Kanada Hane Halklarının Göreceli Gelir Algılarını Şekillendiren Unsurlar

Öz

Bu çalışma, Kanada'daki algılanan gelir düzeylerini etkileyen belirleyicileri araştırmaktadır. 2017 ile 2021 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilen Dünya Değerler Araştırması'nın (WVS-7) Kanada örnekleminden elde edilen veriler kullanılarak, 4,018 katılımcının yanıtları analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada, algılanan gelir düzeyleri üzerinde geniş bir değişken yelpazesinin etkisini değerlendirmek için sıralı lojistik regresyon modeli kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, göçmenlik durumunun erkekler arasında algılanan gelir düzeyleri üzerinde olumsuz bir etkiye sahip olduğunu, medeni durumun ise gelirle pozitif bir korelasyon gösterdiğini, evli bireylerin bekarlara kıyasla daha yüksek gelir düzeyleri bildirdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, yüksek profesyonel becerilere ve ileri düzey eğitim niteliklerine sahip olmanın kadınlar arasında gelir algılarını önemli ölçüde güçlendirdiği görülmüştür. Analiz, iş gücüne katılımın azalması ve kırsal bölgelerde ikametin her iki cinsiyet için de daha düşük gelir düzeyleri ile ilişkili olduğunu, çevresel faktörlerin ise kadınlar üzerinde orantısız bir şekilde olumsuz bir etki yarattığını da göstermiştir. Ek olarak, finansal zorluklar, erkeklerin gelir algıları üzerinde daha şiddetli olumsuz etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bu bulgular, bu çeşitli faktörlerin kapsamlı sosyoekonomik politikaların oluşturulmasına dâhil edilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Göç
• Demografi
• Nispi gelir
• sağlık

The Determinants of Relative Income Perceptions among Canadian Households

Öz

This study investigates the determinants influencing perceived income levels within Canada. Utilizing data from the Canadian cohort of the World Values Survey (WVS-7), spanning from 2017 to 2021, the analysis encompasses responses from 4,018 participants. In the research, an ordinal logistic regression model was utilized to assess the impact of an extensive range of variables on perceived income levels. The results of the study demonstrate that immigration status exerts a deleterious effect on perceived income levels among men, while marital status correlates positively with income, with married individuals reporting higher income levels compared to their single counterparts. Furthermore, possessing high professional skills and advanced educational qualifications significantly bolsters income perceptions among women. The analysis also reveals that reduced participation in the workforce and residence in rural areas are associated with lower income levels across both genders, with environmental factors imposing a disproportionately negative impact on women. Additionally, financial adversities manifest more severe detrimental effects on men's income perceptions. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating these diverse factors into the formulation of comprehensive socioeconomic policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Relative Income
• Migration
• Demography
• health

Kaynakça

1. Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G. ve Samson, A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open journal of statistics, 5(07), 754. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
2. Alvarez-Cuadrado, F. ve Van Long, N. (2011). The relative income hypothesis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(9), 1489-1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.03.012
3. Cui, X. ve Chang, C. T. (2021). How income influences health: decomposition based on absolute income and relative income effects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10738. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010738
4. Dean, J. ve Geloso, V. (2023). Poverty spells and economic freedom: Canadian evidence. Available at SSRN 4688323.
5. Decerf, B. (2023). Absolute and relative income poverty measurement: a survey. Research Handbook on Poverty and Inequality, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800882300.00009
6. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Fliessbach, K., Sunde, U. ve Weber, B. (2011). Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: brain imaging evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3-4), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.025
7. FitzRoy, F. R. ve Nolan, M. A. (2022). Income status and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(1), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00397-y
8. Gero, K., Yazawa, A., Kondo, N., Hanazato, M., Kondo, K. ve Kawachi, I. (2022). Comparison of three indices of relative income deprivation in predicting health status. Social Science ve Medicine, 294, 114722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114722

9. Hu, C., Wu, J. ve Wang, Y. (2015). Relative income, income satisfaction and subjective happiness. Soc. Sci, 3503, 85-94.
10. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
11. Kollamparambil, U. (2020). Happiness, happiness inequality and income dynamics in South Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(1), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00075-0
12. Lim, H. E., Shaw, D., Liao, P. S. ve Duan, H. (2020). The effects of income on happiness in East and South Asia: societal values matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 391-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00088-9
13. McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x
14. Noy, S. ve Sin, I. (2021). The effects of neighbourhood and workplace income comparisons on subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Behavior ve Organization, 185, 918-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.008
15. Osafo Hounkpatin, H., Wood, A. M., Brown, G. D., ve Dunn, G. (2015). Why does income relate to depressive symptoms? Testing the income rank hypothesis longitudinally. Social Indicators Research, 124, 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0795-3
16. Qin, W., Xu, L., Wu, S. ve Shao, H. (2021). Income, relative deprivation and the self-rated health of older people in urban and rural China. Frontiers in public health, 9, 658649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.658649
17. Stranges, M., Vignoli, D. ve Venturini, A. (2021). Migrants’ subjective well-being in Europe: does relative income matter? European Societies, 23(2), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1832238
18. Svavarsdottir, G. ve Asgeirsdottir, T. L. (2023). The relationship between perceived economic standing and happiness. Applied Economics Letters, 30(17), 2413-2419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2097626
19. Syrda, J. (2020). Spousal relative income and male psychological distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 976-992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219883611
20. Szczepaniak, M. (2024). Examining the determinants of Poland’s middle class life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 172, 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03291-7
21. Tauseef, S. (2022). Can money buy happiness? Subjective wellbeing and its relationship with income, relative income, monetary and non-monetary poverty in Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(3), 1073-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00443-9
22. Teeselink, B. K. ve Zauberman, G. (2023). The Anna Karenina income effect: well-being inequality decreases with income. Journal of Economic Behavior ve Organization, 212, 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.036
23. Vartanian, T. P., Byers, D. S., Shapiro, J. ve Solo, C. (2024). The effects of relative income deprivation and low income on adult mental health.
24. Verme, P. (2013). The relative income and relative deprivation hypotheses: a review of the empirical literature. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6606).
25. Walker, S. H. ve Duncan, D. B. (1967). Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika, 54(1-2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.167
26. Zubrickas, R. (2023). The relative income effect and labor supply. Journal of Economic Behavior ve Organization, 209, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.02.025