Forensic Identification in Disasters and Genetic Approaches

Öz

Disasters are sudden events that cause great damage, loss, or destruction. The most challenging phase of a mass disaster is the identification process. Fingerprint examination, dental analysis and deoxyribonucleic acid analysis are three gold standard identification methods. Deoxyribonucleic acid analysis obtained from forensic biological materials provides strong evidence in the identification besides having some disadvantages such as being more costly and difficult to apply within the disaster conditions. The development of fast and reliable deoxyribonucleic acid analysis techniques and the deoxyribonucleic acid data banks started the era of molecular genetics in forensics. Progress is made day by day with new approaches including next generation sequencing, mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, Y chromosome and X chromosome analysis, microhaplotyping, proteomics and microbial deoxyribonucleic acid analysis. In this review the molecular genetics approaches in forensic medicine and deoxyribonucleic acid analysis methods in identification process in the disasters were summarized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster
• identification
• DNA analysis.

Afetlerde Kimliklendirme ve Genetik Yaklaşımlar

Öz

Afetler, büyük hasar, kayıp veya yıkıma neden olan ani olaylardır. Kitlesel bir felaketin en zorlu aşaması kimliklendirme sürecidir. Parmak izi incelemeleri, dental incelemeler ve deoksiribonükleik asit analizleri kimliklendirmede üç altın standart tanımlama yöntemidir. Adli biyolojik materyaller ile yapılan deoksiribonükleik asit analizleri, kişilerin tanımlanmasında güçlü kanıtlar sağlamakla birlikte diğer yöntemlere göre daha maliyetli ve afet koşullarında uygulanmasının zor olması gibi bazı dezavantajlara sahiptir. Hızlı ve güvenilir deoksiribonükleik asit analiz tekniklerinin ve deoksiribonükleik asit veri bankalarının gelişmesi adli tıpta moleküler genetik çağını başlatmıştır. Yeni nesil dizileme, mitokondriyal deoksiribonükleik asit, Y kromozomu ve X kromozomu analizi, epigenetik çalışmalar gibi yeni yaklaşımlarla her geçen gün ilerleme sağlanmaktadır. Bu derlemede adli tıpta moleküler genetik yaklaşımlar ve afetlerde kimliklendirme sürecinde deoksiribonükleik asit analiz yöntemleri özetlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet
• kimliklendirme
• DNA analizi

Kaynakça

1. Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr W.R, Morling N, Parsons T.J, Sajantila A, et. al. Recommendations Regarding The Role of Forensic Genetics for DVI. Forensic Science International: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007; 1; 3–12.
2. Gaglietti NM, Silva RH. Primary Identification Methods and Their Effectiveness in Mass Disaster Situations: A Literature Review. Arab J Forencic Sci Forensic Med. 2017; 1(5); 576-82.
3. Akıncıoğlu NU, Aslan İ, Doğan Y. Afet Kurbanlarının Kimliklendirilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntemler ve Ülkemizdeki Durum. GBD. 2021; 10(1); 217-38.
4. Collins FS, Mansoura MK. The Human Genome Project. Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer. 2001; 1(91); 221-25.
5. Özçelik T. Adli amaçlı DNA analizleri. ACTA MEDICA. 1996; 27(2); 80-2.
6. Southern EM. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975; 98(3); 503-17.
7. Mullis KB. The unusual origin of polimerase chain reaction. Sci Am. 1990; 262; 56-65.
8. Budowle B, Lindsey JA, De Cou JA, Koons BW, Guisti AM, Comey CT. Validation and population studies of the loci LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, Gc(PM loci) and HLADQ alpha using a multiplex amplification and typing procedure. J Forensıc Scı. 1995; 40; 45-54.

9. Helmuth R, Fildes N, Blake E , Luce MC, Chimera J, Madej R et al. HLADQ a allele and genotype frequencies in various human populations, determined by using enzymatic amplification and oligonucleotide probes. Am J Hum Genet. 1990; 47; 515-23.
10. Edwards A, Civitello A, Holl H., Thomas C. DNA typing and genetic mapping with trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeats. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49; 746-56.
11. Sparkes R, Kimpton C, Watson S, Oldroyd N, Clayton T, Barnett L et al. The validation of a 7-lokus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework: mixtures, ageing, degradation and species studies, (ІІ) artefacts, casework studies, and success rates. Int J Legal Med. 1996; 109; 186-204.
12. Karantzali E, Rosmaraki P, Kotsakis A, Le Roux-Le Pajolec MG, Fitsialos G. The effect of FBI CODIS Core STR Loci expansion on familial DNA database searching. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019; 43; 102129.
13. Hares DR. Selection and implementation of expanded CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015; 17; 33-4.
14. Pritchard JK, Seielstad MT, Lezaun AP, Feldman MW. Population growth of human Y chromosome: A study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Mol Bıol Evol. 1999; 16(12); 1791-98.
15. Gökalp Özkorkmaz E, Özkorkmaz A. Y-STR Belirteçleri: Adli Önemi ve Terminolojisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2011; 8(2); 85-91.
16. Gusmao L, Bnon M, Neira A G, Lareu M, Carracedo, A. Y Chromosome specific polymorphisims in forensic anaiysis. Leg Med (Tokyo). 1999; 1; 55-60.
17. Dubut V, Cartault F, Gilles A, Thionville MD, Murail P. Genetic data analysis of 10 Y-STR loci in two ethnic groups of Asian ancestry (Gujarat and Guangdong-Fujian provinces) from Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009; 11(2); 104-6.
18. Roewer L, Krawczak M, Willuweit B, Nagy M, Alves C. Online reference database of European Y chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) haplotypes". Forensıc Scı Int. 2001; 118; 106-13.
19. Wiegand P, Berger B, Edelmann J, Parson W. Population genetic comparisons of three X-chromosomal STRs. Int J Legal Med. 2003; 117; 62-5.
20. Webb MB, Williams NJ, and Sutton MD. Microbial DNA challenge studies of variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) probes used for DNA profiling analysis. J Forencıc Scı. 1993; 5; 1172-5.
21. Szibor R, Krawzak M, Hering S, Edelmann J, Kuhlisch E and Krause D. Use of X-Linked markers for Forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med. 2003; 117; 67-74.
22. Serin A, Canan H, Alper B. Adli Amaçlı Kimliklendirmede Mitokondriyal DNA. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2013; 10(2); 51-8.
23. Wilson MR, Poianskey D, Butler J, DiZinno JA, Repogle J and Budowie B. Extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA from human hair shafts. Biotechniques. 1995; 18; 662-9.
24. Hutchinson CA, Newbold JE, Potter SS and EdgeII MH. Materna inheritance of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nature. 1974; 251; 536- 8.
25. Holland MM, Parsons TJ. Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Anaiysis Validation and Use for Forensic Casework. Forensic Sci Rev. 1999; 11; 21-50.
26. Butler JM. Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022; 27(6); 100311.
27. de Knijff P. From next generation sequencing to now generation sequencing in forensics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019; 38; 175-80.
28. Jager AC, Alvarez ML, Davis CP, Guzman E, Han Y, Way L et. al. Developmental validation of the miSeq FGx forensic genomics system for targeted next generation sequencing in forensic DNA casework and database laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 28; 52-70.
29. Novroski NMM, Wendt FR, Woerner AE, Bus MM, Coble M, Budowle B. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: an exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019; 38; 121-9.
30. Alghanim H, Wu W, McCord B. DNA methylation assay based on pyrosequencing for determination of smoking status. Electrophoresis. 2018; 39; 2806-14.
31. Vidaki A, Kalamara V, Carnero-Montoro E, Spector TD, Bell JT, Kayser M. Investigating the epigenetic discrimination of identical twins using buccal swabs, saliva, and cigarette butts in the forensic setting. Genes. 2018; 9; 252.