The managerial turn in sustainable energy research: Mapping the intellectual structure and emerging trends

Öz

This study aims to analyze the development and intellectual structure of sustainable energy research within the management and organization literature using bibliometric methods. As the energy literature has evolved from a technical field of expertise into a multidisciplinary field of knowledge, the role of managerial dimensions, such as strategy, leadership, organizational culture and human resource management, in the energy transition has become more prominent. Within the scope of the research, a focused dataset was constructed from the Web of Science Core Collection database to identify studies positioned at the intersection of sustainable energy, renewable energy and management and organization research. Accordingly, 101 publications covering the 2007–2026 period were analyzed using the R-based Bibliometrix software. The findings indicate that the field gained momentum particularly after 2016 and reached its highest publication level in 2025. While Technology Analysis & Strategic Management and Business Strategy and the Environment stand out as the most productive journals, the United States, China and India lead in publication output. Conceptual structure analyses reveal that the literature clusters around the axes of sustainability, renewable energy, leadership, environmental performance and strategic management. The thematic development process indicates that discussions, which were initially more focused on general strategy and management, have evolved over time toward more applied and multidimensional topics such as the energy transition, digital transformation and corporate sustainability. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the transition to sustainable energy must be supported not only by technological investments but also by leadership competencies and the capacity for organizational change. In this regard, the study highlights the existing academic structure of the field and provides a structured basis for future theoretical and methodological research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Management and organization
• Sustainable energy
• Renewable energy
• Leadership
• Bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

1. [1] Chai K.H., Yeo C. Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach: A conceptual framework. Energy Policy 2012; 46: 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.012
2. [2] Martin R., Muûls M., de Preux L.B., Wagner U.J. Anatomy of a paradox: Management practices, organizational structure and energy efficiency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2012; 63(2): 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.08.003
3. [3] Kazemi M.Z., Elamer A.A., Theodosopoulos G., Khatib S.F.A. Reinvigorating research on sustainability reporting in the construction industry: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research 2023; 167: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114145
4. [4] Akhtar M.Z., Zaman K., Rehman F.U., Nassani A.A., Haffar M., Abro M.M.Q. Evaluating pollution damage function through carbon pricing, renewable energy demand, and cleaner technologies in China: Blue versus green economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29(17): 24878–24893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17623-y
5. [5] Schumpeter J.A. Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of capitalism. Routledge, 2017.
6. [6] Muscio A., Simonelli F., Vu H. Bridging the valley of death in the EU renewable energy sector: Toward a new energy policy. Business Strategy and the Environment 2023; 32(7): 4620–4635. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3384
7. [7] Deleidi M., Mazzucato M., Semieniuk G. Neither crowding in nor out: Public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects. Energy Policy 2020; 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111195
8. [8] Wang Z., Bui Q., Zhang B., Nawarathna C.L.K., Mombeuil C. The nexus between renewable energy consumption and human development in BRICS countries: The moderating role of public debt. Renewable Energy 2021; 165: 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.144

9. [9] Christofi A., Christofi P., Sisaye S. Corporate sustainability: Historical development and reporting practices. Management Research Review 2012; 35(2): 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211195170
10. [10] Baumgartner R.J. Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable Development 2009; 17(2): 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.405
11. [11] Rizzi F., Annunziata E., Frey M. The relationship between organizational culture and energy performance: A municipal energy manager level study. Business Strategy and the Environment 2018; 27(6): 694–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2025
12. [12] Sonmez Cakir F., Adiguzel Z. An examination of the effects of financial and process innovation on the sustainability of businesses under the influence of entrepreneurial leadership: A research in energy companies. American Journal of Business 2022; 37(4): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-03-2022-0046
13. [13] Lu H., Guo L., Zhang Y. Oil and gas companies’ low-carbon emission transition to integrated energy companies. Science of The Total Environment 2019; 686: 1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.014
14. [14] Shaukat A., Qiu Y., Trojanowski G. Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 2016; 135(3): 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
15. [15] Throop W., Mayberry M. Leadership for the sustainability transition. Business and Society Review 2017; 122(2): 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12116
16. [16] Abdelaziz E.A., Saidur R., Mekhilef S. A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15(1): 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.003
17. [17] Appelbaum S.H., Profka E., Depta A.M., Petrynski B. Impact of business model change on organizational success. Industrial and Commercial Training 2018; 50(2): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-07-2017-0058
18. [18] Galea C. Teaching business sustainability: From theory to practice. Routledge, 2017.
19. [19] Naqshbandi M.M., Jasimuddin S.M. Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review 2018; 27(3): 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001
20. [20] Cui R., Wang J. Shaping sustainable development: External environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2022; 29(3): 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2213
21. [21] Lankoski L. Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: A theory of why and how they are connected. Business Strategy and the Environment 2008; 17(8): 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.582
22. [22] Masud, Md.A.K., Rahman M., Ozturk I. Organizational Strategic Responses to Climate Challenges in Global Carbon Management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2025; 32(5): 6766–6785. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70058
23. [23] Odulaja B.A., Nnabugwu O.C., Abdul A.A., Udeh C.A., Daraojimba C. HR’s role in organizational change within Nigeria’s renewable energy sector: A review. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 2023; 4(5): 259–284. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v4i5.615
24. [24] De Villiers B., Mienie A. Organisational determinants of job satisfaction in the South African renewable energy sector. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 2025; 23. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v23i0.3076
25. [25] Remane G., Hanelt A., Tesch J.F., Kolbe L.M. The business model pattern database: A tool for systematic business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 2017; 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500049
26. [26] Strasser T., de Kraker J., Kemp R. Network leadership for transformative capacity development: Roles, practices and challenges. Global Sustainability 2022; 5: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.6
27. [27] Zhang M., Gu J., Liu Y. Engineering feasibility, economic viability and environmental sustainability of energy recovery from nitrous oxide in biological wastewater treatment plant. Bioresource Technology 2019; 282: 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.040
28. [28] Zhao X., Pan W. The characteristics and evolution of business model for green buildings: A bibliometric approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2022; 29(10): 4241–4266. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2020-0657
29. [29] El-Diraby T., Krijnen T., Papagelis M. BIM-based collaborative design and socio-technical analytics of green buildings. Automation in Construction 2017; 82: 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.004
30. [30] Leydesdorff L. Theories of citation? Scientometrics 1998; 43(1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0245839
31. [31] Zhao X., Hwang B.G., Lu Q. Typology of business model innovations for delivering zero carbon buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 196: 1213–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.018
32. [32] Aria M., Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2017; 11(4): 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
33. [33] Smink M.M., Hekkert M.P., Negro S.O. Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 2015; 24: 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1808
34. [34] Salvato C., Chirico F., Sharma P. A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 2010; 22(3): 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726192.
35. [35] Xu J., Wang X., Liu F. Government subsidies, R&D investment and innovation performance: Analysis from pharmaceutical sector in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2021; 33(5): 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1830055