Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Öğrencilerinde Boş Zaman Motivasyonunun Etkinlik Doyumu ve Rekreasyonel Akış Deneyimi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırma, spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin boş zaman motivasyonunun, etkinlik doyumu ve rekreasyonel akış deneyimi üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlişkisel tarama modelinde tasarlanan çalışmanın örneklemini, 2025-2026 akademik yılı güz döneminde Balıkesir Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 103’ü (%45) kadın ve 126’sı (%55) erkek olmak üzere toplam 229 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Boş Zaman Motivasyon Ölçeği, Etkinlik Doyumu Ölçeği ve Rekreasyonel Akış Deneyimi Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Analizlerde betimsel istatistiklerin yanı sıra Bağımsız Örneklemler t-Testi, Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA), Pearson Korelasyon ve Regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, kadın öğrencilerin boş zaman motivasyonu, etkinlik doyumu ve rekreasyonel akış deneyimi düzeylerinin erkek öğrencilere kıyasla daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, düzenli rekreatif aktivitelere katılmayan öğrencilerin bu değişkenlerde daha yüksek puanlar aldığı, haftalık boş zaman süresi arttıkça motivasyon, doyum ve akış deneyiminin yükseldiği tespit edilmiştir. Boş zaman motivasyonu ile etkinlik doyumu ve rekreasyonel akış deneyimi arasında yüksek düzeyde pozitif ilişkiler bulunmuş, motivasyonun, etkinlik doyumunun %50’sini, rekreasyonel akış deneyiminin ise %49,4’ünü açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin boş zaman motivasyon düzeylerinin hem etkinlik doyumu hem de rekreasyonel akış deneyimi üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Boş zaman motivasyonu
• etkinlik doyumu
• rekreasyonel akış
• spor bilimleri öğrencileri
• rekreatif katılım

The Effect of Leisure Motivation on Activity Satisfaction and Recreational Flow Experience among Students of the Faculty of Sport Sciences

Öz

This study aims to examine the effect of leisure motivation on activity satisfaction and recreational flow experience among students of the Faculty of Sport Sciences. The study was designed using a relational survey model. The sample of the study consists of a total of 229 students studying at the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Balıkesir University during the fall semester of the 2025–2026 academic year, including 103 (45%) female and 126 (55%) male students. The data were collected using a Demographic Information Form, the Leisure Motivation Scale, the Activity Satisfaction Scale, and the Recreational Flow Experience Scale. In addition to descriptive statistics, Independent Samples t-Test, One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Pearson Correlation, and Regression analyses were used in the data analysis. The findings indicated that female students had higher levels of leisure motivation, activity satisfaction, and recreational flow experience compared to male students. Additionally, it was found that students who did not regularly participate in recreational activities scored higher on these variables, and as weekly leisure time increased, motivation, satisfaction, and flow experience also increased. A strong positive relationship was found between leisure motivation, activity satisfaction, and recreational flow experience. Furthermore, leisure motivation explained 50% of the variance in activity satisfaction and 49.4% of the variance in recreational flow experience. In conclusion, the findings reveal that the leisure motivation levels of students in the Faculty of Sport Sciences have a significant effect on both activity satisfaction and recreational flow experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leisure motivation
• activity satisfaction
• recreational flow
• sport sciences students
• recreational participation

Kaynakça

1. Adeleye, A. O., Okueso, S. A., Abdul, A. A., & Balogun, A. H. (2022). Psycho-demographic factors as predictors of sports leisure activities among students of Olabisi Onabanjo University. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 8(1), 14–22 https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v8i1.273
2. Addis, M., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). On the conceptual link between mass customization and experiential consumption: An explosion of subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(1), 50–66.
3. Akgül, O. (2020). The relationship between perceived value, flow experience, and behavioral intention in guided tours: The case of Çanakkale Wars Gallipoli Historical Site (Unpublished master’s thesis). Balıkesir University.
4. Akyüz, H., Yaşartürk, F., Aydın, İ., Zorba, E., & Türkmen, M. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between university students’ quality of life and happiness levels. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies, 3(Special Issue 2), 253–262.
5. Aydın, İ. (2022). The partial mediating effect of activity satisfaction in the relationship between leisure involvement and life satisfaction: The example of recreational runners. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 13(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.911751
6. Ayhan, C. (2022). The effect of leisure involvement, recreational flow experience, recreational benefit, and leisure satisfaction on re-participation intention (Doctoral dissertation). Sakarya University of Applied Sciences.
7. Ayhan, C., & Eskiler, E. (2024). The relationship between leisure attitude and happiness: The mediating effect of recreational flow experience. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1504810
8. Ayhan, C., Eskiler, E., & Soyer, F. (2020). Measuring flow experience in recreational participants: Scale development and validation. Journal of Human Sciences, 17(4), 1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i4.6105

9. Bayram, A., Yalcin, I., Sahin, E., Ekinci, N. E., Talaghir, L. G., & Iconomescu, T. M. (2025). The role of recreational flow experience and well-being on re-participation intention: Recreational sport participants. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1574337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574337
10. Beggs, B. A., Stitt, J. E., & Elkins, D. J. (2004). Leisure motivation of participants and nonparticipants in campus recreational sports programs. Recreational Sports Journal, 28(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.28.1.65
11. Belosevic, M., & Feric, M. (2022). Contribution of leisure context, motivation and experience to the frequency of participation in structured leisure activities among adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020877
12. Blonska, K. (2022). The impact of physical activity on students' happiness in the context of positive and negative motivation. Physical Education of Students. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2022.0205
13. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471548
14. Ceylan, E. H., & Taşkın, C. (2024). Investigation of leisure motivation levels of students in the School of Physical Education and Sports. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 98, 314–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.36791
15. Chen, F., Li, J., Yu, H., Chen, P., & Xia, Y. (2025). The impact of fluency in college students’ leisure sports on happiness: The moderating role of leisure satisfaction. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3594
16. Chen, M., Xue, S., & Shi, Y. (2018). Leisure activities and leisure motivations of Chinese residents. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0206740. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206740
17. Cheng, T. M., & Lu, C. C. (2015). The causal relationships among recreational involvement, flow experience, and well-being for surfing activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(12), 1486–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.999099
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
20. Demiral, G., & Karakaş, G. (2024). The effect of recreational flow experience on happiness in university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 18(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.61962/bsd.1410795
21. Doğan, M., & Ünal, Y. B. (2024). The relationship between leisure involvement, flow experience, and life satisfaction levels of fitness center members. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns, 5(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v5i1.229
22. Dulhamid, H. A., Isa, M. I., Mohamed, B., & Sazali, M. F. (2023). Motivation of outdoor recreation participation among rural and urban communities. Planning Malaysia, 21(25), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i25.1251
23. Elkington, S. D. (2017). Flow theory and leisure. In The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 417-436). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
24. Funk, D. C., Jordan, J., Ridinger, L., & Kaplanidou, K. (2011). Capacity of mass participant sport events for the development of activity commitment and future exercise intention. Leisure Sciences, 33(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.564926
25. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10th ed.). Pearson.
26. Güler, H. (2017). Investigation of the effect of leisure constraints on leisure motivation of students studying in schools of physical education and sports: The example of Bartın University (Master’s thesis). Bartın University.
27. Jackson, S. A., Eklund, R. C., Gordon, A., Norsworthy, C., Mackenzie, S. H., Hodge, K., & Stephen, S. A. (2023). Flow and outdoor adventure recreation: Using flow measures to re-examine motives for participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 67, 102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102427
28. Karagöz, Y. (2021). Applied biostatistics with SPSS AMOS META (3rd ed.). Akademik Publishing.
29. Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method (17th ed.). Nobel Publishing.
30. Kaya, M., Akyol, C. Ç., Özbek, R., & Pepeler, E. (2017). Opinions of academics in the department of educational sciences regarding distance education applications in graduate education programs. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(64, Special Issue), 1616–1627.
31. Kim, S., Sung, J., Park, J., & Dittmore, S. W. (2015). The relationship among leisure attitude, satisfaction, and psychological well-being for college students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.01012
32. Kwon, Y. (2021). Relationship between participation motivation and psychological well-being of marine leisure sports participants. İlköğretim Online, 20(3), 1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.123
33. Lazar, I., Osoian, C., & Ratiu, P. (2010). The role of work-life balance practices in order to improve organizational performance. European Research Studies, 13(1), 201–214.
34. Lee, H., Kim, J., & Bae, I. (2019). A research on the mediating role of flow experience between involvement and satisfaction: Focus on leisure satisfaction for university students. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S6), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1006.0782S619
35. Mutlu, İ. (2008). A study on the leisure attitudes of individuals who exercise: The case of Kayseri province (Master’s thesis). Niğde University.
36. Nakamura, J., & Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press.
37. Nam, I. S., Nam, K. W., & Kim, J. C. (2009). The effect of the motivation of leisure on leisure satisfaction and psychological well-being of male university students. Journal of Leisure and Recreation Studies, 33(2), 27–38.
38. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
39. Önen, L. (2023). Investigation of university students’ leisure motivations and factors preventing participation in recreational activities (Master’s thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University.
40. Öz, R., Akkuş, E., & Yüce, A. (2023). Investigation of recreational flow experiences of individuals participating in fitness sports. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 14(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1268099
41. Özşaker, M. (2012). An investigation on the reasons why young people cannot participate in leisure activities. Selçuk University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 14(1), 126–131.
42. Park, E. S. (2022). Impact of the motivation for college students to participate in leisure activities onto psychological happiness and the satisfaction with school life: Focusing on the moderate effect upon the level of involvement in leisure activities. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 23(9), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.9.117
43. Park, K. W., Lee, C. W., & Kim, M. J. (2016). Effect of serious leisure experience on the leisure satisfaction among senior sport games participants. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(Supplement Issue), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.s1092
44. Peker, H., Teke, C., Çakar, B., Kabadayı, Y., & Caner, N. (2023). The relationship between enjoyment of physical activity, re-participation intention, and happiness: The example of university students participating in campus recreation. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 9(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.61087/IntJCES.2023.8D
45. Pelletier, L. G., Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., & Brière, N. M. (1991). Leisure Motivation Scale (LMS-28). UQAM Leisure Research Centre
46. Soldatnikov, K. G., & Leontiev, D. (2017). The quality of motivation in learning and leisure activities, and their accompanying experiences (Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 83).
47. Tao, H., Zhou, Q., Tian, D., & Zhu, L. (2022). The effect of leisure involvement on place attachment: Flow experience as mediating role. Land, 11(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020151
48. Wang, E. S. T., Chen, L. S. L., Lin, J. Y. C., & Wang, M. C. H. (2008). The relationship between leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of adolescents concerning online games. Adolescence, 43(169), 177–185.
49. Wöran, B., & Arnberger, A. (2012). Exploring relationships between recreation specialization, restorative environments and mountain hikers’ flow experience. Leisure Sciences, 34(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2012.652502
50. Wu, Y., Sun, J., Fan, F., Wang, X., & Peng, Y. (2021). The influence of motivation, attitudes and obstacles for middle school students’ participation in leisure activities on their leisure satisfaction in Southwest China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 758858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758858
51. Yazıcı, T., & Koçak, S. (2024). Serious leisure, motivation, experience value, and behavioral intentions in charity sport event context. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00605-8
52. Yerlisu Lapa, T., Ağyar, E., & Bahadır, Z. (2012). Life satisfaction, leisure motivation, and leisure participation: An investigation on physical education and sports teachers (The case of Kayseri province). Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 10(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000220
53. Yıldız, A. (2025). Investigation of well-being and activity satisfaction levels of individuals participating in recreational sports (Master’s thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University.