Educational Performance and the Role of Institutions

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 , 691 - 700, 01.12.2019

Renata Guidi Stanley Engerman Youssef Youssef

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628584

Öz

The analysis of institutional characteristics within the educational context is necessary due to the relevance that education, as a fundamental area of knowledge for the development of a country, exerts on society. In this sense, the present study seeks to understand how the institutional theory, in the perspective of Acemoglu and Robinson (2012), can be applied inthe context of educational institutions. With regard to the methodological aspects, the study presents a literature review on the divergent perspectives of the institutional theory, followed by a discussion on the design by the theorists Acemoglu, Robinson and collaborators about this theory. The text provides an understanding on the connection of institutional factors and the educational outcome. An implication of this study is the opening of a new vision for analysis and reflection on institutional relationships that influence in the performance of educational institutions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutional theory, efficiency, organizations, education

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013).Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2000).The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation(No. w7771). National bureau of economic research. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution.The Quarterly journal of economics,117(4), 1231-1294. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J., & Johnson, S. (2008).Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook ofEconomic Growth.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005).Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions.The American Economic Review,98(1), 267-293.Ackoff, R. L. (1975).Planejamento de pesquisa social. Editôra Herder.Baciu, L. (2012). An analysis of the Romanian compulsory education from the perspective of institutional efficiency.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,46, 2056-2067.Bhaumik, S. K., & Dimova, R. (2014). Good and bad institutions: is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry.Cambridge journal of economics,38(1), 109-126. Bishop, J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement.The American Economic Review,87(2), 260-264.Bishop, J. H. (1999). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency?.Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349-398.Bishop, J. H., & Wößmann, L. (2004). Institutional effects in a simple model of educational production.Education Economics,12(1), 17-38.Boudreaux, C., Nikolaev, B.& Klein, P. (2019). Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic institutions. Journal of Business Venturing. 34(1), 178-196.Camps, E. & Engerman, S. The impact of race and inequality on human capital formation in Latin America during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Journal of Development Economics,57(2). Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm.Economica,4(16), 386-405. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum.Academy of management journal,45(1), 45-56. Powell, W. W. (1999).El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional(No. 302.35 P6Y.). Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions.Kyklos,47(1), 3-31.DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (1991).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis(Vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development.Journal of monetary economics,50(1), 3-39.Engerman, S. L., & Sokoloff, K. L. (1997). Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among new world economies.How Latin America Fell Behind, 260-304. Fachin, R. C., & Mendonça, J. R. C. (2003). Selznick: uma visão da vida e da obra doprecursor da perspectiva institucional na teoria organizacional.Organizações, instituições e poder no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 29-45.Fadul, É. M. C. (2009). Limites e Possibilidades Disciplinares da Administração Pública e dos Estudos Organizacionais/Disciplinary Limits and Possibilities of Public Administration and Organizational Studies.Revista de Administração Contemporânea,13(3), 351.Fonseca, V. D. (2003). A abordagem institucional nos estudos organizacionais: bases conceituais edesenvolvimentos contemporâneos.Organizações, instituições e poder no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV,58.Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1997).Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. University of Michigan Press.Gonand, F., Joumard, I., & Price, R. (2007). Public spending efficiency: institutional indicators in primary and secondary education.OECD Economic Department Working Papers, (543), 1.Greve, H. (2018). Goal Selection Internally and Externally: A Behavioral Theory of Institutionalization. International Journal of Management Review. (20), 19-38. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989).Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2010). Education and Economic Growth.Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth.Hanushek, E. A. (1981). Throwing money at schools.Journal of policy analysis and management,1(1), 19-41.Hoxby, C. M. (1994).Do private schools provide competition for public schools?(No. w4978). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hoxby, C. M. (1996). How teachers' unions affect education production.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,111(3), 671-718.Hoxby, C. M. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,115(4), 1239-1285.Kahu, E. & Nelson K. (2017). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1).Landsburg, S. E. (1993).The Armchair Economisteconomics and Everyday Life. New York: Macmillan.Levin, B., & Naylor, N. (2007). Using resources effectivelyin education. InIntelligent leadership(pp. 143-158). Springer Netherlands.Lim, J. & Adams-Kane, J. Institutions, Education, and Economic Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1979).Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. London: Reidl.Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American journal of sociology,83(2), 340-363. North, D. C. (1990).Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press. North, D. (1993). The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel: autobiography.The Nobel Foundation.North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973).The rise of the western world: A new economic history. Cambridge University Press.North, D. Structure and Change in Economic History. Nova York: W.W. Norton e Co., 1982.North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England.The journal of economic history,49(04), 803-832. Rajkumar, A. S., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter?.Journal of development economics,86(1), 96-111.Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.The Quarterly journal of economics,113(2), 553-602.Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory.Theory and society,37(5), 427.Scott, W. R. (1995).Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.Scott, W. Introduction: from technology to environment.In: Meyer, J., Scott,R. (Ed.). Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Updated Edition. London: Sage, 1992.Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory.Administrativescience quarterly, 493-511.Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1999). The institutionalization of institutional theory.Studying Organization. Theory & Method. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 169-184. Valente, N. (2007). Breves Considerações sobrea Nova Economia Institucional.Conselho Federal de Economia. Disponível em: <www.cofecon.org.br>. Acesso em: 30 out. 2016.Ventura, E. (2004). Dinâmica de institucionalização de práticas sociais: estudo do movimento pela responsabilidade social no setor bancário.Projeto de doutorado− Ebape/FGV, Rio de Janeiro.Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead.Journal of economic literature,38(3), 595-613.Williamson, O. E. (1985).The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting(Vol. 866). New York: Free Press.Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations.The journal of Law and Economics,22(2), 233-261.Woessmann, L. (2001). Why students in some countries do better.Education Next,1(2).Woessmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international evidence.Oxford bulletin of economics andstatistics,65(2), 117-170.Williamson, O. E. (1985).The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting(Vol. 866). New York: Free Press. Wolf, A. (2004). Education and economic performance: Simplistic theories and their policy consequences.Oxford review of economic policy,20(2), 315-333.