THE CONFLICT BETWEEN FLIGHT SAFETY AND PROTECTION OF PRIVATE LIFE: UNDER TURKISH PILOTS PERSPECTIVE

Öz

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was announced on 10 December 1948 by the United Nations General Assembly. Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference and assault”. The National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) is an independent federal agency appointed to investigate transport accidents, identify possible causes and provide safety recommendations. The NTSB, after conducting an accident investigation, determines how the incident took place. It publishes recommendations to prevent future accidents. NTSB recommends installing a Cockpit Image Recorder (CIR) on most gas turbine-operated aircraft. The cockpit image recorder installed in addition to the sound and flight data recorders in the cockpit will provide additional information for the researchers. This idea was first proposed by the NTSB in 2000. Video cameras will provide researchers with critical information about “events in the cockpit before and during an accident”. However, the pilots opposed proposal of NTSB for a cockpit image recorder on the grounds that there would be a breach of privacy. Because in the past accidents, voice and data records of the flights were leaked to the public. Pilots do not particularly like the idea of being tried in court based on a visual record. Aviation safety is the primary goal of ICAO (The International Civil Aviation Organization) recommends that cockpit image recorders be standard equipment on commercial aircraft. ICAO also wants the newly designed aircraft to start using cockpit image recorders as standard equipment by 2023. Flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder were used to analyze human performance after events or accidents. However, the lack of image data in these data adversely affected the analysis of the incident or accident. The purpose of the Image Recorder in incident and accident analysis is to record the reactions of pilots to flight control systems and audible and visual alerts coming from their systems. The cockpit image recorder will focus on the commands given rather than on the faces of the flight crew. In the first part of this article, the current situation of flight recorders will be examined. In the second part, the need for a cockpit image recorder will be given due to the insufficiency of the existing flight recorders in accident investigations and investigations. In addition, face-to-face interviews were conducted in order to reveal the hesitations and concerns of the pilots against this device with intuitive analysis. In the last part of the study, the advantages and requirements of the cockpit image recorder in ICAO aircraft will be mentioned and suggestions will be made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cockpit image recorder,safety,cockpit,privacy

Kaynakça

1. Ajunwa, I., Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2017). Limitless Worker Surveillance. California Law Review, 105(3), 735-776. doi:DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z38BR8MF94
2. Atkinson, J. (2018). Workplace Monitoring and the Right to Private Life. The Modern Law Review, 81(4), 673-700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12357
3. Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: an overview. Labor History, 51(1), 87-106. doi:10.1080/00236561003654776
4. Chrysochou, C., & Iglezakis, I. (2019). Employees' Protection: Workplace Surveillance 3.0. In Cyber Law, Privacy, and Security: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1329-1348). Hershey: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8897-9.ch066
5. Garvey, H. J. (2000). Safety Recommendation, A-00-30 and -31. Washington: Federal Aviation Administration. April 22, 2019 tarihinde https://www.ntsb.gov/SAFETY/safety-recs/_layouts/ntsb.recsearch/Recommendation.aspx?Rec=A-00-030 adresinden alındı
6. Gerede, E. (2018). Havacılıkta Emniyet Yönetimi: Teoriden Uygulamaya Geleneksel ve Yeni Nesil Yaklaşımlar. Eskişehir: Pegem Akademi.
7. Graaff, A. d. (2001). Aviation Safety, an introduction. Air and Space Europe 3, 203-205.
8. Korkmaz, A. (2014). İnsan Hakları Bağlamında Özel Hayatın Gizliliği ve Korunması. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 16 (Özel Sayı I), 99-103.

9. NTSB. (2019). National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved 25 May, 2019, from https://www.ntsb.gov/
10. Nugroho, S., Nasution, S. M., & Azmi, F. (2017). Analysis of Cockpit Voice Recorder compression reliability for airplane on demand blackbox data transmission. 2017 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCREC) (s. 148-152). Yogyakarta: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCEREC.2017.8226688
11. Potente, C., Ragnoli, A., Tamasi, G., Vergari, R., & Di Mascio, P. (2018). Quantitative Risk Assessment of Temporary Hazards and Maintenance Worksites in the Airport Safety Areas: a case study. Transportation research procedia, 166-175. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.031
12. Purtova, N. (2018). The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law. Law, Innovation and Technology, 40-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176 Rapoport, D. E., & Richter, P. D. (2005). Cockpit Image Recorders: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words. Issues in Aviation Law and Policy, 1051-1065.
13. Santanen, E. (2019). The value of protecting privacy. Business Horizons, 62(1), 5-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.04.004
14. Sedefçi, K. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 Bakış Açısıyla Nesnelerin İnterneti ve Müsteri Deneyimi Açısından İncelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
15. Simmons, J. L., & Forrest, J. S. (2005). United States Aviation Safety Data: Uses and Issues Related to Sanctions and Confidentiality. Journal Of Air Law and Commerce Volume 70 Issue 1, Article 4.
16. Stewart, V. (2003). The Bright Line Rule in the Use of Cockpit. Journal of Communications Law and, 11(2), 389-408. Şen, E. (1996). Devlet ve Kitle İletişim Araçları Karşısında Özel Hayatın Gizliliği ve Korunması. E. Şen içinde, Devlet ve Kitle İletişim Araçları Karşısında Özel Hayatın Gizliliği ve Korunma (s. 5-9). İstanbul: Kazancı Hukuk Yayınları.
17. Tekergül, M. (2010). İş Yerinde Elektronik Gözetim Uygulamaları. İstanbul, Türkiye: Kadir Has Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
18. Timi, P. H., Shermin, S., & Rahman, A. (2017). Study of flight data recorder, underwater locator beacon, data logger and flarm collision avoidance system. 7th BSME International Conference on Thermal Engineering (22–24 December 2016). Dhaka: American Institute of Physics Publishing. doi:10.1063/1.4984692
19. UN. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations.
20. West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2014). Electronic Surveillance at Work: An Ethical Analysis. Administration & Society, 48(5), 628-651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714556502
21. Wiseman, Y. (2016). Can Flight Data Recorder Memory Be Stored on the Cloud? Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 6(1), 16-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.7771/2159-6670.1119
22. Yüksel, Y. D. (2003). Mahremiyet Hakkı ve Sosyo-Tarihsel Gelişimi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 58-1, 58(1), 181-212.