Investigating the Visual Mathematics Literacy Self-Efficacy (VMLSE) Perceptions of Eighth Grade Students and Their Views on This Issue

Öz

The aim of this study was to investigate the VMLSE perception levels of eighth grade students and differentiations based on variables of gender, state of success, final grade and ability to relate mathematical concepts to daily life and examine their views on this issue. The exploratory design of mixed method, which includes both quantitative and qualitative methods, was used in the study. The survey method was used in the quantitative dimension of the study. In qualitative dimension, phenomenological design which is one of the qualitative research designs is used. The data obtained from the quantitative dimension by VMLSE perception scale were analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance. The data obtained from the semi-structured interview form were analyzed by using the content analysis method for the qualitative dimension of the research. As a consequently, there was a significant difference in VMLSE perceptions based on the variables of final grade, finding one’s self successful in the field of mathematics and ability to relate mathematical concepts; however, there was no significant difference based on gender. Additionally, it was found, the students had the idea that having VMLSE perception would affect mathematics success positively. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mathematics education,mixed methods,visual mathematics literacy

Kaynakça

1. Altun, A. (2003). E-literacy. National Education Journal, 158. Retrieved from http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/158/altun.htm
2. Askar, P., & Umay, A. (2001). Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21, 1-8.
3. Askar, P. (2015, May). Literacy as complex and dynamic concept. Paper presented at the Turkish Computer and Math Teaching 2 Symposium, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey.
4. Ayguner, E. (2016). A comparison of eight grade students’ self-efficacy perception of visual Mathematics (Unpublished master’s thesis). Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
5. Baki, A. (1996). What to teach and how to teach in school math? Math World Magazine, 3, 11-15.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.
7. Bekdemir, M., & Duran, M. (2012). Development of a visual math literacy self-efficacy perception scale (VMLSEPS) for elementary students. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education, 31(1), 89-115.
8. Birgin, O., & Gulbez, B. (2014). Investigation of 6th-8th grade middle school students' visual mathematics literacy self-efficacy perception. Paper presented at the 11th National Congress, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

9. Buyukozturk, S., Kilic-Cakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2016). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Chaput, H. H. (2001). Post-piagetian constructivism for grounded knowledge acquisition. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Grounded Knowledge. California, CA: Palo Alto.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.
12. Celik, H. C., Bindak, R., & Ozdemir, F. (2018). Development of a visual mathematics literacy scale and investigation of visual mathematics literacy perception according to various variables. In Y.K. Yeke, T. Yazıcı & O. Hayırlı (Eds.), Innovative Approaches in Educational Sciences (pp.63-76). Ankara: Gece Academy.
13. Cilingir, E. (2015). The effect of the realistic mathematic education (RME) approach on visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions and problem-solving achievement of 4th grade students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
14. Cilingir, E., & Artut, P. D. (2016). The effects of realistic mathematics education based instruction in the elementary mathematics curriculum on the mathematics achievement, Visual Mathematics Literacy Self Efficiency Perceptions and Mathematics Problem Solving Attitude. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 578-600
15. Cimen, E.E., & Ayguner, E. (2018). An analysis of eight grade students’ self-efficacy perception of visual mathematics literacy and their actual performance. Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 675-696
16. Debes, J. L. (1968). Some foundations for visual literacy. Audiovisual Instruction, 13 (9), 961-964.
17. Deveci, O., & Karademir, C. A. (2018). Middle school students’ math self-report level and visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 4(3), 33-49
18. Duran, M. (2011). Relationship between visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions with visual mathematics achievements of elementary 7th grade students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey.
19. Duran, M. (2013). Opinions of 7th grade primary school students about visual mathematical literacy. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education, 2(2), 38-51.
20. Duran, M., & Bekdemir, M. (2013). Evaluation of visual math literacy self-efficacy perception with visual mathematics accomplishment. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction, 3(3), 27-40
21. Feinstein, H., & Hagerty, R. (1994). In visual literacy in the digital age. Paper presented at the 25th annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, New York, USA.
22. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23. Gocer, A., & Tabak, G. (2013). Perceptions of teacher candidates about the concept of visual literacy. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), 517-541
24. Ilhan, A., Celik, H. C., & Pocan, S. (2016). Math and visual mathematical literacy a compilation study. Proceedings of International Engineering, Science and Education Conference (pp. 20-34). Diyarbakir: INESEC.
25. Ipek, I. (2003). Computers, visual design and visual learning strategies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 68-76.
26. Kaptan, F., & Korkmaz, H. (2002, September). The effect of problem based learning approach on problem solving skills and self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service science teachers. Paper presented at the 5th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Ankara, Turkey.
27. Kayis, A. (2005). Reliability analysis. In S. Kalayci (Ed.), Multivariate statistical techniques with SPSS applied (pp. 404-409). Ankara: Asil Yayin Dagitim.
28. Kog, O.U., & Baser, N. (2011). The effect of visualization approach on learned helplessness and abstract thinking in Mathematics. Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences (BAED), 1(3), 89-108.
29. Kose, E. (2014). Scientific research models. In R. Kincal (Ed.), Scientific research methods (pp. 110-123). Ankara: Nobel Press.
30. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
31. MEB. (2013). Middle school mathematics course curriculum. Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx/program2.aspx?islem=1vekno=215
32. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications.
33. NCTM. (2009). Mission, vision and priorities. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org
34. OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem-solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/
35. Ontario Ministry of Education (2014). Leading math success: Mathematical literacy grades 7–12. The report of the expert panel on student success in Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/reports/numeracy/numeracyreport.pdf
36. Ozdemir, F., Duran, M., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Investigation of middle school students’ self-efficacy perceptions of visual mathematics literacy and perceptions of problem-solving skill. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 9(4), 532-554. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.27822
37. Ozgen, K., & Bindak, R. (2008). The development of self-efficacy scale for mathematics literacy. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(2), 517-528.
38. Ozgen, K., & Bindak, R. (2011). Determination of self-efficacy beliefs of high school students towards math literacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 1073-1089.
39. Ozturk, Y. A., & Sahin, C. (2015). Determining the relationships between academic achievement, self-efficacy and attitudes towards maths. International Journal of Social Science, 31, 343-366. doi:10.9761/JASSS2621.
40. Quinnell, L. (2014). Enhancing the teaching and learning of mathematical visual images. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 70(1), 18-25
41. Pajares, F. M., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203
42. Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors about school. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 459-496
43. Schulz, W. (2005). Mathematics self-efficacy and student expectations: Results from PISA 2003. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
44. Senemoglu, N. (2009). Development, learning and teaching: From theory to practice. Ankara: Gazi Bookstore.
45. Sengul, S., Katranci, Y., & Gulbagci, H. (2012, September). Examination of visual mathematics literacy self-efficacy perceptions of 5-6-7-8th grades primary school students. Paper presented at the 21st National Congress of Educational Sciences. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
46. Sengul, S., Kaba, Y. & Ozdisci, S. (2017). Investigation of middle school students’ visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 454- 461. doi:10.18844/prosoc.v4i1.2288
47. Tanoglu, S., Taskesen, O., Bakirhan, A., & Taskesen, P. (2017). Investigating the relationship between three dimensional objects drawing achievement and visual mathematical literacy self-efficacy perceptions of 5th, 6th and 7th graders. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science, 3(2), 29-40
48. Tekin, B., & Tekin, P. (2004). A research on the mathematical literacy levels of mathematics teacher candidates. Retrieved from www.matder.org.tr.
49. Tekin, H. (2009). Measurement and evaluation in education. Ankara: Yargi Publications.
50. Tutkun, O. F., Edogan, D. G, & Ozturk, B. (2014). Levels of visual mathematics literacy self-efficacy perception of the secondary school students. Middle Eastern and African Journal of Educational Research, 8, 19-27.
51. U.S. Department of Education (2014). STEM literacy. Retrieved from https://www.y4y.ed.gov/learn/stem/introduction/stem-literacy
52. Yaman, P., Cansungu, O., & Altuncekic, A. (2004). A research on the investigation of the self-sufficiency belief levels of the science education teacher candidates. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2(3), 355-364.
53. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (9th ed.). Ankara: Seckin Publishing.