Araştırma Makalesi

Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 1 Mayıs 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm

Öz

Antagonism, in the language of agonistic democracy, refers to the conflict between opposing parties. These opposing parties do not recognize each other as legitimate voices. In the context of the election in the Philippines, the emergence of this kind of conflict is manifested during the opposing preferences will meet as they will express their political color. There are significant numbers of literature that discussed the nature of antagonistic conflict in the politics of the Philippines. For instance, patron-client describes the dyadic connection between patron and client through a personal relationship. However, this personal relationship is marked by conflict in personal interests. On the other hand, the moralization of politics has a nature of conflict based on two opposing sectors, the mass sphere, and the civil sphere. In which, the divide is determined by the socioeconomic status of the people. Although there are analyses that explain the possible reasons for these political conflicts, they fail to capture the nature of conflict during the election in the Philippines. The conflict will occur when people engage during the election and will be vocal about their preferred candidates. This article will try to explain the nature of conflict during elections using the Agonistic Democracy framework of Chantal Mouffe. Mouffe explains that there is a conflict between opposing parties because neither of the parties recognizes each other as legitimate or important. Rather the conflict is gapped by friend/enemy relation. Using the framework of Chantal Mouffe, this article will argue that the divide neglects the electoral process and undermines the essence of democracy that is manifested in elections. One of the ways to overcome this problem is to recognize the impossibility of eradicating the different preferences of the people in choosing a candidate

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

N/A

Proje Numarası

N/A

Teşekkür

N/A

Kaynakça

  1. Agoncillo, Teodoro. History of the Filipino People. 903 Quezon Boulevard, Quezon City: R.P. GARCIA Publishing Co.,
  2. Anderson, Benedict. Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Origins and Dreams. Routledge, 1998.
  3. Aquino, Ranhilio. War of Classes. February 16, 2022. https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/02/16/opinion/columns/war-of-the-classes/1833135?fbclid= IwAR0yFHS3np-VtUQbF-NTcbnX2m8fsN_t7JRfNZwMRMSSD7Sb78VGbz1UTbI.
  4. Arambala, Gerry. “Radical Leadership in Post-Parojinog Ozamis Politics.” European Journal of Research, no. 11-12, (November 2018):82.
  5. Cupin, Bea. In vote-rich Quezon City, Uniteam promises a ‘New Society’ but still no concrete plans. February 15, 2022. https://www.rappler.com/nation/elections/uniteam-bets-promise-new-society-without-concrete-plans-rally-quezon-city/.
  6. Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, “Leni Robredo: The Last Man Standing is a Woman,” Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, April 19, 2020. https://www.freiheit.org/leni-robredo-last-man-standing-woman.
  7. Gomes, Robin. Philippine Election: Bishops urge voters to keep at heart the common good. March 28, 2022. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2022-03/philippines-bishops-pastoral-letter-election-2022-common-good.html.
  8. Gregorio, Xave. Over 1200 Catholic clergy endorse Robredo- Pangilinan in ‘the battle for truth. May 4, 2022. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2022/05/04/2178710/over-1200-catholic-clergy-endorse-robredo-pangilinan-battle-truth.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Siyaset Bilimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Kasım 2022

Kabul Tarihi

11 Mart 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Hıpolao, C. (2023). Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. International Journal of Politics and Security, 5(1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896
AMA
1.Hıpolao C. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 2023;5(1):145-162. doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896
Chicago
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. 2023. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security 5 (1): 145-62. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896.
EndNote
Hıpolao C (01 Mayıs 2023) Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. International Journal of Politics and Security 5 1 145–162.
IEEE
[1]C. Hıpolao, “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”, IJPS, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 145–162, May. 2023, doi: 10.53451/ijps.1210896.
ISNAD
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security 5/1 (01 Mayıs 2023): 145-162. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896.
JAMA
1.Hıpolao C. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 2023;5:145–162.
MLA
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security, c. 5, sy 1, Mayıs 2023, ss. 145-62, doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896.
Vancouver
1.Chrıstıan Hıpolao. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 01 Mayıs 2023;5(1):145-62. doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896

© intpolsec, 2019
Open access journal | No APCs | Double-blind peer review | CC BY 4.0