Okul Öncesi Dönemde Arkadaşlık Görünümü: 5-6 Yaş Çocuklarının Görüşleri

Yıl 2024, , 1 - 19, 29.05.2024

Hülya Gülay Ogelman , Nazife Koyutürk Koçer

https://doi.org/10.58648/inciss.1406818

Öz

Bu çalışmada, okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının arkadaşlık görünümüne ilişkin görüşlerinin ele alınması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya, okul öncesi eğitime devam eden 5-6 yaş grubundan 110 çocuk katılmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Seçime Dayalı Sosyometri Tekniği ile Arkadaşlık Görünümü Çocuk Formu kullanılmıştır. Bulgular incelendiğinde, okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının en sevdikleri/sevmedikleri arkadaşlarını genellikle hem cinslerinden seçtikleri, oyunun en sevdikleri/sevmedikleri arkadaşlarını sevme/sevmeme nedenlerinin ve yapmak isteyip/istemedikleri etkinliklerin başında geldiği görülmektedir. Ayrıca küçük çocuklar en sevdikleri arkadaşları okula gelmediğinde genellikle olumsuz, sevmedikleri arkadaşları okula gelmediğinde olumlu duygular yaşayabilmekte, kendileri okula gelmediğinde de en sevdikleri/sevmedikleri arkadaşlarının benzer duygular yaşayacağını düşünmektedirler. Küçük çocukların en sevdikleri/sevmedikleri arkadaşlarıyla tartışma yaşamadıkları, yaşanan tartışmaların arkadaşlık tercihine yönelik cevaplarda olduğu gibi saldırganlık vb. sosyal olmayan davranışlar doğrultusunda yaşanabildiği görülmektedir. En sevdikleri arkadaşlarıyla tartışan çocuklar genel olarak olumsuz duygular hissederken, sevmediği arkadaşıyla tartışan çocuklar çoğunlukla bir şey hissetmediğini ifade etmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arkadaşlık görünümü, okul öncesi dönem, arkadaşlıklar, çocuk değerlendirmesi

Friendship Features During the Preschool Period: 5-6 Years Old Children’s Opinions

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine opinions of preschool period children concerning friendship features. 5-6 years old 110 children attending preschool education participated in the study. The Selection-Based Sociometric Technique and Friendship Features Child Form were used as the data collection tools. According to the findings, it is evident that children generally choose their mostly liked/disliked friends from the same gender, and that play is the main factor for why they like/dislike their mostly liked/disliked friends and the activities they want/don’t want to do. In addition, children usually experience negative feelings when their mostly liked friends are absent and experience positive feelings when their mostly disliked friends are absent; they believe that the friends they mostly like/dislike will have similar feelings when they themselves are absent. It is also evident that young children don’t have conflicts with their mostly liked/disliked friends, and that, as stated in the answers related to friendship preferences, conflicts occur based on unsocial behaviours such as aggressiveness. While children who argue with their mostly liked friends generally feel negative emotions, children who argue with their disliked friends state that they mostly don’t feel anything.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Friendship features, preschool period, friendships, child assessment.

Kaynakça

• Ajrouch, K. J., Hu, R. X., Webster, N. J., ve Antonucci, T. C. (2023). Friendship trajectories and health across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001589
• Brogaard-Clausen, S. ve Robson, S. (2019). Friendships for well being?: parents’ and practitioners’ positioning of young children’s friendships in the evaluation of well being factors. International Journal of Early Years Education, 27 (4), 345-359.
• Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., ve Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company the ykeep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Bukowski, W. M., ve Sandberg, D. (1999). Peer relationships and quality of life. Acta Paediatrica Supplements, 88 (428), 108–109.
• Carter, C., ve Nutbrown, C. (2016). A Pedagogy of Friendship: young children’s friendships and how schools can support them. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24 (4), 395-413.
• Cleary, D. J., Ray, G. E., LoBello, S. G., ve Zachar, P. (2002). Children’s perceptions of close peer relationships: Quality, congruence, and meta-perceptions. Child Study Journal, 32, 179-192.
• Doherty, J., ve M. Hughes. (2009). Child Development: Theory and Practice 0–11. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Dunn, J. (1993). Young children’s close relationships: Beyond attachment (Vol. 4).Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
• Furman, W., ve Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.
• Gunning, C., ve Holloway, J. (2022). Descriptive analysis of preschool social interactions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31, 96-822.
• Gülay-Ogelman, H. (2018). Sosyometrik teknikler. (Ed. A. Önder). Okul öncesi dönemde çocukları değerlendirme ve tanıma teknikleri. 4. Basım (s. 77-91). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
• Gülay Ogelman, H., ve Güngör, H. (2022). Okul öncesi eğitim alanında 2000-2021 yılları arasında tamamlanmış akran ilişkileri konulu tezlerin incelenmesi. Humanistic Perspective, 4(3), 658-680.
• Hartup, W. (1992). Peer relations in early and middle childhood. In V. V. Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of Social Development: A Lifespan Perspective (pp. 257–281). New York: Plenum Press.
• Hazan C., ve Zeifman D. (1994). Sex and the psychologicaltether. In Bartholomew K, Perlman D (eds.), Attachment processors in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships pp 151–178. London: Jessica Kingsley.
• Hollingsworth, H. L., ve V. Buysse. (2009). Establishing Friendships in Early Childhood Inclusive Settings: What Role Do Parents and Teachers Play? Journal of Early Intervention 31 (4): 287–307.
• Hoojisma, M., Huitsing, G., Kisfalusi, D., Dijkstra, J. K., Flache, A., ve Veenstra, R. (2020). Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same- and cross-gender bullies and same- and cross-gender victims. Network Science, 8 (1), 79-96.
• Howes, C. (1996). The earliest friendships. In: W. Bukowski, M.A. Newcomb & W. Hartup (Eds) The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 66–86), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Howes, C. (1998). Continuity in children’s relations with peers. Social Development, 7(3), 340-349.
• Howes, C. (2009). Friendship in early childhood. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 180–194). The Guilford Press.
• Ladd, G. W. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment? Child Development, 61, 1081–1100.
• Ladd, G. W., ve Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children's psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74, 1344−1367.
• Ledger, E., Smith A. B., ve Rich P. (2000). Friendships Over the Transition from Early Childhood Centre to School, International Journal of Early Years Education 8(1), 57-69.
• Lee, L., Williams, A., Lao, C., Lagunas, N., ve Langner, C. A. (2021). The role of home language in children's friendship choice and peer acceptance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 76, 101323.
• Mehta, C. M., ve Strough, J. (2009). Sexsegregation in friend ships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201–220.
• Miller, J. B., ve Hoicowitz, T. (2004). Attachment contexts of adolescent friendship and romance. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 191-206.
• Newcomb, A. F., ve Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306-347.
• Overton, S., ve Rausch, J. L. (2002). Peer relationships as support for children with disabilities: An analysis of mothers’ goals and indicators for friendship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(1), 11-29.
• Park, Y., ve Killen M. (2010). When is peer rejection justifiable? Children’s understanding across two cultures. Cognitive Development, 25, 290-301.
• Rose, P., Beeby, J. ve Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 21(6), 1123-1129.
• Rubin, K. H., R. Coplan., L. J. Nelson., C. S. L. Cheah, ve D. G. Lagace-Seguin (1992). Peer Relationships in Childhood. In Developmental Psychology: An Advanced Textbook, M. H. Borastein, ve M. E. Lamb eds., 3rd ed.,(451–502). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., ve Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Personality and social development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 858– 932). Wiley.
• Sebanc, A. M., Keamsa, K. T., Flemandeza, M. D., ve Galvina, K. B. (2007). Predicting having a best friend in young children: Individual characteristics and friendship features. Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 168, 81-96.