Policy Impacts of the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment on Sino-U.S. Soft Power Competition in Africa

Öz

The Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States is a book-length academic research article written by Dr. Bradley Thayer and commissioned by Andrew Marshal, director of the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment (ONA). Owing to both the significant policymaking power of the ONA, as well as the unique topic of the article, it is the belief of this author that Strategic Consequences is in need of examination by the international community. This paper is the first known academic investigation of Strategic Consequences and seeks to provide a critical lens of analysis. This paper examines the three most significant arguments made by Thayer and cross-examines them against existing datasets and literature to determine their relative degree of veracity. First, this paper examines Thayer’s argument that Chinese society is more racist than U.S. society, and finds that this argument is likely correct. Second, this paper examines Thayer’s argument that Chinese racism acts as a stabilizing force for the Chinese government, and finds that this argument is also likely correct. Finally, this paper examines Thayer’s argument that U.S. anti-racist culture acts as a useful tool of soft-power influence in Africa, and finds that this argument is likely incorrect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Africa
• Anti-racism
• China
• In-group preference
• Racism
• Soft power competition
• United States

Policy Impacts of the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment on Sino-U.S. Soft Power Competition in Africa

Öz

The Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism is a book-length academic research article commissioned by Andrew Marshal, director of the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment (ONA). Owing to the significant policymaking power of ONA, Strategic Consequences indicates potential soft-power tactics in use by the Pentagon in countering Chinese influence in Africa. This paper examines Strategic Consequences’ three key arguments. This paper examines the argument that Chinese society is more racist than U.S. society and finds this argument is likely correct. This paper examines the argument that Chinese racism is a stabilizing force for the Chinese government and finds this argument is likely correct. Finally, this paper examines the argument that U.S. anti-racist culture acts as a useful tool of soft-power influence in Africa, and finds this argument is likely incorrect. This paper concludes that ONA has accurately gauged the strategic value of Chinese racism for the Chinese government but overestimates the U.S. capacity to counter China in the field of soft power competition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afrika
• Irkçılık karşıtlığı
• Çin
• Grup içi tercih
• Irkçılık
• Yumuşak güç rekabeti
• Amerika Birleşik Devletleri

Kaynakça

1. Abdulla, M., & Shamseden, Z. (2021). The Rise of Xenophobia and the Uyghur-China Situation. Social Research, 88(4), 949–972.
2. American National Elections Studies. (2019). 2018 Pilot Study. https://electionstudies.org/data-center/2018-pilot-study/
3. Ang, I. (2021). On the Perils of Racialized Chineseness: Race, Nation and Entangled Racisms in China and Southeast Asia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(4), 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1990979
4. Author Unknown. (2013, January 7). The Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States. United States Department of Defense, Office of Net Assessment. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Litigation_Release/Litigation%20Release%20-%20The%20Strategic%20Consequences%20of%20Chinese%20Racism%20%20201301.pdf
5. Austin, L. (2021, December 20). Report on Countering Extremist Activity Within the Department of Defense. U.S. Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2021/Dec/20/2002912573/-1/-1/0/REPORT-ON-COUNTERING-EXTREMIST-ACTIVITY-WITHIN-THE-DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE.PDF
6. Beugelsdijk, S., & Klasing, M. (2016). Diversity and Trust: The Role of Shared Values. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(3), 522–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.014
7. Carrico, K. (2022). Discourses of Race and Rising China. China Journal, 88, 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1086/720197
8. Castillo, R. (2020). “Race” and “Racism” in Contemporary Africa-China Relations Research: Approaches, Controversies and Reflections. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 21(3), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2020.1796343

9. Cunningham, E., Saich, T., & Turiel, J. (2020, July). Understanding CCP Resilience: Surveying Chinese Public Opinion Through Time. Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation. https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/final_policy_brief_7.6.2020.pdf
10. Dinesen, P., Schaeffer, M., & Sønderskov, K. (2020). Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Narrative and Meta-Analytical Review. Annual Review of Political Science, 23. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20314.70081
11. Edwards, L. (2021, December 28). How Reagan Doctrine Brought Down the Evil Empire. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/how-reagan-doctrine-brought-down-the-evil-empire
12. Elliott, J. (2009, March 10). Inside the Pentagon’s Idea Factory: The Office of Net Assessment. Talking Points Memo. https://web.archive.org/web/20130515022119/http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/03/inside_the_pentagons_idea_factory_office_of_net_as.php#more
13. Encyclopedia.com. (2022). Thayer, Bradley A. Encyclopedia.com. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/thayer-bradley
14. Feng, J. (2021, November 11). Chinese Communist Party Will Outlive United States: State Media Editor. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/chinese-communist-party-outlive-united-states-global-times-media-editor-1653231
15. Gallup. (2020). Rating World Leaders. https://www.gallup.com/analytics/355787/gallup-rating-world-leaders-report.aspx?thank-you-report-form=1
16. Garamore, J. (2020, July 9). No Place for Racism, Discrimination in U.S. Military, Milley Says. U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2269438/no-place-for-racism-discrimination-in-us-military-milley-says/
17. GoArmy. (2021, May 4). RICKIE | THE CALLING | GOARMY [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWo5-pFrjNg
18. Google. (2022). Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism. https://www.google.com/search?q="Strategic+Consequences+of+Chinese+Racism"&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:1/1/2017,cd_max:1/1/2022&sxsrf=ALiCzsZ6oiJW7JJ0Q2y35h_YtVtmabv7vg:1669926072933&ei=uAyJY9-7OMHY5NoP4c67wAw&start=0&sa=N&filter=0&ved=2ahUKEwjf94Kzn9n7AhVBLFkFHWHnDsg4ChDy0wN6BAgFEAQ&biw=1920&bih=962&dpr=1
19. GovTribe. (2022). Thayer Limited, LLC. https://govtribe.com/vendors/thayer-limited-llc-5whe5 Guo, Z., Guo, R., Xu, C., & Wu, Z. (2022). Reflexive or Reflective? Group Bias in Third-Party Punishment in Chinese and Western Cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 100, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104284
20. Hsleh, E. (2011, May 11). Following Obama, Students Define “Black” on Ivy League Campuses. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/barack-obama-has-broken-r_b_217965
21. Jin, X., Bolt, G., & Hooimeijer, P. (2021). Africans in Guangzhou: Is the Ethnic Enclave Model Applicable in the Chinese Context? Cities, 117, 103320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103320
22. Kokkonen, A., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). Migration-based Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of How Country, Neighbourhood and Workplace Diversity Affects Social Trust in 22 Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12027
23. Krepinevich, A., & Watts, B. (2015). The Last Warrior: Andrew Marshall and the Shaping of Modern American Defense Strategy (1st ed.). Basic Books.
24. Krepinevich, A.. (2019, April 19). Measures of Power: On the Lasting Value of Net Assessment. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-04-19/measures-power
25. Lan, S. (2016). The Shifting Meanings of Race in China: A Case Study of the African Diaspora Communities in Guangzhou. City and Society, 28(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12094
26. Lee, Y. (1993). Ingroup Preference and Homogeneity Among African American and Chinese American Students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712140
27. Liu, T., & Deng, Z. (2020). “They’ve Made our Blood Ties Black”: On the Burst of Online Racism Towards the African in China’s Social Media. Critical Arts, 34(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2020.1717567
28. Maddrell, D. (2003, May 3). Quiet Transformation: The Role of the Office of Net Assessment. National Defense University. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA441633.pdf
29. Mattis, P. (2011, October 31). China’s Misunderstood Spies. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2011/10/chinas-misunderstood-spies/
30. Miller, C. (2020, December 17). Memorandum for Senior Pentagon Leadership. U.S. Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2020/Dec/18/2002554854/-1/-1/0/ACTIONS-TO-IMPROVE-RACIAL-AND-ETHNIC-DIVERSITY-AND-INCLUSION-IN-THE-U.S.-MILITARY.PDF
31. Mutesa, M. (2017). Neo-Racism in China: Reasons for China’s Otherwise Inexplicable Modern-Day Racism. Language in India, 17(12), 256–262
32. Pew Research Center. (2020, January 8). U.S. Image Generally Favorable Around the World, but Mixed in Some Countries. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/01/08/u-s-image-generally-favorable-around-the-world-but-mixed-in-some-countries/#:~:text=Across%20the%20three%20sub-Saharan%20African%20countries%20surveyed%2C%20views,60%25%20respectively%29%20say%20they%20view%20the%20U.S.%20positively
33. Pew Research Center. (2022, June 6). Public Trust in Government: 1958-2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/06/06/public-trust-in-government-1958-2022/
34. s_decatur. (2022, February 6). Thread. Twitter. https://twitter.com/s_decatur/status/1490408671779729425
35. Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. (1989). Economics (14th edition). McGraw-Hill Inc., US.
36. United States Census Bureau. (2020). Asian Alone or in Combination with One or More Races, and with One or More Asian Categories for Selected Groups. Universe: Total Asian categories tallied and people with no specific Asian category reported. https://archive.ph/20200212213039/http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml#selection-263.0-269.92
37. United States Department of Defense. (2017, February 26). Litigation Release. Washington Headquarters Service. https://www.esd.whs.mil/FOIA/Reading-Room/Reading-Room-List_2/Litigation_Release/
38. United States Department of Justice. (2022). Freedom of Information Act Guide, May 2004. https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exemption-7c
39. United States Department of Labor. (2021). Median Annual Earnings by Sex, Race and Hispanic Ethnicity. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/earnings/median-annual-sex-race-hispanic-ethnicity
40. Ziller, C. (2014). Ethnic Diversity, Economic and Cultural Contexts, and Social Trust: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from European Regions, 2002–2010. Social Forces, 93(3), 1211–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou088