Beyin Tümörü Nedeniyle Kraniyal Ameliyat Geçiren Hastalarda Cerrahi Korku, Sosyal Destek Algısı Ve Konfor Arasındaki İlişki: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 55 - 59, 28.01.2026

Gülden Küçükakça Çelik , Caner Ali Akoğlu , Sukru Oral

https://doi.org/10.61399/ikcusbfd.1679746

Öz

Amaç: Çalışma beyin tümörü nedeniyle kraniyal ameliyat geçiren hastalarda cerrahi korku, sosyal destek ve konfor düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapıldı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma bir Üniversite Hastanesinin beyin cerrahi ünitesinde Temmuz 2021 ve Ocak 2023 tarihleri arasında yürütüldü. Örneklemini 58 hastanın oluşturduğu çalışmada, yüz yüze veri toplama yöntemi kullanıldı. Çalışmanın verileri; Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu, Cerrahi Korku
Ölçeği, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve Perianestezi Konfor Ölçeği kullanılarak toplandı. Yordayıcılar arasındaki ilişkinin yönü Pearson korelasyon analizi ile ilişkinin kapsamı ise adımsal çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Yaş ortalamaları 52,82±13,03 ve çoğunluğu erkek (%52) olan hastaların kısa ve uzun dönem cerrahi korkularının sırasıyla 12,08±10,01
ve 15,10±13,43 olduğu belirlendi. Hastaların Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği-aile ile konfor düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönlü orta düzey
ilişki olduğu saptandı (r:0,366; p<0,05). Hastalara uygulanan Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği-aile desteği ile birlikte, erkek cinsiyet, ameliyat sonrası Perianestezi Konfor Ölçeği’nin yordayıcıları olarak değerlendirildi.
Sonuç: Beyin tümör cerrahisinde aile desteği ve konfor pozitif yönde ilişkili kavramlar olarak belirlendi. Ayrıca hasta konforu üzerinde erkek cinsiyet, negatif yordayıcılar arasındaydı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Beyin tümörü, cerrahi korku, konfor, kraniyal cerrahi, sosyal destek.

Anahtar Kelimeler

beyin tümörü , kraniyal cerrahi , sosyal destek , korku , konfor

Etik Beyan

Çalışmaya başlamadan önce bir Üniversitenin girişimsel olmayan Etik Kurulu'ndan etik onay (tarih: 14.06.2021, karar no: 2021/7) ve çalışmanın yürütüleceği hastaneden izin alındı (Tarih:01.06.2021, Karar no: E-44008645-010.99-67041). Ayrıca çalışmaya katılan tüm hastalardan yazılı ve sözlü bilgilendirilmiş onam alındı. Çalışma Helsinki Bildirgesi doğrultusunda yürütüldü.

Relationship Between Surgical Fear, Perception of Social Support, and Comfort in Patients Undergoing Cranial Surgery for Brain Tumor: A Cross-Sectional Study

Öz

Objective: The study was conducted to determine the relationship between surgical fear, social support, and comfort levels in patients undergoing cranial surgery for brain tumors.
Material and Methods: This study was conducted in the neurosurgery unit of a university hospital between July 2021 and January 2023. A total of 58 patients participated in the study, which employed a face-to-face data collection method. Data were collected using the Introductory
Information Form, the Surgical Fear Scale, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale. The relationships between the predictors were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis, while the strength of these relationships was evaluated
through stepwise multiple linear regression analysis.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 52.82±13.03 years, with the majority being male (52%). The short-term and long-term surgical fears were measured at 12.08±10.01 and 15.10±13.43, respectively. A moderate positive correlation was found between the patients' scores on the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale and their comfort levels with family (r:0.366; p<0.05). The Multidimensional Perceived Social
Support Scale-family support and male gender were evaluated as predictors of the postoperative Perianesthesia Comfort Scale.
Conclusion: Family support and comfort were identified as positively correlated factors in brain tumor surgery. Additionally, male gender was found to be a negative predictor of patient comfort.
Keywords: Brain tumor, surgery fear, comfort, cranial surgery, social support.

Anahtar Kelimeler

brain tumor , cranial surgery , fear , social support , comfort

Kaynakça

• Sürme Y, Çimen Ö. Preoperative surgical fear and related factors of patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2022;37(6):934-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.04.006.
• Correia MS, Neville IS, Almeida CC, Hayashi CY, Ferreira LTD, Quadros DG, et al. Clinical outcome assessments of motor status in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;201:106420. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106420.
• Valencia L, Becerra Á, Ojeda N, Domínguez A, Prados M, González-Martín JM, et al. Effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain after craniotomy. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):556. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030556.
• Çimen Ö, Sürme Y. Surgical fear and sleep quality effect the postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery: cross sectional study. Perioper Med. 2025;14(1):8. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-025-00491-2.
• Saklı F, Ozsaker E. The Relationship Between Preoperative Fear and Postoperative Comfort in Otolaryngology Patients. J Perianesth Nurs. 2025;40(3):590-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.07.008.
• Taylan S, Çelik GK. The effect of preoperative fear and related factors on patients’ postcataract surgery comfort level: a regression study. J PeriAnesth Nurs. 2022;37(3):398-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.08.014.
• Kolcaba K, Tilton C, Drouin C. Comfort theory: A unifying framework to enhance the practice environment. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(11):538-44.
• Kiliç HS, Mercan N. The Relationship Between Cognitive Intrusion of Pain, Fear of Surgery, and Comfort. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024;25(5):467-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.001.
• Chen Z, Liu C, Chen W. Effect of comfortable nursing on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with idiopathic scoliosis after posterior orthopedic surgery. Front Surg. 2024;11:1395013. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1395013.
• Karacabay K, Savcı A, Hergül FK. Investigating Relationships Between Pain, Comfort, Anxiety and Depression in Surgical Patients. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2022;7(1):40-7. DOI: 10.4274/cjms.2020.1758.
• Özkan ZK, Dığın F, Koç E. Kraniyal ve spinal cerrahi uygulanan hastaların konfor düzeyi ve etkileyen faktörler. Sağlık ve Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;6(1):1-6. DOI: 10.33308/2687248X.202461312.
• Doğan A, Karasu VE, Taşçıoğlu B, Kotluk O, Cırık Z. The Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Postoperative Comfort in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye. Med Rec. 2024;6(3):419-25. DOI: 10.37990/medr.1523158.
• Theunissen M, Peters ML, Schouten EGW, Fiddelers AAA, Willemse MGA, Pinto PR, et al. Validation of the surgical fear questionnaire in adult patients waiting for elective surgery. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):1–9. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100225.
• Bağdigen M, Özlü ZK. Validation of the Turkish version of the surgical fear questionnaire. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018;33(5):708–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2017.05.007.
• Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30-41.DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
• Eker D. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2001;12:17.
• Kolcaba K, Wilson L. Comfort care: A framework for perianesthesia nursing. J Perianesth Nurs. 2002;17(2):102-14.
• Üstündağ H, Aslan FE. Perianestezi Konfor Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci. 2010;2:94-9.
• Oteri V, Martinelli A, Crivellaro E, Gigli F. The impact of preoperative anxiety on patients undergoing brain surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(6):3047–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01498-1.
• Eberhart L, Aust H, Schuster M, Sturm T, Gehling M, Euteneuer F, et al. Preoperative anxiety in adults-a cross-sectional study on specific fears and risk factors. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:1-14. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02552-w.
• Tao Y, Yu H, Liu S, Wang C, Yan M, Sun L, et al. Hope and depression: the mediating role of social support and spiritual coping in advanced cancer patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):345. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03985-1.
• Liu M, Liu L, Zhang S, Li T, Ma F, Liu Y. Fear of cancer recurrence and hope level in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a study on the mediating role of social support. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(11):9453-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07318-6.
• Liu B, Liu S, Wang B, Liu W, Chen L, Zheng T, et al. Effectiveness and safety of implementing an enhanced patient comfort programme for elective neurosurgical patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2023;13(4):e063534. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063534.
• Akduran F, Karaca A, Eroglu SA. Effects of the supportive care needs of patients with cancer on their comfort levels. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2024;30(6):295-306. DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.6.295.
• Brajković L, Milat-Panža K, Kopilaš V. Subjective Well-Being in Cancer Patients: The Roles of Social Support, Purpose in Life, Resilience, and Informativeness. Healthcare. 2023;11(24):3181. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243181.
• He Y, Wang R, Mo L, Feng L. Mediating Effects of Perceived Social Support on the Relationship between Comfort and Hope in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Nurs Manag. 2024;(1):6774939. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6774939.
• Soysal GE, Celebi E. The effect of postoperative pain on comfort in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: The effect of postoperative pain on patient comfort. J Surg Med. 2024;8(6):99-103. DOI: 10.28982/josam.7774.
• İbrahimoğlu Ö, Gezer N, Öğütlü Ö, Polat E. The relationship between perioperative care quality and postoperative comfort level in patients with hip replacement surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2023;38(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.05.068.
• Zener R, Bernstein M. Gender, patient comfort and the neurosurgical operating room. Can J Neurol Sci. 2011;38(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1017/S0317167100011094.
• Rassoulian A, Gaiger A, Loeffler-Stastka H. Gender differences in psychosocial, religious, and spiritual aspects in coping: a cross-sectional study with cancer patients. Womens Health Rep. 2021;2(1):464-72. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2021.0012.