Aşırı Sağ Yönetimlerde Meşruiyetin İnşası: Nazi Almanyası ve Netanyahu Dönemi İsrail’inin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 17, 35 - 60, 28.12.2025

Kübra Betül Biçen Gören

https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1786670

Öz

Bu çalışma, aşırı sağ hükümetlerin siyasal meşruiyetlerini kriz üretimi, düşman inşası ve güvenlik söyleminin kullanımı aracılığıyla nasıl inşa ettiklerini analiz etmektedir. Hitler’in Almanyası ile Netanyahu’nun İsrail’i olmak üzere tarihsel ve güncel iki olguyu karşılaştırmalı olarak ele almaktadır. Makalenin kuramsal çerçevesi, Carl Schmitt’in dost-düşman ayrımı, Giorgio Agamben’in istisna hâli kavramı ve Michel Foucault’nun biyopolitika anlayışı üzerine kuruludur. Nazi Almanyası’nda Yahudiler, ulusal birliğe yönelik içsel bir tehdit olarak tasvir edilmiştir. Bu algı, istisna hâlinin olağanlaştırılmasıyla birleşerek totaliter bir rejimin ortaya çıkmasını mümkün kılmıştır. Netanyahu’nun İsrail’inde kriz söylemi, İran, Hamas ve sol muhalefeti sistematik biçimde ötekileştirme aracına da dönüşmüştür. Her iki rejim, farklı tarihsel ve kültürel bağlamlarda ortaya çıkmış olsalar da, ortak olarak siyasal meşruiyetlerini krizlerin süreklileştirilmesine, düşman figürünün toplumsal hafızada kalıcı hale getirilmesine ve medyanın bu sürecin asli taşıyıcısı olarak kullanılmasına dayandırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda medya, yalnızca ideolojik değil, aynı zamanda psikolojik ve duygusal bir savaşın da temel cephesini oluşturmaktadır. Makale, aşırı sağ rejimlerin sürekli krizler ve düşman figürleri üreterek otoriterliği demokratik biçimler içinde yeniden ürettiklerini ileri sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aşırı Sağ , Meşruiyet , Düşmanlaştırma , Nazi Almanyası , Netanyahu.

Legitimacy Construction in Far-Right Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Nazi Germany and Israel under Netanyahu

Öz

This study analyzes how far-right governments construct their political legitimacy through the production of crises, the construction of enemies, and the use of security discourse. It offers a comparative examination of two historical and contemporary cases: Hitler’s Germany and Netanyahu’s Israel. The theoretical framework of the article is grounded in Carl Schmitt’s friend–enemy distinction, Giorgio Agamben’s concept of the state of exception, and Michel Foucault’s notion of biopolitics. In Nazi Germany, Jews were portrayed as an internal threat to national unity. This perception, combined with the normalization of the state of exception, enabled the emergence of a totalitarian regime. In Netanyahu’s Israel, the discourse of crisis has also become a tool for systematically marginalizing Iran, Hamas, and the left-wing opposition. Although these regimes emerged in different historical and cultural contexts, both base their political legitimacy on the perpetuation of crises, the entrenchment of enemy figures within collective memory, and the strategic use of media as the primary vehicle of this process. In this context, media functions not only as an ideological apparatus but also as a psychological and emotional front of warfare. The article argues that far-right regimes reproduce authoritarianism within democratic forms by continuously generating crises and enemy figures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Far-right , Legitimacy , Enemy Construction , Nazi Germany , Netanyahu.

Kaynakça

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press.
• Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.
• Berent, M. (2015). A Nation Like All Nations: Towards the Establishment of an Israeli Republic, Israel Academic Press.
• Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(Special Issue), 63-92.
• Browning, C. R. (1992). Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland, HarperCollins.
• Burleigh, M., Wippermann, W. (1991). The racial state: Germany 1933–1945, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Cohen, J., Blanco, M. (2020). Avrupa’da kutuplaşma ve güvenlik, H. Akhgar & D. Wells (Ed). Radikalleşme eğilimleri üzerine araştırmalar içinde, Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Esposito, R. (2008). Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press.
• Evans, R. J. (2004). The coming of the Third Reich, London, UK: Penguin Books.
• Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction, Pantheon Books.
• Foucault, M. (1997). Society must be defended, M. Ergün (Çev), İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, Picador.
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, Palgrave Macmillan.
• Gellately, R. (2001). Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany, Oxford University Press.
• Hajjar, L. (2005). Courting conflict: The Israeli military court system in the West Bank and Gaza. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Haraetz (2025). The Attorney General Must Investigate Netanyahu's Government Before She Becomes Their Next Victim. https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2025
• Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish enemy: Nazi propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hilberg, R. (2003). The destruction of the European Jews, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Ignazi, P. (2006). Extreme right parties in Western Europe, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Jamal, A. (2020). The rise of “bad civil society” in Israel: Jewish settler associations as an undemocratic force, Democratization, 27(2), 211-229.
• Kershaw, I. (2008). Hitler, New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Koonz, C. (2003). The Nazi Conscience, Belknap Press.
• Kühl, S. (1994). The Nazi connection: Eugenics, American racism, and German national socialism, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Levitsky, S., Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die, New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
• Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe, University of Wisconsin Press.
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political, London, UK: Routledge.
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Mudde, C. (2000). The ideology of the extreme right, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
• Mudde, C. (2019). The Far Right Today, Polity Press.
• Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of Security, Edinburgh University Press.
• Netanyahu addresses Congress amid tensions over Gaza war. Retrieved from, ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/netanyahu-speaks-congress-amid-political-tensions-us-israel-war-gaza/story?id=112227122
• Overy, R. (2004). Dictators: Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia, New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Pappé, I. (2017). Ten myths about Israel, London, UK: Verso Books.
• Peleg, I., Waxman, D. (2011). Israel’s Palestinians: The conflict within, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Proctor, R. (1988). Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis, Harvard University Press.
• Rabah, Z. (2024). Reshaping the European Union Landscape: The Rise of Far-Right Movements and Their Potential Impact on Middle East Policy, İmgelem, (15), 413-434. Doi: https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1569427
• Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Schnapper, D. (2005). Community of citizens: On the modern idea of nationality, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Skocpol, T., Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174-197.
• Smooha, S. (1997). Ethnic democracy: Israel as an archetype, Israel Studies, 2(2), 198-241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/isr.1997.0010
• Stöss, R. (2019). Europa weiter rechts? Rechtspopulismus und Rechtsextremismus in den Europawahlen, Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
• Tamir, Y. (2019). Why Nationalism, Princeton University Press.
• URL-1: Netanyahu denounces Iran nuclear deal but faces criticism from within Israel. (2015, 14 July). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/14/netanyahu-denounces-iran-nuclear-dealcriticism-israel (Erişim: 23.08. 2025).
• URL-2: Netanyahu calls on Congress to give bipartisan support to Israel. (2024, 24 July). ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/netanyahu-speaks-congress-amid-political-tensions-us-israel-war-gaza/story?id=112227122 (Erişim: 19.08.2025).
• URL-3: Netanyahu labels critics of war in Gaza ‘Iran’s useful idiots’ in speech to Congress. (2024, 24 July). CNN Politics. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/24/politics/benjamin-netanyahu-address-washington (Erişim: 23.09.2025).
• URL-4: Binyamin Netanyahu: ‘Arab voters are heading to the polling stations in droves’. (2015, 17 March). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/17/binyamin-netanyahu-israel-arab-election (Erişim: 19.08.2025).
• Yassan, S. (2021). A question of legitimacy: West Bank right-wing activists explain violent clashes with the state, Israel Affairs, 27(5), 844-863.