Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Fabrika ve Üretim Sorunlarından Bilimsel Yönetim Derneklerine: Bilimse Yönetim Hareketinin Meşruiyet Kazanması

Yıl 2019, , 159 - 177, 23.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Amerika’da teknik ve mühendislik uygulamalarının yoğun kullanıldığı demiryolu ağları, ağır sanayiye dayalı
endüstri örgütleri gibi yönetim-çalışan ve yönetim-çalışma yeri arasında mesafenin olduğu ve nicelik açısından büyük,
aynı zamanda bir arada yönetilmesi zor olan endüstri örgütlerindeki yönetim sorunlarının oluşumuna zemin hazırlayan
bilimsel yönetim hareketinin meşruiyet kazanması evrelerinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada, 19. yüzyılın
son çeyreğinde Amerika’da yönetim sorunlarının demiryolu ve sanayi endüstrisi yayın organlarında ele alınmaya
başlaması, başta ASME olmak üzere yönetim derneklerinin kurulması ve dernek faaliyetlerinin duyurulması amacıyla
ulusal ve uluslararası çapta kongreler düzenlenmesi konuları ele alınmıştır. Bilimsel Yönetim hareketinin bayrak taşıyıcısı
olan Taylor Derneği’nin faaliyetlerine derneğin yayın organı Taylor Derneği Bülteni aracılığıyla ulaşılmıştır. Amerika’da
endüstri örgütlerinin büyümesi ve çeşitlenmesi ile başlayan yönetim sorunlarının önem kazanmasına ve bilimsel yönetim
hareketinin küresel bir boyut kazanmasına kadar geçen süreçte, bilimsel yönetim hareketinin meşruiyet kazanması
evreleri ortaya koyulmuştur.

Destekleyen Kurum

Yazar bu çalışma için finansal destek almamıştır.

Kaynakça

  • ASME (2018). Presidents, Choronological List of ASME Presidents, https://community.asme.org/board_of_governors/w/wiki/6387.asme-presidents.aspx, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2019
  • Astley, W. G., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1983). Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 245-273.
  • Berber, A. (2013). Klasik Yönetim Düşüncesi: Geleneksel ve Klasik Paradigmalarla Klasik ve Neo-Klasik Örgüt Teorileri. Alfa Yayınları.
  • Berber, A. (2016). 100 Yıl Öncesine Bir Yolculuk:“Genel ve Endüstriyel Yönetim” ve Fransa’da Fayolizm- Taylorizm Kutuplaşması. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 45, 118-132.
  • Blake, A. M., & Moseley, J. L. (2010). One Hundred Years After the Principles of Scientific Management: Frederick Taylor's Life and İmpact on the Field of Human Performance Technology. Performance Improvement, 49(4), 27-34.
  • Brown, P. S. (1925). The Work and Aims of The Taylor Society. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 119(1), 134-139.
  • Hutton, F. R. (1915). A History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers from 1880 to 1915. The Society.
  • Jenks, L. H. (1960). Early Phases of The Management Movement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-447.
  • Kipping, M. (1997). Consultancies, Institutions and the Diffusion of Taylorism in Britain, Germany and France, 1920s to 1950s. Business History, 39(4), 67-83.
  • Kotnour, T., & Farr, J. V. (2005). Engineering Management: Past, Present, and Future. Engineering Management Journal, 17(1), 15-26.
  • Lauer Schachter, H. (2010). The Role Played by Frederick Taylor in the Rise of the Academic Management Fields. Journal of Management History, 16(4), 437-448.
  • Metcalfe, H. (1894). The Cost of Manufactures and the Administration of Workshops, Public and Private. J Wiley.
  • Nevins, A., Commager, H. S., ve Morris, J. B. (1992). A Pocket History of the United States (Vol. 9023). Simon and Schuster.
  • Nadworny, M. J. (1957). Frederick Taylor and Frank Gilbreth: Competition in Scientific Management. Business History Review, 31(1), 23-34.
  • Sinclair, B., & Hull, J. P. (1980). A Centennial History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1880-1980. Published for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers by University of Toronto Press.
  • Sinclair, B. (1986). Local History and National Culture: Notions on Engineering Professionalism In America. Technology and Culture, 27(4), 683-693.
  • Taylor Society (1914). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:1, No 1: 1-5.
  • Taylor Society (1915). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. November, Vol:1, No 6: 1-36.
  • Taylor Society (1916). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. January, Vol:2, No 1: 1-20.
  • Taylor Society (1922). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:7, No 6: 209-246.
  • Taylor Society (1924). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. June, Vol:9, No 3: 97-156.
  • Taylor Society (1925). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:10, No 6: 238-281.
  • Taylor Society (1930). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:15, No 2: 62-136.
  • Towne, H. R. (1986, August). The Engineer as an Economist. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1986, No. 1, Pp. 3-4). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  • Wren, D. A., ve Bedeian, A. G. (1994). The Evolution of Management Thought. 6. Ed. John Wiley. Wren, D. A. (1997). The Evolution of Management Thought. 7. Ed. John Wiley.

Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement

Yıl 2019, , 159 - 177, 23.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007

Öz

This
research aims to shed light on legitimization phases of scientific management
movement, which was stemmed from problems of namely American railway and heavy
manufacturing industries. I
n
the last quarter of the 19th century, emphasizing management
problems in bulletins of American railways and bulletins of manufacturing
industries were pointed out essentialness establish platform for arguing management
problems. Within a decade, ASME transformed into main platform of management
movement, and soon after Taylor Society named after pioneer of Scientific
Management Movement. From early part of nineteenth century to date that its
merge under the name of Society for Advancement of Management, the Society
published dozens of bulletins, under the name Bulletin of Taylor Society, became
platform for management movement, and hosted national and international
management congress, especially in America and some part of the world.  Hence, in this research, I revisit the
certain and important phases of the movement, the legitimization phases of the
scientific management movement, through bring into view support of societies,
publications and, national and international congresses.

Kaynakça

  • ASME (2018). Presidents, Choronological List of ASME Presidents, https://community.asme.org/board_of_governors/w/wiki/6387.asme-presidents.aspx, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2019
  • Astley, W. G., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1983). Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 245-273.
  • Berber, A. (2013). Klasik Yönetim Düşüncesi: Geleneksel ve Klasik Paradigmalarla Klasik ve Neo-Klasik Örgüt Teorileri. Alfa Yayınları.
  • Berber, A. (2016). 100 Yıl Öncesine Bir Yolculuk:“Genel ve Endüstriyel Yönetim” ve Fransa’da Fayolizm- Taylorizm Kutuplaşması. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 45, 118-132.
  • Blake, A. M., & Moseley, J. L. (2010). One Hundred Years After the Principles of Scientific Management: Frederick Taylor's Life and İmpact on the Field of Human Performance Technology. Performance Improvement, 49(4), 27-34.
  • Brown, P. S. (1925). The Work and Aims of The Taylor Society. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 119(1), 134-139.
  • Hutton, F. R. (1915). A History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers from 1880 to 1915. The Society.
  • Jenks, L. H. (1960). Early Phases of The Management Movement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-447.
  • Kipping, M. (1997). Consultancies, Institutions and the Diffusion of Taylorism in Britain, Germany and France, 1920s to 1950s. Business History, 39(4), 67-83.
  • Kotnour, T., & Farr, J. V. (2005). Engineering Management: Past, Present, and Future. Engineering Management Journal, 17(1), 15-26.
  • Lauer Schachter, H. (2010). The Role Played by Frederick Taylor in the Rise of the Academic Management Fields. Journal of Management History, 16(4), 437-448.
  • Metcalfe, H. (1894). The Cost of Manufactures and the Administration of Workshops, Public and Private. J Wiley.
  • Nevins, A., Commager, H. S., ve Morris, J. B. (1992). A Pocket History of the United States (Vol. 9023). Simon and Schuster.
  • Nadworny, M. J. (1957). Frederick Taylor and Frank Gilbreth: Competition in Scientific Management. Business History Review, 31(1), 23-34.
  • Sinclair, B., & Hull, J. P. (1980). A Centennial History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1880-1980. Published for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers by University of Toronto Press.
  • Sinclair, B. (1986). Local History and National Culture: Notions on Engineering Professionalism In America. Technology and Culture, 27(4), 683-693.
  • Taylor Society (1914). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:1, No 1: 1-5.
  • Taylor Society (1915). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. November, Vol:1, No 6: 1-36.
  • Taylor Society (1916). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. January, Vol:2, No 1: 1-20.
  • Taylor Society (1922). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:7, No 6: 209-246.
  • Taylor Society (1924). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. June, Vol:9, No 3: 97-156.
  • Taylor Society (1925). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:10, No 6: 238-281.
  • Taylor Society (1930). Bulletin of The Society to Promote the Science of Management. December, Vol:15, No 2: 62-136.
  • Towne, H. R. (1986, August). The Engineer as an Economist. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1986, No. 1, Pp. 3-4). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  • Wren, D. A., ve Bedeian, A. G. (1994). The Evolution of Management Thought. 6. Ed. John Wiley. Wren, D. A. (1997). The Evolution of Management Thought. 7. Ed. John Wiley.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Burak Külli 0000-0001-7367-9788

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Ekim 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Külli, B. (2019). Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal(87), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007
AMA Külli B. Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal. Aralık 2019;(87):159-177. doi:10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007
Chicago Külli, Burak. “Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement”. Istanbul Management Journal, sy. 87 (Aralık 2019): 159-77. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007.
EndNote Külli B (01 Aralık 2019) Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal 87 159–177.
IEEE B. Külli, “Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement”, Istanbul Management Journal, sy. 87, ss. 159–177, Aralık 2019, doi: 10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007.
ISNAD Külli, Burak. “Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement”. Istanbul Management Journal 87 (Aralık 2019), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007.
JAMA Külli B. Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal. 2019;:159–177.
MLA Külli, Burak. “Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement”. Istanbul Management Journal, sy. 87, 2019, ss. 159-77, doi:10.26650/imj.2019.87.0007.
Vancouver Külli B. Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal. 2019(87):159-77.