Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, , 178 - 182, 01.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517995

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Achmad Rifa’I dan Chatarina Tri Anni. (2009). Psikologi pendidikan. Semarang: Semarang State University Press Arsyad (2010). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada Daryanto (2013). Manajemen pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Gavamedia Purwanto,D. (2006). Komunikasi bisnis. Jakarta: Erlangga Majid, A. (2013). Penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Nazir, M. (1988). Metode penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Sanjaya, W. (2009). Perencanaan & Desain sistem pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana Prenadamedia Group Sugiyono (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprijono, A. (2012). Cooperative learning teori dan aplikasi PAIKEM. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia Wahab, A. A. (2008). Metode dan Model-model mengajar ılmu pengetahuan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia 182

Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes

Yıl 2019, , 178 - 182, 01.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517995

Öz

Purpose of this study was to find out how the learning outcomes of class X Marketing students on business communication material using cooperative-based learning models, knowing how to learn Marketing class X students on business communication material using inquiry-based learning models, find out whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X Marketing students on business communication material with cooperative learning and inquiry models. It is said that cooperative learning models are due to teaching strategies designed to educate group cooperation and interaction between students. While the inquiry learning model is learning that is centered on the activities of students to find their own experiences and knowledge. The design of this study is pre-test, treatment of learning models, and post-test. The results of this study are that there are differences in the learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students (X Pm 1) with an average value of 74.75 and experimental class 2 (X Pm 2) with an average value of 77.00. And the calculation using the t-test obtained tcount= 2.086> ttable = 0.39. Based on the results of these studies it can be concluded that the experimental class 2 which uses the inquiry learning model is better than the experimental class 1 which uses the cooperative learning model.

Kaynakça

  • Achmad Rifa’I dan Chatarina Tri Anni. (2009). Psikologi pendidikan. Semarang: Semarang State University Press Arsyad (2010). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada Daryanto (2013). Manajemen pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Gavamedia Purwanto,D. (2006). Komunikasi bisnis. Jakarta: Erlangga Majid, A. (2013). Penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Nazir, M. (1988). Metode penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Sanjaya, W. (2009). Perencanaan & Desain sistem pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana Prenadamedia Group Sugiyono (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprijono, A. (2012). Cooperative learning teori dan aplikasi PAIKEM. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia Wahab, A. A. (2008). Metode dan Model-model mengajar ılmu pengetahuan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia 182
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İftitakhul İlmi Nasibhul Janah Bu kişi benim

Waspodo Tjipto Subroto Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Janah, İ. İ. N., & Subroto, W. T. (2019). Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517995
AMA Janah İİN, Subroto WT. Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. IJERE. Nisan 2019;4(2):178-182. doi:10.24331/ijere.517995
Chicago Janah, İftitakhul İlmi Nasibhul, ve Waspodo Tjipto Subroto. “Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4, sy. 2 (Nisan 2019): 178-82. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517995.
EndNote Janah İİN, Subroto WT (01 Nisan 2019) Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 2 178–182.
IEEE İ. İ. N. Janah ve W. T. Subroto, “Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes”, IJERE, c. 4, sy. 2, ss. 178–182, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.517995.
ISNAD Janah, İftitakhul İlmi Nasibhul - Subroto, Waspodo Tjipto. “Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4/2 (Nisan 2019), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517995.
JAMA Janah İİN, Subroto WT. Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. IJERE. 2019;4:178–182.
MLA Janah, İftitakhul İlmi Nasibhul ve Waspodo Tjipto Subroto. “Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, c. 4, sy. 2, 2019, ss. 178-82, doi:10.24331/ijere.517995.
Vancouver Janah İİN, Subroto WT. Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. IJERE. 2019;4(2):178-82.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Gazi University, serhatarslan@gazi.edu.tr ,  Turkey
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement