Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 652 - 659, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478

Öz

The aim of the current study is to compare two learning models in quadrilaterallearning. The models are Whole Brain Teaching (WBT) and Brain-Based Learning (BBL). This research is quasi-experimental research with a 2x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the 7th grade of junior high school in Karanganyar Regency with 181 students as the sample, 91 students taught with WBT and 90 students taught with BBL. Data analysis using a two-way ANOVA test with different cells. In this researchindicating that learning models and the students' learning stylehave a significant impact onthequadrilateral learning achievement.The result showed that Fa(9.79)> Ftable (3.89) it means (1) the students who were taught by WBT model had better achievement with student who was taught by BBL model, (2) Fb(25.05)>Ftable(3.05) it means auditory learners have better achievement than visual and kinesthetic , visual learners have achievement than kinesthetic learners, and (3) Fab (0.0197) < Ftable (3.05) it means there is no interaction between the learning model and learning style

Kaynakça

  • Ahmed, M., & Iliyasu, M. B. (2017). Effect of laboratory activity based method on performance in geometry among junior secondary school students in kastina state, Nigeria. Abacus,The Journal of The Mathematical Association of Nriaige, 42(2), 55–60. Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian. surakarta: Uns Press. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259–1274. DePorter, B., & M Hernacki. (2013). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning. Emilda. (2015). Teaching mathematics through ıntegrated brain gym in pair checks of cooperative learning. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science Ver. III, 20(11), 27–31. Gantasala, P. V., & Gantasala, S. B. (2009). Influence of learning styles. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 169–184.Handayani, B. S., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). Model brain based learning (BBL) and whole brain teaching (WBT) in learning. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 153. Jensen, E. (2008). Brain based learning: The new paradigm of teaching second-edition (2nd ed.). usa: crowin press. Kaur, J. (2013). Effectiveness of brain based learning strategies on enhancement of life skills among primary school students with internal and external locus of control. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(6), 128–143.Kharsati, M. P. D., & G.S, D. P. (2017). Whole brain teaching. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(06), 76–83. Ministry of Education and Culture Indonesia. (2018). National examination report. Retrieved from hasilun.puspendik.kemendikbud.go.id Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technologypedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Educ, 5(21), 509–523. Pangadongan, F. V. (2015). Konsepsi Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segiempat Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. 1001–1008. Pradhita Yudhi Astri, T., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2018). Numbered-board quiz with tgt to ımprove students’ science achievement based on learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 68–76. Prahmana, R. C. I., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). The hypothetical learning trajectory on research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Pedagogika, 123(3), 42–54. Priyono. (2018). The implementation of PAIKEM (Active, innovative, creative, effective, and exiting learning) and conventional learning method to improve student learning results. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 124–137. Purwanti, D., Gunarhadi., & Musadad, A. A. (2019). The effect of local-based 2013 curriculum implementation on students’ environmental awareness. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(1), 65–75.Putra, F., Kusmayadi, A., & Sujadi, I. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT Berbantuan Software CABRI 3D Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(8), 816–827. Putri, M. E., Mardiyana., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2019). The effect of application of react learning strategies on mathematics learning achievements: empirical analysis on learning styles of junior high school students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 231–237. Ramlah, F. D. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Keaktifan Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika (Survey Pada SMP Negeri di Kecamatan Klari Kabupaten Karawang). Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi. Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi, 1(3), 68–75. Schott, D. (2014). Context-dependent statements and consequences for the mathematical education of engineeringstudents. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ, 12(3), 437–442. Simsek, Y. (2017). The evaluation of the application of transported education by teachers. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(1), 41–48.Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya (5th ed.). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Stenberg, R. (1997). Thinking Styles. cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2017). Mathematics instruction, problems, challenges and opportunities: A case study in Manokwari Regency, Indonesia. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 287–291.Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for ımproving students’ memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83(5), 310. Winarso, W., & Karimah, S. A. (2017). The influence of implementation brain-friendly learning through the whole brain teaching to students’ response and creative character in learning mathematics. Ssrn, (October).
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 652 - 659, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ahmed, M., & Iliyasu, M. B. (2017). Effect of laboratory activity based method on performance in geometry among junior secondary school students in kastina state, Nigeria. Abacus,The Journal of The Mathematical Association of Nriaige, 42(2), 55–60. Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian. surakarta: Uns Press. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259–1274. DePorter, B., & M Hernacki. (2013). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning. Emilda. (2015). Teaching mathematics through ıntegrated brain gym in pair checks of cooperative learning. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science Ver. III, 20(11), 27–31. Gantasala, P. V., & Gantasala, S. B. (2009). Influence of learning styles. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 169–184.Handayani, B. S., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). Model brain based learning (BBL) and whole brain teaching (WBT) in learning. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 153. Jensen, E. (2008). Brain based learning: The new paradigm of teaching second-edition (2nd ed.). usa: crowin press. Kaur, J. (2013). Effectiveness of brain based learning strategies on enhancement of life skills among primary school students with internal and external locus of control. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(6), 128–143.Kharsati, M. P. D., & G.S, D. P. (2017). Whole brain teaching. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(06), 76–83. Ministry of Education and Culture Indonesia. (2018). National examination report. Retrieved from hasilun.puspendik.kemendikbud.go.id Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technologypedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Educ, 5(21), 509–523. Pangadongan, F. V. (2015). Konsepsi Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segiempat Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. 1001–1008. Pradhita Yudhi Astri, T., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2018). Numbered-board quiz with tgt to ımprove students’ science achievement based on learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 68–76. Prahmana, R. C. I., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). The hypothetical learning trajectory on research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Pedagogika, 123(3), 42–54. Priyono. (2018). The implementation of PAIKEM (Active, innovative, creative, effective, and exiting learning) and conventional learning method to improve student learning results. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 124–137. Purwanti, D., Gunarhadi., & Musadad, A. A. (2019). The effect of local-based 2013 curriculum implementation on students’ environmental awareness. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(1), 65–75.Putra, F., Kusmayadi, A., & Sujadi, I. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT Berbantuan Software CABRI 3D Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(8), 816–827. Putri, M. E., Mardiyana., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2019). The effect of application of react learning strategies on mathematics learning achievements: empirical analysis on learning styles of junior high school students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 231–237. Ramlah, F. D. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Keaktifan Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika (Survey Pada SMP Negeri di Kecamatan Klari Kabupaten Karawang). Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi. Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi, 1(3), 68–75. Schott, D. (2014). Context-dependent statements and consequences for the mathematical education of engineeringstudents. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ, 12(3), 437–442. Simsek, Y. (2017). The evaluation of the application of transported education by teachers. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(1), 41–48.Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya (5th ed.). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Stenberg, R. (1997). Thinking Styles. cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2017). Mathematics instruction, problems, challenges and opportunities: A case study in Manokwari Regency, Indonesia. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 287–291.Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for ımproving students’ memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83(5), 310. Winarso, W., & Karimah, S. A. (2017). The influence of implementation brain-friendly learning through the whole brain teaching to students’ response and creative character in learning mathematics. Ssrn, (October).
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Marwah Wulan Mulıa Bu kişi benim

Budi Usodo Bu kişi benim

Tri Atmojo Kusmayadı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ekim 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Mulıa, M. W., Usodo, B., & Kusmayadı, T. A. (2019). Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 652-659. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478
AMA Mulıa MW, Usodo B, Kusmayadı TA. Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. IJERE. Ekim 2019;4(4):652-659. doi:10.24331/ijere.628478
Chicago Mulıa, Marwah Wulan, Budi Usodo, ve Tri Atmojo Kusmayadı. “Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4, sy. 4 (Ekim 2019): 652-59. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478.
EndNote Mulıa MW, Usodo B, Kusmayadı TA (01 Ekim 2019) Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 4 652–659.
IEEE M. W. Mulıa, B. Usodo, ve T. A. Kusmayadı, “Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia”, IJERE, c. 4, sy. 4, ss. 652–659, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.628478.
ISNAD Mulıa, Marwah Wulan vd. “Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4/4 (Ekim 2019), 652-659. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478.
JAMA Mulıa MW, Usodo B, Kusmayadı TA. Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. IJERE. 2019;4:652–659.
MLA Mulıa, Marwah Wulan vd. “Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, c. 4, sy. 4, 2019, ss. 652-9, doi:10.24331/ijere.628478.
Vancouver Mulıa MW, Usodo B, Kusmayadı TA. Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. IJERE. 2019;4(4):652-9.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Gazi University, serhatarslan@gazi.edu.tr ,  Turkey
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement