Üst Kademe Teorisine İlişkin Bir Literatür Taraması

Öz

Üst kademe teorisi, örgütleri yöneticilerinin birer yansıması olarak görmektedir. Teoriye göre yöneticilerin gözlemlenebilir yani demografik ve gözlemlenemeyen yani psikolojik değişkenleri örgütün stratejik seçim ve eylemlerini yönlendirmektedir. Çalışmanın esas amacı, üst kademe teorisi yazınının mevcut durumunu ve ilgili alanda anlaşılması gereken ve henüz yeterli çalışma yapılmamış olan alanları ortaya koymaktır. Bu doğrultuda, üst kademe teorisine ilişkin bir literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Teorinin ortaya konduğu 1984 yılından günümüze dek yapılmış olan çalışmalar analiz birimi, kullanılan değişkenler, kullanılan araştırma yöntemi gibi özellikleri açısından kategorize edilerek sunulmuştur. Teorinin gözlemlenebilir değişkenlerin ele alındığı çalışmalar ile hız kazandığı ancak diğer taraftan gözlemlenemeyen değişkenlerin yeterli sayıda çalışmaya konu edilmediği görülmüştür. Aynı zamanda, ilgili yazında nicel araştırma yöntemlerinin kullanımının çok yoğun olduğu ancak yönetici özelliklerinin stratejik eylemleri nasıl etkilediğini anlamaya yönelik yapılan nitel çalışmaların sıklıkla yapılmadığı görülmüştür. Mevcut çalışmanın, ilgili alanda yer alan araştırmacılara alana dair bir inceleme sunması açısından ve alanın mevcut durumunu ortaya koyması açısından katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• üst kademe teorisi
• stratejik seçim
• davranışsal strateji
• literatür taraması

A Literature Review on Upper Echelon Theory

Öz

Upper echelon theory sees organizations as a reflection of their managers. According to upper echelon theory, the observable -demographic- and unobservable -psychological- variables of the managers direct the strategic choices and actions of the managers. The main purpose of the study is to reveal the current state of the upper-echelon theory literature and the areas that need to be understood and for which adequate studies have not been done yet. In this direction, a literature review on upper-echelon theory was conducted. The studies carried out since 1984, when the theory was introduced- are presented by categorizing them in terms of features such as analysis unit, variables, and research method. It has been observed that the theory has gained momentum with studies dealing with observable variables but on the other hand, unobservable variables are not subject to a sufficient number of studies. At the same time, it has been observed that the use of the quantitative research method is very intense, but qualitative studies aimed at understanding how managerial characteristics affect strategic actions are not frequently conducted. It is thought that the current study will contribute to the researchers in the field in terms of presenting a review of the field and revealing the current situation of the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• upper echelon theory
• strategic choice
• behavioral strategy
• literature review

Kaynakça

1. *Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2016). Upper echelons and executive profiles in the construction value chain: evidence from Italy. Project Management Journal, 47(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21562
2. Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2020). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016
3. *Abdulaziz-al-Humaidan, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Investigating the mediating relationship between sustainability orientations and sustainable performance in the SME context of Tunisia. Vision, 26(3), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211000481
4. *Acar, F. P., & Gozum, A. G. (2020). Gender Composition of the Upper Echelons and Firm Sustainability Performance: an Examination of Istanbul Stock Exchange Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility In Developing and Emerging Markets: Institutions, Actors and Sustainable Development.
5. *Ahrens, J. P., Uhlaner, L., Woywode, M., & Zybura, J. (2018). “Shadow emperor” or “loyal paladin”?–The Janus face of previous owner involvement in family firm successions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.003
6. *Aibar-Guzmán, B., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2021). Is it necessary to centralize power in the CEO to ensure environmental innovation?. Administrative sciences, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010027
7. Alas, R., Ennulo, J., & Türnpuu, L. (2006). Managerial values in the institutional context. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5494-1
8. *Ali, A., Jiang, X., Ali, A., & Qadeer, A. A moderated mediation model linking entrepreneurial leadership to green innovation: An upper echelons theory perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12538

9. *Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., Suleman, S., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). CEO attributes, investment decisions, and firm performance: New insights from upper echelons theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(2), 398-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3389
10. *Amin, M., Wu, J., & Tu, R. (2019). Signaling value of top management team: Evidence from Chinese initial public offerings on US markets. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0097
11. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin.
12. *Bachrach, D. G., Guedes, M. J., Harms, P. D., & Patel, P. C. (2022). CEO narcissism, top management team transactive memory systems, and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective on CEO admiration and rivalry narcissism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1926989
13. *Bao, S., Fainshmidt, S., Nair, A., & Vracheva, V. (2014). Women in upper echelons of management, tenure and legal risk. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 388-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00847.x
14. *Bennat, T., & Sternberg, R. (2022). CEO characteristics and the Doing-Using-Interacting mode of innovation: a new upper echelons perspective. Industry and Innovation, 29(10), 1202-1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2090319
15. *Bendoly, E., Bachrach, D. G., Esper, T. L., Blanco, C., Iversen, J., & Yin, Y. (2021). Operations in the upper echelons: leading sustainability through stewardship. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(11), 1737-1760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2021-0502
16. *Berisha, V., & Miftari, I. (2022). CFO and CEO Characteristics and Managerial Accounting Techniques (MAT’s) Usage: An Upper-Echelons Perspective. JEEMS Journal of East European Management Studies, 27(2), 348-375. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2022-2
17. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
18. *Bjornali, E. S., Knockaert, M., & Erikson, T. (2016). The impact of top management team characteristics and board service involvement on team effectiveness in high-tech start-ups. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.014
19. *Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6
20. *Boone, C., Lokshin, B., Guenter, H., & Belderbos, R. (2019). Top management team nationality diversity, corporate entrepreneurship, and innovation in multinational firms. Strategic management journal, 40(2), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2976
21. *Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: A literature review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
22. *Buyl, T., Boone, C., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011417345
23. *Camelo, C., Fernández‐Alles, M., & Hernández, A. B. (2010). Strategic consensus, top management teams, and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011073373
24. *Camelo‐Ordaz, C., Hernández‐Lara, A. B., & Valle‐Cabrera, R. (2005). The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 683-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510613726
25. *Camors, C., Chavez, S. L., & Romi, A. M. (2020). The cannabis industry within the USA: the influence of gender on cannabis policy and sales. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0330
26. Cannella, S. F. B., Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Strategic management.
27. *Cannella Jr, A. A. (2001). Upper echelons: Donald Hambrick on executives and strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5229499
28. *Cannella, A. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model. In Multi-level issues in strategy and methods (Vol. 4, pp. 195-237). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9
29. *Cannella, A. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model: Planting seeds for future research. In Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Methods (Vol. 4, pp. 263-273). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04012-9
30. *Cao, G., & Zhang, J. (2021). Guanxi, overconfidence and corporate fraud in China. Chinese Management Studies, 15(3), 501-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2020-0166
31. *Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of management, 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
32. *Carpenter, M. A. (2005). Moving (finally) toward a multi-level model of the upper echelons. In Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Methods. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04010-5
33. *Carpenter, M. A., & Reilly, G. P. (2006). Constructs and construct measurement in upper echelons research. In Research methodology in strategy and management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-8387(06)03003-7
34. *Cetindamar, D., & Pala, O. (2011). Chief technology officer roles and performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1031-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.621297
35. *Cetindamar, D., & Pala, O. (2008, July). The relationship between CTO and performance. In PICMET'08-2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 42-49). IEEE.
36. *Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2011). The sidelining of top IT executives in the governance of outsourcing: Antecedents, power struggles, and consequences. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 58(4), 799-814.
37. *Chang, J., Bai, X., & Li, J. J. (2015). The influence of leadership on product and process innovations in China: The contingent role of knowledge acquisition capability. Industrial marketing management, 50, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.014
38. *Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2021). How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 897-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09698-6
39. *Chen, W. H., Kang, M. P., & Butler, B. (2019). How does top management team composition matter for continual growth? Reinvestigating Penrose’s growth theory through the lens of upper echelons theory. Management Decision, 57(1), 41-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0147
40. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101
41. *Chua, M., Ab Razak, N. H., Nassir, A. M., & Yahya, M. H. (2022). Dynamic capital structure in Indonesia: Does the education and experience of CEOs matter?. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003
42. *Chuang, T. T., Nakatani, K., & Zhou, D. (2009). An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: an application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise information management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910932821
43. *Civera, A., Lehmann, E. E., & Meoli, M. (2022). The importance of team diversity for academic spinoff performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 14(4-5), 472-496. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2022.127438
44. *Corner, P. D., & Kinicki, A. J. (2004). An upper echelons explanation of acquisition outcomes. In Advances in mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 4, pp. 83-120). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(04)04004-9
45. *Cuypers, I. R., Patel, C., Ertug, G., Li, J., & Cuypers, Y. (2022). Top management teams in international business research: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(3), 481-515. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00456-9
46. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
47. *Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2005). Upper echelons perspective and multi-level analysis: a case of the cart before the horse?. In Multi-level issues in strategy and methods. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04011-7
48. *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2020). Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory. European Management Journal, 38(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.006
49. *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2015). Top management team’s intellectual capital and firm performance. European Management Journal, 33(5), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.004
50. *Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Paddison, B. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of firm performance in a Latin-American and European diverse industrial context. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 28(4), 502-522. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2015-0037
51. *Diánez-González, J. P., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2016). How management team composition affects academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of conflict. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 530-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9428-5
52. *Diánez-González, J. P., del Carmen Camelo-Ordaz, M., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2016). Management teams’ composition and academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: A theoretical approach. Entrepreneurship-Practice-Oriented Perspectives, 2, 65-99. https://doi.org/10.5772/65270
53. *Dolz, C., Iborra, M., & Safon, V. (2015). Family-owned company, management teams, diversity, and ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises/Empresa familiar, equipos directivos, diversidad y ambidiestria en las PyMEs/Empresa familiar, equipes administrativas, diversidade e ambidestria em pequenas e medias empresas. RAE, 55(6), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150606
54. *Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Helo, P. (2019). Supplier relationship management for circular economy: Influence of external pressures and top management commitment. Management Decision, 57(4), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0396
55. *Egerová, D., & Nosková, M. (2019). Top management team composition and financial performance: Examining the role of gender diversity. Business Administration and Management, 2(22), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-2-009
56. *Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2023). Board gender diversity and ESG decoupling: Does religiosity matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3353
57. Eryılmaz, M. (2004). Stratejik seçim ve kurumsalcı bakış açılarının birlikteliği üzerine eğitim sektöründe bir araştırma. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 25-48.
58. *Evans, R. W., & Butler, F. C. (2011). An upper echelons view of “Good to Great”: Principles for behavioral integration in the top management team. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20224
59. *Everaert, P., Sarens, G., & Rommel, J. (2010). Using transaction cost economics to explain outsourcing of accounting. Small Business Economics, 35, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9149-3
60. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-Management-Team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393314
61. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.
62. *Firk, S., Gehrke, Y., Hanelt, A., & Wolff, M. (2022). Top management team characteristics and digital innovation: Exploring digital knowledge and TMT interfaces. Long Range Planning, 55(3), 102-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102166
63. *Friedmann, C. B., Garg, R., & Holtbrügge, D. (2018). CEOs' cultural and demographic attributes and organisational performance of Indian SMEs: an upper echelon approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(5), 483-512. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.094606
64. *Friedman, Y., Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2016). How CEOs and TMTs build adaptive capacity in small entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 996-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12184
65. *Fuentes‐Henríquez, F., & Del Sol, P. (2012). Analogical foundation of the scope of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211199646
66. *Gao, L., Wang, J., He, H., & Wang, S. (2022). Do motives contribute to sustainable supply chain management? A Motive–Ability–Opportunity triangle research perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(4-5), 694-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1914565
67. *Garavan, T. N., Sheerin, C., Koukpaki, S., O'Brien, F., Chami-Malaeb, R., MacKenzie, C., & Buckley, J. (2022). Strategic talent management in hotels during COVID-19: upper echelons and dynamic attention-based perspectives. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0516
68. *Garcés-Galdeano, L., García-Olaverri, C., & Huerta, E. (2021). Does one size fit all? CEO profiles and strategic management choices. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 34(2), 244-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-04-2020-0075
69. *García-Sánchez, I. M., & García-Meca, E. (2020). Do able bank managers Exhibit specific attributes? An empirical analysis of their investment efficiency. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030044
70. *Garms, F. P., & Engelen, A. (2019). Innovation and R&D in the upper echelons: The association between the CTO's power depth and breadth and the TMT's commitment to innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12441
71. Gavetti, G., & Rivkin, J. W. (2007). On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organization Science, 18(3), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0282
72. *Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2012). New directions on compensation and upper echelons. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12005
73. *Geyer, A., & Geyer, A. (2016). Variations in Strategic Choices Concerning Firm Growth–a Conceptual Framework and Its Application to the Context of Family Businesses. The Growth Behavior of Family Firms: Theoretical and Empirical Elaborations, 15-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13117-3_2
74. *Geyer, A., & Geyer, A. (2016). The Influence of Executives’ Membership in the FB Owner-Family on Firm Growth–the Central Role of Individual Growth Intentions. The Growth Behavior of Family Firms: Theoretical and Empirical Elaborations, 173-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13117-3_4
75. *Glińska-Neweś, A., Barabasz, A., Escher, I., & Fu, Y. (2022). Defence mechanisms as predictors of trust and positive relationships in top management teams. Human Systems Management, 41(5), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211562
76. *Gurkov, I., & Settles, A. (2013). A dominant archetype of the HRM system in Russian industrial companies in post-recession times. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(19), 3630-3643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.778315
77. *Hafiz, N., Latiff, A. S. A., Islam, M. A., Saif, A. N. M., & Wahab, S. A. (2022). Towards the underlying theories of small firm growth: A literature review. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211049627
78. *Haislip, J., Lim, J. H., & Pinsker, R. (2021). The impact of executives’ IT expertise on reported data security breaches. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0986
79. *Halder, A., Prügl, R., Kraiczy, N. D., & Hack, A. (2021). The family factor: How collaborative dialogue between owner managers and the owner family shapes firm-level outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1844484
80. Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Guest editor’s introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100703
81. *Hambrick, D. C., Humphrey, S. E., & Gupta, A. (2015). Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2230
82. *Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
83. *Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of management review, 32(2), 334-343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159303
84. *Hattke, F., & Blaschke, S. (2015). Striving for excellence: The role of top management team diversity in universities. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 21(3/4), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2014-0019
85. Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W. (2013). The Psychological and Neurological Bases of Leader Self-Complexity and Effects on Adaptive Decision-Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032257
86. *Hashim, M. Z., Chao, L., & Wang, C. (2022). The role of project managers’ attributes in project sustainability management and project performance under China-Pakistan economic corridor. Chinese Management Studies, 16(3), 708-731. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2021-0333
87. *Hassan, H., Saleh, N. M., Kamaluddin, A., & Hamzah, N. (2015, November). The Role of Leadership on Intellectual Capital as Strategy Towards Hospitals' Performance. In International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (p. 363). Academic Conferences International Limited.
88. *Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2015). Transactive memory systems and firm performance: An upper echelons perspective. Organization Science, 26(4), 941-959. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43661031
89. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2002). CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: an empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491031
90. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2006). CEO experiences: effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 755-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00610.x
91. *Heyden, M. L., Van Doorn, S., Reimer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2013). Perceived environmental dynamism, relative competitive performance, and top management team heterogeneity: Examining correlates of upper echelons’ advice-seeking. Organization studies, 34(9), 1327-1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612470229
92. *Hiebl, M. R. (2017). Finance managers in family firms: an upper-echelons view. Journal of Family Business Management, 7(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2016-0014
93. *Higgs, M. (2006). How do top teams succeed? Factors that contribute to successful senior management team performance. Journal of General Management, 32(2), 77-99. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51414
94. Hitt, M. A., & Tyler, B. B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120502
95. *Hoffmann, W. H., & Meusburger, L. (2018). How CEO values and TMT diversity jointly influence the corporate strategy making process. Schmalenbach Business Review, 70, 149-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-017-0042-y
96. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500307
97. *Ilaboya, O. J., & Aronmwan, E. J. (2023). Chief Executive Officer’s attributes and tax avoidance: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00168-y
98. *Issa, A., & Bensalem, N. (2022). Are gender‐diverse boards eco‐innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2385
99. *Istipliler, B., Ahrens, J. P., Hauer, A., Steininger, D. M., & Woywode, M. (2022). Heroes of the Green Room–How Able Successors Revitalize and Reinvent Family Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, (tba), tba. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2161554
100. *Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., Li, Z., & Li, Y. (2022). To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(3), 738-750. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3415
101. *Javed, M., Akhtar, M. W., Husnain, M., Lodhi, R., & Emaan, S. (2020). A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case”‐An investigation through moderated‐mediation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2563-2577. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1976
102. *Jaw, Y. L., & Lin, W. T. (2009). Corporate elite characteristics and firm's internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802528797
103. *Ji, Y. Y. (2015). Top management team pay structure and corporate social performance. Journal of General Management, 40(3), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701504000302
104. *Jiao, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, M. (2019). The effect of the social network of the top management team on innovation in cultural and creative industries: A study based on knowledge network embedding. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 10(1/2), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHRM-10-2018-0021
105. *Juravich, M., Salaga, S., & Babiak, K. (2017). Upper echelons in professional sport: The impact of NBA general managers on team performance. Journal of Sport Management, 31(5), 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0044
106. *Kanadlı, S. B., Bankewitz, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). Job-related diversity: the comprehensiveness and speed of board decision-making processes—an upper echelons approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 427-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9394-4
107. *Kaur, R., & Singh, B. (2021). The impact of CEOs’ characteristics on corporate leverage: Indian scenario. Vision, 25(4), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920954596
108. *Kaur, R., & Singh, B. (2019). Do CEO characteristics explain firm performance in India? Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2019-0027
109. Kesner, I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000204
110. *Kim, J. W., & Higgins, M. C. (2007). Where do alliances come from?: The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.017
111. Kokot, K., Tipurić, D., & Čalopa, M. K. (2021). Upper Echelon Theory: A Review And Future Research Agenda. 9. International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship, Book Of Proceedings, 123-135.
112. *Kolev, K. D., & McNamara, G. (2022). The role of top management teams in firm responses to performance shortfalls. Strategic Organization, 20(3), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020962683
113. *Kortmann, S. (2015). The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity‐oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151
114. *Kraft, P. S. (2022). The double‐edged sword of CEO narcissism: A meta‐analysis of innovation and firm performance implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(6), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12649
115. *Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). The relationship between top management team innovation orientation and firm growth: The mediating role of firm innovativeness. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(01), 1550005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961550005X
116. *Kumar, A., & Paraskevas, J. P. (2018). A proactive environmental strategy: Analyzing the effect of SCM experience, age, and female representation in TMTs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(4), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12179
117. *Kunz, J., & Sonnenholzner, L. (2022). Managerial overconfidence: promoter of or obstacle to organizational resilience? Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00530-y
118. *Kutzschbach, J., Tanikulova, P., & Lueg, R. (2021). The role of top managers in implementing corporate sustainability—A systematic literature review on small and medium-sized enterprises. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020044
119. *La Rosa, F., Bernini, F., & Terzani, S. (2022). Does corporate and country corruption risk affect CEO performance? A study of the best-performing CEOs worldwide. European Management Journal, 40(2), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.05.002
120. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). Perspective—the black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.1.1
121. *Lee, W. S., & Moon, J. (2016). Determinants of CEO strategic risk-taking in the airline industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18, 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.01.009
122. *Lee, W. S., Kim, I., & Moon, J. (2016). Determinants of restaurant internationalization: an upper echelons theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28812, 2864-2887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2015-0048
123. *Li, P. Y., & Lo, F. Y. (2017). Top management teams’ managerial resources and international diversification: the evidence under an uncertain environment. Management Decision, 55(9), 1999-2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2016-0364
124. *Li, C. R., Liu, Y. Y., Lin, C. J., & Ma, H. J. (2016). Top management team diversity, ambidextrous innovation and the mediating effect of top team decision-making processes. Industry and Innovation, 23(3), 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1144503
125. *Lin, T. C., Ku, Y. C., & Huang, Y. S. (2014). Exploring top managers’ innovative IT (IIT) championing behavior: Integrating the personal and technical contexts. Information & Management, 51(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.09.002
126. *Li, Y., Tan, C. H., Teo, H. H., & Tan, B. C. (2006). Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: Do CIO characteristics make a difference?. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.872250
127. *Lin, W. T., & Cheng, K. Y. (2013). The effect of upper echelons’ compensation on firm internationalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9261-9
128. *Ling, Y. H. (2022). Leader, context and CSR: evidence from Taiwan. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(3), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-07-2021-0132
129. *Liu, X., Zhang, L., Gupta, A., Zheng, X., & Wu, C. (2022). Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units. Strategic Management Journal, 43(11), 2351-2381. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3406
130. *Liu, W., Gong, Y., & Liu, J. (2014). When do business units benefit more from collective citizenship behavior of management teams? An upper echelons perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035538
131. *López-Muñoz, J. F., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2017). An upper echelons perspective on information technology business value. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(3), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.02.003
132. *Ma, S., Kor, Y. Y., & Seidl, D. (2022). Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), O1-O28. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3368
133. *Mai, Y., Xiong, C., & He, X. (2015). The effects of entrepreneurs’ socioeconomic status and political characteristics on new ventures’ establishment of formal political ties in China. Chinese Management Studies, 9(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-05-2013-0078
134. March, J. G., & Herbert, A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley.
135. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
136. Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-Making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164491
137. *Molina-Garcia, A., Dieguez-Soto, J., Galache-Laza, M. T., & Campos-Valenzuela, M. (2022). Financial literacy in SMEs: a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review of an emerging research field. Review of Managerial Science, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00556-2
138. *Mousa, F. T., Kim, S. K., & Rutherford, M. A. (2016). Top management team and IPO firms’ acquisition activity. Management Decision, 54(3), 664-682. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0059
139. *Moreno-Gómez, J., Lafuente, E., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Gender diversity in the board, women’s leadership and business performance. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2017-0058
140. *Mungai, E. M., Ndiritu, S. W., & Rajwani, T. (2020). Raising the bar? Top management teams, gender diversity, and environmental sustainability. Africa Journal of Management, 6(4), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1830688
141. *Najmaei, A., & Sadeghinejad, Z. (2019). Metacognition, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons View. The Anatomy of Entrepreneurial Decisions: Past, Present and Future Research Directions, 79-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19685-1_5
142. *Neely Jr, B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P., & Hiller, N. J. (2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640
143. *Neill, S., Wu, M., & Noel, T. W. (2022). Linking managerial capital with explorative strategy and growth in China. Management Research Review, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2021-0702
144. *Neffe, C., Wilderom, C. P., & Lattuch, F. (2022). Emotionally intelligent top management and high family firm performance: Evidence from Germany. European management journal, 40(3), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.007
145. *Oppong, S. (2014). Upper echelons theory revisited: The need for a change from causal description to casual explanation. Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 19(2), 169-183. https://hrcak.srce.hr/133229
146. *Orij, R. P., Rehman, S., Khan, H., & Khan, F. (2021). Is CSR the new competitive environment for CEOs? The association between CEO turnover, corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: Asian evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 731-747. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2084
147. *Ormiston, M. E., Wong, E. M., & Ha, J. (2022). The role of CEO emotional stability and team heterogeneity in shaping the top management team affective tone and firm performance relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101543
148. *Peck-Ling, T., Nai-Chiek, A., & Chee-Seong, L. (2016). Foreign ownership, foreign directors and the profitability of Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 580-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.037
149. *Polat, B. (2010). Resource acquisition and venture survival in the telecommunications industry. In Strategic Reconfigurations. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805629.00016
150. Popli, M., Ahsan, F. M., & Mukherjee, D. (2022). Upper echelons and firm internationalization: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 152, 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2261
151. Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies’ performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924589
152. *Purkayastha, A., Sharma, S., & Karna, A. (2020). Theoretical foundations of antecedents of internationalization and moderators in multinationality–performance relationship: What is missing? Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 27(2), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2019-0055
153. *Rasheed, M. A., Shahzad, K., & Nadeem, S. (2021). Transformational leadership and employee voice for product and process innovation in SMEs. Innovation & Management Review, 18(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-01-2020-0007
154. *Raziq, M. M., Benito, G. R., & Igoe, J. (2020). Subsidiary country managers and subsidiary development: Upper echelons and resource-based perspectives. German journal of human resource management, 34(3), 291-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219898184
155. *Rengel, R., Monteiro, J. J., Lunkes, R. J., Lavarda, C. E. F., & Schnorrenberger, D. (2020). Effect of Manager's Characteristics on Budget Participation mediated by Perception of Procedural Justice/Efeito das Caracteristicas dos Gestores na Participacao Orcamentaria mediado pela Percepcao de Justica Processual. Revista Contabilidade, Gestao e Governanca (CGG), 23(2), 256-276. http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/6397
156. *Reutzel, C. R., & Belsito, C. A. (2012). Examining the relative influence of upper echelons ties on IPO underpricing. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0163-y
157. *Ribeiro, I., Serra, F. A. R., Marietto, M. L., & Serra, B. P. D. C. (2020). Strategic decision-making: research mapping from Exploratory Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling. http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/6538
158. *Rivas, J. L. (2012). Board versus TMT international experience: a study of their joint effects. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211270011
159. *Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Opening the black box of upper echelons: Drivers of poor information processing during the financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(3), 212-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00796.x
160. *Salleh, S. S. M. M., Fareed, M., Yusoff, R. Z., & Saad, R. (2018). Internal and external top management team (TMT) networking for advancing firm innovativeness. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.23
161. *Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199611)17:9<739::AID-SMJ846>3.0.CO;2-K
162. *Schechowiz, R., & Sumilo, E. (2019). Interim managers in the CFO role in medium-sized companies: Literature overview, conceptual approach, and empirical study. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 4(2). https://doi.org/0.24088/IJBEA-2019-42002
163. *Schmid, S., Wurster, D. J., & Dauth, T. (2015). Internationalisation of upper echelons in different institutional contexts: top managers in Germany and the UK. European Journal of International Management, 9(4), 510-535. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2015.070232
164. *Sekiguchi, T., Bebenroth, R., & Li, D. (2011). Nationality background of MNC affiliates' top management and affiliate performance in Japan: knowledge-based and upper echelons perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05), 999-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.556774
165. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Harper & Row.
166. *Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Chen, Y., Ullah, F., Li, H. X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2345
167. *Shahi, R., & Parekh, N. (2022). Financing social enterprises: An upper echelon perspective. FIIB Business Review, 11(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211033092
168. *Shi, W., Pathak, S., Song, L. J., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2018). The adoption of chief diversity officers among S&P 500 firms: Institutional, resource dependence, and upper echelons accounts. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21837
169. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. 4th edn. Free Press.
170. Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25-44.
171. *Smith, A. L., Bradley, R. V., Bichescu, B. C., & Tremblay, M. C. (2013). IT governance characteristics, electronic medical records sophistication, and financial performance in US hospitals: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, 44(3), 483-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12019
172. *Sosik, J. J., Gentry, W. A., & Chun, J. U. (2012). The value of virtue in the upper echelons: A multisource examination of executive character strengths and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.010
173. *Steinbach, A. L., Gamache, D. L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Don’t get it misconstrued: Executive construal-level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 871-895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0273
174. *Tan, M., & Xia, Q. (2022). Curious, unconventional and creative: CEO openness and innovation ambidexterity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2069007
175. *Taylor, J., Sahaym, A., & Vithayathil, J. (2022). Do CIOs Matter in the Face of Exogenous Shocks? An Examination Through Upper Echelon Theory. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2350005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877023500050
176. *Turner, L. A., & Merriman, K. K. (2022). Cultural intelligence and establishment of organisational diversity management practices: An upper echelons perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12407
177. *Tretbar, T., Reimer, M., & Schäffer, U. (2016). Upper echelons in family firms: what we know and still can learn about family-TMT-involvement. The Routledge companion to family business, 120-147.
178. *Troy, C., Smith, K. G., & Domino, M. A. (2011). CEO demographics and accounting fraud: Who is more likely to rationalize illegal acts? Strategic Organization, 9(4), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011421534
179. *Wagner, S. M., & Kemmerling, R. (2014). Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.006
180. *Waldman, D. A., & Javidan, M. (2013). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: Taking a new look at upper echelons theory. In Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition (Vol. 5, pp. 201-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005017
181. *Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The leadership quarterly, 15(3), 355-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.013
182. *Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2022). Community norms and corporate philanthropy: the moderating role of women on board of directors. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1239-1264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0118
183. *Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lee, J. J. (2021). Management characteristics and corporate performance of Chinese chemical companies: the moderating effect of managerial ability. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(2), 976-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12575
184. *Wang, K., Miao, N. N., & Xue, K. K. (2020). Does the technology background of the Party Committee Secretary affect firm’s innovation efficiency? Evidence from listed state-owned enterprises in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(5), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1668920
185. *Wang, T., Libaers, D., & Jiao, H. (2015). Opening the Black Box of Upper Echelons in C hina: TMT Attributes and Strategic Flexibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12152
186. *Wang, G., Holmes Jr, R. M., Oh, I. S., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta‐analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140
187. *Wang, D., Su, Z., & Guo, H. (2019). Top management team conflict and exploratory innovation: The mediating impact of market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.014
188. *Weihong, C., Xi, Z., Lan, H., & Zhiyuan, L. (2020). “Accelerating” and “jumping” internationalization: CEO career horizon, board supervision ability and corporate internationalization process. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 587-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2019-0239
189. *Van Doorn, S., Heyden, M. L., Reimer, M., Buyl, T., & Volberda, H. W. (2022). Internal and external interfaces of the executive suite: Advancing research on the porous bounds of strategic leadership. Long Range Planning, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102214
190. *Van Veen, K., & Elbertsen, J. (2008). Governance regimes and nationality diversity in corporate boards: A comparative study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00698.x
191. *Vega-Jurado, J., Schmutzler, J., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., & Vega-Cárcamo, J. (2019). Orchestrating absorptive capacity: organizational catalysts of TMT’s influence. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2018-0892
192. *Xia, Q., Tan, M., Cao, Q., & Li, L. (2023). The microfoundations of open innovation: CEO overconfidence and innovation choices. R&D Management, 53(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12544
193. *Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2014). The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 69-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113511663
194. *Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., Minichilli, A., & Esteve, A. E. (2013). Contextualising upper echelon research: The interactions of top management teams and CEOs. European Journal of International Management, 7, 1-5.
195. *Yuan, X. N., Guo, Z., & Fang, E. (2014). An examination of how and when the top management team matters for firm innovativeness: The effects of TMT functional backgrounds. Innovation, 16(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2014.11081991
196. *Zhao, S., Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H., & Cooper, B. (2019). A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0643
197. *Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Lam, D., Fu, X. M., & Li, M. (2022). CEOs' marital status and corporate innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(5), 686-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12619
198. *Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Jia, M. (2022). Poverty as a double‐edged sword: how CEOs’ childhood poverty experience affect firms’ risk taking. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1632-1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12515
199. *Zhou, Z., & Verburg, R. (2020). Open for business: The impact of creative team environment and innovative behaviour in technology-based start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 38(4), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619892793
200. *Zhu, D. H., & Shen, W. (2016). Why do some outside successions fare better than others? The role of outside CEOs' prior experience with board diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2695-2708. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2471