Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC)

Yıl 2018, , 141 - 149, 01.10.2018
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.455333

Öz

The aim of this paper is to discuss the several dominant research approaches incorporated by the intercultural researchers of the past. These approaches are elaborated into two different manners. Firstly, an overview of the six prominent theoretical approaches is discussed briefly along with the lacking and culture-specific elements in the approaches are witnessed. Secondly, culture general approaches are considered with their importance in the research practice regarding their culture general nature. Following with the remarkable contributions towards the current body of knowledge by Lily A. Arasaratnam in intercultural communication competence (ICC). In addition, it is also pointed out that how she developed such culture general models of ICC with a thorough discussion on the series of her culture general models. It is noticed from the literature on intercultural competence that previous approaches and culture general model are mostly addressed in the Western context. Even though context does matter a lot in the intercultural research. Therefore, it is suggested to explore these approaches and culture general models of multiple cultural perspectives, especially in Non-Western contexts to validate their culture-general nature

Kaynakça

  • Arasaratnam, L. A. (2006). Further testing of a new model of intercultural communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 23(2), 93-99. Arasaratnam, L. A. (2007). Research in intercultural communication competence: Past perspectives and future directions. Journal of International Communication, 13(2), 66-73. Arasaratnam, L. A. (2016, February). Intercultural competence. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 01-23). USA: Oxford University Press. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Banerjee, S. C. (2007). Ethnocentrism and sensation seeking as variables that influence intercultural contact-seeking behavior: A path analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 303-310. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Banerjee, S. C. (2011). Sensation seeking and intercultural communication competence: A model test. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(2), 226-233. Arasaratnam, L. A., Banerjee, S. C., & Dembek, K. (2010a). The integrated model of intercultural communication competence (IMICC): Model test. Australian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 103-116. Arasaratnam, L. A., Banerjee, S. C., & Dembek, K. (2010b). Sensation seeking and the integrated model of intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39(2), 69-79. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Doerfel, M. L. (2005). Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 137-163. Collier, M. J. (1989). Cultural and intercultural communication competence: Current approaches and directions for future research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 287-302. Dalib, S., Harun, M., & Yusof, N. (2017). Student intercultural competence in a Malaysian campus: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12(1), 42-62. Dalib, S., Harun, M., & Yusoff, N. (2014). Reconceptualizing intercultural competence: A phenomenological investigation of students’ intercultural experiences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 130-135. Dillon, R. K., & McKenzie, N. J. (1998). The influence of ethnicity on listening, communication competence, approach, and avoidance. International Journal of Listening, 12(1), 106-121. Driskill, G. W., & Downs, C. W. (1995). Hidden differences in competent communication: A case study of an organization with Euro-Americans and first generation immigrants from India. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19(4), 505-522. Gudykunst, W. B. (1993). Toward a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (Vol. 17, pp. 33-71). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Eds.), Intercultural communication theory (Vol. 19, pp. 8-58). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Applying anxiety\uncertainty management (AUM) theory to intercultural adjustment training. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 227-250. Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of strangers’ intercultural adjustment. In W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 419-457). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Kapikiran, N. A., & Gundogan, A. (2018). Assessment for children’s values: Picture-Based value survey for children adaptation study. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 9-21. Kim, Y. Y. (1986). Understanding the social context of intergroup communication: A personal network approach. In W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Intergroup communication (pp. 86-95). London: Edward Arnold. Kim, Y. Y. (1991). Intercultural communication competence: A systems theoretic view. In S. Ting-Toomey, & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication (pp. 259-275). Newbury Park,CA: Sage. Kim, Y. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Eds.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 170-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kim, Y. Y. (2002). Adapting to an unfamiliar culture. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 259-273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Knutson, T. J., Komolsevin, R., Chatiketu, P., & Smith, V. R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 63-78. Lin, Y., & Rancer, A. S. (2003). Ethnocentrism, intercultural communication apprehension, intercultural willingness‐to‐communicate, and intentions to participate in an intercultural dialogue program: Testing a proposed model. Communication Research Reports, 20(1), 62-72. Martin, J. N., & Hammer, M. R. (1989). Behavioral categories of intercultural communication competence: Everyday communicators' perceptions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 303-332. Morgan, S., & Arasaratnam, L. (2003). Intercultural friendships as social excitation: Sensation seeking as a predictor of intercultural friendship seeking behavior. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 32(3/4), 175-186. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2017a). A proposed model of intercultural communication competence (ICC) in Malaysian context. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(2), 11-20. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2017b). Religion and intercultural communication competence. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 28(3), 25-29. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2018, March). Historical development and models of intercultural communication competence (ICC). Paper presented at the SMMTC Postgraduate Symposium 2018, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Neuliep, J. W., Chaudoir, M., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). A cross‐cultural comparison of ethnocentrism among Japanese and United States college students. Communication Research Reports, 18(2), 137-146. Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of a US and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Reports, 14(4), 385-398. Riggio, R. E., & Riggio, H. R. (2001). Self-report measurement of interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall, & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 124-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Saputri, D. Y., Rukayah, R., & Indriayu, M. (2018). Need assessment of interactive multimedia based on game in elementary school: A challenge into learning in 21st century. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 1-8. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Ting-Toomey, S. (1993). Communicative resourcefulness: An identity negotiation perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (Vol. 17, pp. 72-111). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Wiseman, R. L., Hammer, M. R., & Nishida, H. (1989). Predictors of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 349-370. Witteborn, S. (2003). Communicative competence revisited: An emic approach to studying intercultural communicative competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 32(3), 187-203. Yeh, J. B. (2010). Relations matter: redefining communication competence from a Chinese perspective. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(1), 64-75. Yoshitake, M. (2002). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: A critical examination of an intercultural communication theory. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(2), 177-193. Yum, J. O. (2012). Communication competence: A Korean perspective. China Media Research, 8(2), 11-18.
Yıl 2018, , 141 - 149, 01.10.2018
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.455333

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Arasaratnam, L. A. (2006). Further testing of a new model of intercultural communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 23(2), 93-99. Arasaratnam, L. A. (2007). Research in intercultural communication competence: Past perspectives and future directions. Journal of International Communication, 13(2), 66-73. Arasaratnam, L. A. (2016, February). Intercultural competence. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 01-23). USA: Oxford University Press. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Banerjee, S. C. (2007). Ethnocentrism and sensation seeking as variables that influence intercultural contact-seeking behavior: A path analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 303-310. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Banerjee, S. C. (2011). Sensation seeking and intercultural communication competence: A model test. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(2), 226-233. Arasaratnam, L. A., Banerjee, S. C., & Dembek, K. (2010a). The integrated model of intercultural communication competence (IMICC): Model test. Australian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 103-116. Arasaratnam, L. A., Banerjee, S. C., & Dembek, K. (2010b). Sensation seeking and the integrated model of intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39(2), 69-79. Arasaratnam, L. A., & Doerfel, M. L. (2005). Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 137-163. Collier, M. J. (1989). Cultural and intercultural communication competence: Current approaches and directions for future research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 287-302. Dalib, S., Harun, M., & Yusof, N. (2017). Student intercultural competence in a Malaysian campus: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12(1), 42-62. Dalib, S., Harun, M., & Yusoff, N. (2014). Reconceptualizing intercultural competence: A phenomenological investigation of students’ intercultural experiences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 130-135. Dillon, R. K., & McKenzie, N. J. (1998). The influence of ethnicity on listening, communication competence, approach, and avoidance. International Journal of Listening, 12(1), 106-121. Driskill, G. W., & Downs, C. W. (1995). Hidden differences in competent communication: A case study of an organization with Euro-Americans and first generation immigrants from India. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19(4), 505-522. Gudykunst, W. B. (1993). Toward a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (Vol. 17, pp. 33-71). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Eds.), Intercultural communication theory (Vol. 19, pp. 8-58). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Applying anxiety\uncertainty management (AUM) theory to intercultural adjustment training. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 227-250. Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of strangers’ intercultural adjustment. In W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 419-457). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Kapikiran, N. A., & Gundogan, A. (2018). Assessment for children’s values: Picture-Based value survey for children adaptation study. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 9-21. Kim, Y. Y. (1986). Understanding the social context of intergroup communication: A personal network approach. In W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Intergroup communication (pp. 86-95). London: Edward Arnold. Kim, Y. Y. (1991). Intercultural communication competence: A systems theoretic view. In S. Ting-Toomey, & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication (pp. 259-275). Newbury Park,CA: Sage. Kim, Y. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Eds.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 170-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kim, Y. Y. (2002). Adapting to an unfamiliar culture. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 259-273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Knutson, T. J., Komolsevin, R., Chatiketu, P., & Smith, V. R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 63-78. Lin, Y., & Rancer, A. S. (2003). Ethnocentrism, intercultural communication apprehension, intercultural willingness‐to‐communicate, and intentions to participate in an intercultural dialogue program: Testing a proposed model. Communication Research Reports, 20(1), 62-72. Martin, J. N., & Hammer, M. R. (1989). Behavioral categories of intercultural communication competence: Everyday communicators' perceptions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 303-332. Morgan, S., & Arasaratnam, L. (2003). Intercultural friendships as social excitation: Sensation seeking as a predictor of intercultural friendship seeking behavior. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 32(3/4), 175-186. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2017a). A proposed model of intercultural communication competence (ICC) in Malaysian context. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(2), 11-20. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2017b). Religion and intercultural communication competence. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 28(3), 25-29. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2018, March). Historical development and models of intercultural communication competence (ICC). Paper presented at the SMMTC Postgraduate Symposium 2018, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Neuliep, J. W., Chaudoir, M., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). A cross‐cultural comparison of ethnocentrism among Japanese and United States college students. Communication Research Reports, 18(2), 137-146. Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of a US and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Reports, 14(4), 385-398. Riggio, R. E., & Riggio, H. R. (2001). Self-report measurement of interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall, & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 124-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Saputri, D. Y., Rukayah, R., & Indriayu, M. (2018). Need assessment of interactive multimedia based on game in elementary school: A challenge into learning in 21st century. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 1-8. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Ting-Toomey, S. (1993). Communicative resourcefulness: An identity negotiation perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (Vol. 17, pp. 72-111). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Wiseman, R. L., Hammer, M. R., & Nishida, H. (1989). Predictors of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(3), 349-370. Witteborn, S. (2003). Communicative competence revisited: An emic approach to studying intercultural communicative competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 32(3), 187-203. Yeh, J. B. (2010). Relations matter: redefining communication competence from a Chinese perspective. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(1), 64-75. Yoshitake, M. (2002). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: A critical examination of an intercultural communication theory. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(2), 177-193. Yum, J. O. (2012). Communication competence: A Korean perspective. China Media Research, 8(2), 11-18.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Muhammad Umar Nadeem

Rosli Mohammed Bu kişi benim

Syarizan Dalib Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018

Kaynak Göster

APA Umar Nadeem, M., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2018). An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC). International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.455333
AMA Umar Nadeem M, Mohammed R, Dalib S. An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC). IJERE. Ekim 2018;3(4):141-149. doi:10.24331/ijere.455333
Chicago Umar Nadeem, Muhammad, Rosli Mohammed, ve Syarizan Dalib. “An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC)”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 3, sy. 4 (Ekim 2018): 141-49. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.455333.
EndNote Umar Nadeem M, Mohammed R, Dalib S (01 Ekim 2018) An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC). International Journal of Educational Research Review 3 4 141–149.
IEEE M. Umar Nadeem, R. Mohammed, ve S. Dalib, “An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC)”, IJERE, c. 3, sy. 4, ss. 141–149, 2018, doi: 10.24331/ijere.455333.
ISNAD Umar Nadeem, Muhammad vd. “An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC)”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 3/4 (Ekim 2018), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.455333.
JAMA Umar Nadeem M, Mohammed R, Dalib S. An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC). IJERE. 2018;3:141–149.
MLA Umar Nadeem, Muhammad vd. “An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC)”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, c. 3, sy. 4, 2018, ss. 141-9, doi:10.24331/ijere.455333.
Vancouver Umar Nadeem M, Mohammed R, Dalib S. An Overview of Dominant Research Approaches to Measure Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC). IJERE. 2018;3(4):141-9.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Gazi University, serhatarslan@gazi.edu.tr ,  Turkey
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement