Bibliometric Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership

Öz

The study presents a bibliometric analysis of 520 publications found through a Web of Science database search to identify trends and developments in the academic literature on paternalistic leadership. It is also expected that the study will identify existing gaps in the “paternalistic leadership” literature, where the frequency of study tends to increase after 2018, and potential opportunities for future research. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the highest number of citations in the publications reached in the field of paternalistic leadership was in 2022, and the most frequently used keywords were “paternalistic leadership” and “authoritarian leadership”. In addition, it was determined that the country that conducted the most studies and had the highest citation score was Peoples R China. According to the findings of the analysis, it was concluded that Cheng Bs is the researcher with the highest number of publications and citations in this field. The study is expected to contribute by raising awareness for researchers who want to study leadership literature in the field of management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paternalistic leadership
• authoritarian leadership
• bibliometric analysis

Paternalist Liderlik Yazınına İlişkin Bibliyometrik Analiz

Öz

Çalışma, paternalist liderlik konusundaki akademik literatürdeki eğilimleri ve gelişmeleri belirlemek amacıyla Web of Science veritabanında yapılan tarama sonucu ulaşılan 520 yayına ait bibliyometrik analizi sunmaktadır. Ayrıca çalışma ile 2018 yılı sonrasında çalışılma sıklığının artış eğiliminde olduğu “paternalist liderlik” literatüründeki mevcut boşlukların ve gelecek araştırmalar için potansiyel fırsatların belirlenmesi de beklenmektedir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda paternalist liderlik alanında ulaşılan yayınlarda en yüksek atıf sayısının 2022 yılında gerçekleştiği, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin “paternalistic leadership” ile “authoritarian leadership” olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca en fazla çalışma yapan ve en fazla atıf puanına sahip olan ülkenin Peoples R China olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Analiz bulgularına göre, Cheng Bs’nin bu alanda en fazla yayın yapan ve atıf alan araştırmacı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmanın yönetim alanında liderlik literatürüne yönelik çalışma yapmak isteyen araştırmacılar için farkındalık yaratarak katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paternalist liderlik
• otoriter liderlik
• bibliyometrik analiz

Destekleyen Kurum

---

Etik Beyan

Çalışma bibliyometrik analize dayalı olduğundan(ikincil veri kullanımı) etik kurul onayı gerektirmeyen çalışma grubundadır.

Teşekkür

---

Kaynakça

1. Apaydın, E. (2017). Paternalistik liderliğin değişime direnç üzerine etkileri: Örgütsel Güvenin Aracılık Rolü. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Bahçeşehir University Institute of Social Sciences İstanbul.
2. Artsın, M. (2020). Bir metin madenciliği uygulaması: Vosviewer. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B-Teorik Bilimler, 8(2), 344-354. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/estubtdb/issue/56628/644637
3. Aycan, Z. (2001). Human resource management in Turkey‐current issues and future challenges. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720110398347
4. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalizations. U. Kim, K.S. Yang, & K.K. Hwang (Eds.), In Indigenous and Cultural Psycholog (pp. 445-466). Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
5. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., and Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied psychology, 49(1), 192-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00010
6. Blake, R.R. and A. A. McCanse (1991). Leadership dilemmas—grid solutions. Gulf Publishing.
7. Bütüner, O. (2021). Toplam kalite yönetiminin görsel haritalama teknikleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(78), 705-730. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.788525
8. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., and Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x

9. Cheng, M. Y., Wang, L., and Lesmana, S. D. (2013). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior-the mediating effect of ethical climate. Clear International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4(10), 108-117. https://ezproxy.iku.edu.tr:4227/c/rgv5hk/viewer/pdf/43u4vbubrz
10. Cüce, H. (2022). Babacan liderlik ile ekstra rol davranışı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracı, kendinden fedakarlık etmenin düzenleyici rolü (Doctoral Thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
11. Çıraklar, N. H., Ucar, Z., and Sezgin, O. B. (2016). Effects of paternalistic leadership on organizational identification: mediating role of trust in leader. Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116546
12. Dağlı, A., and Ağalday, B. (2018). Okul müdürlerinin paternalist liderlik davranışlarının incelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(66), 518-534. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.341663
13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
14. Durmuş, A. (2016). Yöneticilerin liderlik davranışlarının çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığı ile ilişkisinin istatistiksel yöntemlerle araştırılması. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 4(2), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v4i2.154
15. Düzenli, H. (2021). Algılanan babacan liderlik davranışlarının algılanan öz performans üzerine etkisinde öz liderlik ve psikolojik güçlendirmenin aracılık rolü: Enerji sektöründe bir araştırma. (Doctoral Thesis). Istanbul Arel University, İstanbul.
16. Farh, J. L. and Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon, (eds). In Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, (pp. 85–127). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511590_5
17. Farh, J.L., Liang, J., Chou, L.F., and Cheng, B.S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research Progress and Future Research Directions. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753763
18. Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., and Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479-514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085559
19. Hiller, T. (2019). Structure of teams—A cooperative game theory approach. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(5), 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3021
20. Hofstede, G. (2006). What did globe really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 882-896. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400233
21. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Univ of California Press.
22. Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). The autonomous-relational self. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180-186. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180
23. Kılınç, E. (2018). Sağlık kurumlarında paternalist liderlik modelinin incelenmesi. Journal of Healthcare Management and Leadership, (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.35345/johmal.518870
24. Martinez, P. G. (2003). Paternalism as a positive form of leader - subordinate exchange: Evidence from Mexico. Management Research, 1(3): 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/15365430380000529
25. Northhouse, PG. (2000). Leadership theory and practice. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage
26. Özyilmaz, B., and Ataç Oral, L. (2019). Paternalist liderlik algısının çalışan sesliliğine etkisi: Gıda sektörü çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 26(2), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.574425
27. Padavic, I., and Earnest, W. R. (1994). Paternalism as a component of managerial strategy. The Social Science Journal, 31(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(94)90031-0
28. Pellegrini, E. K. and Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: a review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
29. Pellegrini, E. K. and Scandura, T. A. and Jayaraman, V. (2010). Crosscultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: an expansion of leader–member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 391-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378456
30. Pellegrini, E. K., and Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400185
31. Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 176-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1
32. Redding, S. G. (2013). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. (Vol. 22). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887709
33. Redding, S. G., Norman, A. and Schlander, A. (1994). The nature of individual attachment to theory: A review of East Asian variations. Triandis, H. C., M. D. Dunnett and L. M. Hough. CA (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology inside (p. 674-688). Consulting Psychology Press.
34. Silin, R. F. (1976). Leadership and values. Harvard University Press.
35. Şimşir, İ. (2021). Bibliyometri ve bibliyometrik analize ilişkin kavramsal çerçeve. O. Öztürk ve G. Gürler (Eds.). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz içinde (p. 7-31). Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
36. Thompson, C. (2018). Psychoanalysis: Evolution and development (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351307802
37. Uhl-Bien, M., Tierney, P. S., Graen, G. B., and Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Company Paternalism and The Hidden-Investment Process: Identification of the “Right Type” for line managers in leading Japanese organizations. Group & Organization Management, 15(4), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500406
38. Van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2018). Analyzing the activities of visitors of the Leiden Ranking website. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(3), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0015
39. Westwood, R. I. and Chan, A. (1992). Headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational behavior-Southeast Asian perspectives (pp. 118-143). Addison Wesley Longman Asia.
40. Zupic, I., and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
41. Zupic, I., and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629