Mary Parker Follett's Footprints in the Management Principles of Today and the Future

Öz

Mary Parker Follett’s management philosophy and principles at the beginning of the 20th century exhibit the characteristic of management models of the past, present and future, and they appear to be linked to current theories of management. The aim of this research is to define the connection between Mary Parker Follett's management philosophy and past, present and expected future management approaches and to make a contribution to the science of management in this sense. For this purpose, this study seeks to investigate the relationship between, and similarities of, Follett’s management principles of those of matriarchal societies as the first social structures inancient times. The study also seeks to evaluate the basic concepts of management theories which have emerged since the industrial revolution. A narrative approach was applied in this study. The research findings indicate that Mary Parker Follett's management philosophy serves as a link between the management practices of the past, present and future and presents solutions to today's organizational, industrial, societal and international management problems. Through adopting Follett's management philosophy, humanity might be able to open the doors to a world with more freedom, peace, justice, equality and sharing. This in turn might give way to more happiness, more peacefulness, and high value of creativity in society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• M. P. Follett
• Management
• Power
• Conflict. Integration
• Ethics

Kaynakça

1. Ağlargöz, O. (2018). Mary Parker Follett’ın yönetim düşüncesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 51(1), 1-26. Argyris, C. (1977). Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115-125. Bachofen, J. J. (1967). Myth, Religion, and Mother Rright, trans. Ralph Manheim. Princeton: Princeton UP. google scholar
2. Bachofen, J. J. [1861] 2006. Mother Right: An Investigation of the Religious and Juridical Character of Matriarchy in the Ancient World, Translated by David Partenheimer. Newyork: The Edwin Mellen Press. google scholar
3. Baransel, A., (1993). Çağdaş Yönetim Düşüncesinin Evrimi. İstanbul: İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Yayını No: 257. google scholar
4. Barnard, C. (1938; 1968 [30th anniversary edition]). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. google scholar
5. Baum, J. A. (2005). Companion to Organizations, The Blackwell companion to organizations, Oxford: Blackwell Business. google scholar
6. Bebel, A. (1910). Woman and Socialism, trans. Meta L. Stern, (HEBE). Newyork: Socialist Literature Co. google scholar
7. Bennis, W. (1995). The Essentials of Leadership in P. Graham (Ed.). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management:163-177. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
8. Berber, A. (2013). Klasik Yönetim Düşüncesi: Geleneksel ve Klasik Paradigmalarla Klasik ve Neo-klasik Örgüt Teorileri. İstanbul: Alfa. google scholar

9. Berktay, F. (2010). Tarihin Cinsiyeti. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
10. Boje, D. M., & Rosile, G. A. (2001). Where’s the power in empowerment? Answers from Follett and Clegg. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 37(1), 90-117. google scholar
11. Child, J. (1995). Commentary on Follett: Constructive Conflict. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. 87-95). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
12. Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the firm. Economica 4 (November) 386 - 405. google scholar
13. Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129-169. google scholar
14. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative Iınquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. google scholar
15. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. google scholar
16. Drucker, P. F. (1995). Introduction, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s (pp. 1-9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
17. Engels F. (1978). Ailenin, Özel Mülkiyetin ve Devletin Kökeni, Ankara: Sol Yayınları. google scholar
18. Enomoto, T. (1995). The individual in the group. In P. Graham (Ed.). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management: 240-246. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
19. Eylon, D. (1998). Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 4(1), 16-28. google scholar
20. Fayol, H. (1988). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman. google scholar
21. Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. Newyork: Penguin Groups. google scholar
22. Fişek, K. (2015). Yönetim. Ankara: SBF Yayınları. google scholar
23. Follett, M. P. (1896). The Speaker of the House of Representatives. London and Bombay: Longmans, Green, and Company. google scholar
24. Follett, M. (1918). The New State, Group Organization and the Solution of Popular Government. New York: David McKay Co. google scholar
25. Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a process. The Philosophical Review, 28(6), 576-588. google scholar
26. Follett, M. P. (1923). Haldane Introduction to the New State. USA: Longmans, Green and Co. google scholar
27. Follett, M.P. (1924). Creative Experience. New York: Longmans, Green Co. google scholar
28. Follett, M Parker (1925). The Law of the Situation. New York: Longmans. google scholar
29. Follett, M. P. (1928). The Teacher-Student Relation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(1), 1970, 137-48. google scholar
30. Follett, M. P. (1949). Freedom and Coordination: Lectures in Business Organization. Garland, New York. google scholar
31. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman. google scholar
32. Freeman, R. E., & Evan, M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337-359. google scholar
33. Gergen, K. (1982). Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. New York: Springer. google scholar
34. Gerzema, J., & D’Antonio, M. (2013). The Athena Doctrine: How Women and the Men (Who Think Like Them) will Rule the Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
35. Gibson, J. W., & Deem, J. (2016). Leadership lessons from the past: Examining the work of Mary Parker Follett and Lillian Gilbreth. International Leadership Journal, 8(1), 3-26. google scholar
36. Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett, Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
37. Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam Press. google scholar
38. Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). Grand Design. Newyork: Bantam Books. google scholar
39. Héon, F., Damart, S., & Nelson, L. (2017). Mary Parker Follett: Change in the paradigm of integration. İçinde D. Szabla, W. Pasmore, M. Barnes ve A. Gibson (Eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, pp.1-22. HAL: Post-Print hal-01629684. google scholar
40. Juran, J. (1995). Managerial Breakthrough: The Classic Book on Improving Management Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
41. Kanter, R. M. (1985), Drucker: the Unsolved Puzzle. New Management, 2(1), 10-13. google scholar
42. Kanter, R. M. (1995). Preface. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: a celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. xiii-xxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
43. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Foundational scholars of experiential learning [PowerPoint slides]. Presented at the Power of Words, the 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia. google scholar
44. Koçel, T. (2010). İşletme Yöneticiliği, 12. basım. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş. google scholar
45. Machiavelli, N. (1993). Prince. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions. google scholar
46. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166-179. google scholar
47. Mcgrath, J., & Bates, B. (2017). The Little Book of Big Management Theories and how to use them. Harlow UK.: Pearson. google scholar
48. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise, New York, McGraw-Hill. google scholar
49. McLarney, C., & Rhyno, S. (1999). Mary Parker Follett: visionary leadership and strategic management. Women in Management Review, 14(7), 292-304. google scholar
50. Melé, D., & Rosanas, J. M. (2003). Power, freedom and authority in management: Mary Parker Follett’s ‘power-with’. Philosophy of Management, 3(2), 35-46. google scholar
51. Mendenhall, M. E., Macomber, J. H., & Cutright, M. (2000). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of chaos and complexity. Journal of Management History, 6, 191-204. google scholar
52. Metcalf, H. C., & Urwick, L. (Eds). (1942). Dynamic Administration: The Collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. google scholar
53. Monin, N., & Bathurst, R. (2008). Mary Parker Follett on the leadership of everyman. Ephemeratheory &Politics in Organization, 8(4), 447-461. google scholar
54. Morgan, L. H., (1969, II). Ancient Society. New York: Meridian Books. google scholar
55. Newman, M. A., & Guy, M. E. (1998). Taylor’s triangle, Follett’s web. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 287-297. google scholar
56. Nohrıa, N., (1995), “The Basis ofAuthority 141 Commentary Mary Parker Follett’s View on Power, the Giving of Orders, and Authority: An Alternative to Hierarchy or a Utopian Ideology?”, In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: a celebration of writings from the 1920s, (pp. 141-162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.141-162. google scholar
57. Parker, L. D. (1984). Control in organizational life: The contribution of Mary Parker Follett. Academy ofManagement Review, 9(4), 736-745. google scholar
58. Phipps, S. T. A. (2011). Mary, Mary, quite contrary. In a male-dominated field, women contributed by bringing a touch of spirituality to early management theory and practice. Journal of Management History, 17, 270-281. google scholar
59. Ryan, L., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Mary Parker Follett: Individidualist, collectivist? Or both? Journal of Management History, 6(5), 207-223. google scholar
60. Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096- 1120. google scholar
61. Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-901. google scholar
62. Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5), 224-242. google scholar
63. Sebenius, J. K. (2013). What Roger Fisher got profoundly right: Five enduring lessons for negotiators. Negotiation Journal, 29(2), 159-169. google scholar
64. Simms, M. (2009). Insights from a management prophet: Mary Parker Follett on social entrepreneurship. Business and Society Review, 114(3), 349-363. google scholar
65. Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library. google scholar
66. Tonn, J. C. (2003). Mary P. Follett Creating Democracy, Transforming Management. London: Yale University Press. google scholar
67. Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, google scholar