OECD ÜLKELERİNDE EĞİTİM HARCAMALARI, EKONOMİK BÜYÜME VE VERGİ GELİRLERİ ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ (1973–2021)

Öz

Bu çalışma, eğitim harcamaları, vergi politikaları ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki etkileşimleri incelemektedir. 1973-2021 dönemine ait seçilmiş OECD ülkelerinin verileri, Bootstrap panel Granger nedensellik analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, bazı ülkelerde eğitim harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme arasında çift yönlü bir ilişki tespit edilirken, Türkiye’de ise bu neviden bir ilişkiye rastlanmamıştır. İrlanda ve İsveç gibi ülkelerde eğitim harcamalarının vergi gelirleri üzerindeki etkisinin belirgin olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma ayrıca, eğitim harcamalarının insan sermayesi birikimi, uzun vadeli büyüme ve sosyal refah üzerindeki kritik rolüne dikkat çekmektedir. Bu bağlamda, sürdürülebilir büyüme için eğitim harcamalarının artırılması ve etkin vergi politikalarıyla desteklenmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır.

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION EXPENDITURES, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND TAX REVENUES IN OECD COUNTRIES (1973–2021)

Abstract

This study examines the interactions between education expenditures, tax policies and economic growth. The data of selected OECD countries for the period 1973-2021 are evaluated by Bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis. As a result of the analysis, while a bidirectional relationship between education expenditures and economic growth is found in some countries, this relationship is not found in Türkiye. In countries such as Ireland and Sweden, the effect of education expenditures on tax revenues is significant. The study also highlights the critical role of education expenditures on human capital accumulation, long-term growth and social welfare. In this context, it is emphasized that education expenditures should be increased and supported by effective tax policies for sustainable growth.

Keywords

• Education Expenditures
• Economic Growths
• Tax Policies
• Human Capital
• Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality

Kaynakça

1. Akadiri, S.S., Lasisi, T.T., Uzuner, G., & Akadiri, A.C. (2020). Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globalization, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis, Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4), 470-484.
2. Annabi, N., Harvey, S., & Lan, Y. (2011). Public expenditures on education, human capital and growth in Canada: An OLG model analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(6), 852-865.
3. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.
4. Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2007). Applied econometrics: A modern approach using E-views and microfit, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
5. Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2001.
6. Barro, R. J. (2013). Education and economic growth. Annals Of Economics And Finance, 14(2), 301-328.
7. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
8. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (1997). Determinants of schooling quality. Unpublished, Harvard University, March.

9. Blankenau, W. F., & Simpson, N. B. (2004). Public education expenditures and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2), 583-605.
10. Blumkin, T., & Sadka, E. (2008). A case for taxing education. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 145-163.
11. Bovenberg, A. L., & Jacobs, B. (2005). Redistribution and education subsidies are siamese twins. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12).
12. Bovenberg, A. L., & Jacobs, B. (2005). Redistribution and education subsidies are siamese twins. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12).
13. Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data, Econometric Reviews, 24, 151-173.
14. Brett, C., & Weymark, J. A. (2003). Financing education using optimal redistributive taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 87(11), 2549-2569.
15. Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and ıts application to model specifications in econometrics, Reviews of Economics Studies, Vol: 47, 239-253.
16. Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. The Review Of Economic Studies, 32(3), 233-240.
17. Chu, H. P., Chang, T., & Sagafi-nejad, T. (2016). Globalization and economic growth revisited: a bootstrap panel causality test. contemporary economic and management studies in Asia and Africa, Cyrus Chronicle Journal, May 2016, 1(1): 30-44.
18. Davin 2, M. (2014). Public education spending, sectoral taxation, and growth 1. Revue D'économie Politique, (3), 553-570.
19. De Fraja, G. (2002). The design of optimal education policies. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(2), 437-466.
20. Durusu-Ciftci, D., Soytas, U., & Nazlioglu, S. (2020). Financial development and energy consumption in emerging markets: Smooth structural shifts and causal linkages, Energy Economics, Elsevier, 87(C).
21. Dünya Bankası (2024). World development indicators–Dünya kalkınma göstergeleri (WDI), databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
22. Esener, C., Granville, B., & Matousek, R. (2022). Choosing the optimal tool for fiscal adjustment or living under fiscal constraints: panel evidence from selected OECD countries, Economic Research Guardian, Weissberg Publishing, 12(1), 2-29.
23. Esener, S. Ç. (2019a). Mali özerklik ve mali tevzin açısından yerel yönetim vergi gelirlerinin kişi başı gelir ve ekonomik büyüme ile karşılıklı nedensellik ilişkisi: seçilmiş OECD üyesi ülkelerde mali yerelleşme üzerine bazı çıkarımlar, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 11 (20), 1-28.
24. Esener, S. Ç. (2019b). Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde iktisadi büyüme, kamu gelirleri ve harcamalarının çift yönlü nedenselliğine dair ampirik bir analiz (a two-way empirical investigation on economic growth, public revenue and expenditure for developed and developing countries), Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, 10(5), 1051-1070.
25. Esener, S. Ç., & Biber, A. E. (2022). Kamusal birer mal ve hizmet olarak savunma ve sağlık harcamalarının gelir dağılımı üzerindeki etkileri: seçilmiş Avrupa birliği ülkeleri üzerine bir analiz. Fiscaoeconomia, 6(2), 402-438.
26. Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorat, S. (2000). Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India. American Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 1038-1051.
27. Fan, S., Yu, B., & Jitsuchon, S. (2008). Does allocation of public spending matter in poverty reduction? Evidence from Thailand. Asian Economic Journal, 22(4), 411-430.
28. Freire-Serén, M. J., & i Martí, J. P. (2013). Tax avoidance, human capital accumulation and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 30, 22-29.
29. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
30. Granger, C. W. J. (2003). Some aspects of causal relationships, Journal of Econometrics, 112, 69-71.
31. Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1997). Productive government expenditures and long-run growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(1), 183-204.
32. Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1998). Flat-rate taxes, government spending on education, and growth. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(1), 306-325.
33. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis, Prentice Hall, London, 5th Edition, 2003.
34. Gross, C. (1988). Tax treatment of education expenses: perspectives from normative theory. The University of Chicago Law Review, 55(3), 916-942.
35. Grout, P. (1983). Imperfect information, markets and public provision of education. Journal of Public Economics, 22(1), 113-121.
36. Guvenen, F. (2009). An empirical investigation of labor income processes. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12(1), 58-79.
37. Hacker, R. S., & Hatemi-j, A. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application, Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489-1500.
38. Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184-1208.
39. Hare, P. G., & Ulph, D. T. (1979). On education and distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5, Part 2), 193-212.
40. Hurlin, C. (2008). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels, mimeo. Department of Economics: University of Orleans.
41. Kar, M., Nazlıoğlu, Ş., & Ağır, H. (2011). Financial development and economic growth nexus in the MENA countries: Bootstrap panel granger causality analysis, Economic Modelling, 28(1-2): 685-693.c
42. Krause, A. (2006). Redistributive taxation and public education. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(5), 807-819.
43. Krause, A. (2009). Education and taxation policies in the presence of countervailing incentives. Economica, 76(302), 387-399.
44. Koopmans, T. C. (1963). On the concept of optimal economic growth, https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cowles-discussion-paper-series/392
45. Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach, Economic Modelling, vol. 23(6): 978-992.
46. Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The relationship between housing prices and inflation rate in Turkey: Evidence from panel Konya causality test, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(3), 427-452.
47. Krueger, D., & Ludwig, A. (2013). Optimal progressive labor income taxation and education subsidies when education decisions and intergenerational transfers are endogenous. American Economic Review, 103(3), 496-501.
48. MacPhail-Wilcox, B. (1984). Tax policy analysis and education finance: a conceptual framework for issues and analyses. Journal Of Education Finance, 9(3), 312-331.
49. Maldonado, D. (2008). Education policies and optimal taxation. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 131-143.
50. Menyah, K., Nazlıoğlu, S., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African Countries: New insights from a panel causality Approach, Economic Modelling, 37: 386-394.
51. Nazlıoğlu, Ş., Lebe, F., & Kayhan, S. (2011). Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: Cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel causality analysis, Energy Policy, 39(10), 6615-6621.
52. OECD (2024). OECD statistics, “Fiscal Decentralisation Database” (oecd.stat), stats.oecd.org
53. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, CESifo WP, 1229, IZA Discussion Paper, 1240.
54. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, Journal of Econometrics, Vol: 142(1), 50-93.
55. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence, Econometrics Journal, Vol: 11 (1), 105-127.
56. Sadeghi, P., Shahrestani, H., Hojhabr Kiani, K., & Torabi, T. (2018). The impact of human capital on fdi with new evidence from bootstrap panel granger causality analysis, Iranian Economic Review, 22(1), 215-233.
57. Sequeira, T. N., & Martins, E. V. (2008). Education public financing and economic growth: an endogenous growth model versus evidence. Empirical Economics, 35, 361-377.
58. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
59. Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica, 38 (2), 311-323.
60. Tkhir, A. M. (2021). Education and tax policies in the presence of informality. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/242394/1/vfs-2021-pid-49792.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 27.01.2025
61. Tuomala, M. (1986). On the optimal income taxation and educational decisions. Journal of Public Economics, 30(2), 183-198.
62. Turner, N. (2016). Tax expenditures for education. Department of the Treasury. Verbic, M., Majcen, B., Cok, M., 2009. Education and economic growth in Slovenia: a dynamic general equilibrium approach with endogenous growth. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 17817. Institute for Economic Research, Ljublijana.
63. Voyvoda, E., & c Yeldan, E. (2000). Financing of public education in a debt constrained economy: Investigation of fiscal alternatives in an OLG model of endogenous growth for Turkey. İçinde: The Sources of European Growth, Spain.
64. Zellner, A. (1962). An efficiency method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests for aggregation bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348-368.
65. Zubairi, A., & Rose, P. (2016). Raising domestic resources for equitable education. Research for Equitable Access and Learning (REAL) Centre, University of Cambridge.