PROJE YÖNETİMİNİN KURUMSAL BİR PRATİK OLARAK MUHAFAZASI

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 407 - 427, 30.06.2022

Emre Bulut , Çağrı Topal

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.812416

Öz

Bu çalışma, farklı pek çok aktörün ve departmanın rol oynadığı, karmaşık ve değişken yapıdaki Türk sağlık sektöründe projelerin nasıl başarılı bir şekilde yürütüldüğünü ve proje yönetiminin kurumsal bir pratik olarak nasıl muhafaza edildiğini incelemektedir. Çalışma, proje yönetiminde kuralların/normların ve ilişkilerin bağlantılı şekilde kullanılmasını konu edinmektedir. Kuralların uygulanmasında esnekliğin ve değişik departmanlarca kabul görecek çoklu norm sisteminin yanısıra, karşılıklı güvenin ve durumsal güç pozisyonlarının önemine işaret etmektedir. Çalışma, kapsayıcı kurallara/normlara dayanan ve bu kapsayıcılığın karşılıklı güven ve rol değişimleriyle ilişkilere yansımasını sağlayan gayri resmi bir ortamın, proje yönetiminin başarısı için gerekli olduğunu göstermekte, firmaların proje yönetim pratiklerini iyileştirebilmeleri ve uzun dönemde muhafaza edebilmeleri için öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

KURUMSAL İŞ, KURUMSAL MUHAFAZA, PROJE YÖNETİMİ

MAINTENANCE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT AS AN INSTITUTIONAL PRACTICE

Öz

This study examines how projects are successfully conducted and how project management is maintained as an institutional practice within the complex and dynamic environment of the healthcare industry in Turkey where many different actors and departments are involved. It explores the interdependent operation of rules/norms and relations in project management. It highlights the importance of being flexible in the implementation of rules and developing multiple norms acceptable for different departments. It also emphasizes building trust and reciprocity and using conditional positions of dominance. The study shows that creating an informal environment based on inclusive rules/norms and reflecting them in relations through trust/reciprocity and role reversals are critical for the success of project management. It develops suggestions for companies to improve and ensure the long-term maintenance of project management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

INSTITUTIONAL WORK, INSTITUTIONAL MAINTENANCE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Kaynakça

• Acquier, A., Carbone, V., & Moatti, V. (2018). Teaching the sushi chef: Hybridization work and CSR integration in a Japanese multinational company. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 625-645.
• Andersson, T., & Gadolinb, C. (2020). Understanding institutional work through social interaction in highly institutionalized settings: Lessons from public healthcare organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(2), 1-10.
• Bartram, T., Stanton, P., Bamber, G. J., Leggat, S. G., Ballardie, R., & Gough, R. (2020). Engaging professionals in sustainable workplace innovation: Medical doctors and institutional work. British Journal of Management, 31, 41-55.
• Bjerregaard, T., & Jonasson, C. (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1507-1536.
• Chreim, S., Langley, A., Reay, T., Comeau-Vallee, M., & Huq, J. L. (2020). Constructing and sustaining counter-institutional identities. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 935-964.
• Collien, I., Sieben, B., & Müller-Camen, M. (2016). Age work in organizations: Maintaining and disrupting institutionalized understandings of higher age. British Journal of Management, 27, 778-795.
• Creed, W. E. D., Dejordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336-1364.
• Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937-962.
• Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393-1418.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp 1-32). London: Sage.
• Empson, L., Cleaver, I., & Allen, J. (2013). Managing partners and management professionals: Institutional work dyads in professional partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 808-844.
• Evered, R., Louis, & M. R. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: ‘Inquiry from the inside’ and ‘inquiry from the outside’. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 385-395.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Gephart, R. P. (2004). From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454-462.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
• Grafstrom, M., & Windell, K. (2012). Newcomers conserving the old: Transformation processes in the field of news journalism. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(1), 65-76.
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58-80.
• Hamann, R., & Bertels, S. (2018). The institutional work of exploitation: Employers’ work to create and perpetuate inequality. Journal of Management Studies, 55(3), 394-423.
• Heaphy, E. D. (2013). Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organization Science, 24(5), 1291-1315.
• Herepath, A., & Kitchener, M. (2016). When small bandages fails: The field-level repair of severe and protracted institutional breaches. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1113-1139.
• Koskela-Huotari, K., Edvardsson, B., Jonas, J. M., Sorhammar, D., & Witell, L. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems - breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2964-2971.
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). London: Sage.
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.
• Lefsrud, L. M., & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1477-1506.
• Louis, M. R., & Bartunek, J. M. (1992). Insider/outsider research teams: Collaborations across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(2), 101-110.
• Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggles for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 870-899.
• Mccann, L., Granter, E., Hyde, P., & Hassard, J. (2013). Still blue-collar after all these years? An ethnography of the professionalization of emergency ambulance work. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 750–776.
• PMI (Project Management Institute). (2017). PMBOK guide: A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
• Raviola, E., & Norback, M. (2013). Bringing technology and meaning into institutional work: Making news at an Italian business newspaper. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1171-1194.
• Rodner, V., Roulet, T. J., Kerrigan, F., & Lehn, D. V. (2020). Making space for art: A spatial perspective of disruptive and defensive institutional work in Venezuela’s art world. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1054-1081.
• Styhre, A. (2013). Gender equality as institutional work: The case of the church of Sweden. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(2), 105-120.
• Symon, G., Buehring, A., Johnson, P., & Cassell, C. (2008). Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labor process. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1315-1336.
• Van Maanen, J. (1998). Different strokes: Qualitative research in the Administrative Science Quarterly from 1956 to 1996. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. 8-33) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Wright, A. L., Zammuto, R. F., & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 200–237.
• Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234-254.
• Zilber, T. B. (2009). Institutional Maintenance as Narrative Acts. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 205-235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional logics and institutional work: Should they be agreed? Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39A, 77-96.