Arctic Council and Turkey's Forgotten Arctic Council Observer Membership Application: Swiss Example

Öz

The Arctic Council is an important initiative towards the creation of a shared and collaborative Arctic. This initiative began in the late 1980s with the identification of the Arctic as an international region. This article examines the structure of the Arctic Council from past to present and aims to examine the Swiss example of why Turkey’s application for observer membership status to the Arctic Council was not accepted and how it could be accepted. The article has two main hypotheses. The first is that the structure of the Arctic Council has changed since its establishment, and it is important on a global scale in terms of addressing issues such as climate change, environmental protection, regional geopolitical stability, but it is no more than a forum. The second is that Switzerland’s observer membership status in the Arctic Council, it can be an example for Turkey. Concerning the Arctic Council, the current academic literature focuses specifically on the structure of the Arctic Council, and the criteria it sets for observer membership status. But surprisingly, from its foundation to the present day, considerations on the development of the Arctic Council and its observer membership status have not been sufficiently studied enough. Besides, Turkey’s application for observer membership to the Arctic Council and why Switzerland, which along with Turkey applied for observer membership to the Arctic Council in 2015, was admitted to membership two years later has not been studied. This article also aims to address these deficiencies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Arctic
• the Arctic Council
• Observer Member Status
• Switzerland
• Turkey

Arktik Konseyi ve Türkiye’nin Unutulan Arktik Konseyi Gözlemci Üyelik Başvurusu: İsviçre Örneği

Öz

Arktika Konseyi, paylaşılan ve iş birliği yapılan bir Arktika’nın yaratılmasına yönelik önemli bir girişimdir. Bu girişim, 1980’li yılların sonlarından itibaren Arktika’nın uluslararası bir bölge olarak tanımlanmasıyla başlamıştır. Bu makale; Arktika Konseyi’nin geçmişten günümüze yapısını incelemekte ve Türkiye’nin Arktika Konseyi’ne gözlemci üyelik statüsü için yapmış olduğu başvurunun neden kabul edilmediğini ve nasıl kabul edilebileceğini İsviçre örneği üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Makalenin iki temel hipotezi bulunmaktadır. Birincisi; Arktika Konseyi’nin kuruluşundan günümüze yapısının değiştiği, iklim değişikliği, çevre koruma, bölgesel jeopolitik istikrar gibi konulara değinmesi açısından küresel ölçekte önemli ancak bir forumdan daha fazlası olmadığıdır. İkincisi; İsviçre’nin Arktika Konseyi gözlemci üyelik statüsünün, Türkiye için örnek teşkil edebileceğidir. Arktika Konseyi ile ilgili olarak mevcut akademik literatür, özellikle Arktika Konseyi’nin yapısına odaklanmaktadır. Ancak şaşırtıcı bir şekilde kuruluşundan günümüze Arktika Konseyi’nin gelişimi ve gözlemci üyelik statüsüne ilişkin hususlar yeteri kadar çalışılmamıştır. Ayrıca Türkiye’nin Arktika Konseyi’ne gözlemci üyelik başvurusu ve Türkiye ile birlikte 2015 yılında Arktika Konseyi gözlemci üyeliği için başvuru yapan İsviçre’nin iki yıl sonra neden üyeliğe kabul edildiği incelenmemiştir. Bu makale aynı zamanda bu eksiklikleri gidermeyi hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Arktika Konseyi
• Gözlemci Statüsü
• İsviçre,
• Türkiye.
• Arktik
• Arktik Konseyi

Kaynakça

1. AMAP, Amap Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 1998, https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-report-Arctic-pollution-issues/68 /, (Erişim: 09.11.2017).
2. Gorbaçov, Mihail, Murmansk Konuşması, Süha Sert (Çev.), Barış Basın Yayın Sanayi, İstanbul, 1987.
3. McCannon, John, A History of The Arctic, Nature, Exploration, and Expoloation, Reaktion Books, London, 2012.
4. McGhee, Robert, The Last Imaginary Place A Human History of the Arctic World, Oxford University Press, Kanada, 2005.
5. Öztürk, Bayram, Neden Antarktika?, E Yayınları, İstanbul, 2015.
6. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, “Ulusal Kutup Bilim Programı (2018-2022)”, Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, Bilim ve Teknoloji Genel Müdürlüğü, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2204/bstb_btgm_ukbp_kitapcik_195x265_final.pdf, (Erişim: 16.04.2019).
7. Dolman, C. Everett, “Uzay Çağında Jeostrateji: Astropolitik Bir Çözümleme”, Colin S. Gray ve Geoffrey Sloan (Ed.), Jeopolitik, Strateji ve Coğrafya, Tuğrul Karabacak (Çev.), ASAM Yayınları, 2003, ss. 111-142.
8. Exner-Pirot, Heather, “The Return of the Arctic Five”, www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-Arctic/2015/07/23/blog-the-return-of-the-Arctic-five/, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 1-3. Halinen, Hannu, “Arctic Council in Perspective: Moving Forward”, Lassi Heininen (Ed.), Arctic Yearbook, Northern Research Forum Akureyri, Iceland, 2016, http://www.Arcticyearbook.com, (Erişim: 18.10.2017), ss. 28-33.

9. Heininen, Lassi, “Circumpolar International Relatios and Geopolitics”, Arctic Human Development Report 2004, http://www.svs.is/static/files/images/pdf_files/ahdr/English_version/AHDR_chp_12.pdf, (Erişim: 01.10.2017), ss. 207-225.
10. Heininen, Lassi, “Küreselleşmenin Etkileri ve Dünya Siyasetinde Kuzey Kutbu’nun Yeri”, Demet Tunçeri (Çev.), Harun Gümrükçü, Natalia Shulgina Şanlı, Selçuk Demirkılınç, Aybüke İnan ve Tamer İlbuğa (Ed.), “Küresel Bakışla Kutup Çağı: Çatışmalar, İşbirlikleri ve Ulusal Çıkarlar”, Siyasal Kitapevi, Ankara, 2015, ss. 33-46.
11. İnam, İlknur, Ünal, Eda ve Koçak, Mesut, “Arktik Bölgesi ve Yürütülen Çalışmalar, Türkiye’nin Kutup Çalışmaları”, Kalkınmada Anahtar Verimlilik Dergisi, Ekim 2018, Yıl: 30, Sayı: 358, T.C. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı Sanayi ve Verimlilik Genel Müdürlüğü, http://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/Files/Pdfs/anahtar_ekim_2018.pdf, (Erişim: 05.06.2019), ss. 41-43.
12. Knecht, Sebastian, “New Observers Queuing Up: Why the Arctic Council should Expand and Expel”, Arctic Institute, 20 Nisan 2015, https://www.theArcticinstitute.org/new-observers-queuing-up/, (Erişim: 26.05.2019), ss. 1-3.
13. Petursson, Gustav, “Cooperation in the High North: The Case of Iceland”, Lassi Heininen ve Regis Rouge-Oikarinen (Ed.), NGP Yearbook 2011 Sustainable Development in the Arctic Region Through Peace and Stability, Nordia Geographical Publications, 40/4, https://wiki.oulu.fi/download/attachments/28086119/NGBY2011ABSTRACT.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1344583001000, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 77-86.
14. Sellheim, Nikolas, Zou, Leilei ve Inagaki, Osamu, “Legal Arctopia? How Arctic Governance Express A Better World”, Heininen, Lassi (Ed.), Arctic Yearbook, Northern Research Forum Akureyri, Iceland, 2017, http://www.Arcticyearbook.com, (Erişim: 18.10.2017), ss. 415-427.
15. Storey, Ian, “Singapore and the Arctic: Tropical Country, Polar Interests”, Vijay Sakhuja ve Kapil Narula (Ed.), Asia and the Arctic Narratives, Perspectives and Policies, Springer Geology, Singapore, 2016, ss. 63-76.
16. Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, “Swiss Polar Research Pioneering Spirit, Passion and Excellence”, Bern, 2015, https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/en/documents/publications/Science/Schweizer_Polarforschung_EN.pdf (Erişim: 07.08.2020), ss. 1-36.
17. The Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), “Observer Status to the Arctic Council: Switzerland’s Candidature”, https://arcticportal.org/images/swiss-arctic-council-brochure.pdf, (Erişim: 08.07.2020), ss. 1-4.
18. “Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/531/EDOCS-3661-v1-ACMMDK07_Nuuk_2011_SAR_Search_and_Rescue_Agreement_signed_EN_FR_RU.PDF? sequence=5&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 25.01.2018), ss. 1-20.
19. “Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/529/EDOCS-2067-v1-ACMMSE08_KIRUNA_2013_agreement_on_oil_pollution_preparedness_and_response__in_the_arctic_formatted.PDF?sequence=5&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 25.01.2018), ss. 1-11.
20. “Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1916, (Erişim: 25.01.2018), ss. 1-18.
21. Arctic Council, “Declaration on The Establishment of Arctic Council”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/85/EDOCS-1752-v2-ACMMCA00_Ottawa_1996_Founding_Declaration.PDF?sequence=5&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 1-4.
22. Arctic Council, “Arctic Council Rules of Procedure”, Kiruna, İsveç, 15 Mayıs 2013, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/940/2015-09-01_Rules_of_Procedure_website_version.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 16.12.2017), ss. 1-16.
23. Arctic Council, “Arctic Council Observer Manual For Subsidiary Bodies”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/939/EDOCS-3020-v1B-Observer-manual-with-addendum-finalized_Oct2016.PDF?sequence=8&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 06.01.2018), ss. 1-16.
24. “1993, Nuuk, Greenland”, https://Arctic-council.org/eppr/reports/ministerial-direction/1993-nuuk-greenland/, (Erişim: 05.01.2018).
25. “1996, Inuvik, Canada”, https://Arctic-council.org/eppr/reports/ministerial-direction/1996-inuvik-canada/, (Erişim: 05.01.2018).
26. “1997, Alta, Norway”, https://Arctic-council.org/eppr/reports/ministerial-direction/1997-alta-norway/, (Erişim: 05.01.2018).
27. Arctic Council, “About Us”, http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), s. 1.
28. Arctic Council, “Aleut International Association (AIA)”, http://www.Arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/permanent-participants/aia, (Erişim: 06.01.2018), s. 1.
29. Arctic Council, “Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC)”, http://www.Arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/permanent-participants/aac, (Erişim: 06.01.2018), ss. 1-2.
30. Arctic Council, “Arctic Council: A Backgrounder”, https://oaarchive.Arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2076/2017-09-25_Arctic_Council_Backgrounder_PRINT_ VERSION_NO_LINKS.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 1-3.
31. Arctic Council, “Expert Group on Black Carbon and Methane”, http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/expert-groups/339-egbcm, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), s. 1.
32. Arctic Council, “Gwich’in Uluslararası Konsey (GCI)”, http://www.Arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/permanent-participants/gci, (Erişim: 06.01.2018), ss. 1-2.
33. Arctic Council, “Observers”, http://www.Arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/Arctic-council/observers, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 1-3.
34. Arctic Council, “Arctic Council Secretariat”, http://www.Arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/Arctic-council/the-Arctic-council-secretariat (Erişim: 05.01.2018), s. 1.
35. Arctic Council, “Who is The Arctic Council?”, https://arctic-council.org/en/, (Erişim: 05.02.2020), s. 1.
36. Arctic Council, “Agreements”, https://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work/agreements, (Erişim: 21.12.2018), s. 1.
37. Arctic Council, “Interview With Arctic Council Observer: Switzerland”, Arctic Council News, 06 Temmuz 2020, https://arctic-council.org/en/news/interview-with-arctic-council-observer-switzerland/, (Erişim: 08.07.2020), ss. 1-2.
38. Arctic Council, “New Observer: Switzerland”, Arctic Council News, 03 Ekim 2017, https://arctic-council.org/en/news/new-observer-switzerland/, (Erişim: 06.07.2020), ss. 1-2.
39. “Barents Euro-Arctic Cooperatıon”, http://www.barentscooperation.org/en/About, (Erişim: 25.12.2017).
40. Encyclopedia Britannica, “Sea of Osthotsk”, https://www.britannica.com/place/Sea-of-Ohotsk, (Erişim: 27.11.2017).
41. EPPR, “Ministerial Direction”, Emergency Prevention, Preparedness and Response-EPPR, https://Arctic-council.org/eppr/reports/ministerial-direction/, (Erişim: 05.01.2018), ss. 1-2.
42. Escude, Camille ve Plouffe, Joel, “How the Arctic Council Sets the Tone for International Cooperation”, Arctic Deeply, 01 Mayıs 2017, https://www.newsdeeply.com/arctic/articles/2017/05/01/how-the-arctic-council-sets-the-tone-for-international-cooperation, (Erişim: 18.08.2020).
43. “Formal Nordic Co-operation”, http://www.norden.org/en/om-samarbejdet-1/formal-nordic-co-operation, (Erişim: 25.12.2017).
44. “İTÜ PolRec”, http://www.polarresearch.center/, (Erişim: 24.11.2017).
45. National Geophysical Data Center, “Volumes of the World’s Oceans from ETOPO1”, https://ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/etopo1_ocean_volumes.html, (Erişim: 27.11.2017).
46. Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, “Switzerland Obtains Observer Status in the Arctic Council”, https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/documentation/media-releases.msg-id-66698.html, (Erişim: 07.07.2020).
47. Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, “Sectoral Foreign Policies Division”, https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/fdfa/fdfa/organisation-fdfa/directorates-divisions/directorate-political-affairs/asa.html, (08.07.2020).
48. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL),“Involvement in the Arctic”, https://www.wsl.ch/en/publicationssearch/diagonal-the-wsl-magazine/focus/cold/involvement-in-the-arctic.html, (Erişim: 09.07.2020), ss. 1-3.
49. “The Northern Dimension”, http://www.northerndimension.info/northern-dimension, (Erişim: 25.12.2017).
50. Dışişleri Bakanlığı, Denizcilik, Havacılık ve Hudut Genel Müdür Yardımcılığı (DHGY) ile Cumhurbaşkanlığı İletişim Merkezi (CİMER) üzerinden yapılan görüşme, 02 Şubat 2018.
51. Kopenhag Büyükelçiliği ile Cumhurbaşkanlığı İletişim Merkezi (CİMER) üzerinden yapılan görüşme, 13 Kasım 2019.
52. Prof.Dr. Heather Exner-Pirot ile elektronik posta yoluyla yapılan görüşme, 22 Nisan 2019.