The Relationship Between Academic Perfectionism and Self-Efficacy: An Investigation on Students of The Faculty of Sport Sciences

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between academic perfectionism and self-efficacy beliefs of students in the faculty of sport sciences. Data were collected through two validated instruments: the Academic Perfectionism Scale developed by Odacı et al. (2017), and the General Self-Efficacy Scale originally developed by Sherer et al. and later adapted into Turkish by Yıldırım and İlhan (2010). The Academic Perfectionism Scale consists of three sub-dimensions, namely self-doubt, comparison, and idealization, while the General Self-Efficacy Scale includes initiation, perseverance, and maintenance efforts as its sub-dimensions. The findings revealed a significant negative correlation between academic perfectionism and self-efficacy levels. Specifically, higher levels of self-doubt and comparison were associated with lower levels of self-efficacy, whereas students with strong self-efficacy beliefs were found to be more resilient, persistent, and motivated when facing challenges. These results are in line with previous studies suggesting that adaptive perfectionism may strengthen self-confidence and motivation, while maladaptive perfectionism leads to procrastination, self-sabotage, and increased anxiety. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between academic perfectionism and self-efficacy among university students, particularly those in sport sciences. Recognizing this relationship may contribute to the development of educational strategies that not only enhance academic achievement but also support students’ psychological well-being. Encouraging students to set realistic goals, view mistakes as a natural part of learning, and direct self-criticism in a constructive manner can help foster a healthier balance between academic performance and personal growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Academic perfectionism
• self-efficacy
• scale
• student achievement
• psychological well-being

Etik Beyan

The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki after obtaining approval from Pamukkale University Non-Intrusive Clinical Research Ethics Board with the official letter numbered - E-60116787-020-44905

Akademik Mükemmeliyetçilik ve Öz Yeterlik İlişkisi: Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin akademik mükemmeliyetçilikleri ile öz-yeterlik inançları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Veriler, geçerliği sağlanmış iki ölçme aracıyla toplanmıştır: Odacı ve ark. (2017) tarafından geliştirilen Akademik Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği ile, Sherer ve ark. tarafından geliştirilen ve Yıldırım ile İlhan (2010) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Genel Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği. Akademik Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği kendinden şüphe, karşılaştırma ve idealleştirme olmak üzere üç alt boyuttan oluşurken, Genel Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği başlatma, yılmama (sebat) ve sürdürme çabası alt boyutlarını içermektedir. Bulgular, akademik mükemmeliyetçilik ile öz-yeterlik düzeyleri arasında anlamlı ve negatif bir korelasyon olduğunu göstermiştir. Özellikle, kendinden şüphe ve karşılaştırma düzeyi arttıkça öz-yeterlik düzeyinin azaldığı; buna karşılık öz-yeterlik inancı güçlü olan öğrencilerin zorluklarla karşılaştıklarında daha dirençli, ısrarcı ve motive oldukları bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, uyumlu mükemmeliyetçiliğin öz güven ve motivasyonu güçlendirebileceğini, uyumsuz mükemmeliyetçiliğin ise erteleme, öz sabotaj ve artan kaygıya yol açtığını öne süren önceki çalışmalarla tutarlıdır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, özellikle spor bilimleri alanındaki üniversite öğrencileri arasında akademik mükemmeliyetçilik ile öz-yeterlik arasındaki etkileşimin anlaşılmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu ilişkinin tanınması, yalnızca akademik başarıyı artırmakla kalmayıp öğrencilerin psikolojik iyi oluşunu da destekleyecek eğitim stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine katkı sağlayabilir. Öğrencilerin gerçekçi hedefler belirlemeye teşvik edilmesi, hataları öğrenmenin doğal bir parçası olarak görmelerinin sağlanması ve öz eleştirinin yapıcı biçimde yönlendirilmesi, akademik performans ile kişisel gelişim arasında daha sağlıklı bir dengenin kurulmasına yardımcı olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akademik mükemmeliyetçilik
• öz yeterlik
• ölçek
• öğrenci başarısı
• psikolojik iyi oluş

Etik Beyan

Araştırma, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu'nun E-60116787-020-44905 sayılı resmi yazısıyla onay alındıktan sonra Helsinki Bildirgesi'ne uygun olarak yürütülmüştür.

Kaynakça

1. Anjum, A. (2025). Impact of positive and negative perfectionism on self-efficacy of students. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.12345/jess.2025.13109
2. Ardestani, M. M., Farshadnia, A., & Rastegar, A. (2025). Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and academic achievement: The mediating role of perfectionism among university students. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1531149. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1531149
3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
5. Burger, J. M. (2006). Personality (İ. D. Erguvan Sarıoğlu, Trans.). Kaknüs Publishing.
6. Burns, D. D. (1980). The perfectionist’s script for self-defeat. Psychology Today, 14(6), 34–52.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods (8th ed.). Pegem Academy.
8. Çetiner, T., & Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2023). The mediating role of self-regulation and self-compassion in the relationship between maladaptive perfectionism and burnout among university students. Journal of Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education, 57, 1622–1645. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1277921

9. Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000178
10. Ditchburn, G., Howells, F. M., & Guo, J. (2025). Socially prescribed perfectionism and self-efficacy: Exploring maladaptive patterns among university students. Psychology & Health, 40(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2552227
11. Erturan, G., McBride, R., & Ağbuğa, B. (2020). Self-regulation and self-efficacy as mediators of achievement goals and leisure time physical activity: A proposed model. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sport, 24(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0102
12. Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2002). Perfectionism and maladjustment: An overview of theoretical, definitional, and treatment issues. In P. L. Hewitt & G. L. Flett (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–31). American Psychological Association.
13. Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2014). The destructiveness of perfectionism revisited: Implications for the assessment of suicide risk and the prevention of suicide. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000011
14. Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Dyck, D. G. (1989). Self-oriented perfectionism, neuroticism, and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7), 731–735.
15. Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 15(1), 27–33.
16. Jinks, J., & Lorsbach, A. (2003). Introduction: Motivation and self-efficacy beliefs. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 113–118.
17. Karasar, N. (2014). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, and techniques (27th ed.). Nobel Publishing.
18. Kearns, H., Forbes, A., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). When a high distinction isn’t good enough: A review of perfectionism and self-handicapping. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 21–36.
19. Küçüker, K., & Işık, Ö. (2022). Predicting the academic achievement of students in faculties of sport sciences. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Sciences, 5(2), 1042–1052.
20. Locicero, K., & Ashby, J. S. (2000). Multidimensional perfectionism and self-reported self-efficacy in college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 15(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1300/J035v15n02_06
21. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.
22. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
23. Odacı, H., Kalkan, M., & Çıkrıkçı, Ö. (2017). Development of the Academic Perfectionism Scale. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18(1), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2017.18.1.022
24. Shafran, R., & Mansell, W. (2001). Perfectionism and psychopathology: A review of research and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 879–906.
25. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.
26. Sotardi, V. A., Stoeber, J., & Smith, M. M. (2025). Perfectionism profiles and their links with academic achievement, self-compassion, and well-being in higher education students. Personality and Individual Differences, 239, Article 113117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113117
27. Stoeber, J., Hutchfield, J., & Wood, K. V. (2008). Perfectionism, self-efficacy, and aspiration level: Differential effects of perfectionistic striving and self-criticism after success and failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(4), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.021
28. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Victor-Aigbodion, V., & Ngwoke, D. U. (2020). Cognitive behavioural coaching protocol for adolescents’ perfectionism. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 11(7), 1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v11i7.10230
30. Yıldırım, F., & İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish form of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21(4), 301–308.
31. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (11th ed.). Ankara, Türkiye: Seçkin Publishing