SHADOW ECONOMY AND INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY RELATIONSHIP IN OECD COUNTRIES

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 51 - 66, 01.01.2018

Erdoğan Teyyare

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018137573

Cited By: 4

Öz

Shadow economy is described as an activities which are out of national income accounts by legal or illegal methods in spite of being in a countries’ economic activities. Behind economical, fiscal, legal and social factors, institutional factors also effect the size of shadow economy. Lower shadow economy is expected with higher institutional quality. In this study, institutional quality and shadow economy relationship in OECD countries is investigated for 2003-2013 period by panel data model GMM-system estimate approach. Evidence from estimation shows that institutional quality is an essential tool for prohibiting the shadow economy

Anahtar Kelimeler

Shadow Economy, Institutional Quality, OECD, GMM-system

OECD ÜLKELERİNDE KAYIT DIŞI EKONOMİ VE KURUMSAL KALİTE İLİŞKİSİ

Öz

Bir ülkenin iktisadi faaliyetleri içinde yer aldığı halde yasal veya yasal olmayan yöntemler ile milli gelir hesapları dışında kalan faaliyetler olarak ifade edilen kayıt dışı ekonominin ortaya çıkmasında iktisadi, mali, hukuki ve sosyal faktörlerin yanı sıra kurumsal faktörlerin de etkisi bulunmaktadır. Kurumsal kalite düzeyi daha iyi olan ülkelerde kayıt dışı ekonominin daha düşük olması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışmada OECD ülkelerinde kurumsal kalite kayıt dışı ekonomi ilişkisi 2003-2013 dönemi için panel veri modeli GMM-Sistem tahmin yaklaşımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular kayıt dışının önlenmesinde kurumsal kalitenin önemli bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kayıt Dışı Ekonomi, Kurumsal Kalite, OECD, GMM-sistem

Kaynakça

• Anderson, T.W. & Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 589-606.
• Anderson, T.W. & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47-82.
• Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error- components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
• Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some test specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277- 299.
• Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99-135.
• Biswas, A.K., Farzanegan, M.R., & Thum, M. (2012). Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: Theory and evidence. Ecological Economics, 75(3), 114-125.
• Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
• Bovi, M. (2002). The nature of the underground economy: Some evidence from OECD countries, institute for studies and economic analyses working paper. Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016, https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.
• Çetintaş, H. & Vergil, H. (2003). Türkiye’de kayıtdışı ekonominin tahmini. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 4(1), 15-30.
• De Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world, (Translator: June A.), Newyork: NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
• Dreher A. & Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. IZA Discussion Paper, (1936), Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016, http://ftp.iza.org/dp1936.pdf.
• Dreher, A., Kotsogiannis, C., & Mccorriston, S. (2005). How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy. Econ WPA Public Economics Series, Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016, http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/pe/papers/0502/0502012.pdf.
• Feige, E. (1990). Defining and estimating underground and informal economies: The new institional economcs approach. World Development, 18(7), 989-1002.
• Frey, B. & Pommerehne, W. (1984). The hidden economy: State and prospect for measurement. Review of Income and Wealth, 30(1), 1-23.
• Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D. & Pablo Z.L. (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 459-493.
• GİB (2009). Kayıt dışı ekonomiyle mücadele stratejisi eylem planı (2008 – 2010), Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı Yayınları No: 87, Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2016, http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/beyannamerehberi/Kayit_disi_2009tr.pdf.
• Gutmann, P. M. (1977). The subterranean economy. Financial Analysts Journal, 33(6), 24-27.
• Johnson S., Kaufmann, D. & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory discretion and corruption. American Economic Review, 88(2), 387-392.
• North, D. C. (2005). Institutions and the performance of economies over time. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, (Der: Claude Me´nard & Mary M. Shirley), Springer, Netherlands.
• North, D. C. (2010). Kurumlar, kurumsal değişim ve ekonomik performans. (Çev.: Gül Çağalı Güven), İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• OECD. (2012). Reducing opportunities for tax non-compliancein the underground economy. Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2016, http://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax- administration/49427993.pdf.
• Prokhorov, A. B. (2001). The world unobserved economy: Defınition, measurement, and optimality considerations, Erişim Tarihi:19.04.2016 https://www.google.com.tr/url? sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiEi vXd1JrMAhVKLZoKHYQ6As8QFggfMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibrarian. net%2Fnavon%2Fpaper%2FThe_World_Unobserved_Economy__Definition__ Measure.pdf%3Fpaperid%3D1313072&usg=AFQjCNEBX2uBmYfUuMmcWKFdsxh NZ3OyaQ.
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper 103, Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2016, https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/103.html.
• Savaşan, F. (2011). Türkiye’de kayıtdışı ekonomi ve kayıtdışılıkla mücadelenin serencamı. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı, 35, 1-39.
• Schneider, F. (2012). The shadow economy and work in the shadow: What do we (not) know? IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 6423, Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016. http://ftp.iza.org/ dp6423.pdf.
• Schneider, F. (2015). Size and development of the shadow economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD countries from 2003 to 2015: Different developments, Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016, http://www.econ.jku.at/members/Schneider/files/publications/2015/ShadEcEurope31. pdf.
• Schneider, F. & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77–114.
• Schneider, F. & Teobaldelli, D. (2012). Beyond the veil of ignorance: The ınfluence of direct democracy on the shadow economy. CESIFO Working Paper, No. 3749, Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2016, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_3749.html.
• Singh, A., Jain-Chandra, S. & Mohommad, A. (2012). Inclusive growth, institutions, and the underground economy. IMF Working Paper, No 47, Erişim Tarihi:18.04.2016, https:// www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp1247.pdf.
• Soto, M. (2010). System GMM estimation with a small sample, Erişim Tarihi:27.02.2017 ,http://www.barcelonagse.eu/sites/default/files/working_paper_pdfs/395.pdf.
• Torgler, B.& Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 228-245.
• Tosuner, M. (1995). Vergi kayıp ve kaçakları sorununa ilişkin görüş ve öneriler. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 85, 65-72.
• Us, V. (2004). Kayıtdışı ekonomi tahmini yöntem önerisi: Türkiye örneği. Türkiye ekonomi Kurumu Tartışma Metni, 2004/17, Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2016, http://www.tek.org.tr/ dosyalar/VUSLAT-US1-KAYITDISI.pdf.