Required Quality Standards for Augmented Reality Applications

Öz

A lot of research is being done by researchers to increase the quality of service in education and training. The fact that today's technology is advancing rapidly contributes to the whole field of life and undoubtedly contributes positively to education in many ways. In today's world where real life is moving rapidly as a necessity of technology age, it has begun to take its place in teaching programs in some applications. Augmented reality is one of the applications that especially researchers are trying to include in the field of education and its popularity has increased in recent years. Within the scope of the study, it was aimed to determine the quality standards that should be included in the augmented reality applications. Sequential exploratory mixed method was used in the research process. It is stated that this method which provides qualitative data for research problem by collecting and analyzing qualitative data and then forming quantitative data according to the obtained data will provide effective advantages in many aspects as well as being advantageous to researchers and also being used in scale development studies. In this context, a 5-point likert type scale called "Augmented Reality Quality Standards Scale (ARQSS)" was used as data collection tool. The sample of the study is composed of 350 science teachers and 60 faculty members working in Turkey. A number of analyzes have been conducted in order to ensure validity and reliability of the ARQSS in the course of development and it has been determined that the EFA outcome KMO coefficient is .857 and the Barlett Sphericity test χ2 is significant at 1741.20 (p <.05). In addition, the CFA results showed that the goodness of fit indexes obtained were RMSEA 0.047, GFI 0.88, CFI 0.95, and SRMR 0.049. As a result of the analysis, a scale with 2 factors and 20 items and a reliability coefficient Cronbach's Alpha 0.82 was developed. The application was made with the help of the developed scale and the quality standards that should be included in the applications of the Augmented Reality were determined taking the results obtained into consideration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Augmented Reality

Kaynakça

1. A du sselam M. S. Karal . 2 2). Fi i o retiminde art r lm er e li ortamlar n n o renci a ademi a ar s u erine et isi . S n f manyeti ma onusu o rne i. E itim e O retim Ara t rmalar Dergisi, 1(4), 170-181.
2. Acar . . 2 7). emel e eli mi Karma o ntem esenleri. M. So ilir Ed.) Karma o ntem Ara t rmalar na iri .Bas ) i inde 35-51. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
3. Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Educational technology in Turkey: Past, present and future. Educational Media International, 39(2), 165-174.
4. Arslan, A. & Elibol, M. (2015). Analysis of educational augmented reality applications: The case of Android operating DOI:10.14687/ijhs.v12i2.3524 International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1792-1817.
5. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
6. Berryman, D. R. (2012). Augmented Reality: A Review. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31(2), 212-218. DOI:10.1080/02763869.2012.670604
7. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. New York: Guilford.
8. Bulun M. u lnar B. u ran M. S. 2 ). E itimde mo il te nolo iler. The Turkish Online Journal of

9. Educational Technology, 3(2), 165-169.
10. Bu yu o tu r . (201 ). Sosyal ilimler i in eri anali i el ita statisti ara t rma deseni S SS uy ulamalar e yorum . Bas ). An ara e emA.
11. Cuendet, S., Bonnard, Q., Do-Lenh, S. & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Designing augmented reality for the classroom.
12. Computers & Education, 68, 557-569.
13. etin aya . . A ay M. 2 ). E itim ortamlar nda artt r lm er e li uy ulamalar . A ademi Bili im Konferans 2 -25 Oca 2 Antalya A deni ni ersitesi.
14. al M. e So ilir M. 2 ). eri anali inin parametreleri. E itim e Bilim, 39(174), 33-38.
15. Daugherty, J. (2012). Infusing engineering concepts: Teaching engineering design. National Center for
16. Engineering and Technology Education.
17. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications rd ed.). housand Oa s CA SA E. Er a . emirer . 2 ). E itimde art r lm er e li uy ulamalar oo le lass o rne i. Journal of
18. Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 3(2), 8-16.
19. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (Third Ed.). London: SAGE
20. Fraenkel, J. R. &Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education, (5th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Freitas, R. & Campos, P. (2008). SMART: A system of augmented reality for teaching 2nd grade students. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture,
22. Creativity, Interaction -Volume 2 (pp. 27-30). British Computer Society.
23. u l u n C. lma A. a lar, A. (2017). Teacher opinions about the qualities required in STEM activities applied in the science course. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences (JoCReSS), 7(1). 460-478. Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Florida: Chapman ve Hall/CRC.
24. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A. & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
25. Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), - 2. Karaday - a ran A. Koral E. Bo urt A. 2 5). Art r lm er e li uy ulamas n n ya anc dil o retiminde ullan lmas . A ademi Bili im, 462-467.
26. Karasar . 2 6). Bilimsel ara t rma yo ntemi 6.Bas ). An ara o el.
27. Kempa, R. (2002). Research and research utilization in chemical education. Chemistry Education:
28. Research and Practice in Europe, 3(3), 327-343.
29. Kor ma O . ahin A. e il . 2 ). Bilimsel ara t rmaya yo neli tutum o l e i e erlili e u enirlik al mas . l o retim Online, 10(3), 961-973.
30. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
31. Luckin, R. & Fraser, D. S. (2011). Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(5), 510-524.
32. McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (sixth Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
33. Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994). A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
34. O tur M. A. 2 ). An e ploratory study on measurin educators’ attitudes to ard educational research. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(12), 758-769.
35. Seo, J., Kim, N. & Kim, G. J. (2006). Designing interactions for augmented reality based educational contents.
36. echnolo ies for E- earnin and i ital Entertainment 88- 7. O . 7 7 66 . Su mer . 2 ). ap sal e itli modelleri emel a ramlar e o rne uy ulamalar. u r si olo i a lar 6) -7 . im e O . F. 2 7). ap sal e itli modellemesine iri emel il eler e S E uy ulamalar . Ankara: Ekinoks Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Usin multi ariate statistics 5th Ed.). Boston Allyn e Bacon. a anc l E. 2 6). utumlar n o l u lmesi e S SS ile eri anali i .Bas ). An ara Nobel.
37. Walker, D. A. (2010). The attitudes toward research scale. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 6 ) 8-26. a u M. 2 ). E itim ara t rmalar ile il ili o retmen e yo netici o ru lerinin anali i. Sel u ni ersitesi
38. Ahmet Kele o lu E itim Fa u ltesi er isi, 27, 143-158.
39. lma A. 2 2). O retmen Adaylar n n Ele tro imya Konusunda Anlay lar n n Belirlenmesi. ay nlanm u se isans e i Atatu r ni ersitesi E itim Bilimleri Enstitu su , Erzurum.
40. lma A. 2 6). Approaches to ards to hi her education quality and accreditation A meta-analysis application made up until 2016 year. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences (JoCReSS), 6(1), 33-54.
41. lma A. Ertu rul-A yol B. Kal E. 2 7). equired professional competency and quality standards of newly appointed science teachers. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science (JoSReSS),3(2).242-256.
42. lma A. Bayra e en S. 2 5). eterminin of the prospecti e teachers’ understadin s of electrochemistry. International Conference On New Horizons In Education (INTE 2014), Procedia-Social and Online[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815010344]. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.975 Sciences, 174(2015), 2831-2838.
43. lma A. u l u n C. a lar, A. (2017). Teaching with STEM applications for 7th class students unit of "Force and Energy": Let's make a parachute, water jet, catapult, intelligent curtain and hydraulic work machine (bucket machine) activities. Journal of Current Researches on Educational Studies (JoCuRES), 7(1). 98-116.
44. *Note: This paper was presented as oral presentation in 3rd International Conference on Lifelong Learning and Leadership for All - ICLEL-17 between 12-14 September 2017 in Porto, Portugal.