of Proximal Intentions in Self-Regulation of Refractory Behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(3), 177-193.
17. Barling, J., ve Beattie, R. (1983). Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Sales Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5(1), 41-51.
18. Baumann, N. (2012). Autotelic Personality. Advances in Flow Research (Ed. S. Engeser). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 165-186.
19. Baumann, N., Lürig, C., ve Engeser, S. (2016). Flow and Enjoyment Beyond Skill-Demand Balance: The Role of Game Pacing Curves and Personality. Motivation and Emotion, 40(4), 507-519.
20. Baumann, N., ve Scheffer, D. (2011). Seeking Flow in the Achievement Domain: The Achievement Flow Motive Behind Flow Experience. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 267-284.
21. Busch, H., Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., ve Campos, D. (2013). The Achievement Flow Motive as an Element of the Autotelic Personality: Predicting Educational Attainment in Three Cultures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 239-254.
22. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.
24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, New York.
25. Csikszentmihalyi, M., ve Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Latter, P., ve Duranso, C. W. (2017). Running Flow: Mental Immersion Techniques for Better Running. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
27. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., ve Whalen, S. (1993). Talented Teenagers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
28. Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İş Gören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
29. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Bulletin. 95(3), 542-575.
30. Engeser, S., ve Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, Performance and Moderators of Challenge-Skill Balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158-172.
31. George, D., ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 17.0 Update (10e ed.) Pearson, Boston.
32. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Ed). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press, New York.
34. Hu, L., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criterion for Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
35. Jackson S. A., ve Eklund R. C. (2002). Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133-150.
36. Jerusalem, M., ve Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-Efficacy as a Resource Factor in Stress Appraisal Processes. Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action (Ed. R. Schwarzer). Hemisphere, Washington, 195-213.
37. Judge, T. A., ve Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations Traits Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability with Job Satisfaction and job Performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
38. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., ve Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127.
39. Keller, J., ve Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of Control and The Flow Experience: An Experimental Analysis. European Journal of Personality, 22(7), 589-607.
40. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3th ed.). The Guilford Press, New York.
41. Kirkman, B. L., ve Rosen B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
42. Kramer, R. M. (2013). Self-Concept and the Theory of Self. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Ed. E. H. Kessler). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 682-685.
43. Maslow, A. H. (1950). Self-actualizing People: A Study of Psychological Health. Personality, 1, 11-34.
44. Mikicin, M. (2015). The Autotelic Involvement of Attention Induced by EEG Neurofeedback Training Improves the Performance of an Athlete’s Mind. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 7(1), 58-65.
45. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., ve Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30-38.
46. Nakamura, J., ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The Concept of Flow. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (Eds. C. R. Snyder, S. J. Lopez). Oxford University Press, USA, 89-105.
47. Phillips, J. M., ve Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of Goal Orientation, Ability, Need for Achievement, and Locus of Control in The Self-Efficacy and Goal-Setting Process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 792-802.
48. Preacher, K. J., ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-91.
49. Ross, S. R., ve Keiser, H. N. (2014). Autotelic Personality Through a Five-Factor Lens: Individual Differences in Flow-Propensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 3-8.
50. Sarıer, Y. (2016). Türkiye'de Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörler: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 609-627.
51. Schaufeli, W. B., ve Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job Demands, Job Resources and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-Sample Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
52. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-Efficacy and Achievement Behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173-208.
53. Schwarzer, R., ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale, Measures in Health Psychology: Auser’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (Eds. J. Weinman, S. Wright, M. Johnston). NFER-Nelson, Windsor, UK, 35-37.
54. Shrout, P. E., ve Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-45.
55. Stajkovic, A. D., ve Luthans, F. (2003). Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Efficacy: Implications for Motivation Theory and Practice, Motivation and Work Behavior (7th ed). (Eds. L. W. Porter, G. A. Bigley, R. M. Steers). Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Burr Ridge, IL, 126-140.
56. Şerif, M. (1968). Self-Concept, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Ed. D. L. Sill). Vol. 14, Macmillan & Free Press, New York, 150-159.
57. Tan, F. B., ve Chou, J. P. C. (2011). Dimensions of Autotelic Personality and Their Effects on Perceived Playfulness in The Context of Mobile Information and Entertainment Services. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 5-22.
58. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., ve Derks, D. (2014). Daily Job Crafting and the Self-efficacy - Performance Relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490-507.
59. Yeşilay, A. (1996). Genelleştirilmiş Özyetki Beklentisi Ölçeği. Erişim adresi: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/turk. htm, Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2017.
60. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
61. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., ve Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.