Investigating Language Learning Strategies Used by Good and Poor Learners In E-Learning Class

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 184 - 193, 01.04.2021

Dwi Prastiani V Virgonita Endang Fauziati Endang Setyaningsih

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.873600

Öz

This study focused on English language learning strategies used by good and poor learners in e-learning class during The Covid-19 pandemic. It investigated the similarity and differences of their learning strategies. Moreover, it investigated deeply factors that affected the preference of their learning strategies. It revealed that good and poor learners used all six learning strategies proposed by Oxford. Almost half of the good and poor learners used social strategy. However, most good learners used metacognitive strategies. While most poor learners used effective strategies. The lowest influencing strategy of good learners was social strategy. While the lowest influencing strategy of poor learners was metacognitive strategy. The Learning strategy preferences of good learners were affected by some factors such as belief, degree of awareness, learning style, motivation, and purpose of the learning language. The learning strategy preferences of poor learners were also affected by those factors except the purpose of the learning language.

Anahtar Kelimeler

E-learning, Language Learning Strategy, Poor Learner, Good Learner

Kaynakça

• Alderman, M. K. (2008). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. New York, us: Routledge.
• Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The Role of E-learning, the Advantages and Disadvantages of Its Adoption in Higher Education. International Journal of Education and Research. 2(12). 397-410.
• Bogdan, Robert, and Steven, J., Taylor. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
• Chang, Y.-P. (2010). A study of efl college students’ self- handicapping and English performance. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2006-2010.
• Diana Novita, A. R. H. (2020). Plus Minus Penggunaan Aplikasi-Aplikasi Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Unimed Medan, June, 1–11.
• Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fee, K. (2009). Delivering E-learning: A Complete Strategy for Design, Application, and Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
• Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL Students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88:229-44.
• Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: a case study. System. 28(1). 85-96.
• Holmes, B. & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
• Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-Learning Strategies: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey, PA, USA: Idea Group Inc.
• Kuama, S., & Intharaksa, U. (2016). University students’ perceptions of an online English language course. Proceedings of ICHiSS 2016: 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. National Defence University of Malaysia (pp 226-336). Selangor, Malaysia.
• Labaw, P.J .(1980). Advanced Questionnaire Design. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
• Liang, T. (2009). Language learning strategies: The theoretical framework and some suggestions for learner training practice. English Language Teaching,2(4), 199-206.
• Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2009). A comparative study on e-learning technologies and products: from the East to the West. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 26(2), 191–209.
• Miles and Huberman. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.
• Moleong, Lexy J. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
• Normazidah, C. M., Koo, Y. L., & Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-55.
• O’ Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training, System, 17, 235-247.
• Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• Rubin, J (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9,41-51.
• Samperio, N. (2019). Learning Strategies Used by High and Low Achievers in the First Level of English. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 21(1), 75–89.
• Schemeck, R. R. (Ed.) (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
• Skylar, A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 69-84.
• Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Language learning strategies of language e-learners in Turkey. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 107-120.
• Pages, M. (2015). Successful and Unsuccessful English Learners: The use of learning strategies as an indicator of L2 (lack of Success).
• Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2) 177-198.
• Wenden, A. L. (1987a). Conceptual Background and Utility. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 3-13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). l2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 27-48.