Covid-19 Öncesi ve Sonrası Dijital Okuryazarlık: Öğrenci Odaklı Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 1984 - 2018, 30.12.2025

Hilmiye Türesin

https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1718745

https://izlik.org/JA66HM77DC

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 21.yüzyıl becerilerinden kabul edilen dijital okuryazarlık becerilerinin öğrenciler bağlamında bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle Covid-19 öncesi ve sonrası dönem karşılaştırmaları yapılarak incelenmesi ve dijital okuryazarlık kavramının yapısının ve gelişiminin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında 1 Ocak 2025 tarihine kadar Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanında öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık becerileriyle ilgili yayımlanmış 745 çalışma (makale, bildiri, kitap bölümü) VOSviewer programı ile analiz edilmiştir. 2019 ve öncesi yıllarını kapsayan dönemde 345 yayın üretilmişken, 2020 yılı dahil olmak üzere 1 Ocak 2025 yılına kadar son beş yılda 400 yayın üretildiği görülmektedir. Pandemi öncesi dönemde yapılan çalışmalar ile sonrasında yapılan çalışmalarda odaklanılan anahtar kelimeleri belirlemek üzere ortak kelime analizi yapılmıştır. Her iki dönemdeki çalışmalarda ortak alanlar olmakla birlikte pandemi sonrasında yayınlarda odaklanılan farklı alanlar olduğu da görülmüştür. Bu çalışmanın hem dijital okuryazarlık ile ilgili alana katkı sağlaması hem de bu alanda araştırma yapmak isteyenler için yol gösterici olması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital okuryazarlık , Öğrenciler , Bibliyometrik Analiz

Digital Literacy Before and After COVID-19: A Student-Oriented Bibliometric Analysis

https://izlik.org/JA66HM77DC

Öz

This study aims to examine digital literacy skills—recognized as one of the 21st-century competencies—in the context of students through a bibliometric analysis method by comparing the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods. Additionally, it seeks to reveal the structure and development of the concept of digital literacy. To achieve this objective, 745 studies (including articles, conference papers, and book chapters) published in the Web of Science (WOS) database on students' digital literacy skills until January 1, 2025, were analyzed using the VOSviewer software. While 345 publications were produced during the period covering 2019 and earlier years, 400 publications were produced in the last five years, including 2020 and extending until January 1, 2025. A co-word analysis was conducted to identify the key terms that studies focused on before and after the pandemic. Although there were shared themes in both periods, it was observed that different areas of focus emerged in publications after the pandemic. This study is expected to contribute to the field of digital literacy and serve as a guide for researchers interested in conducting studies in this area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

digital literacy , students , bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

• Akman, A. (2024). Dijital okuryazarlık becerilerine ilişkin öğrenci algıları. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 538-561. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1423190
• Akpınar, M. E. (2025). Dijital dönüşüm ve dijital okuryazarlık: teorik temeller, faydalar ve zararlar. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.1530919
• Aksoy, N.C., Karabay, E. & Aksoy, E. (2021). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi. 14 (2), 859-894, https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.871290
• Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
• Alpsülün, M., & Balıkçı, H. C. (2024). Okul yöneticilerinin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 15(29), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1415279
• Anthonysamy, L. (2020). Digital literacy deficiencies in digital learning among undergraduates. Understanding Digital Industry. Routledge.
• Arono, Arsyad, S., Syahriman, Nadrah, & Villia, A. S. (2022). Exploring the effect of digital literacy skill and learning style of students on their meta-cognitive strategies in listening. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15130a
• Ateş, M., & Aşcı, A. U. (2025). Otantik öğrenme yönteminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık becerilerine etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1589994
• Ayazlar, R.A., & Yılmazsoy, D.Ö. (2025). Turizm eğitimi alan öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi: muğla örneği. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.26677//TR1010.2025.1583
• Bakker, A., & Wagner, D. (2020). Pandemic: Lessons for today and tomorrow? Educational Studies in Mathematics. (104), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09946-3.
• Birlik, A., & Yaraş, A. (2025). Spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yeni Medya, (18), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1636701
• Blikstad-Balas, M., & Klette, K. (2020). Still a long way to go narrow and transmissive use of technology in the classroom. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2020-01-05
• Brata, W. W. W., Padang, R. Y., Suriani, C., Prasetya, E., & Pratiwi, N. (2022). Student’s digital literacy based on students’ interest in digital technology, internet costs, gender, and learning outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(3), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.27151
• Brown, J., Morgan, A., Mason, J., Pope, N., & Bosco, A. M. (2020). Student nurses’ digital literacy levels: lessons for curricula. CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing, 38(9), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615.
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001.
• De Smedt, T., Fastrez, P., Philippette, T., Pérez Tornero, J. M., & Celot, P. (2009). Study on assessment criteria for media literacy levels: A comprehensive view of the concept of media literacy and an understanding of how media literacy level in Europe should be assessed (No. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain).
• Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of chatGPT on higher education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
• Dhillon, S., & Murray, N. (2021). An investigation of EAP teachers’ views and experiences of E-learning technology. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020054.
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004.
• Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y
• Gültekin, V., & Özel, N. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık becerileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 64(1), 384-420. https://doi.org//10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.1.16.
• Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Curriculum Leadership, Futurelab Inovation in Education, 1-58.
• Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van Berg, J. den. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7.
• Hsieh, M.-C. (2021). Development and application of an augmented reality oyster learning system for primary marine education. Electronics, 10, 2818. https:// doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222818.
• Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031.
• Huang, Q. (2015). Digital Transformation of Education Publishing in China. Publishing Research Quarterly, 31(4), 258–263. doi:10.1007/s12109-015-9421-8.
• Kara, M. (2022). Revisiting online learner engagement: exploring the role of learner characteristics in an emergency period. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S236–S252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891997
• Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). My teacher is a machine: Understanding students' perceptions of AI teaching assistants in online education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(20), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227
• Klosky, J. V., Gazmararian, J. A., Casimir, O., & Blake, S. C. (2022). Effects of remote education during the covıd-19 pandemic on young children’s learning and academic behavior in georgia: perceptions of parents and school administrators. Journal of School Health, 92(7), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13185
• Li, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Teachers’ satisfaction, role, and digital literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031121
• Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.008
• Martin, A. (2008). Digital Literacy and the “Digital Society”. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies, and Practices (pp. 151-176). New York: Peter Lang.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
• Ng, C. (2019). Shifting the focus from motivated learners to motivating distributed environments: A review of 40 years of published motivation research in Distance Education. Distance Education, 40, 469–496.
• Nogueira, V. B., Teixeira, D. G., de Lima, I. A. C. N., Moreira, M. V. C., de Oliveira, B. S. C., Pedrosa, I. M. B., de Queiroz, J. W., & Jeronimo, S. M. B. (2022). Towards an inclusive digital literacy: An experimental intervention study in a rural area of Brazil. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2807–2834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10711-z
• Ocak, G., Ütebay, G., & Karakuyu, A. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinin metaverse inançları ile dijital okuryazarlık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1426412
• Özbilen, U. (2024). Dijital okuryazarlıkla ilgili eğitim alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.48066/kusob.1502957
• Powel, M. (2002). Designing library space to facilitate learning: A review of the UK higher education sector. LIBRI, 52(2), 110–120
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: do they really think differently . On the Horizon, 9(6).
• Rafi, M., JianMing, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0049
• Reddy, P., Kaylash, C., Sharma, B., & Chand, D. (2021). Contextualized game-based intervention for digital literacy for the Pacific Islands. Education and Information Technologies, 1 (26), 5535-5562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10534-y
• Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
• Rini, R., Sukamto, I., & Hariri, H. (2022). The effect of self-directed learning on students’ digital literacy levels in online learning. International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 15, Issue 3). www.e-iji.net
• Rozhkova, D., Rozhkova, N., & Blinova, U. (2019, October). Digital universities in Russia: prospects and problems. In The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science (pp. 252-262). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Salma, C. & Kahramanoğlu, R. (2024). Dijital okuryazarlık ile ilgili gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların analizi. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 6 (2), 196-213.
• Turkaya, A., & Özdemir, E. B. (2024). Yapay zekâ teknolojileri kullanımının ön lisans öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerine etkisi. Journal of University Research, 7(4), 400-465. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1486583
• Williams, A., Bangun, C. S., & Shino, Y. (2022). The urgency of digital literacy in Indonesia on COVID-19 pandemic. Startupreneur Bisnis Digital (SABDA Journal, 1(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.34306/sabda.v1i2.143
• Yaşar, Y., Narin, H., Tekdağ, S., Demir, Ö., Varanlar, M., & Önemli, H. (2022). Covid 19 pandemi sürecinde eğitimde yaşanan sorunlara ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi. International Journal of Disciplines in Economics & Administrative Sciences Studies, 8(45), 654-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.2922 8/ideas.64457
• Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the covıd-19 pandemic. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 8). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388
• Zhang, Y., Zhao, G., & Zhou, B. (2021). Does learning longer improve student achievement? Evidence from online education of graduating students in a high school during COVID-19 period. China Economic Review, 70, 101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101691
• Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Aı in teacher education: unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988