YUNANISTAN'DA DEMOKRATIK DÜŞÜNCE VE VATANDAŞLIK EĞITIMI: SIRADAN BIR LOJISTIK REGRESYON MODELI

Öz

This paper presents a research that was carried out in autumn of 2021in Thessaloniki, Greece. Main purpose was to find out the link between democratic behavior of Greek young adults and the civic education that is obtained in public secondary education. For this reason 524 students of the department of political sciences were asked questions regarding their points of view on civic education in public schools. This sample was chosen due to the political sensitization they have because of their main field of studies. The results showed the emphasis they pose on public schools as far as the political edu-cation is concerned. Moreover, views that politicization is connected with peer groups and watching TV were refuted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• democratic behavior
• Greek educational system
• students.

DEMOCRATIC THINKING AND CIVIC EDUCATION IN GREECE: AN ORDINAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL

Öz

This paper presents a research that was carried out in autumn of 2021in Thessaloniki, Greece. Main purpose was to find out the link between democratic behavior of Greek young adults and the civic education that is obtained in public secondary education. For this reason, 524 students of the department of political sciences were asked questions regarding their points of view on civic education in public schools. This sample was chosen due to the political sensitization they have, because of their main field of studies. The results showed the emphasis they pose on public schools as far as the political education is concerned. Moreover, views that politicization is connected with peer groups and watching TV were refuted.
Keywords: Democratic Behavior, Greek Educational System, Secondary Education, Civic Education, Students, Ordinal Regression.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Greek educational System
• Democratic thinking
• Regressional Model

Kaynakça

1. Centre for Social and Economic Research (CASE), (2009). Key Competences in Europe: Opening Doors For Lifelong Learners Across the School Curriculum and Teacher Education. Warsaw: CASE.
2. Council of Europe, (2010). Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Council of Europe Charter on Education for Dem-ocratic Citizenship and Human Rights Education. [Online] Available at: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1621697 [Accessed 07 May 2012].
3. EACEA/Eurydice, (2009). National testing of pupils in Europe: objectives, or-ganization and use of results. Brussels: Eurydice
4. EACEA/Eurydice, (2011). Teaching reading in Europe: Contexts, policies and Practices. Brussels: Eurydice.
5. EACEA/Eurydice, (2012a). Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe: National Strategies, Curricula and Learning Outcomes. Brussels: Eurydice.
6. EACEA/Eurydice, (2012b). Key data on education in Europe 2012. Brussels: Eurydice.
7. European Commission, (2009a). Progress towards the Lisbon objectives in edu-cation and training. Indicators and benchmarks 2009. Commission staff working doc-ument, SEC (2009) 1616.
8. European Commission, (2009b). Key competences for a changing world. Com-munication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Draft 2010 joint progress report of the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the “Edu-cation & Training 2010 work program”, Brussels, 25.11.2009, COM(2009) 640 final.

9. Eurydice, (2017). Citizenship education at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
10. Filzmaier, P., (2007). Jugend und Politische Bildung – Einstellungen und Erwartungen von 14- bis 24-Jährigen [Youth and Citizenship Education – attitudes and expectations of 14 to 24 years of age]. ([Online] Available at: www.donau-uni.ac.at/dpk/studies [Accessed 07 May 2012].
11. Heater, D. (2011). The History of Citizenship Education: A Comparative Out-line, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56, p. 135
12. Hoskins, B. & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring Active Citizenship through the Development of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research 90(3):459–88.