PERCEPTION OF INNOVATION AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS: THE CASE OF IZMIR

Abstract

Innovation literature includes studies observing the differentiation in perceptions related to stakeholders, industries, products/services etc. Despite, no similar studies are carried in Izmir, therefore the purpose of research is to understand and analyze the perception and concept of innovation in Izmir, Turkey. Sample size consists of 94 residents, where snowball sampling method is used. According to results 14% of the respondents stated that environment for innovation is not very satisfactory while 66 % of the respondents believed that there are promising developments. The study presents various perspectives of innovation for both practitioners and researchers

Keywords

• Innovation Perception,Innovative Firms and Sectors,Izmir,Turkey

İNOVASYON VE KARAKTERİSTİKLERİNİN ALGILANMASI: İZMİR ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

İnovasyonun literatüründe, paydaşlar, endüstriler, ürün ve hizmet gibi unsurlarla ilişkili olarak algıdaki farklılıkları inceleyen çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Buna rağmen, İzmir’de buna benzer bir çalışma yapılmamıştır, bu sebeple araştırmanın amacı, inovasyon kavramının İzmir’deki algısını anlamak ve analiz etmektir. Örneklem büyüklüğü İzmir’de yaşayan 94 kişidir ve kartopu örneklem yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre katılımcıların yüzde 14’ü, inovasyonun bölgede tatmin edici düzeyde olmadığına inanmaktadı, yüzde 66’sı ise İzmir’de umut veren gelişmeler olduğuna inanmaktadır. Çalışma hem uygulayıcılar hem de araştırmacılar için farklı bakış açıları sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovasyon Algısı,İnovatif Firmalar ve Sektörler,İzmir,Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Abadi, A. (2014). A study of innovation perception within the construction industry (PhD Thesis). University of Manchester.
2. Akalın, Ş. A. (2007). Innovation, inovasyon: Yenileşim. Türk Dili Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayını, XCIII (666), 483-486.
3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10 (1), 123-167.
4. Anamaria, R. & Maria-Cristina, I. (2013). Consumer’s perception on innovation in the tourism value chain, Annals of The University of Oradea. Economic Science Series, 22 (1), 815-824.
5. Besier, S. (2015). Generational perceptions of pro-environmental packaging advantages; A case study of the packaging innovation of ‘compressed’ deodorants in Germany. Uwf Umweltwirtschaftsforum, (4), 315. doi:10.1007/s00550-015-0375-2.
6. Charles, B. & Issifu, Y. (2015). Innovation in education: Students’ perceptions of implementing ICT in learning in second-cycle institutions in Ghana. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 1512-1519. doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.07.103.
7. Dabrowska, J., Fiegenbaum, I., & Kutvonen, A. (2013). Mapping the perception and reality of open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17 (6), 1-25.
8. Daly, J. (2000). Sage advice: An exclusive interview with Peter Drucker. Retrieved July 8, 2017, from http://www.ghandchi.com/iranscope/Anthology/Drucker-SageAdvice.htm

9. Damanpour, F. & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top Managers. British Journal of Management, 17 (3), 215-236.
10. Dasgupta, M. & Gupta, R. K. (2009). Innovation in organizations a review of the role of organizational learning and knowledge management. Global Business Review, 10 (2), 203-224.
11. Drazin, R. & Schoonhoven, B. C. (1996). Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1065-1083.
12. Gleim, M. R., Lawson, S. J., & Robinson, S. G. (2015). When perception isn’t reality: an examination of consumer perceptions of innovation. Marketing Management Journal, 25 (1), 16-26.
13. Gorghiu, G., Anghel, G. A., & Ion, R. (2015). Students’ perception related to a responsible research and innovation demarche. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014: Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, November 7 – 9, 2014, 600-605. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.166.
14. Hanush H., & Pyka A. (2007). Applying a comprehensive neo-schumpeterian approach to Europe and its Lisbon agenda. In 50 Years of EU Economic Dynamics (pp. 275-299). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
15. Iorgulescu, M., & Răvar, A. S. (2013). Measuring managers’ perception of innovation in the Romanian hospitality industry. Procedia economics and finance, International Economic Conference of Sibiu 2013 Post Crisis Economy: Challenges and Opportunities - IECS, pp: 512-522, doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00169-X.
16. Izmir Young Businessman Association (2015). İGİD inovasyon ödülleri, Retrieved April 13, 2016, from http://www.igid.org.tr/index.php
17. IZTEKGEB İnovasyon Merkezi (n.d.), İnovasyon Merkezi Hakkında, Retrieved April 13, 2016, from http://inovasyonmerkezi.blogspot.com.tr/p/hakknda.html
18. Kesken, J., Soyuer, H., Çağraz, B., İlic, D. K., Ünnü, N. A. A., Kocamaz, M., Çiçekli, U. G., Aracıoğlu, B., & Koçak, A. (2014). Çalışanlar perspektifinden inovatif iş davranışının belirleyicileri: İzmir ilindeki öncelikli sektörlere ilişkin bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 3 (4), 25-48.
19. Karaata, S., Kesici, E., Hacıoglu, F., Dalgıc, G., Arbak, H., Nazlı, M., & Taspınar, P. (2016). İzmir yenilik başarı hikayeleri. Izmir Development Agency, Retrieved March 1, 2016, from http://www.investinizmir.com/en/html/1128/Izmir+in+Numbers
20. Karaca, Y. (2013). Hizmetlerde inovasyon ve tüketici algısına etkisi: Yolcu taşımacılığı sektöründe bir araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 195-212.
21. Lowe, B. & Alpert, F. (2015). Forecasting consumer perception of innovativeness. Technovation, 45/461-14. doi:10.1016/j.technovation. 2015.02.001
22. OECD-Eurostat (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd Edition.
23. Okereke, E., Aminu, A., Butera, J., Mohammed, B., Tanko, M., Yisa, I., & Tukur, J. (2015). An innovation for improving maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) service delivery in Jigawa state, northern Nigeria: A qualitative study of stakeholders’ perceptions about clinical mentoring. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), doi:10.1186/s12913-015- 0724-4.
24. Onişor, L. & Roşca, M. (2013). Product innovation effect on consumer’s perceptions. International Journal of Management Science & Technology Information, (9), 17-26.
25. Pop, A. N., Săniuță, A., & Roman, M. (2012). Perception and communication of innovation in retail trade, Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Science Series, 21 (1), 1200-1208.
26. Roussy, C., Ridier, A., & Chaib, K. (2014). A methodological proposal to approach farmers’ adoption behavior: Stated preferences and perceptions of the innovation. 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
27. Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). The innovation effect of user design: exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing, 76 (5), 18-32.
28. Sledzik, K. (2013). Schumpeter’s view on innovation and entrepreneurship. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=225778
29. Stone, A., Rose, S., Lal, B., & Shipp, S. (2008). Measuring innovation and intangibles: A business perspective. Washington: Institute For Defense Analyses - Science and Technology Institute.
30. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (2015). TÜBİTAK duyurular. Retrieved April 13, 2016, from http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/kurumsal/politikalar/icerik- girisimci-ve-yenilikci-universite-endeksi
31. Shuman, J. & Twombly, J. (2010). Collaborative networks are the organization: An innovation in organization design and management. Vikalpa, 35 (1), 1-13.
32. Temel, S. T., Akdeniz, R. T., & Sukan, F. T. (2011). Ar-Ge ve inovasyon açısından İzmir KOBİ’lerinin durumu. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 48 (555), 83.
33. Temel, S. T., Akdeniz, R. T., & Sukan, F. T. (2013). Bilgi tabanlı ekonomilere geçişte üniversitelerin ve üniversite-sanayi işbirliğinin yeri ve önemi: İzmir örneği. Finans, Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 50 (578), 31-46.
34. Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Review, 3 (3), 169-183.
35. Yanchenko, Z. B. (2013). Improvement of terminological approaches to innovation notion definition. Problems of Economy, (2), 196-200.
36. Yılmaz, T. (2010). Küçük ve orta ölçekli imalat işletmelerinde yenilik (inovasyon) yönetimi: İzmir ili örneği (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.