Olgu Sunumu
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2021, , 184 - 193, 01.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alderman, M. K. (2008). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. New York, us: Routledge.
  • Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The Role of E-learning, the Advantages and Disadvantages of Its Adoption in Higher Education. International Journal of Education and Research. 2(12). 397-410.
  • Bogdan, Robert, and Steven, J., Taylor. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
  • Chang, Y.-P. (2010). A study of efl college students’ self- handicapping and English performance. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2006-2010.
  • Diana Novita, A. R. H. (2020). Plus Minus Penggunaan Aplikasi-Aplikasi Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Unimed Medan, June, 1–11.
  • Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fee, K. (2009). Delivering E-learning: A Complete Strategy for Design, Application, and Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
  • Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL Students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88:229-44.
  • Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: a case study. System. 28(1). 85-96.
  • Holmes, B. & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-Learning Strategies: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey, PA, USA: Idea Group Inc.
  • Kuama, S., & Intharaksa, U. (2016). University students’ perceptions of an online English language course. Proceedings of ICHiSS 2016: 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. National Defence University of Malaysia (pp 226-336). Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Labaw, P.J .(1980). Advanced Questionnaire Design. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
  • Liang, T. (2009). Language learning strategies: The theoretical framework and some suggestions for learner training practice. English Language Teaching,2(4), 199-206.
  • Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2009). A comparative study on e-learning technologies and products: from the East to the West. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 26(2), 191–209.
  • Miles and Huberman. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.
  • Moleong, Lexy J. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  • Normazidah, C. M., Koo, Y. L., & Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-55.
  • O’ Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training, System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rubin, J (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9,41-51.
  • Samperio, N. (2019). Learning Strategies Used by High and Low Achievers in the First Level of English. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 21(1), 75–89.
  • Schemeck, R. R. (Ed.) (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Skylar, A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 69-84.
  • Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Language learning strategies of language e-learners in Turkey. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 107-120.
  • Pages, M. (2015). Successful and Unsuccessful English Learners: The use of learning strategies as an indicator of L2 (lack of Success).
  • Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2) 177-198.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1987a). Conceptual Background and Utility. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 3-13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). l2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 27-48.

Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class

Yıl 2021, , 184 - 193, 01.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600

Öz

This study focused on English language learning strategies used by good and poor learners in e-learning class during The Covid-19 pandemic. It investigated the similarity and differences of their learning strategies. Moreover, it investigated deeply factors that affected the preference of their learning strategies. It revealed that good and poor learners used all six learning strategies proposed by Oxford. Almost half of the good and poor learners used social strategy. However, most good learners used metacognitive strategies. While most poor learners used effective strategies. The lowest influencing strategy of good learners was social strategy. While the lowest influencing strategy of poor learners was metacognitive strategy. The Learning strategy preferences of good learners were affected by some factors such as belief, degree of awareness, learning style, motivation, and purpose of the learning language. The learning strategy preferences of poor learners were also affected by those factors except the purpose of the learning language.

Kaynakça

  • Alderman, M. K. (2008). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. New York, us: Routledge.
  • Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The Role of E-learning, the Advantages and Disadvantages of Its Adoption in Higher Education. International Journal of Education and Research. 2(12). 397-410.
  • Bogdan, Robert, and Steven, J., Taylor. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
  • Chang, Y.-P. (2010). A study of efl college students’ self- handicapping and English performance. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2006-2010.
  • Diana Novita, A. R. H. (2020). Plus Minus Penggunaan Aplikasi-Aplikasi Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Unimed Medan, June, 1–11.
  • Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fee, K. (2009). Delivering E-learning: A Complete Strategy for Design, Application, and Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
  • Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL Students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88:229-44.
  • Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: a case study. System. 28(1). 85-96.
  • Holmes, B. & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-Learning Strategies: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey, PA, USA: Idea Group Inc.
  • Kuama, S., & Intharaksa, U. (2016). University students’ perceptions of an online English language course. Proceedings of ICHiSS 2016: 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. National Defence University of Malaysia (pp 226-336). Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Labaw, P.J .(1980). Advanced Questionnaire Design. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
  • Liang, T. (2009). Language learning strategies: The theoretical framework and some suggestions for learner training practice. English Language Teaching,2(4), 199-206.
  • Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2009). A comparative study on e-learning technologies and products: from the East to the West. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 26(2), 191–209.
  • Miles and Huberman. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.
  • Moleong, Lexy J. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  • Normazidah, C. M., Koo, Y. L., & Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-55.
  • O’ Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training, System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rubin, J (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9,41-51.
  • Samperio, N. (2019). Learning Strategies Used by High and Low Achievers in the First Level of English. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 21(1), 75–89.
  • Schemeck, R. R. (Ed.) (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Skylar, A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 69-84.
  • Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Language learning strategies of language e-learners in Turkey. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 107-120.
  • Pages, M. (2015). Successful and Unsuccessful English Learners: The use of learning strategies as an indicator of L2 (lack of Success).
  • Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2) 177-198.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1987a). Conceptual Background and Utility. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 3-13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). l2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 27-48.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Dwi Prastiani V Virgonita

Endang Fauziati Bu kişi benim

Endang Setyaningsih Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

APA Virgonita, D. P. V., Fauziati, E., & Setyaningsih, E. (2021). Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(2), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600
AMA Virgonita DPV, Fauziati E, Setyaningsih E. Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class. IJERE. Nisan 2021;6(2):184-193. doi:10.24331/ijere.873600
Chicago Virgonita, Dwi Prastiani V, Endang Fauziati, ve Endang Setyaningsih. “Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 6, sy. 2 (Nisan 2021): 184-93. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600.
EndNote Virgonita DPV, Fauziati E, Setyaningsih E (01 Nisan 2021) Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class. International Journal of Educational Research Review 6 2 184–193.
IEEE D. P. V. Virgonita, E. Fauziati, ve E. Setyaningsih, “Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class”, IJERE, c. 6, sy. 2, ss. 184–193, 2021, doi: 10.24331/ijere.873600.
ISNAD Virgonita, Dwi Prastiani V vd. “Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 6/2 (Nisan 2021), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600.
JAMA Virgonita DPV, Fauziati E, Setyaningsih E. Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class. IJERE. 2021;6:184–193.
MLA Virgonita, Dwi Prastiani V vd. “Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, c. 6, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 184-93, doi:10.24331/ijere.873600.
Vancouver Virgonita DPV, Fauziati E, Setyaningsih E. Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class. IJERE. 2021;6(2):184-93.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Gazi University, serhatarslan@gazi.edu.tr ,  Turkey
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement