Muhasebe Eğitiminde Aktif Öğrenme: SCOPUS Veri Tabanındaki Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Scopus veri tabanında muhasebe eğitiminde aktif öğrenme ile ilgili yayınlanmış çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizini yaparak, bu alanda öncü yazarları, kaynakları ve dökümanları belirlemek ve alanın kavramsal yapısını ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçtan hareket edilerek, Scopus veri tabanında, işletme, yönetim ve muhasebe alanında, muhasebe eğitiminde aktif öğrenme ile ilgili yayınlanmış 252 döküman ele alınarak performans analizi yapılmış ve alanın kavramsal yapısı incelenmiştir. Performans analizi sonucunda, en fazla yayını olan yazarlar arasından Jose L. Arquero’nun, en fazla atıf almış yazarlar arasından ise Paul Brynes, Kevin C. Moffitt ve Donald J. Warren’ın en etkili yazarlar, “How big data will change accounting” başlıklı makalenin en etkili makale, “Accounting Education” dergisinin bu alanda en fazla sayıda makaleyi yayınlamış olan dergi olduğu görülmüştür. Alanın kavramsal yapısının analiz edilmesi sonucunda, bu alanda yayınlanmış olan yayınların 9 küme altında toplandığı, literatürde aktif öğrenme yöntemlerine ilişkin öne çıkan anahtar kelimelerin deneysel öğrenme, harmanlanmış öğrenme, işbirlikçi öğrenme, hizmet öğrenimi, işle bütünleşik öğrenme ve tersyüz edilmiş sınıflar anahtar kelimeleri olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Muhasebe eğitimi
• Z kuşağı
• aktif öğrenme
• bibliyometrik analiz

Active Learning in Accounting Education: Bibliometric Analysis of Studies in SCOPUS Database

Öz

The aim of this study is to identify the leading authors, sources and documents in the field of active learning in accounting education and to reveal the conceptual structure of the field by conducting a bibliometric analysis of studies on the Scopus database. With this aim, 252 documents published in the Scopus database in the field of business, management and accounting related to active learning in accounting education were analysed and the conceptual structure of the field was examined. As a result of the performance analysis, it was seen that Jose L. Arquero was the most influential author among the authors with the most publications, Paul Brynes, Kevin C. Moffitt and Donald J. Warren were the most influential authors among the most cited authors, the article titled “How big data will change accounting” was the most influential article, and the journal of “Accounting Education” was the journal that published the most articles in this field. The analysis of the conceptual structure of the field showed that the publications published in this field were grouped into nine clusters, and the most recurring keywords related to active learning methods in these clusters were experimental learning, blended learning, collaborative learning, service learning, work-integrated learning and flipped classrooms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Accounting education
• generation Z
• active learning
• bibliometric analysis.

Kaynakça

1. Aristovnik, A., Karampelas, K., Umek, L., & Ravšelj, D. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1225834. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1225834
2. Ayers, L., Gartin, T. L., Lahoda, B. D., Veyon, S. R., Rushford, M., & Neidermeyer, P. E. (2010). Service learning: Bringing the business classroom to life. American Journal of Business Education, 3(9), 55-60.
3. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Research on education in Southeast Asia (1996–2019): A bibliometric review. Educational Review, 75(2), 348-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907313
4. Bergner, J., & Brooks, M. (2017). The efficacy of using Monopoly to improve undergraduate students’ understanding of the accounting cycle. In Advances in accounting education: Teaching and curriculum innovations (pp. 33-50). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-462220170000020003
5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
6. Bui, B., & Porter, B. (2014). The expectation-performance gap in accounting education: An exploratory study. In Personal transferable skills in accounting education (pp. 22-49). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902875556
7. Carvalho, C., & Almeida, A. C. (2022). The adequacy of accounting education in the development of transversal skills needed to meet market demands. Sustainability, 14(10), 5755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105755
8. Convery, S. P., & Swaney, A. M. (2012). Analyzing business issues—With Excel: The case of Superior Log Cabins, Inc. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50095

9. Cretu, D. M., & Morandau, F. (2024). Bullying and cyberbullying: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of research in education. Educational Review, 76(2), 371-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2034749
10. Crovini, C. (2024). How to foster student engagement with technology and the mediating role of the teacher's strategy: Lessons learned in a problem-based learning university. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 35(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2024.137640
11. Desiraju, R., & Gopinath, C. (2001). Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case methods. Journal of Management Education, 25(4), 394-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290102500404
12. Diez-Busto, E., Palazuelos, E., San-Martín, P., & del Corte, J. M. (2023). Developing accounting students’ professional competencies and satisfaction through learning experiences: Validation of a self-administered questionnaire. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100859
13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
14. Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning: A literature review. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183
15. Düzenli, H. (2021). A systematic review of educational suggestions on generation Z in the context of distance education. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(4), 896-912. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1016512
16. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
17. Elo, T., Pätäri, S., Sjögrén, H., & Mättö, M. (2024). Transformation of skills in the accounting field: The expectation–performance gap perceived by accounting students. Accounting Education, 33(3), 237-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2023.2191289
18. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
19. Ghani, E. K., Ilias, A., Muhammad, K., Rosley, N. A., Mohd Ali, M., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2024). Expectation gap on accounting graduates’ skill attributes between accounting educators and employers in Industry 4.0 environment: A Malaysian evidence. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v30i3.1059
20. Granleese, J. (1996). Devising an assessment schedule for essays. Accounting Education, 5(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289600000016
21. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
22. Inayati, N. L., & Ariona, V. D. (2023). Charting the course of active learning methods research: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(4), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.282
23. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium. https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2013-higher-education-edition/
24. Kamarrudin, H., Talib, O., Kamarudin, N., Ismail, N., & Md Zamin, A. A. (2022). Examining the trend of research on active engagement in science education: Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 937-957. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.157
25. Kayapınar, Ö., & Kayapınar, U. (2023). Sanat pazarlaması ve kültür pazarlaması çalışmalarının bilimsel haritalama yöntemi ile incelenmesi: Bibliometrik analiz (2000-2023). Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25, 469-488. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1231037
26. Kolb, D. A. (2000). Facilitator's guide to learning. Hay/McBer.
27. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
28. Kılınç, A. (2007). Probleme dayalı öğrenme. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 561-578.
29. Lento, C. (2018). Student usage of assessment-based and self-study online learning resources in introductory accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 33(4), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-52252
30. Ling, E. W. M., Li, C. Y. Y., & Deni, A. R. M. (2019, November). Promoting student engagement using flipped classroom in large introductory financial accounting class. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and E-Learning (pp. 61-66). https://doi.org/10.1145/3371647.3371658
31. Lowell, V. L., & Morris Jr, J. M. (2019). Multigenerational classrooms in higher education: equity and learning with technology. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(2), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2018-0068
32. Lux, G., Callimaci, A., Caron, M. A., Fortin, A., & Smaili, N. (2023). COVID-19 and emergency online and distance accounting courses: A student perspective of engagement and satisfaction. Accounting Education, 32(2), 115-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2039729
33. Martella, A. M., Yatcilla, J. K., Park, H., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Martella, R. C. (2021). Investigating the active learning research landscape through a bibliometric analysis of an influential meta-analysis on active learning. SN Social Sciences, 1(9), 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00235-1
34. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome as a function of learners’ conception of task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
35. Micallef, M., Mifsud, C., Ellul, L., Baldacchino, P. J., & Grima, S. (2023). The skill set required in the accounting workplace: Perspectives of accounting graduates and warrant holders. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 11(4), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/828
36. Michael, J. (2006). The impact of active learning on students’ academic performance. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73017
37. Millis, B. (2010). Learning, P. D. IDEA Paper #47.
38. Mohr, K. A. J., & Mohr, E. S. (2017). Understanding Generation Z students to promote a contemporary learning environment. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15142/T3M05T
39. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.
40. Mosca, J. B., Curtis, K. P., & Savoth, P. G. (2019). New approaches to learning for Generation Z. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v19i3.2214
41. Narin, F., & Hamilton, K. S. (1996). Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics, 36, 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129596
42. Noyons, E. (1999). Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research management tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 68-81. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/38308
43. Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46, 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459614
44. Osgerby, J. (2013). Students' perceptions of the introduction of a blended learning environment: An exploratory case study. Accounting Education, 22(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.729341
45. Patrick, C. -j, Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., & Pretto, G. (2009). The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: A national scoping study. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. www.altc.edu.au and www.acen.edu.au
46. Phillips, M. E., & Graeff, T. R. (2014). Using an in-class simulation in the first accounting class: Moving from surface to deep learning. Journal of Education for Business, 89(5), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.863751
47. Potter, B. N., & Johnston, C. G. (2006). The effect of interactive on-line learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.003
48. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
49. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
50. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
51. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 24, 348–349.
52. Rajasekharan Pillai, K., Sankaran, K., Komattil Ramnarayan, & Nandan Prabhu, K. P. (2023). Research in higher education governance: Past performance and an agenda for the future. Educational Review, 75(6), 1255-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1984214
53. Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Úbeda-Sánchez, Á. M., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., & Álvarez-Ferrándiz, D. (2020). Active learning in an environment of innovative training and sustainability: Mapping of the conceptual structure of research fronts through a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(19), 8012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198012
54. Roy, S. (2023). Graduate readiness for a professional career in accounting – an investigation of employers’ perspectives in Fiji. Pacific Accounting Review, 35(2), 314-335. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-06-2021-0087
55. Samkin, G., & Keevy, M. (2019). Using a stakeholder developed case study to develop soft skills. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(6), 862-882. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2018-0260
56. Sathe, R., & Yu, W. (2021). Experiential learning in the classroom: An accounting cycle simulation project. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(7), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i7.4496
57. Sawan, N., Al-Hajaya, K., Salem, R. I. A., & Alshhadat, M. (2023). Pre-COVID-19 student perceptions on blended learning and flipped classroom in accountancy: A case study from two emerging UK HEIs. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2023-0002
58. Schweiggart, N. (2024). Mapping the role of animal welfare in tourism: Examining discourses in tourism research and beyond using a bibliometric co-occurrence analysis of author keywords. Journal of Ecotourism, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2024.2319221
59. Segura-Robles, A., Parra-González, M. E., & Gallardo-Vigil, M. Á. (2020). Bibliometric and collaborative network analysis on active methodologies in education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.575
60. Serçemeli, M. (2016). Muhasebe eğitiminde yeni bir yaklaşım önerisi: Ters yüz edilmiş sınıflar. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (69), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.396664
61. Sledgianowski, D., Gomaa, M., & Tan, C. (2017). Toward integration of Big Data, technology and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.008
62. Sidorova, M., Kopus, T., & Yurasova, I. (2023). Digital transformation for teaching management accounting: Training with a simulation in an authentic professional environment. Accounting Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2023.2255980
63. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
64. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2021). The global state of democracy: Building resilience in a pandemic era. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
65. The K-20 Active Learning Landscape. (2017). eClassroom News. http://www.ecampusnews.com/pdfs/k-20-active-learning-landscape
66. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2023). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Türk Dil Kurumu. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
67. Uygun, M. A. (2019). Piyano dersindeki öğrenme yaklaşımı düzeyleri ile akademik başarı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(2), 1087-1110. https://doi.org/10.9761/jasss_721
68. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
69. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.19.pdf
70. Van Niekerk, M., & Delport, M. (2022). Evolving flipped classroom design in a cost/management accounting module in a rural South African context. Accounting Education, 31(5), 567-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2029748
71. Walters, B., Potetz, J., & Fedesco, H. N. (2017). Simulations in the classroom: An innovative active learning experience. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(12), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.07.009
72. Warren, J. D., Moffitt, K. C., & Byrnes, P. (2015). How big data will change accounting. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51069
73. Zaif, F., & Ayanoğlu, Y. (2007). Muhasebe eğitiminde kalitenin arttırılmasında ders programlarının önemi: Türkiye’de bir inceleme. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 115-136.
74. Zamora, V. L. (2012). Using a social enterprise service-learning strategy in an introductory management accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 187-226. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50102
75. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629