COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 1 Aralık 2016
  • Onur Gunel
  • Emre Koc
  • Tahir Yavuz
PDF İndir
EN

COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER

Öz

Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory is generally used technique for calculation of aerodynamic performance of such turbine application. To obtain close results with blade element momentum theory, aerodynamic data of airfoil has to be as correct as possible. Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used for optimization and design of turbine application. Lift coefficient, drag coefficient and Lift coefficient over drag coefficient are significant parameters for turbine application. Panel method and an integral boundary layer formulation are combined in the XFOIL code for the analysis of potential ?ow around the airfoils. In this study, XFOIL code, Transition SST k-omega model was used to predict the aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds number (Re=3x105 and 4x105). The results were compared and CFD results and XFOIL code result are compatible with each other until stall angle. Also, lift coefficient over drag coefficient was tried to optimize by changing the airfoil geometry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Onur Gunel Bu kişi benim

Tahir Yavuz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gunel, O., Koc, E., & Yavuz, T. (2016). COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 3(2), 83-86. https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM
AMA
1.Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies. 2016;3(2):83-86. https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM
Chicago
Gunel, Onur, Emre Koc, ve Tahir Yavuz. 2016. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3 (2): 83-86. https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM.
EndNote
Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T (01 Aralık 2016) COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3 2 83–86.
IEEE
[1]O. Gunel, E. Koc, ve T. Yavuz, “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”, International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 83–86, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM
ISNAD
Gunel, Onur - Koc, Emre - Yavuz, Tahir. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3/2 (01 Aralık 2016): 83-86. https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM.
JAMA
1.Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies. 2016;3:83–86.
MLA
Gunel, Onur, vd. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, c. 3, sy 2, Aralık 2016, ss. 83-86, https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM.
Vancouver
1.Onur Gunel, Emre Koc, Tahir Yavuz. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;3(2):83-6. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA79YM83JM