DİJİTAL TEKNOLOJİ KAPSAMININ TEKNOLOJİK VE ÖRGÜTSEL YENİLİK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 1127 - 1145, 30.09.2025

Ebru Öztürk Köse

Öz

Yapay zeka, bulut bilişim, akıllı cihazlar, robotik ve blok zinciri gibi dijital teknolojilerin kullanılması firmalar ve örgütler için önemli bir konu başlığıdır. Bu çalışma, teknolojik ve örgütsel inovasyon arasındaki farkları vurgulayarak dijital teknoloji kapsamı ve inovasyon arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Mevcut çalışmalar, dijital teknolojilerin inovasyon üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu öne sürmüştür. Ancak, bazı çalışmalar dijitalleşmenin karanlık taraflarını da vurgulamıştır. Özellikle, bu çalışma, çok çeşitli dijital teknolojiler kullanan firmaların belirli bir noktadan sonra inovasyonda olumsuz getiriler yaşadığını öne sürmektedir. Bu çalışma ayrıca, bu olumsuz getirinin örgütsel inovasyon için gerçekleşme olasılığının daha yüksek olduğunu öne sürmektedir. Bu çalışma, hipotezlerini AB ve AB dışı ülkelerdeki 15,448 firmadan oluşan nihai bir örneklemle Eurostat Flash Eurobarometer No. 486 veri setini kullanarak test etmektedir. Çalışma sonuçları hipotezlerin desteklendiğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, dijital teknoloji kapsamının inovasyonu önce pozitif, belirli bir noktadan sonra negatif etkilediğini ve bu ters-U etkisinin teknolojik inovasyondan daha belirgin bir şekilde örgütsel inovasyon için geçerli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, dijital teknolojilerin olumsuz getirilerini vurgulayarak dijitalleşme literatürüne katkıda bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, dijital teknolojilerin etkisini araştırırken teknolojik ve örgütsel inovasyon arasındaki farkları vurgulayarak dijitalleşme literatürüne katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Teknoloji Kapsamı , Teknolojik Yenilik , Örgütsel Yenilik

THE CURVILINEAR INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY SCOPE ON TECHNOLOGICAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION

Öz

The adoption of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, smart devices, robotics, and blockchain has been an important topic for firms and organizations. This study examines the link between digital technology scope and innovation by highlighting differences between technological and organizational innovation. Existing studies have proposed that digital technologies have positive influence on innovation. However, some studies have also highlighted the dark sides of digitalization. In particular, this study argues that firms using a wide range of digital technologies experience negative returns on innovation after a certain point. This study also proposes that this negative return is more likely to happen for organizational innovation. This study tests its hypotheses by using the Eurostat Flash Eurobarometer No. 486 dataset, with a final sample of 15,448 firms from EU and non-EU countries. The hypotheses are supported. The results suggest that digital technology scope negatively influences innovation after a certain point and this negative curvilinear effect is more pronounced for organizational innovation than technological innovation. This study advances the digitalization literature by highlighting the negative returns of digital technologies. It also contributes to digitalization literature by highlighting the differences between technological and organizational innovation when investigating the impact of digital technologies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Technology Scope , Technological Innovation , Organizational Innovation

Kaynakça

• Ancillai, C., Sabatini, A., Gatti, M., & Perna, A. (2023). Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122307.
• Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F., De Arroyabe, I. F., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79, 102733.
• Athaide, G. A., Jeon, J., Raj, S. P., Sivakumar, K., & Xiong, G. (2025). Marketing innovations and digital technologies: A systematic review, proposed framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(1), 144-165.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
• Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590.
• Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, A. (2013). Digital business strategy: Towards a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
• Birkinshaw, M. M. J. (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 81-88.
• Birkinshaw, M. M. J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
• Blichfeldt, H., & Faullant, R. (2021). Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation-A process-industry perspective. Technovation, 105, 102275.
• Boeker, W., Howard, M. D., Basu, S., & Sahaym, A. (2021). Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Business Research, 125, 495-507.
• Boss, G., Malladi, P., Quan, D., Legregni, L., & Hall, H. (2007). Cloud computing. IBM White Paper, 321, 224-231.
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
• Caputo, A., Marzi, G., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2016). The internet of things in manufacturing innovation processes: Development and application of a conceptual framework. Business Process Management Journal, 22, 383-402.
• Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196-206.
• Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Piscitello, L. (2021). Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Research Policy, 50(7), 104289.
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
• Dabrowska, J., Almpanopoulou, A., Brem, A., Chesbrough, H., Cucino, V., Di Minin, A., … Ritala, P. (2022). Digital transformation, for better or worse: A critical multi-level research agenda. R&D Management, 52(5), 930-954.
• Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996-1010.
• Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8, 423-454.
• Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “Organizational Lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
• Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24-42.
• Del Giudice, M., Soto-Acosta, P., Carayannis, E., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Emerging perspectives on business process management (BPM): IT-based processes and ambidextrous organizations, theory and practice. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1070-1076.
• Dutta, S., & Folta, T. B. (2016). A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 39-54.
• Eden, R., Jones, A. B., Casey, V., & Draheim, M. (2019). Digital transformation requires workforce transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(1).
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
• Elbanna, A., & Newman, M. (2022). The bright side and the dark side of top management support in digital transformation-A hermeneutical reading. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121411.
• Erevelles, S., Fukawa, N., & Swayne, L. (2016). Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 897-904.
• European Commission, (2020). Flash Eurobarometer 486: SMEs, start-ups, scale-ups and entrepreneurship, February-May 2020. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13639
• Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. (2019). To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 101, 583-590.
• Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2013). Embracing digital technology: A strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1-12.
• Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of AI applications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(1), 76-111.
• Garud, R., & Karunakaran, A. (2018). Process-based ideology of participative experimentation to foster identity challenging innovations: The case of Gmail and AdSense. Strategic Organization, 16(3), 273-303.
• Goduscheit, R. C., & Faullant, R. (2018). Paths towards radical service innovation in manufacturing companies - a service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(5), 701-719.
• Gómez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2017). Does information technology improve open innovation performance? An examination of manufacturers in Spain. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 661-675.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
• Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P. K., & Karahanna. E. (2020). The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 1-8.
• Guinan, P. J., Parise, S., & Langowitz, N. (2019). Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 717-727.
• Gupta, S., & Misra, S. C. (2016). Compliance, network, security and the people related factors in cloud ERP implementation. International Journal of Communication Systems, 29(8), 1395-1419.
• Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes, C. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159-1197.
• Hassan, S. S., Meisner, K., Krause, K., Bzhalava, L., & Moog, P. (2024). Is digitalization a source of innovation? Exploring the role of digital diffusion in SME innovation performance. Small Business Economics, 62(4), 1469-1491.
• Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61.
• Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331-343.
• Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T. S., Ossenbrink, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Technology life-cycles in the energy sector-Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 102-121.
• Hwang, I., & Seo, R. (2025). Organizational support for digital transformation in the metaverse: A contingent pathway from user experience to digitalization resistance. R&D Management, 55(2), 420-437.
• Islam, N., Wang, Q., Marinakis, Y., & Walsh, S. (2022). Family enterprise and technological innovation. Journal of Business Research, 147, 208-221.
• Kim, Y., & Lui, S. S. (2015). The impacts of external network and business group on innovation: Do the types of innovation matter?. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1964-1973.
• Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Patel, P. C., & Gebauer, H. (2020). The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119804.
• Kotha, R., Zheng, Y., & George, G. (2011). Entry into new niches: The effects of firm age and the expansion of technological capabilities on innovative output and impact. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9), 1011-1024.
• Kroh, J., Luetjen, H., Globocnik, D., & Schultz, C. (2018). Use and efficacy of information technology in innovation processes: The specific role of servitization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(5), 720-741.
• Lee, B. C., Moorman, C., Moreau, C. P., Stephen, A. T., & Lehmann, D. R. (2020). The past, present, and future of innovation research. Marketing Letters, 31, 187-198.
• Li, R., Yuan, L., & Jiang, Z. (2024). Management innovation, digital capacity and enterprise innovation performance. Management Decision, 62(12), 3857-3875.
• Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Wang, C. (2025). Digital platform capability and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of strategic flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114971.
• Lian, J. W., Yen, D. C., & Wang, Y. T. (2014). An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 28-36.
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Predicted probabilities for count models. The Stata Journal, 1(1), 51-57.
• Marsh, E., Vallejos, E. P., & Spence, A. (2022). The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review. Computers in Human Behavior, 107118.
• Mithas, S., & Rust, R. T. (2016). How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 223-246.
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238.
• Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.
• Niebel, T., Rasel, F., & Viete, S. (2019). Big data - big gains? Understanding the link between big data analytics and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(3), 296-316.
• Paul, J., Ueno, A., Dennis, C., Alamanos, E., Curtis, L., Foroudi, P., … Wirtz, J. (2024). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary perspective and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13015.
• Piening, E. P., & Salge, T. O. (2015). Understanding the atecenents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80-97.
• Plangger, K., Grewal, D., de Ruyter, K., & Tucker, C. (2022). The future of digital technologies in marketing: A conceptual framework and an overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1125-1134.
• Qin, J., van der Rhee, B., Venkataraman, V., & Ahmadi, T. (2021). The impact of IT infrastructure capability on NPD performance: The roles of market knowledge and innovation process formality. Journal of Business Research, 133, 252-264.
• Radicic, D., & Petković, S. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122474.
• Rousselière, D., Bouchard, M. J., & Rousselière, S. (2024). How does the social economy contribute to social and environmental innovation? Evidence of direct and indirect effects from a European survey. Research Policy, 53(5), 104991.
• Ruiz-Alba, J. L., Guesalaga, R., Ayestarán, R., & Mediano, J. M. (2020). Interfunctional coordination: The role of digitalization. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 404-419.
• Sarbu, M. (2021). The impact of industry 4.0 on innovation performance: Insights from German manufacturing and service firms. Technovation, 113, 102415.
• Sarwar, Z., Gao, J., & Khan, A. (2024). Nexus of digital platforms, innovation capability, and strategic alignment to enhance innovation performance in the Asia Pacific region: A dynamic capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 867-901.
• Sinha, K. K., Raby, S., & Salari, T. (2025). Exploring the scope and depth of digitalisation in times of crisis: Implications for SME resilience. International Small Business Journal.
• Solberg, E., Traavik, L. E., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Digital mindsets: Recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review, 62(4), 105-124.
• Toga, A. W., & Dinov, I. D. (2015). Sharing big biomedical data. Journal of Big Data, 2, 1-12.
• Tsou, H. T., & Chen, J. S. (2023). How does digital technology usage benefit firm performance? Digital transformation strategy and organisational innovation as mediators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(9), 1114-1127.
• Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P., Farina Briamonte, M., & Orlando, B. (2021). Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 133, 327-336.
• Valero-Gil, J., Suárez-Perales, I., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2024). Navigating toward the promised land of digitalization and sustainability convergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123283.
• Verganti, R., Luca, V., & Marco, I. (2020). Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 212-227.
• Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Heij, C. V. (2013). Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review, 10(1), 1-15.
• Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356-365.
• Wan, Q., Tang, S., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Does the development of digital technology contribute to the innovation performance of China’s high-tech industry?. Technovation, 124, 102738.
• Wang, B., Gong, S., & Yang, Y. (2024). Unveiling the relation between digital technology and low-carbon innovation: Carbon emission trading policy as an antecedent. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123522.
• Yoo, Y., Boland Jr., R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398-1408.
• Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375-404.
• Zimmermann, R., Soares, A., & Roca, J. B. (2024). The moderator effect of balance of power on the relationships between the adoption of digital technologies in supply chain management processes and innovation performance in SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 118, 44-55.