SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİNDE TEDARİKÇİ DEĞERLENDİRME KRİTERLERİNİN DEMATEL YÖNTEMİYLE İNCELENMESİ VE AHŞAP SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Tedarikçi seçimi birbiri ile çelişkili hedeflerin maksimizasyonunu amaçladığından çok kriterli karar verme problemleri arasında kabul edilmektedir. İşletmeler müşterilerin taleplerini yerine getirebilmek için ekonomik faktörlerin yanı sıra, çevresel ve sosyal faktörleri de önemle dikkate almaktadır. Çalışmanın ana amacı sürdürülebilir bir tedarik zinciri içerisinde tedarikçi seçimi kriterlerinin değerlendirilmesi, hangi kriterlerin daha fazla ağırlığa sahip olduğunun belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada, sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri performansını değerlendirmek için ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal faktörleri kapsayan bir kavramsal çerçeve geliştirilmiştir. Bu 3 ana kritere ek olarak 9 tane alt kriter de çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada doğal ahşap kaplama sektöründe faaliyet göstermekte olan bir firmanın tedarikçi seçimi konusunda sürdürülebilirlik performanslarını ölçebilmek için DEMATEL yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Uygulamanın sonunda her kritere ait ağırlık derecesi hesaplanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında değerlendirilen firma için sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçim kriterlerinde öncelikle ekonomik, daha sonra sosyal ve çevresel boyutun önemli olarak görüldüğü, tedarik maliyetinin en önemli performans kriteri olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Kriterlerin etkileyen ve etkilenen şeklinde birbirlerine göre önem seviyesi belirlenmiştir. İşletmenin tedarikçi seçiminde odaklanması gereken performans kriterleri ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi
• Tedarikçi Seçimi
• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
• DEMATEL
• Üçlü Bilanço Yaklaşımı

REVIEW OF SUPPLIER EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT BY DEMATEL METHOD AND AN APPLICATION IN THE WOOD SECTOR

Abstract

Supplier selection is considered among the most criterional decision-making problems as it aims to maximize conflicting targets. In order to meet the demands of customers, enterprises take environmental and social factors into account as well as economic factors. The main objective of the study is to evaluate supplier selection criteria within a sustainable supply chain and to determine which criteria have more weight. In the study, a conceptual framework has been developed by taking into account economic, environmental and social factors in order to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain performance. In addition to these 3 main criteria, 9 sub-criteria are also included in the study. In this study, the DEMATEL method is applied to measure the sustainability performance of suppliers in the sustainable supply chain of a company operating in the natural wood coating sector. At the end of the practice, the weight rating of each criterion is calculated. It has been revealed that the economic, then social and environmental dimension is considered important in the sustainable supplier selection criteria for the company evaluated within the scope of the study and that the cost of supply is the most important performance criterion. The criteria are divided into affecting and affected by evaluating the level of importance relative to each other. It has been shown that the enterprise should focus on which performance criteria in the supplier selection.

Keywords

• Sustainable Supply Chain Management
• Supplier Selection
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• DEMATEL
• Triple Bottom Line

Kaynakça

1. Abdel-Baset, M., Chang, V., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2019). An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field. Computers in Industry, 106, 94-110.
2. Abdullah, L., Chan, W., & Afshari, A. (2019). Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: A comparative result based on preference functions. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(2), 271-285.
3. Acar, Ö.E., & Köylüoğlu, A.S. (2020). Sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçiminin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi (AHP) yöntemiyle analizi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(1), 419-440.
4. Aguezzoul, A. (2014). Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, 69-78.
5. Ağar, F. (2010). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde SCOR Modeli, Tedarik Süreci Performans Değerlendirmesi ve Scorcard Uygulaması (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
6. Ahi, M., & T. Yildiz, K. (2020). Innovative decision support model for construction supply chain performance management. Production Planning & Control, 1-13.
7. Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 360-377.
8. Ahmadi, H. B., Petrudi, S. H. H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9), 2413-2427.

9. Akman, G. & Alkan, A. (2006). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bulanık AHP yöntemi kullanılarak tedarikçilerin performansının ölçülmesi: Otomotiv yan sanayiinde bir uygulama. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Yıl: 5 Sayı: 9 Bahar 2006/1 s.23-46.
10. Aktas, E., Agaran, B., Ulengin, F., & Onsel, S. (2011). The use of outsourcing logistics Activities: The case of Turkey. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(5), 833- 852.
11. Alkan, A., Kasımoğlu, H. Ç., Çelik, C., & Aladağ, Z. (2017). AHP ve PROMETHEE yöntemleri ile lastik üreticisi bir firma için tedarikçi seçimi. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 21(2), 261-269.
12. Altuntaş, C. & Türker, D. (2012). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirleri: sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının içerik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(3): 39-64.
13. Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied soft computing, 12(6), 1668-1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
14. Ansari ZN. & Kant R. (2017). A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2524-2543.
15. Ar, I. M., Göksen, H., & Tuncer, M. A. (2015). Kablo sektöründe tedarikçi seçimi için Bütünlesik DEMATEL-AAS-VIKOR yönteminin kullanilması/Using Integrated DEMATEL-ANP-VIKOR Method for Supplier Selection in Cable Sector. Ege Akademik Bakis, 15(2), 285.
16. Arabsheybani, A., Paydar, M. M., & Safaei, A. S. (2018). An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier's risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 577-591.
17. Arıkan, M. & Gökbek, B. (2014). Çok ölçütlü karar verme yaklaşımlarına dayalı tedarikçi seçimi: Elektronik sektöründe bir uygulama, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30 (5): 346-354.
18. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International journal of production economics, 126(2), 370-378.
19. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117.
20. Awasthi, A., Kaur, J., Sidhu, R., Chauhan, S., & Goyal, S. (2018). A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 312-332.
21. Aydın, Y., & Eren, T. (2018). Savunma sanayiinde stratejik ürün için çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile tedarikçi seçimi.
22. Ayvaz, B., Boltürk, E., & Kaçtıoğlu, S. (2015). Supplier selection with TOPSIS method in fuzzy environment: An applicatıon in banking sector. Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 33(3).
23. Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Saen, R. F., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2015). A new Fuzzy DEA Model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers And Operations Research, 54, 274-285.
24. Azadnia, A. H., Ghadimi, P., Saman, M. Z. M., Wong, K. Y., & Heavey, C. (2013). An integrated approach for sustainable supplier selection using fuzzy logic and fuzzy AHP. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 315, pp. 206-210). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
25. Azadnia, A. H., Ghadimi, P., Yusof, N. M., & Saman, M. Z. M. (2012). A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: a case study in automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 10-21.
26. Azimifard, A., Moosavirad, S. H., & Ariafar, S. (2018). Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods. Resources Policy, 57, 30-44.
27. Bai, C. & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics,124(1), 252-264.
28. Bakir S, Khan S, Ahsan K., & Rahman S. (2018). Exploring the critical determinants of environmentally oriented public procurement using the dematel method. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 325-335.
29. Balıbaş, B. (2020). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Sürdürülebilir Tedarikçi Seçimi: Katı Atık İşleme Tesisinde Bir Uygulama (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Endüstri Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Karabük Üniversitesi.
30. Barrios, M. O., Jiménez, H. F., &Isaza, S. N. (2014). Comparative analysis between anp and anp-dematel for six sigma project selection process in a healthcare provider. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8868, 413–416.
31. Baynal, K. & Yüzügüllü, E. (2013). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde analitik ağ süreci ile tedarikçi seçimi ve bir uygulama. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 42(1).
32. Beşkese, A., & Evecen, C. (2012). Supplier selection in healthcare sector. Journal of Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology, 16(1), 91-94.
33. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in industry, 62(2), 164-174.
34. Carter, C.R. & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A Framework Of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
35. Chan, F. T., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C., & Choy, K. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of production research, 46(14), 3825-3857.
36. Chang, B., Chang, C.-W., & Wu, C.-H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3),1850-1858. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114
37. Chen, Y., Okudan, G. E., & Riley, D. R. (2010). Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in construction, 19(2),235-244.
38. Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836.
39. Cihangir (2019). Tedarikçi seçimi kriterlerinin dematel yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi: Yapı kimyasalları sektöründe örnek uygulama. 30 Ağustos Bilimsel Araştırmalar Sempozyumu.
40. Colicchia, C., Marchet, G., Melacini, M. & Perotti, S. (2013). Building environmental sustainability: Empirical Evidence From Logistics Service Providers Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 197-209
41. Çalık, A., Pehlivan, N. Y., & Kahraman, C. (2018). An integrated fuzzy AHP/DEA approach for performance evaluation of territorial units in Turkey. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(4), 1280-1302.
42. Çelik F., & Çağıl G. (2021). Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Tedarikçi Seçimi; Bir Traktör Fabrikasi Örneği. DEÜFMD 23(68), 607-619.
43. Çiçek, T., Yıldız, M.S., & Durak, İ. (2020). The selection of the most suitable supplier in sustainable supply chain with AHP, TOPSIS and ELECTRE Methods. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Eurasian Econometrics, Statistics & Emprical Economic Journal, 16, 1-18.
44. Dai, J., & Blackhurst, J. (2012). A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(19), 5474-5490.
45. Dargi, A., Anjomshoae, A., Galankashi, M. R., Memari, A., & Tap, M. B. M. (2014). Supplier selection: A fuzzy-ANP approach. Procedia computer science, 31, 691-700.
46. Dawei, Z., Chin, T. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Rasli, A. (2014). Supply chain integration implementation and operational capability in SMEs: A literature review and a research agenda. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (ICSTSS) 2012 (pp. 285-290). Springer, Singapore.
47. De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European journal of purchasing supply management, 7(2), 75-89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9
48. Demirtaş, Ö., Zaralı, F., & Doğan, S. (2020). Bulanık ortamda tedarikçi seçimi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 457-472.
49. Dickson, G.W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing 2(1), 5–17.
50. Doğan, A. (2017). Bulanık Ortamda Üçlü Performans Yaklaşımına Dayalı Sürdürülebilir Tedarikçi Seçimi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Anabilim Dalı, Bilişim Enstitüsü.
51. Dong, C., Boute, R., McKinnon, A., & Verelst, M. (2018). Investigating synchromodality from a supply chain perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 42-57.
52. Dou, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2010). A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 567-592.
53. Durmaz, E. D., Akgündüz, E., & Şahin, R. (2017). Tedarikçi seçim probleminde hedef programlama ve MOORA yöntemi: Uygulama çalışması. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 1021-1044.
54. Ecemiş, O. & Yaykaşlı, M., (2018). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleriyle sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi ve bir uygulama. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı: 83,382-399.
55. Ellram, L. M. (1990). The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. Journal of Purchasing and materials Management,26(4), 8-14.
56. Eren, T., & Özder, E. H. 2016. Çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemleri ile bir içecek firması için tedarikçi seçimi. In 4th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science, Alanya/Antalya-Turkey.
57. Eskandarpour, M., Dejax, P., Miemczyk, J., & Péton, O. (2015). Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega, 54, 11-32.
58. Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E., Musa, S., Khezrimotlagh, D., & Wong, K. (2015). An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 1-19. Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N., Wong, K. Y., & Noori, S. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 391-410.
59. Fontela, E., Gabus, A., (1976). The DEMATEL Observer. DEMATEL Report.Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland, Geneva.
60. Ghadimi, P., & Heavey, C. (2014). Sustainable supplier selection in medical device industry: toward sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Cirp, 15, 165-170.
61. Ghayebloo, S., Tarokh, M. J., & Abedzadeh, M. (2013). Closed-loop supply chain network with green supplier selection and disassembly of products: A bi-objective model. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering, 2(4), 58-71.
62. Ghodsypour, S. H., & O‘Brien, C. A, (1998). Decision support system for supplier selection using an in¬tegrated analytical hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of Production Economics, 56–57, 199–212.
63. Ghorabaee, K. M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017). Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of MADM approaches. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 1073-1118. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314828
64. Girubha, J., Vinodh, S., & Vimal, K. E. K. (2016). Application of interpretative structural modelling integrated multi criteria decision making methods for sustainable supplier selection. Journal of Modelling in Management.
65. Gold, S., & Awasthi, A. (2015). Sustainable global supplier selection extended towards sustainability risks from (1+ n) th tier suppliers using fuzzy AHP based approach. Ifac-Papersonline,48(3), 966-971.
66. Govindan, K., Jha, P.C., Agarwal, V. ve Darbari, J.D. (2019). Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 236(2019), 784-797.
67. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7207-7220.
68. Govindan, K., Sarkis, J. & Palaniappan, M. (2013). An analytic network process-based multicriteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(1–4), 863-880.
69. Gören, H. G. (2018). A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1156-1169.
70. Görener, A. (2013). Tedarik zinciri stratejisi seçimi: Bulanık VIKOR yöntemiyle imalat sektöründe bir uygulama. Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business/Alanya Isletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3).
71. Güner, H., & Mutlu, Ö. (2005). Bulanık AHP ile tedarikçi seçim problemi ve bir uygulama.
72. Güray, E., Yayla, A. Y., & Yildiz, K. (2015). A Choquet integral-based model for sustainable performance of suppliers. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
73. He, H., & Cheng, H. (2012). Analyzing key influence factors of city logistics development using the fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. African Journal of Business Management, 6(45), 11281-11293.
74. Hori, S., & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Eng. Pract., 7(11), 1413-1419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00112-4
75. Hsu, C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2009). Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. Journal of cleaner production, 17(2), 255-264.
76. Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 56, 164-172.
77. Hussain, M., Awasthi, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). An ISM-ANP integrated framework for evaluating alternatives for sustainable supply chain management. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(5-6), 3671-3687.
78. Jain, V., Sangaiah, A. K., Sakhuja, S., Thoduka, N., & Aggarwal, R. (2018). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry. Neural computing and applications, 29(7), 555-564.
79. Jeng, Don J.F. (2015). Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration usingthe fuzzy DEMATEL. Comput. Ind. Eng. 87, 283–295.
80. Kang, H. Y., Lee, A. H., & Yang, C. Y. (2012). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1477-1488.
81. Kannan, G., Murugesan, P., Senthil, P., & Noorul Haq, A. (2009). Multicriteria group decision making for the third party reverse logistics service provider in the supply chain model using fuzzy TOPSIS for transportation services. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 11(2), 162-181.
82. Kara, İ., & Ecer, F. (2016). AHP-VIKOR entegre yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi: tekstil sektörü uygulaması. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 18: 2 255-272
83. Karagöz, S. (2009). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde tedarikçi seçimi ve AHP ile uygulaması. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
84. Keskin, G. A., İlhan, S., & Özkan, C. (2010). The Fuzzy ART algorithm: A categorization method for supplier evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1235-1240.
85. Koç, T. (2020). Bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri kullanarak sürdürülebilir tedarikçi değerlendirme (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.
86. Koç, E. (2019). Uluslararası tedarikçi seçim probleminde Bulanık DEMATEL yönteminin kullanımı. Journal of Social Sciences Institute/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(17).
87. Kolbin, V.V. (2003). Decision making and programming. World Sci-entific, Singapore.
88. Köroğlu, E. (2019). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri için kömür termik santrallerinde tedarikçi seçimi: AHP Uygulaması. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ekonometri Anabilim Dalı.
89. Kumar, A., Pal, A., Vohra, A., Gupta, S., Manchanda, S., & Dash, M. K. (2018). Construction of capital procurement decision making model to optimize supplier selection using Fuzzy Delphi and AHP-DEMATEL. Benchmarking: an international journal.
90. Leblebicioğlu, B. & Keskin, A. (2021). Evaluation of supplier selection criteria with fuzzy DEMATEL method: An application on the pharmacy ındustry. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (23), 236-242.
91. Li, S., Rao, S. S., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2005). Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. Journal of operations management, 23(6), 618-641.
92. Liang, F., Peng, X., & Liang, Z. (2016). Evaluation on comprehensive energy efficiency of power distribution network based on DEMATEL-ANP-AEW-TOPSIS. Guangdong Electric Power, 01.
93. Lima Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied soft computing, 21, 194-209.
94. Lin, K. M., Chen, W. C., Chang, H. P., & Kan, N. H. (2015). An efficient model for npd performance evaluation using DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP—Applied to the TFT-LCD touch panel industry in Taiwan. Energies, 8(10), 11973-12003.
95. Lin, K. P., Tseng, M. L., & Pai, P. F. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 134-142. doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.017
96. Lin, R.J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chainmanagement practices. J. Clean. Prod. 40, 32–39.
97. Liu, H.T. & Wang, W.K. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4387-4398.
98. Liu, T., Deng, Y., & Chan, F. (2018). Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1321-1333.
99. Luthra, S. ve Mangla, S.K. (2018). When strategies matter: adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices in an emerging economy’s context. resources. Conservation and Recycling, 138, 194-206.
100. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698.
101. Madenoğlu, F. S. (2020). Dengeli Puan Kart-AHP-MARCOS yöntemlerine dayalı tedarikçi seçimi, Business and Organization Research, 2(2), pp. 99-120
102. Mehregan, M. R., Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Merikhi, B. (2014). Analysis of interactions among sustainability supplier selection criteria using ISM and fuzzy DEMATEL. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 7(3), 270-294.
103. Memari, A., Dargib, A., Jokara, M.R.A., Ahmad, R. ve Rahim, R.A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50: 9-24.
104. Mohammed, H. J., Mat Kasim, M., & Mohd Shaharanee, I. N. (2018). Evaluation of e-learning approaches using AHP TOPSIS technique. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(1-10), 7-10.
105. Neumüller, C., Kellner, F., Gupta, J. N., & Lasch, R. (2015). Integrating three-dimensional sustainability in distribution centre selection: The process analysis method-based analytic network process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 409-434.
106. Odeh, M., & Smallwood, J. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: Literature review, trends, and framework. International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, 15(1), 85-90.
107. Orji, I. J., & Wei, S. (2014). A decision support tool for sustainable supplier selection in manufacturing firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 7(5), 1293-1315.
108. Özçakar, N., & Demir, H. (2011). Bulanik Topsis Yöntemiyle Tedarikçi Seçimi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, 22(69), 25-44.
109. Öztürk, B. A., & Özçelik, F. (2014). Sustainable supplier selection with a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method based on triple bottom line. Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(3), 129.
110. Öztürk, H., Pekel, E., & Elevli, B. (2018). Using ANP and ELECTRE methods for supplier selection: cable industry application. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(5), 1190-1198.
111. Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R. & Lario F. C. (2009). Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: A review, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3-4), 400-420, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1715-y
112. Rajesh, G., & Malliga, P. (2013). Supplier selection based on AHP QFD methodology. Procedia Engineering, 64, 1283-1292.
113. Ross C.A., (1998). Competiting through supply chain management, creating market– winning strategies through supply chain partnerships. Material Management/Logistics Series, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher,32-33.
114. Saen, R. F. (2007). A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: Accounting for nonhomogeneity is important. Applied mathematics and computation, 185(1), 84-95.
115. Sağnak, M. (2020). Mobilya sektöründe sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi performans değerlendirmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (26), 97-114.
116. Sarı U., İ., Çayır Ervural, B., & Bozat, S. (2017). Analyzing criteria used in supplier evaluation by DEMATEL method in sustainable supply chain management and an application to health sector. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23(4), 477-485.
117. Sarkis, J., Meade, L. M., & Presley, A. R. (2012). Incorporating sustainability into contractor evaluation and team formation in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 40-53.
118. Seuring, S. & Müller, M. (2008). From a literatüre review to a conceptual framework for sustainable. Journal of cleaner production 16, 1699-1710.
119. Si SL, You XY, Liu HC., & Zhang P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-33.
120. Soner, S., & Önüt, S. (2006). Multi-criteria supplier selection: An ELECTRE-AHP application. Sigma, 4, 110-120.
121. Song, W., Ming, X., & Liu, H. C. (2017). Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 100-115.
122. Su, C. M., Horng, D. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., Wu, K. J., & Chen, H. P. (2016). Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach. Journal of cleaner production, 134, 469-481.
123. Şenkayas, H., & Hekimoğlu, H. (2013). Çok kriterli tedarikçi seçim problemine PROMETHEE yöntemi uygulaması. Verimlilik Dergisi (2).
124. Şenocak, A. A., & Gören, H. G. (2016). An integrated approach for sustainable supplier selection in fuzzy environment. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 130-135.
125. Şişman, B. (2018). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansını geliştirmede en uygun alternatif faaliyetlerin bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14, 83-98.
126. Tavana, M., Yazdani, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2017). An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(3), 254-275.
127. Tavana, M., Zareinejad, M., Di Caprio, D., & Kaviani, M. A. (2016). An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 544-557.
128. Toklu, M. C., Çağıl, G., Pazar, E., & Faydalı, R. (2018). SWARA-WASPAS metodolojisine dayalı tedarikçi seçimi: Türkiye'de demir-çelik endüstrisi örneği. Akademik Platform Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 113-120.
129. Tsai WH, & Chou W.C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and ZOGP”. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
130. Tseng ML, & Lin YH. (2009). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158(1-4), 519-533.
131. Türkoğlu, M. (2016). Bulanık analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ile tedarikçi seçimi ve bir uygulama (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
132. Tzeng GH, Chiang CH., & Li CW. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL”. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
133. Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC
134. Uysal F. (2012). An integrated model for sustainable performance measurement in supply chain. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 689-694.
135. Ünal, Z. (2015). Tedarikçi seçiminde bulanık AHP ve TAGUCHI kayıp fonksiyonunun kullanımı: Bir otel işletmesinde uygulama. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
136. Valmohammadi, C., & Sofiyabadi, J. (2015). Modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map using fuzzy DEMATEL and fourth generation of balanced scorecard. Benchmarking: An International Journal.
137. Verdecho, M. J., Alfaro-Saiz, J. J., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R. (2010). An approach to select suppliers for sustainable collaborative networks. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 304-311). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
138. Vonderembse, M. A., & Tracey, M. (1999). The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance. Journal of supply chain management, 35(2), 33-39.
139. W.W. Wu, (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach, Expert Syst. Appl. 35 828–835.
140. Wan, S. P., Xu, G. L., & Dong, J. Y. (2017). Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 385, 19-38.
141. Weber, C.A. (1991). A decision support system using multicriteria techniques for vendor selection. University Micro"lms International, Ann Arbor, MI. Wittstruck, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2012). Integrating the concept of sustainability into the partner selection process: a fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 12(2), 195-226.
142. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York.
143. Wu, C. M., Hsieh, C. L., & Chang, K. L. (2013). A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013.
144. Wu, W.W., ve Lee, Y.T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
145. Yalçın, A. S., & Kılıç, H. S. (2018). A model for supplier selection under environmental considerations. 16th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress October 18-20, 2018, Denizli, Turkey.
146. Yayla, A.Y., Oztekin, A., Gumus, A.T. ve Gunasekaran, A. (2015). A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6097-6113.
147. Yeh, T. M., & Huang, Y. L. (2014). Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP. Renewable Energy, 66, 159-169.
148. Zimmer K, Frohling M, Schultmann F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management–a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. Int J Prod Res;54(5):1412–42.