Evaluation of Information Technologies and Software Course Curriculum in the Context of CIPP Model
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the Information Technologies and Software curriculum using the Context-Input-Process-Product (CIPP) model introduced by Stufflebeam in line with the teachers' opinions. In this study, it was aimed to conduct a program evaluation study based on the CIPP model using an interview method from qualitative research methods. The study group of the research consists of 25 Information Technology Teachers working in Ağrı, Aksaray, Eskişehir, İstanbul, Manisa, Şanlıurfa and Şırnak province determined by using maximum diversity sampling, one of the purposeful sampling methods. Qualitive data were collected using a study a structured interview form based on the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam. Descriptive analysis method was used in qualitive data analysis. According to the results of the study, while the teaching principal methods in the curriculum were found to be successful in measurement and evaluation, it was observed that they could not be put into practice due to deficiencies such as inadequate Computer infrastructure and hardware.
Keywords
References
- Akbıyık, C., & Seferoğlu, S.S. (2012). İlköğretim bilişim teknolojileri dersinin işlenişi: Öğretmen görüş ve uygulamaları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1(1), 405-424.
- Başaran, M., Can, M.S., & Özdemir, O.İ. (2020). 8. Sınıf İngilizce öğretim programının bağlam, girdi, süreç ve ürün (CIPP) modeline göre değerlendirilmesi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(3), 154-178. http://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.767692
- Bektaş, C. (2006). İlköğretim okullarında bilgisayar derslerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Elazığ ili örneği). [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Fırat Üniversitesi.
- Durdukoca F., & Arıbaş S. (2011) İlköğretim seçmeli bilişim teknolojileri dersi 5. basamak öğretim programının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi (Malatya ili örneği). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 140-168.
- Erden, M. (1998). Eğitimde program değerlendirme. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Ersoy, H. (2016). Durum çalışması. M. Y. Özden & L. Durdu (Ed.). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (3-18). Anı Yayıncılık.
- Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: design and methods. (3. Basım). Sage Publication
- Fidan, T., & Öztürk, İ. (2015). Perspectives and expectations of union member and non- union member teachers on teacher unions. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5(2), 191-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr. 2015.52.10
- Worthern, B.R., Sanders J.R., & Fitzpatrick J.L. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical Guidelines. Pearson Education.
- Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690