Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması

Zübeyde Demet Kırbulut; Esen Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı

doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı üstbilişsel öğrenme yönelimleri ve üstbilişsel özdüzenlemenin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen öğretimi özyeterliklerini ne derecede yordadığını araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya farklı üniversitelerin eğitim fakültelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan 224 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Veriler Fen Bilgisi Öğretimine Yönelik İnançlar Ölçeği, Özyeterlik ve Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri Ölçeği ve Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde aşamalı çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre üstbilişsel öğrenme yönelimlerinin alt boyutlarından yapılandırmacı ilişki ve öğrenme risk farkındalığı ile üstbilişsel özdüzenleme fen öğretimi özyeterliğini anlamlı olarak yordamaktadır. Yordayıcı değişkenler, fen öğretimi özyeterliğindeki varyansın %27’sini açıklamaktadır. Buna göre farklı fen öğrenme ortamlarındaki bilgiler arasında bağlantı kuran, öğrenmede zorlu durumların farkında olan ve öğrenmelerinde üstbilişsel stratejileri kullanan fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen bilgisi öğretiminde yüksek özyeterliğe sahip olma eğiliminde oldukları söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fen öğretimi özyeterliği,Üstbilişsel öğrenme yönelimleri,Üstbilişsel özdüzenleme,Çoklu doğrusal regresyon,Öğretmen adayları

Kaynakça

Alkan, F., & Erdem, E. (2014). The relationship between metacognitive awareness, teacher self-efficacy and chemistry competency perceptions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 778-783. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.475
Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86-95. doi: doi.org/10.1177/088840649401700203
Anderson, R. D., Anderson, B. L., Varank-Martin, M. A., Romagnano, L., Bielenberg, J., Flory, M.,...Whitworth, J. (1994). Issues of curriculum reform in science, mathematics and higher order thinking across the disciplines. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of Knowledge Construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320. doi: 10.1002/sce.20176
Babaoğlan, E., & Korkut, K. (2010). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Öz Yeterlik İnançları ile Sınıf Yönetimi Beceri Algıları Arasındaki İlişki. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 1-19.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
Bandura, A (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82(3), 343-356. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<343::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-C
Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84(4), 486-506. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<486::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-U
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bulucu, Ö. (2003). İlköğretim I. kademe öğretmenlerinin sınıf davranış yönetiminde yetkinlik algılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
Chi, M. T. H. (1987). Representing knowledge and metaknowledge: Implications for interpreting metamemory research. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 239-266). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1992.9943869
Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B., Drusi, S., & Tencati, C. (2015). Improving problem solving in primary school students: The effect of a training programme focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-439. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12083
Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131-151. doi: 10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7
Duffin, L. C., French, B. F., & Patrick, H. (2012). The teachers' sense of efficacy scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 827-834. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.004
Efklides, A., & Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2012). Measurement of metacognitive knowledge of self, task, and strategies in mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 227-239. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000145
Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 695-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comment: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. doi: 10.1159/000271221
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Columbus: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Gencer, A. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.013
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365-383. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119401
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. doi: 10.3102/00028312037002479
Gokalp, M. S., & Kirbulut, Z. D. (2013). Investigating pre-service elementary school teachers’ metacognitive science learning orientations. Anthropologist, 16(1-2), 177-184.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J.Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.). Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp.1-23). New York: Routledge.
Hammann, L. A., & Stevens, R. J. (1998, April). Metacognitive awareness assessment in self-regulated learning and performance measures in an introductory educational psychology course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Hart, L. C., & Memnun, D. S. (2015). The relationship between preservice elementary mathematics teachers' beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 70-77. doi: 10.11114/jets.v3i5.840
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jou, Y. J. (2015). Investigation of technological university students' use of metacognitive reading strategies in first and second languages. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 180-188. doi: 10.5539/elt.v8n1p180
Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. I. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 92-107. doi: 10.3758/BF03211579
Kim, Y. H. (2011). Prospective early childhood educators’ meta-cognitive knowledge and teacher self-efficacy: Exploring domain-specific associations. Educational Psychology, 31(6), 707-721. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2011.599924
Knaggs, C. M., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2015). Science as a learner and as a teacher: Measuring science self-efficacy of elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 117-128. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12110
Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M., & Zoller, U. (2006). Using ‘HOCS-Centered Learning’ as a pathway to promote science teachers’ metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 69-84. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3916-9
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301-1320. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187009
Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 241-258. doi: 10.1007/s10972-005-4585-2
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McCormick, C. B., Dimmitt, C., & Sullivan, F. R. (2012). Metacognition, learning, and instruction. In I. B. Weiner, W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, volume 7, educational psychology, 2nd edition (pp. 69-98). New York: Wiley.
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 243-261. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328. doi: 10.1080/0022027870190403
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
Pajares, M. F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. L. Maehr & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0
Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Changes in science teaching self-efficacy among primary teacher education students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12), 27-40. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.3
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. doi: doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Vlerick, P., & Vermeulen, K. (2007). Teacher education, graduates’ teaching commitment and entrance into the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 543-556. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.012
Sandi‐Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Stevens, R. H. (2011). Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 323-340. doi: 10.1080/09500690903452922
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125. doi: 10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. doi: 10.1007/BF02212307
Scott, B. M., & Berman, A. F. (2013). Examining the domain-specificity of metacognition using academic domains and task-specific individual differences. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 13, 28-43.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Sungur, S. (2004). The implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among students' motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 315-326. doi: 10.1080/00313830701356166
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tarkın, A., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik inançları ve mesleğe yönelik tutumlarının kanonik korelasyon analizi ile incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 11(2), 332-341.
Tekkaya, C., Çakıroglu, J., & Özkan, Ö. (2004). Turkish preservice science teachers’ understanding of science and their confidence in teaching it. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 30(1), 57-66. doi: 10.1080/0260747032000162316
Telef, B. B. (2011). Öğretmenlerin öz-yeterlikleri, iş doyumları, yaşam doyumları ve tükenmişliklerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 91-108.
Thomas, G. (2003). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientations of science classroom learning environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale–Science (MOLES–S). Learning Environment Research, 6(2), 175-197. doi: 10.1023/A:1024943103341
Thomas G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 131-144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Thomas G. P., Anderson D., & Nashon, N. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701-1724. doi: 10.1080/09500690701482493
Tschannen‐Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self‐efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self‐efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228-245. doi: 10.1086/605771
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. doi: doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
Veenman, M. V. (2012). Metacognition in science education: definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar and Y.J. Dori (eds.), Metacognition in science education (pp. 21-36). Springer Netherlands.
Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Veenman, M. V. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Technical students’ metacognitive skills: Relating general vs. specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 259-272. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00094-8
von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Eds.), The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Eds.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). Washington DC: AAAS Press.
Vrieling, E. M., Bastiaens, Th. J., & Stijnen, P. J. J. (2012). The ‘Self-Regulated Learning Opportunities Questionnaire': A diagnostic instrument for teacher educators' professional development. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 799-821. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.708905
Wang, C. Y. (2015). Exploring general versus task-specific assessments of metacognition in university chemistry students: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 555-579. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9436-8
White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. London: Blackwell.
Wolters, C., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2013.847261

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Zübeyde Demet Kırbulut

Esen Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Nisan 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Temmuz 2016

Kabul Tarihi

15 Mayıs 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93KC56YU

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kırbulut, Z. D., & Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı, E. (2017). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması. İlköğretim Online, 16(3), 1316-1328. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260

AMA

1.Kırbulut ZD, Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı E. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması. İOO. 2017;16(3):1316-1328. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260

Chicago

Kırbulut, Zübeyde Demet, ve Esen Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı. 2017. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması”. İlköğretim Online 16 (3): 1316-28. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260.

EndNote

Kırbulut ZD, Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı E (01 Nisan 2017) Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması. İlköğretim Online 16 3 1316–1328.

IEEE

[1]Z. D. Kırbulut ve E. Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı, “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması”, İOO, c. 16, sy 3, ss. 1316–1328, Nis. 2017, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260.

ISNAD

Kırbulut, Zübeyde Demet - Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı, Esen. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması”. İlköğretim Online 16/3 (01 Nisan 2017): 1316-1328. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260.

JAMA

1.Kırbulut ZD, Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı E. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması. İOO. 2017;16:1316–1328.

MLA

Kırbulut, Zübeyde Demet, ve Esen Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması”. İlköğretim Online, c. 16, sy 3, Nisan 2017, ss. 1316-28, doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260.

Vancouver

1.Zübeyde Demet Kırbulut, Esen Uzuntiryaki-kondakçı. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Özyeterliklerinin Üstbilişsel Öğrenme Yönelimleri ve Üstbilişsel Özdüzenleme ile Yordanması. İOO. 01 Nisan 2017;16(3):1316-28. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330260

Cited By

FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMENLİĞİ VE PEDAGOJİK FORMASYON FEN GRUBU ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FEN ÖĞRETİMİ ÖZYETERLİK İNANÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.616983

The Relatıonshıp Between The Crıtıcal Thınkıng Skılls Of Scıence Teachers And Bıodıversıty Lıteracy

Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1109241