Üst Kademe Teorisine İlişkin Bir Literatür Taraması

Yıl 2023, , 411 - 432, 30.06.2023

Ceyda Kavurmacı Aytaç , Füsun Çınar Altıntaş

https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1217535

Öz

Üst kademe teorisi, örgütleri yöneticilerinin birer yansıması olarak görmektedir. Teoriye göre yöneticilerin gözlemlenebilir yani demografik ve gözlemlenemeyen yani psikolojik değişkenleri örgütün stratejik seçim ve eylemlerini yönlendirmektedir. Çalışmanın esas amacı, üst kademe teorisi yazınının mevcut durumunu ve ilgili alanda anlaşılması gereken ve henüz yeterli çalışma yapılmamış olan alanları ortaya koymaktır. Bu doğrultuda, üst kademe teorisine ilişkin bir literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Teorinin ortaya konduğu 1984 yılından günümüze dek yapılmış olan çalışmalar analiz birimi, kullanılan değişkenler, kullanılan araştırma yöntemi gibi özellikleri açısından kategorize edilerek sunulmuştur. Teorinin gözlemlenebilir değişkenlerin ele alındığı çalışmalar ile hız kazandığı ancak diğer taraftan gözlemlenemeyen değişkenlerin yeterli sayıda çalışmaya konu edilmediği görülmüştür. Aynı zamanda, ilgili yazında nicel araştırma yöntemlerinin kullanımının çok yoğun olduğu ancak yönetici özelliklerinin stratejik eylemleri nasıl etkilediğini anlamaya yönelik yapılan nitel çalışmaların sıklıkla yapılmadığı görülmüştür. Mevcut çalışmanın, ilgili alanda yer alan araştırmacılara alana dair bir inceleme sunması açısından ve alanın mevcut durumunu ortaya koyması açısından katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

üst kademe teorisi, stratejik seçim, davranışsal strateji, literatür taraması

A Literature Review on Upper Echelon Theory

Öz

Upper echelon theory sees organizations as a reflection of their managers. According to upper echelon theory, the observable -demographic- and unobservable -psychological- variables of the managers direct the strategic choices and actions of the managers. The main purpose of the study is to reveal the current state of the upper-echelon theory literature and the areas that need to be understood and for which adequate studies have not been done yet. In this direction, a literature review on upper-echelon theory was conducted. The studies carried out since 1984, when the theory was introduced- are presented by categorizing them in terms of features such as analysis unit, variables, and research method. It has been observed that the theory has gained momentum with studies dealing with observable variables but on the other hand, unobservable variables are not subject to a sufficient number of studies. At the same time, it has been observed that the use of the quantitative research method is very intense, but qualitative studies aimed at understanding how managerial characteristics affect strategic actions are not frequently conducted. It is thought that the current study will contribute to the researchers in the field in terms of presenting a review of the field and revealing the current situation of the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

upper echelon theory, strategic choice, behavioral strategy, literature review

Kaynakça

• *Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2016). Upper echelons and executive profiles in the construction value chain: evidence from Italy. Project Management Journal, 47(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21562
• Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2020). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016
• *Abdulaziz-al-Humaidan, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Investigating the mediating relationship between sustainability orientations and sustainable performance in the SME context of Tunisia. Vision, 26(3), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211000481
• *Acar, F. P., & Gozum, A. G. (2020). Gender Composition of the Upper Echelons and Firm Sustainability Performance: an Examination of Istanbul Stock Exchange Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility In Developing and Emerging Markets: Institutions, Actors and Sustainable Development.
• *Ahrens, J. P., Uhlaner, L., Woywode, M., & Zybura, J. (2018). “Shadow emperor” or “loyal paladin”?–The Janus face of previous owner involvement in family firm successions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.003
• *Aibar-Guzmán, B., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2021). Is it necessary to centralize power in the CEO to ensure environmental innovation?. Administrative sciences, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010027
• Alas, R., Ennulo, J., & Türnpuu, L. (2006). Managerial values in the institutional context. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5494-1
• *Ali, A., Jiang, X., Ali, A., & Qadeer, A. A moderated mediation model linking entrepreneurial leadership to green innovation: An upper echelons theory perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12538
• *Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., Suleman, S., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). CEO attributes, investment decisions, and firm performance: New insights from upper echelons theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(2), 398-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3389
• *Amin, M., Wu, J., & Tu, R. (2019). Signaling value of top management team: Evidence from Chinese initial public offerings on US markets. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0097
• Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin.
• *Bachrach, D. G., Guedes, M. J., Harms, P. D., & Patel, P. C. (2022). CEO narcissism, top management team transactive memory systems, and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective on CEO admiration and rivalry narcissism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1926989
• *Bao, S., Fainshmidt, S., Nair, A., & Vracheva, V. (2014). Women in upper echelons of management, tenure and legal risk. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 388-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00847.x
• *Bennat, T., & Sternberg, R. (2022). CEO characteristics and the Doing-Using-Interacting mode of innovation: a new upper echelons perspective. Industry and Innovation, 29(10), 1202-1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2090319
• *Bendoly, E., Bachrach, D. G., Esper, T. L., Blanco, C., Iversen, J., & Yin, Y. (2021). Operations in the upper echelons: leading sustainability through stewardship. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(11), 1737-1760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2021-0502
• *Berisha, V., & Miftari, I. (2022). CFO and CEO Characteristics and Managerial Accounting Techniques (MAT’s) Usage: An Upper-Echelons Perspective. JEEMS Journal of East European Management Studies, 27(2), 348-375. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2022-2
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
• *Bjornali, E. S., Knockaert, M., & Erikson, T. (2016). The impact of top management team characteristics and board service involvement on team effectiveness in high-tech start-ups. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.014
• *Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6
• *Boone, C., Lokshin, B., Guenter, H., & Belderbos, R. (2019). Top management team nationality diversity, corporate entrepreneurship, and innovation in multinational firms. Strategic management journal, 40(2), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2976
• *Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: A literature review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
• *Buyl, T., Boone, C., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011417345
• *Camelo, C., Fernández‐Alles, M., & Hernández, A. B. (2010). Strategic consensus, top management teams, and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011073373
• *Camelo‐Ordaz, C., Hernández‐Lara, A. B., & Valle‐Cabrera, R. (2005). The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 683-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510613726
• *Camors, C., Chavez, S. L., & Romi, A. M. (2020). The cannabis industry within the USA: the influence of gender on cannabis policy and sales. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0330
• Cannella, S. F. B., Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Strategic management.
• *Cannella Jr, A. A. (2001). Upper echelons: Donald Hambrick on executives and strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5229499
• *Cannella, A. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model. In Multi-level issues in strategy and methods (Vol. 4, pp. 195-237). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9
• *Cannella, A. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model: Planting seeds for future research. In Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Methods (Vol. 4, pp. 263-273). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04012-9
• *Cao, G., & Zhang, J. (2021). Guanxi, overconfidence and corporate fraud in China. Chinese Management Studies, 15(3), 501-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2020-0166
• *Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of management, 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
• *Carpenter, M. A. (2005). Moving (finally) toward a multi-level model of the upper echelons. In Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Methods. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04010-5
• *Carpenter, M. A., & Reilly, G. P. (2006). Constructs and construct measurement in upper echelons research. In Research methodology in strategy and management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-8387(06)03003-7
• *Cetindamar, D., & Pala, O. (2011). Chief technology officer roles and performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1031-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.621297
• *Cetindamar, D., & Pala, O. (2008, July). The relationship between CTO and performance. In PICMET'08-2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 42-49). IEEE.
• *Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2011). The sidelining of top IT executives in the governance of outsourcing: Antecedents, power struggles, and consequences. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 58(4), 799-814.
• *Chang, J., Bai, X., & Li, J. J. (2015). The influence of leadership on product and process innovations in China: The contingent role of knowledge acquisition capability. Industrial marketing management, 50, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.014
• *Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2021). How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 897-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09698-6
• *Chen, W. H., Kang, M. P., & Butler, B. (2019). How does top management team composition matter for continual growth? Reinvestigating Penrose’s growth theory through the lens of upper echelons theory. Management Decision, 57(1), 41-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0147
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101
• *Chua, M., Ab Razak, N. H., Nassir, A. M., & Yahya, M. H. (2022). Dynamic capital structure in Indonesia: Does the education and experience of CEOs matter?. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003
• *Chuang, T. T., Nakatani, K., & Zhou, D. (2009). An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: an application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise information management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910932821
• *Civera, A., Lehmann, E. E., & Meoli, M. (2022). The importance of team diversity for academic spinoff performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 14(4-5), 472-496. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2022.127438
• *Corner, P. D., & Kinicki, A. J. (2004). An upper echelons explanation of acquisition outcomes. In Advances in mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 4, pp. 83-120). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(04)04004-9
• *Cuypers, I. R., Patel, C., Ertug, G., Li, J., & Cuypers, Y. (2022). Top management teams in international business research: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(3), 481-515. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00456-9
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
• *Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2005). Upper echelons perspective and multi-level analysis: a case of the cart before the horse?. In Multi-level issues in strategy and methods. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04011-7
• *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2020). Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory. European Management Journal, 38(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.006
• *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2015). Top management team’s intellectual capital and firm performance. European Management Journal, 33(5), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.004
• *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Paddison, B. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of firm performance in a Latin-American and European diverse industrial context. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 28(4), 502-522. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2015-0037
• *Diánez-González, J. P., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2016). How management team composition affects academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of conflict. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 530-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9428-5
• *Diánez-González, J. P., del Carmen Camelo-Ordaz, M., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2016). Management teams’ composition and academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: A theoretical approach. Entrepreneurship-Practice-Oriented Perspectives, 2, 65-99. https://doi.org/10.5772/65270
• *Dolz, C., Iborra, M., & Safon, V. (2015). Family-owned company, management teams, diversity, and ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises/Empresa familiar, equipos directivos, diversidad y ambidiestria en las PyMEs/Empresa familiar, equipes administrativas, diversidade e ambidestria em pequenas e medias empresas. RAE, 55(6), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150606
• *Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Helo, P. (2019). Supplier relationship management for circular economy: Influence of external pressures and top management commitment. Management Decision, 57(4), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0396
• *Egerová, D., & Nosková, M. (2019). Top management team composition and financial performance: Examining the role of gender diversity. Business Administration and Management, 2(22), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-2-009
• *Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2023). Board gender diversity and ESG decoupling: Does religiosity matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3353
• Eryılmaz, M. (2004). Stratejik seçim ve kurumsalcı bakış açılarının birlikteliği üzerine eğitim sektöründe bir araştırma. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 25-48.
• *Evans, R. W., & Butler, F. C. (2011). An upper echelons view of “Good to Great”: Principles for behavioral integration in the top management team. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20224
• *Everaert, P., Sarens, G., & Rommel, J. (2010). Using transaction cost economics to explain outsourcing of accounting. Small Business Economics, 35, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9149-3
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-Management-Team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393314
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.
• *Firk, S., Gehrke, Y., Hanelt, A., & Wolff, M. (2022). Top management team characteristics and digital innovation: Exploring digital knowledge and TMT interfaces. Long Range Planning, 55(3), 102-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102166
• *Friedmann, C. B., Garg, R., & Holtbrügge, D. (2018). CEOs' cultural and demographic attributes and organisational performance of Indian SMEs: an upper echelon approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(5), 483-512. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.094606
• *Friedman, Y., Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2016). How CEOs and TMTs build adaptive capacity in small entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 996-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12184
• *Fuentes‐Henríquez, F., & Del Sol, P. (2012). Analogical foundation of the scope of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211199646
• *Gao, L., Wang, J., He, H., & Wang, S. (2022). Do motives contribute to sustainable supply chain management? A Motive–Ability–Opportunity triangle research perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(4-5), 694-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1914565
• *Garavan, T. N., Sheerin, C., Koukpaki, S., O'Brien, F., Chami-Malaeb, R., MacKenzie, C., & Buckley, J. (2022). Strategic talent management in hotels during COVID-19: upper echelons and dynamic attention-based perspectives. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0516
• *Garcés-Galdeano, L., García-Olaverri, C., & Huerta, E. (2021). Does one size fit all? CEO profiles and strategic management choices. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 34(2), 244-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-04-2020-0075
• *García-Sánchez, I. M., & García-Meca, E. (2020). Do able bank managers Exhibit specific attributes? An empirical analysis of their investment efficiency. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030044
• *Garms, F. P., & Engelen, A. (2019). Innovation and R&D in the upper echelons: The association between the CTO's power depth and breadth and the TMT's commitment to innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12441
• Gavetti, G., & Rivkin, J. W. (2007). On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organization Science, 18(3), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0282
• *Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2012). New directions on compensation and upper echelons. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12005
• *Geyer, A., & Geyer, A. (2016). Variations in Strategic Choices Concerning Firm Growth–a Conceptual Framework and Its Application to the Context of Family Businesses. The Growth Behavior of Family Firms: Theoretical and Empirical Elaborations, 15-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13117-3_2
• *Geyer, A., & Geyer, A. (2016). The Influence of Executives’ Membership in the FB Owner-Family on Firm Growth–the Central Role of Individual Growth Intentions. The Growth Behavior of Family Firms: Theoretical and Empirical Elaborations, 173-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13117-3_4
• *Glińska-Neweś, A., Barabasz, A., Escher, I., & Fu, Y. (2022). Defence mechanisms as predictors of trust and positive relationships in top management teams. Human Systems Management, 41(5), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211562
• *Gurkov, I., & Settles, A. (2013). A dominant archetype of the HRM system in Russian industrial companies in post-recession times. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(19), 3630-3643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.778315
• *Hafiz, N., Latiff, A. S. A., Islam, M. A., Saif, A. N. M., & Wahab, S. A. (2022). Towards the underlying theories of small firm growth: A literature review. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211049627
• *Haislip, J., Lim, J. H., & Pinsker, R. (2021). The impact of executives’ IT expertise on reported data security breaches. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0986
• *Halder, A., Prügl, R., Kraiczy, N. D., & Hack, A. (2021). The family factor: How collaborative dialogue between owner managers and the owner family shapes firm-level outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1844484
• Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Guest editor’s introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100703
• *Hambrick, D. C., Humphrey, S. E., & Gupta, A. (2015). Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2230
• *Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
• *Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of management review, 32(2), 334-343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159303
• *Hattke, F., & Blaschke, S. (2015). Striving for excellence: The role of top management team diversity in universities. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 21(3/4), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2014-0019
• Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W. (2013). The Psychological and Neurological Bases of Leader Self-Complexity and Effects on Adaptive Decision-Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032257
• *Hashim, M. Z., Chao, L., & Wang, C. (2022). The role of project managers’ attributes in project sustainability management and project performance under China-Pakistan economic corridor. Chinese Management Studies, 16(3), 708-731. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2021-0333
• *Hassan, H., Saleh, N. M., Kamaluddin, A., & Hamzah, N. (2015, November). The Role of Leadership on Intellectual Capital as Strategy Towards Hospitals' Performance. In International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (p. 363). Academic Conferences International Limited.
• *Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2015). Transactive memory systems and firm performance: An upper echelons perspective. Organization Science, 26(4), 941-959. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43661031
• Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2002). CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: an empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491031
• Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2006). CEO experiences: effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 755-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00610.x
• *Heyden, M. L., Van Doorn, S., Reimer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2013). Perceived environmental dynamism, relative competitive performance, and top management team heterogeneity: Examining correlates of upper echelons’ advice-seeking. Organization studies, 34(9), 1327-1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612470229
• *Hiebl, M. R. (2017). Finance managers in family firms: an upper-echelons view. Journal of Family Business Management, 7(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2016-0014
• *Higgs, M. (2006). How do top teams succeed? Factors that contribute to successful senior management team performance. Journal of General Management, 32(2), 77-99. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51414
• Hitt, M. A., & Tyler, B. B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120502
• *Hoffmann, W. H., & Meusburger, L. (2018). How CEO values and TMT diversity jointly influence the corporate strategy making process. Schmalenbach Business Review, 70, 149-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-017-0042-y
• Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500307
• *Ilaboya, O. J., & Aronmwan, E. J. (2023). Chief Executive Officer’s attributes and tax avoidance: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00168-y
• *Issa, A., & Bensalem, N. (2022). Are gender‐diverse boards eco‐innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2385
• *Istipliler, B., Ahrens, J. P., Hauer, A., Steininger, D. M., & Woywode, M. (2022). Heroes of the Green Room–How Able Successors Revitalize and Reinvent Family Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, (tba), tba. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2161554
• *Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., Li, Z., & Li, Y. (2022). To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(3), 738-750. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3415
• *Javed, M., Akhtar, M. W., Husnain, M., Lodhi, R., & Emaan, S. (2020). A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case”‐An investigation through moderated‐mediation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2563-2577. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1976
• *Jaw, Y. L., & Lin, W. T. (2009). Corporate elite characteristics and firm's internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802528797
• *Ji, Y. Y. (2015). Top management team pay structure and corporate social performance. Journal of General Management, 40(3), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701504000302
• *Jiao, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, M. (2019). The effect of the social network of the top management team on innovation in cultural and creative industries: A study based on knowledge network embedding. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 10(1/2), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHRM-10-2018-0021
• *Juravich, M., Salaga, S., & Babiak, K. (2017). Upper echelons in professional sport: The impact of NBA general managers on team performance. Journal of Sport Management, 31(5), 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0044
• *Kanadlı, S. B., Bankewitz, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). Job-related diversity: the comprehensiveness and speed of board decision-making processes—an upper echelons approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 427-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9394-4
• *Kaur, R., & Singh, B. (2021). The impact of CEOs’ characteristics on corporate leverage: Indian scenario. Vision, 25(4), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920954596
• *Kaur, R., & Singh, B. (2019). Do CEO characteristics explain firm performance in India? Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2019-0027
• Kesner, I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000204
• *Kim, J. W., & Higgins, M. C. (2007). Where do alliances come from?: The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.017
• Kokot, K., Tipurić, D., & Čalopa, M. K. (2021). Upper Echelon Theory: A Review And Future Research Agenda. 9. International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship, Book Of Proceedings, 123-135.
• *Kolev, K. D., & McNamara, G. (2022). The role of top management teams in firm responses to performance shortfalls. Strategic Organization, 20(3), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020962683
• *Kortmann, S. (2015). The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity‐oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151
• *Kraft, P. S. (2022). The double‐edged sword of CEO narcissism: A meta‐analysis of innovation and firm performance implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(6), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12649
• *Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). The relationship between top management team innovation orientation and firm growth: The mediating role of firm innovativeness. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(01), 1550005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961550005X
• *Kumar, A., & Paraskevas, J. P. (2018). A proactive environmental strategy: Analyzing the effect of SCM experience, age, and female representation in TMTs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(4), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12179
• *Kunz, J., & Sonnenholzner, L. (2022). Managerial overconfidence: promoter of or obstacle to organizational resilience? Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00530-y
• *Kutzschbach, J., Tanikulova, P., & Lueg, R. (2021). The role of top managers in implementing corporate sustainability—A systematic literature review on small and medium-sized enterprises. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020044
• *La Rosa, F., Bernini, F., & Terzani, S. (2022). Does corporate and country corruption risk affect CEO performance? A study of the best-performing CEOs worldwide. European Management Journal, 40(2), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.05.002
• Lawrence, B. S. (1997). Perspective—the black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.1.1
• *Lee, W. S., & Moon, J. (2016). Determinants of CEO strategic risk-taking in the airline industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18, 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.01.009
• *Lee, W. S., Kim, I., & Moon, J. (2016). Determinants of restaurant internationalization: an upper echelons theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28812, 2864-2887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2015-0048
• *Li, P. Y., & Lo, F. Y. (2017). Top management teams’ managerial resources and international diversification: the evidence under an uncertain environment. Management Decision, 55(9), 1999-2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2016-0364
• *Li, C. R., Liu, Y. Y., Lin, C. J., & Ma, H. J. (2016). Top management team diversity, ambidextrous innovation and the mediating effect of top team decision-making processes. Industry and Innovation, 23(3), 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1144503
• *Lin, T. C., Ku, Y. C., & Huang, Y. S. (2014). Exploring top managers’ innovative IT (IIT) championing behavior: Integrating the personal and technical contexts. Information & Management, 51(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.09.002
• *Li, Y., Tan, C. H., Teo, H. H., & Tan, B. C. (2006). Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: Do CIO characteristics make a difference?. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.872250
• *Lin, W. T., & Cheng, K. Y. (2013). The effect of upper echelons’ compensation on firm internationalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9261-9
• *Ling, Y. H. (2022). Leader, context and CSR: evidence from Taiwan. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(3), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-07-2021-0132
• *Liu, X., Zhang, L., Gupta, A., Zheng, X., & Wu, C. (2022). Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units. Strategic Management Journal, 43(11), 2351-2381. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3406
• *Liu, W., Gong, Y., & Liu, J. (2014). When do business units benefit more from collective citizenship behavior of management teams? An upper echelons perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035538
• *López-Muñoz, J. F., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2017). An upper echelons perspective on information technology business value. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(3), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.02.003
• *Ma, S., Kor, Y. Y., & Seidl, D. (2022). Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), O1-O28. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3368
• *Mai, Y., Xiong, C., & He, X. (2015). The effects of entrepreneurs’ socioeconomic status and political characteristics on new ventures’ establishment of formal political ties in China. Chinese Management Studies, 9(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-05-2013-0078
• March, J. G., & Herbert, A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley.
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-Making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164491
• *Molina-Garcia, A., Dieguez-Soto, J., Galache-Laza, M. T., & Campos-Valenzuela, M. (2022). Financial literacy in SMEs: a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review of an emerging research field. Review of Managerial Science, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00556-2
• *Mousa, F. T., Kim, S. K., & Rutherford, M. A. (2016). Top management team and IPO firms’ acquisition activity. Management Decision, 54(3), 664-682. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0059
• *Moreno-Gómez, J., Lafuente, E., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Gender diversity in the board, women’s leadership and business performance. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2017-0058
• *Mungai, E. M., Ndiritu, S. W., & Rajwani, T. (2020). Raising the bar? Top management teams, gender diversity, and environmental sustainability. Africa Journal of Management, 6(4), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1830688
• *Najmaei, A., & Sadeghinejad, Z. (2019). Metacognition, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons View. The Anatomy of Entrepreneurial Decisions: Past, Present and Future Research Directions, 79-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19685-1_5
• *Neely Jr, B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P., & Hiller, N. J. (2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640
• *Neill, S., Wu, M., & Noel, T. W. (2022). Linking managerial capital with explorative strategy and growth in China. Management Research Review, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2021-0702
• *Neffe, C., Wilderom, C. P., & Lattuch, F. (2022). Emotionally intelligent top management and high family firm performance: Evidence from Germany. European management journal, 40(3), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.007
• *Oppong, S. (2014). Upper echelons theory revisited: The need for a change from causal description to casual explanation. Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 19(2), 169-183. https://hrcak.srce.hr/133229
• *Orij, R. P., Rehman, S., Khan, H., & Khan, F. (2021). Is CSR the new competitive environment for CEOs? The association between CEO turnover, corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: Asian evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 731-747. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2084
• *Ormiston, M. E., Wong, E. M., & Ha, J. (2022). The role of CEO emotional stability and team heterogeneity in shaping the top management team affective tone and firm performance relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101543
• *Peck-Ling, T., Nai-Chiek, A., & Chee-Seong, L. (2016). Foreign ownership, foreign directors and the profitability of Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 580-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.037
• *Polat, B. (2010). Resource acquisition and venture survival in the telecommunications industry. In Strategic Reconfigurations. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805629.00016
• Popli, M., Ahsan, F. M., & Mukherjee, D. (2022). Upper echelons and firm internationalization: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 152, 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2261
• Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies’ performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924589
• *Purkayastha, A., Sharma, S., & Karna, A. (2020). Theoretical foundations of antecedents of internationalization and moderators in multinationality–performance relationship: What is missing? Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 27(2), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2019-0055
• *Rasheed, M. A., Shahzad, K., & Nadeem, S. (2021). Transformational leadership and employee voice for product and process innovation in SMEs. Innovation & Management Review, 18(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-01-2020-0007
• *Raziq, M. M., Benito, G. R., & Igoe, J. (2020). Subsidiary country managers and subsidiary development: Upper echelons and resource-based perspectives. German journal of human resource management, 34(3), 291-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219898184
• *Rengel, R., Monteiro, J. J., Lunkes, R. J., Lavarda, C. E. F., & Schnorrenberger, D. (2020). Effect of Manager's Characteristics on Budget Participation mediated by Perception of Procedural Justice/Efeito das Caracteristicas dos Gestores na Participacao Orcamentaria mediado pela Percepcao de Justica Processual. Revista Contabilidade, Gestao e Governanca (CGG), 23(2), 256-276. http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/6397
• *Reutzel, C. R., & Belsito, C. A. (2012). Examining the relative influence of upper echelons ties on IPO underpricing. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0163-y
• *Ribeiro, I., Serra, F. A. R., Marietto, M. L., & Serra, B. P. D. C. (2020). Strategic decision-making: research mapping from Exploratory Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling. http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/6538
• *Rivas, J. L. (2012). Board versus TMT international experience: a study of their joint effects. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211270011
• *Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Opening the black box of upper echelons: Drivers of poor information processing during the financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(3), 212-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00796.x
• *Salleh, S. S. M. M., Fareed, M., Yusoff, R. Z., & Saad, R. (2018). Internal and external top management team (TMT) networking for advancing firm innovativeness. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.23
• *Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199611)17:9<739::AID-SMJ846>3.0.CO;2-K
• *Schechowiz, R., & Sumilo, E. (2019). Interim managers in the CFO role in medium-sized companies: Literature overview, conceptual approach, and empirical study. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 4(2). https://doi.org/0.24088/IJBEA-2019-42002
• *Schmid, S., Wurster, D. J., & Dauth, T. (2015). Internationalisation of upper echelons in different institutional contexts: top managers in Germany and the UK. European Journal of International Management, 9(4), 510-535. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2015.070232
• *Sekiguchi, T., Bebenroth, R., & Li, D. (2011). Nationality background of MNC affiliates' top management and affiliate performance in Japan: knowledge-based and upper echelons perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05), 999-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.556774
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Harper & Row.
• *Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Chen, Y., Ullah, F., Li, H. X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2345
• *Shahi, R., & Parekh, N. (2022). Financing social enterprises: An upper echelon perspective. FIIB Business Review, 11(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211033092
• *Shi, W., Pathak, S., Song, L. J., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2018). The adoption of chief diversity officers among S&P 500 firms: Institutional, resource dependence, and upper echelons accounts. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21837
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. 4th edn. Free Press.
• Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25-44.
• *Smith, A. L., Bradley, R. V., Bichescu, B. C., & Tremblay, M. C. (2013). IT governance characteristics, electronic medical records sophistication, and financial performance in US hospitals: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, 44(3), 483-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12019
• *Sosik, J. J., Gentry, W. A., & Chun, J. U. (2012). The value of virtue in the upper echelons: A multisource examination of executive character strengths and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.010
• *Steinbach, A. L., Gamache, D. L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Don’t get it misconstrued: Executive construal-level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 871-895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0273
• *Tan, M., & Xia, Q. (2022). Curious, unconventional and creative: CEO openness and innovation ambidexterity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2069007
• *Taylor, J., Sahaym, A., & Vithayathil, J. (2022). Do CIOs Matter in the Face of Exogenous Shocks? An Examination Through Upper Echelon Theory. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2350005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877023500050
• *Turner, L. A., & Merriman, K. K. (2022). Cultural intelligence and establishment of organisational diversity management practices: An upper echelons perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12407
• *Tretbar, T., Reimer, M., & Schäffer, U. (2016). Upper echelons in family firms: what we know and still can learn about family-TMT-involvement. The Routledge companion to family business, 120-147.
• *Troy, C., Smith, K. G., & Domino, M. A. (2011). CEO demographics and accounting fraud: Who is more likely to rationalize illegal acts? Strategic Organization, 9(4), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011421534
• *Wagner, S. M., & Kemmerling, R. (2014). Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.006
• *Waldman, D. A., & Javidan, M. (2013). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: Taking a new look at upper echelons theory. In Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition (Vol. 5, pp. 201-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005017
• *Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The leadership quarterly, 15(3), 355-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.013
• *Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2022). Community norms and corporate philanthropy: the moderating role of women on board of directors. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1239-1264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0118
• *Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lee, J. J. (2021). Management characteristics and corporate performance of Chinese chemical companies: the moderating effect of managerial ability. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(2), 976-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12575
• *Wang, K., Miao, N. N., & Xue, K. K. (2020). Does the technology background of the Party Committee Secretary affect firm’s innovation efficiency? Evidence from listed state-owned enterprises in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(5), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1668920
• *Wang, T., Libaers, D., & Jiao, H. (2015). Opening the Black Box of Upper Echelons in C hina: TMT Attributes and Strategic Flexibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12152
• *Wang, G., Holmes Jr, R. M., Oh, I. S., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta‐analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140
• *Wang, D., Su, Z., & Guo, H. (2019). Top management team conflict and exploratory innovation: The mediating impact of market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.014
• *Weihong, C., Xi, Z., Lan, H., & Zhiyuan, L. (2020). “Accelerating” and “jumping” internationalization: CEO career horizon, board supervision ability and corporate internationalization process. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 587-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2019-0239
• *Van Doorn, S., Heyden, M. L., Reimer, M., Buyl, T., & Volberda, H. W. (2022). Internal and external interfaces of the executive suite: Advancing research on the porous bounds of strategic leadership. Long Range Planning, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102214
• *Van Veen, K., & Elbertsen, J. (2008). Governance regimes and nationality diversity in corporate boards: A comparative study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00698.x
• *Vega-Jurado, J., Schmutzler, J., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., & Vega-Cárcamo, J. (2019). Orchestrating absorptive capacity: organizational catalysts of TMT’s influence. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2018-0892
• *Xia, Q., Tan, M., Cao, Q., & Li, L. (2023). The microfoundations of open innovation: CEO overconfidence and innovation choices. R&D Management, 53(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12544
• *Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2014). The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 69-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113511663
• *Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., Minichilli, A., & Esteve, A. E. (2013). Contextualising upper echelon research: The interactions of top management teams and CEOs. European Journal of International Management, 7, 1-5.
• *Yuan, X. N., Guo, Z., & Fang, E. (2014). An examination of how and when the top management team matters for firm innovativeness: The effects of TMT functional backgrounds. Innovation, 16(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2014.11081991
• *Zhao, S., Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H., & Cooper, B. (2019). A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0643
• *Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Lam, D., Fu, X. M., & Li, M. (2022). CEOs' marital status and corporate innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(5), 686-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12619
• *Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Jia, M. (2022). Poverty as a double‐edged sword: how CEOs’ childhood poverty experience affect firms’ risk taking. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1632-1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12515
• *Zhou, Z., & Verburg, R. (2020). Open for business: The impact of creative team environment and innovative behaviour in technology-based start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 38(4), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619892793
• *Zhu, D. H., & Shen, W. (2016). Why do some outside successions fare better than others? The role of outside CEOs' prior experience with board diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2695-2708. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2471