Difficulties Faced by Postgraduate Students of English Language Teaching (ELT) in Thesis Writing in Turkey
Abstract
There are a growing number of students who continue postgraduate degrees in English Language Teaching (ELT) in state and private universities in Turkey. It is taken for granted that thesis writing is a significant aspect of postgraduate education and postgraduate students are experiencing some difficulties with the thesis writing process. In this process, supervision is a complex process and sometimes supervision is the element that makes things easier for postgraduate students or exacerbates the process. Therefore, supervisor–supervisee relationship is a topic that has been explored much abroad lately but relatively few are written about the Turkish case. Considering this research gap, this article investigates postgraduates’ views on master’s and PhD thesis supervision and difficulties they faced in thesis writing in ELT. The participants from different private and state universities received a link to an online survey engine. The aim was to understand how thesis writing in ELT and supervision are experienced in Turkey. In this study, qualitative and quantitative research methods were used. The data collected in the study were analyzed by content analysis technique and frequency counting. The findings are important as they show that there are serious linguistic challenges inherent in thesis writing that are complicating the process but also supervisory process that needs delicate attention. The paper suggests that supervisors and universities should consider the positive and negative aspects of their attitudes and behaviors throughout this process. Some measures can be taken to enhance the quality of supervision at universities in Turkey.
Keywords
postgraduate programmes,thesis writing,supervision,supervisor,English language teaching
References
- Aydemir, S & Çam, Ş. S. (2015). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin lisansüstü eğitimi almaya ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Journal of Education, 4 (4), 4-16.
- Bakioğlu, A. & Gürdal, A. (2001). Lisansüstü tezlerde danışman ve öğrencilerin rol algıları: Yönetim için göstergeler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 9-18.
- Basturkmen, H. & East, M. & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19 (4), 432-445,
- Carter, S. & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54 (1), 68-75.
- Delamont, S. & Parry, O. & Atkinson, P. (1998). Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmas. Teaching in Higher Education, 3 (2), 157-172.
- Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (4), 489-500.
- Doğan, N. & Bıkmaz, Ö. (2015). Expectation of students from their thesis supervisor. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3730 – 3737.
- Elgar, F. C. & Klein, R. M. (2004). What You Don’t Know: Graduate Deans’ Knowledge of Doctoral Completion Rates. Higher Education Policy, 17, 325-336.
- Eskici, M. & Çayak, S. (2017). Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalında Yapılan Yüksek Lisans Tezlerine Genel Bir Bakış. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (1), 211-226.
- Frischer, J., & Larsson, K. (2000). Laissez-faire in research education–an inquiry into a Swedish doctoral program. Higher Education Policy, 13, 131-155.