BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 83 - 86, 01.12.2016

Öz

Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory is generally used technique for calculation of aerodynamic performance of such turbine application. To obtain close results with blade element momentum theory, aerodynamic data of airfoil has to be as correct as possible. Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used for optimization and design of turbine application. Lift coefficient, drag coefficient and Lift coefficient over drag coefficient are significant parameters for turbine application. Panel method and an integral boundary layer formulation are combined in the XFOIL code for the analysis of potential ?ow around the airfoils. In this study, XFOIL code, Transition SST k-omega model was used to predict the aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds number (Re=3x105 and 4x105). The results were compared and CFD results and XFOIL code result are compatible with each other until stall angle. Also, lift coefficient over drag coefficient was tried to optimize by changing the airfoil geometry.

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 83 - 86, 01.12.2016

Öz

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA28VT93UZ
Bölüm Araştıma
Yazarlar

Onur Gunel Bu kişi benim

Emre Koc Bu kişi benim

Tahir Yavuz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Gunel, O., Koc, E., & Yavuz, T. (2016). COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 3(2), 83-86.
AMA Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. IJEAT. Aralık 2016;3(2):83-86.
Chicago Gunel, Onur, Emre Koc, ve Tahir Yavuz. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3, sy. 2 (Aralık 2016): 83-86.
EndNote Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T (01 Aralık 2016) COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3 2 83–86.
IEEE O. Gunel, E. Koc, ve T. Yavuz, “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”, IJEAT, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 83–86, 2016.
ISNAD Gunel, Onur vd. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 3/2 (Aralık 2016), 83-86.
JAMA Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. IJEAT. 2016;3:83–86.
MLA Gunel, Onur vd. “COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, c. 3, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 83-86.
Vancouver Gunel O, Koc E, Yavuz T. COMPARISON OF CFD AND XFOIL AIRFOIL ANALYSES FOR LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER. IJEAT. 2016;3(2):83-6.