Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

5, 6 ve 7. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Ortaokul Ders Kitaplarında Ölçme Değerlendirme Unsurlarının İncelenmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 188 - 253, 27.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.53046/ijotem.1537064

Öz

Ders kitapları en temel eğitim materyalidir. Bu materyalin etkili bir biçimde kullanılması için yaşadığımız çağa hitap etmesi gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda 2004 yılından itibaren ülkemizde uygulanmaya başlanan yapılandırmacı eğitim kapsamında ders kitaplarının içeriği öğrencilerin bilişsel, duyuşsal ve psikomotor becerilerini geliştirecek düzeyde hazırlanmaktadır. Yapılan bu çalışmada Sosyal Bilgiler ders kitaplarının içeriğinde yer alan ölçme ve değerlendirme unsurlarının yapılandırmacı eğitim kapsamında öğrencilerin hangi becerilerine yönelik olduklarını ve kitapların içeriğinde yer alan öğrenme yaklaşımlarına uygun olup olmadığını belirlenmek amaçlanmıştır. Amaç doğrultusunda MEB'in yayınlamış olduğu ve onayladığı 6 farklı ders kitabında yer alan ölçme ve değerlendirme unsurları incelenmiştir. Ders kitaplarının içerisinde yer alan 7 adet öğrenme yaklaşımında yer alan ölçme ve değerlendirme unsurları konuya başlarken hazırlık soruları, metin içerisindeki sorular, metin içerisindeki etkinlikler, metin sonu değerlendirmeler, öz değerlendirme, akran değerlendirme, kavram haritası, ünite sonu değerlendirme soruları, grup öz değerlendirme başlıkları altında sınıflandırılarak incelenmiştir. Ardından sınıflandırılan bu unsurlar yapılandırmacı yaklaşım doğrultusunda ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada bir nitel araştırma deseni olan doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılarak ders kitaplarının içeriğinde yer alan her öğrenme yaklaşımı ayrı olarak ele alınmış, ölçme ve değerlendirme unsurları tespit edilmiş, yapılandırmacı eğitim doğrultusunda becerilerle ilişkilendirilmiş ardından da genel bir değerlendirme yapılarak her kademedeki iki farklı kitap arasındaki fark ortaya konulmuştur. Böylece Sosyal Bilgiler ders kitaplarında yer alan ölçme ve değerlendirme unsurlarının yapılandırmacı eğitimle olan ilişkileri ortaya konularak alan yazına kaynak oluşturmuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Adanalı, K. (2008). Alternative assessment in social studies education: evaluation of 5th grade social studies education in terms of alternative assessment activities. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Adana.
  • Akarsu Yakar, E., & Yılmaz, S. (2017). Mathematical language skills of 7th grade students in the process of transforming the real life situation ınto a mathematical expression in Algebra, Inonu University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 18 (1), 292-310.
  • Akbaba, B. (2013). Development of an evaluation form for social studies textbooks. In Bülent Akbaba (Ed.), Subject Area Textbook Review Guide In Social Studies (pp. 457-470). Pegem.
  • Anagün, Ş. S., & Kılıç, Z. (2015). Let's know how much we taught: Measurement and evaluation in life sciences teaching. In M. Gültekin (Ed.), Life Sciences Teaching (pp. 153-186). Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Bahadırtaş, Ş. (2022). The use of alternative measurement and evaluation methods and techniques ın the social studies teaching undergraduate program. (Master's Thesis). Erciyes University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Kayseri.
  • Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S. & Bıçak, B. (2014). Traditional and alternative measurement and evaluation teacher's handbook. Pegem Publishing.
  • Baykul, Y., Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2003). Measurement and evaluation in education for anatolian teacher training high schools. State Books, National Education Printing House.
  • Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display – Mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools ın mathematics education, Mathematics Education Review, 16, 35–48.
  • Çalışkan, H., & Yiğittir, S. (2015). Measurement and evaluation ın social studies. In B. Tay And A. Öcal (Eds.), Teaching social studies with special teaching methods (pp. 223-290). Pegem.
  • Çelikkaya, T. (2014). Diagnostic branched tree. In S. Baştürk (Edt.), Measurement and evaluation in education (Pp. 175-194). Nobel.
  • Çiydem, E., Kaymakcı, S. (2023). Understanding a new course in the curriculum ın the transition process from village ınstitutes to teacher training schools ın Turkey: An examination of the 1953 social studies course curriculum. Vakanüvis - International Journal of History Research, 8(1), 321-370.
  • Demir, E. K. (2021). Measuring higher-order thinking skills: Measurement and evaluation ın education, Editor: Şahin, M. D., Nobel, 369-396.
  • Demirel, Ö. (2005). Planning and evaluation in education - The art of teaching (8th Edition). Pegem Publishing.
  • Doğanay, A. (2008). Evaluation of the new social studies program ın the light of contemporary social studies. Ç.Ü. Social Sciences Institute Journal, 17(2), 77-96.
  • Dündar, H. (2012). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences course. In S. Oğulmuş (Ed.), Life sciences teaching and teacher's handbook (pp. 527-281). Pegem Academy.
  • Dündar, H., Batmaz, O. & Cevahir Batmaz, M. (2023). Evaluatıon of studies conducted on prımary school level ın the fıeld of educatıon durıng the covıd-19 pandemıc perıod. Trakya Education Journal, 13(2), 977-988.
  • Erkuş, A. (2008). Measurement and evaluation-concepts and applications-for classroom teachers. Ekinoks Publishing House.
  • Güler N. (2011). Measurement and evaluation ın education. Pegem Academy.
  • Gülersoy, A. E. (2013). Investigation of some features of social studies textbooks ın search of ıdeal textbook. International Journal of New Trends ın Arts, Sports & Science Education, 2(1), 8-26.
  • Güzel D., Şimşek A. (2012). The Coursebooks ın the national educational councils. The Journal Of SAU Education Faculty, 172- 216.
  • Göçer, A. (2005). Measurement and evaluation ın teaching turkish at the second stage of primary school. (Doctoral Thesis). Erzurum, Atatürk University.
  • Gök, B. (2016). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences teaching. In S. Güven and S. Kaymakcı (Eds.), Life sciences teaching (294-345). Pegem Academy.
  • Jones, J. E. (1994). Portfolio assessment as a strategy for self-direction ın learning. New Directions for Adult And Continuing Education, 64, 23-29.
  • Karagözoğlu, A. G. (1966). Social studies teaching in primary schools. MEB Publications.
  • Kaur S., & Kumar, D. (2008). Comparative study of government and Non-Government College teacher in relation to Job Satisfaction and Job Stress From Eric.
  • Kurt E. (2003). 2018 social studies curriculum and 4th grade social studies coursebook revıew ın terms of socıal skılls.
  • MEB. (2023). Social studies course curriculum (Primary and secondary school 4, 5, 6 and 7th grades). Retrieved from The Database of The Ministry of National Education of The Republic of Turkey, Curriculum Monitoring and Evaluation System on October 22, 2024.
  • NCSS (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Washington: NCSS.
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2008). Development of an attitude scale towards primary school science and technology course. Primary Education Online, 7(3), 627- 638.
  • Oğuz Tunç, H. (2019). The effects of alternative assessment and evaluation activities on success and retention ın social studies. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Niğde.
  • Özcelik, D. A. (1989). Test preparation guide. OSYM Education Publications.
  • Özmercan, E. E. Basic concepts in measurement and evaluation. In Educational Sciences Research-III (pp. 127-141). Ozgur Publishing Distribution Ltd. Co.
  • Ross, E. W. (2006). The struggle for the social studies curriculum. E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (pp. 17-36) In. State University Of New York Press
  • Şahin, C. (2003). Subject area textbook review guide social studies. Gündüz Education and Publishing,
  • Şaşmaz Ören, F. (2014). Alternative measurement-evaluation ın science, In Ş.S. Anagün & N. Duban (Eds.), Science Education (pp. 277-340). Anı Publishing.
  • Şeker, M. (2017). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences teaching. In B. Tay (Edt.), Life sciences teaching with activity examples (pp. 493-521). Pegem Academy.
  • Şimsek, N. (2009). Measurement and evaluation in social studies. In M. Safran (ed.), Social studies education (pp. 573-622). Pegem Academy Publishing.
  • Şişman, M. (2015). Introduction to educational science. Pegem Academy.
  • Tekin, H. (1996). Measurement and evaluation in education. Yargı Book And Publishing House.
  • Tekindal, S., (2020). Measurement and evaluation ın education, Pegem A Publishing.
  • Temel, A. (2010). Measurement and evaluation ın education. Istanbul Maltepe University Publications.
  • Tokcan, H. (2015). Concept teaching ın social studies. Pegem Academy.
  • Tuncel, G. (2011). Effective use of rubrics in social studies course. Marmara Geography Journal, (23), 213-233.
  • Turgut, M. F., (1987). Measurement And Evaluation Methods In Education, Saydam Printing House.
  • Turgut, M. F. & Baykul, Y. (2013). Measurement And Evaluation In Education. Pegem Academy.
  • Yaşar, M. (2014). Investigation of attitudes of prospective teachers towards the course "Measurement and evaluation education" In terms of some variables. Trakya University Faculty of Education Journal, 4 (2), 64-83.
  • Yetkin, D., & Daşcan, Ö. (2010). Primary school program with recent changes, 1-5th grades. Anı Publishing.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2011). Evaluation of the applicability of the 2005 social studies course curriculum ın multigrade classes according to teachers' views (A Qualitative Research). Master's Thesis. Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Afyonkarahisar.

Examinatıon of Assessment and Evaluation Elements in 5th, 6th and 7th Grade Social Studies Middle School Textbooks

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 188 - 253, 27.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.53046/ijotem.1537064

Öz

Textbooks are the most fundamental educational materials. For these materials to be effectively used, they need to be relevant to the era we live in. In this context, since 2004, the content of textbooks in Turkey has been prepared within the framework of constructivist education, aiming to enhance students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. This study examines the assessment and evaluation elements within Social Studies textbooks to determine their alignment with constructivist education and the specific skills they target for students. The research analyzes assessment components found in six different textbooks approved by the Ministry of National Education (MEB). Within these textbooks, the assessment elements related to seven learning approaches—such as preparatory questions, in-text questions, activities, end-of-text evaluations, self-assessment, peer assessment, concept maps, end-of-unit assessment questions, and group self-assessment—are classified and studied from a constructivist perspective. Using a qualitative research design, document analysis is employed to identify assessment elements and link them to skills consistent with constructivist education. Finally, a comparative evaluation reveals differences between textbooks at different educational levels, contributing to the literature on the relationship between assessment elements and constructivist education in Social Studies textbooks.

Kaynakça

  • Adanalı, K. (2008). Alternative assessment in social studies education: evaluation of 5th grade social studies education in terms of alternative assessment activities. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Adana.
  • Akarsu Yakar, E., & Yılmaz, S. (2017). Mathematical language skills of 7th grade students in the process of transforming the real life situation ınto a mathematical expression in Algebra, Inonu University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 18 (1), 292-310.
  • Akbaba, B. (2013). Development of an evaluation form for social studies textbooks. In Bülent Akbaba (Ed.), Subject Area Textbook Review Guide In Social Studies (pp. 457-470). Pegem.
  • Anagün, Ş. S., & Kılıç, Z. (2015). Let's know how much we taught: Measurement and evaluation in life sciences teaching. In M. Gültekin (Ed.), Life Sciences Teaching (pp. 153-186). Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Bahadırtaş, Ş. (2022). The use of alternative measurement and evaluation methods and techniques ın the social studies teaching undergraduate program. (Master's Thesis). Erciyes University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Kayseri.
  • Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S. & Bıçak, B. (2014). Traditional and alternative measurement and evaluation teacher's handbook. Pegem Publishing.
  • Baykul, Y., Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2003). Measurement and evaluation in education for anatolian teacher training high schools. State Books, National Education Printing House.
  • Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display – Mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools ın mathematics education, Mathematics Education Review, 16, 35–48.
  • Çalışkan, H., & Yiğittir, S. (2015). Measurement and evaluation ın social studies. In B. Tay And A. Öcal (Eds.), Teaching social studies with special teaching methods (pp. 223-290). Pegem.
  • Çelikkaya, T. (2014). Diagnostic branched tree. In S. Baştürk (Edt.), Measurement and evaluation in education (Pp. 175-194). Nobel.
  • Çiydem, E., Kaymakcı, S. (2023). Understanding a new course in the curriculum ın the transition process from village ınstitutes to teacher training schools ın Turkey: An examination of the 1953 social studies course curriculum. Vakanüvis - International Journal of History Research, 8(1), 321-370.
  • Demir, E. K. (2021). Measuring higher-order thinking skills: Measurement and evaluation ın education, Editor: Şahin, M. D., Nobel, 369-396.
  • Demirel, Ö. (2005). Planning and evaluation in education - The art of teaching (8th Edition). Pegem Publishing.
  • Doğanay, A. (2008). Evaluation of the new social studies program ın the light of contemporary social studies. Ç.Ü. Social Sciences Institute Journal, 17(2), 77-96.
  • Dündar, H. (2012). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences course. In S. Oğulmuş (Ed.), Life sciences teaching and teacher's handbook (pp. 527-281). Pegem Academy.
  • Dündar, H., Batmaz, O. & Cevahir Batmaz, M. (2023). Evaluatıon of studies conducted on prımary school level ın the fıeld of educatıon durıng the covıd-19 pandemıc perıod. Trakya Education Journal, 13(2), 977-988.
  • Erkuş, A. (2008). Measurement and evaluation-concepts and applications-for classroom teachers. Ekinoks Publishing House.
  • Güler N. (2011). Measurement and evaluation ın education. Pegem Academy.
  • Gülersoy, A. E. (2013). Investigation of some features of social studies textbooks ın search of ıdeal textbook. International Journal of New Trends ın Arts, Sports & Science Education, 2(1), 8-26.
  • Güzel D., Şimşek A. (2012). The Coursebooks ın the national educational councils. The Journal Of SAU Education Faculty, 172- 216.
  • Göçer, A. (2005). Measurement and evaluation ın teaching turkish at the second stage of primary school. (Doctoral Thesis). Erzurum, Atatürk University.
  • Gök, B. (2016). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences teaching. In S. Güven and S. Kaymakcı (Eds.), Life sciences teaching (294-345). Pegem Academy.
  • Jones, J. E. (1994). Portfolio assessment as a strategy for self-direction ın learning. New Directions for Adult And Continuing Education, 64, 23-29.
  • Karagözoğlu, A. G. (1966). Social studies teaching in primary schools. MEB Publications.
  • Kaur S., & Kumar, D. (2008). Comparative study of government and Non-Government College teacher in relation to Job Satisfaction and Job Stress From Eric.
  • Kurt E. (2003). 2018 social studies curriculum and 4th grade social studies coursebook revıew ın terms of socıal skılls.
  • MEB. (2023). Social studies course curriculum (Primary and secondary school 4, 5, 6 and 7th grades). Retrieved from The Database of The Ministry of National Education of The Republic of Turkey, Curriculum Monitoring and Evaluation System on October 22, 2024.
  • NCSS (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Washington: NCSS.
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2008). Development of an attitude scale towards primary school science and technology course. Primary Education Online, 7(3), 627- 638.
  • Oğuz Tunç, H. (2019). The effects of alternative assessment and evaluation activities on success and retention ın social studies. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Niğde.
  • Özcelik, D. A. (1989). Test preparation guide. OSYM Education Publications.
  • Özmercan, E. E. Basic concepts in measurement and evaluation. In Educational Sciences Research-III (pp. 127-141). Ozgur Publishing Distribution Ltd. Co.
  • Ross, E. W. (2006). The struggle for the social studies curriculum. E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (pp. 17-36) In. State University Of New York Press
  • Şahin, C. (2003). Subject area textbook review guide social studies. Gündüz Education and Publishing,
  • Şaşmaz Ören, F. (2014). Alternative measurement-evaluation ın science, In Ş.S. Anagün & N. Duban (Eds.), Science Education (pp. 277-340). Anı Publishing.
  • Şeker, M. (2017). Measurement and evaluation ın life sciences teaching. In B. Tay (Edt.), Life sciences teaching with activity examples (pp. 493-521). Pegem Academy.
  • Şimsek, N. (2009). Measurement and evaluation in social studies. In M. Safran (ed.), Social studies education (pp. 573-622). Pegem Academy Publishing.
  • Şişman, M. (2015). Introduction to educational science. Pegem Academy.
  • Tekin, H. (1996). Measurement and evaluation in education. Yargı Book And Publishing House.
  • Tekindal, S., (2020). Measurement and evaluation ın education, Pegem A Publishing.
  • Temel, A. (2010). Measurement and evaluation ın education. Istanbul Maltepe University Publications.
  • Tokcan, H. (2015). Concept teaching ın social studies. Pegem Academy.
  • Tuncel, G. (2011). Effective use of rubrics in social studies course. Marmara Geography Journal, (23), 213-233.
  • Turgut, M. F., (1987). Measurement And Evaluation Methods In Education, Saydam Printing House.
  • Turgut, M. F. & Baykul, Y. (2013). Measurement And Evaluation In Education. Pegem Academy.
  • Yaşar, M. (2014). Investigation of attitudes of prospective teachers towards the course "Measurement and evaluation education" In terms of some variables. Trakya University Faculty of Education Journal, 4 (2), 64-83.
  • Yetkin, D., & Daşcan, Ö. (2010). Primary school program with recent changes, 1-5th grades. Anı Publishing.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2011). Evaluation of the applicability of the 2005 social studies course curriculum ın multigrade classes according to teachers' views (A Qualitative Research). Master's Thesis. Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Afyonkarahisar.
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Eğitimi (Ekonomi, İşletme ve Yönetim Hariç)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Şeymanur Çelik Çetinkaya 0009-0009-1374-7959

Şahin Oruç 0000-0001-8666-3654

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Ekim 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 27 Ekim 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çelik Çetinkaya, Ş., & Oruç, Ş. (2024). Examinatıon of Assessment and Evaluation Elements in 5th, 6th and 7th Grade Social Studies Middle School Textbooks. Uluslararası Ders Kitapları Ve Eğitim Materyalleri Dergisi, 7(2), 188-253. https://doi.org/10.53046/ijotem.1537064

17394 17395 18802  189911899819047 19738209842099321032