Devletlerin Tanınmasında Dönüm Noktaları: Badinter Komisyonu ve Kosova'nın Tanınması

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 143 - 184, 13.07.2016

Ezeli Azarkan

Öz

Bu makale Kosova’nın bağımsızlık ilanı ve Badinter Komisyonu çerçevesinde yeni devletlerin tanınmasına ilişkin uluslararası hukuktaki gelişmeleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Badinter Komisyonu Avrupa Topluluğu ve uluslararası toplumun yetkilendirdiği sınırlar içinde Yugoslavya’daki self-determinasyon, ayrılma ve egemenlik konularını çözümüne katkı sağladı. Kosova’nın tek taraflı ve ani bağımsızlık ilanı ise uluslararası toplumu ikiye böldü. Birçok Avrupa devleti Kosova’yı hemen tanıdı ve Kosova’nın bağımsızlık deklarasyonuna destek verdi. Bazı Avrupalı devletler ise Kosova Parlamentosunun eylemini uluslararası hukuka aykırı ve hukuk dışı bir eylem olarak niteledi. Bu makalede, bu iki durumun ortaya çıkardığı durumları incelenecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Hukuk, Badinter Komisyonu, Kosova, Tanıma

Turning Points in the Recognition of States: Badinter Commission and Kosovo's Declaration of Independence

Öz

This article intends to examine the developments in international law in relation to the recognition of new states within the frame work of the Badinter Commission and Kosovo’s declaration of independence. The self-determination in Yugoslavia authorized within the limits of Badinter Commission, European Community and the International Community has contributed to settling issues of sovereignty and secession. Kosovo’s unilateral and immediate declaration of independence has divided the international community. Many European countries both recognized Kosovo and gave support to its independence declaration. However, some European countries denounced this action of Kosovo’s parliament as unlawful and contrary to international law. In this article, the consequences stemmed from these two cases are to be examined

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Law, Badinter Commission, Kosovo, Recognition

Kaynakça

• Benedict, Kingsbury, “ Claims by Non- State Grups in International Law”, Cornel International Law Journal, Vol.25,No.3,1992.
• Bennett,Christopher, Yugoslavia's Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences, NYU Press, New York, 1997.
• Bing JIA, Bing, “The Independence of Kosovo: A Unique Caseof Secession?”, Chinese Journal of International Law , Vol. 8, No1,2009.
• Borgen,Christopher J.,” Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: SelfDetermination, Secession and Recognition”, American Society of International Law: Asil Insight , 2008, http://slomanson.tjsl.edu/2.4_KosSecession.pdf ( Erişim tarihi 18.01.2009 )
• Brown, Bartram, Human Rights, Sovereignty, and the Final Status of Kosovo, Chicago-Kent Law Review,Vol.80,No.1,2005.
• Calic ,Marie-Janine,” Kosovo in the Twentieth Century: A Historical Account”, Kosovo and The Challenge Of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation”, Collective Action, and International iıtizenship, Eds.: Albrecht Schnabel & Ramesh Thakur, United Nations University Press, New York, Paris, Tokyo, 2000.
• Cassese, Antonio, Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal,Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.
• Charney, Jonathan, “Self-determination: Chechnya, Kosovo, East Timor”,Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol.34,No 2,2001.
• Daskalovski,Zhidas, ” The Independence of Kosovo and the Consolidation of Macedonia—A Reason to Worry?”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, , 2008.
• De Wet ,Erika, “The Governance of Kosovo: Securıty Council Resolution 1244 and The Establishment and Functionıng Of Eulex “, The Amerıcan Journal Of Internatıonal Law, Vol.103,No.1,2009.
• Delahunty ,Robert J. and Perez, Antonio F., “The Kosovo Crisis: A Dostoievskian Dialogue on International Law, Statecraft, and Soulcraft”, Vanderbilt Journal Of Transnational Law, Vol.42,No.1, 2009.
• Dugard , John, "Secession: Is the Case of Yugoslavia a Precedent for Africa?" African Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 5, No.1,1993.
• Dugard John and Raić David, “The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession”, Secession: International Law Perspectives, ( Ed. )Marcelo Kohen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,2006.
• Erlanger, Steven,” Yugoslavs Demand a Role in U.N. Kosovo Settlement”, N.Y. TIMES, 22 Mayıs1999.
• Grant,Thomas D., The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution, Westpost Press, London,1999. Hill,Christopher, European Foreign Policy: Key Documents, Routledge, London, 200
• Hilpold, Peter, “The Kosovo Case and International Law: Looking for Applicable Theories”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 8, No.1,2009.
• Islami, Iliriana, “the Insufficiency of International Legal Personality of Kosova as Attained Through The European Court of Human Rights: a Call for Statehood” , Chıcago-Kent Law Review, , Vol.80,No.1, 2005.
• Klejda, Mulaj, “A recurrent tragedy: Ethnic Cleansing as a Tool of State Building in The Yugoslav Multinational Setting”, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006.
• Knop,Karen, Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2002.
• Koktsidis, Pavlos-Ioannis, “A Success Story? Analysing Albanian EthnoNatıonalist Extremism in the Balkans”, East European Quarterly, Vol.XIII, No. 2,2008.
• Krasner , Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, , N.J. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999.
• Kuci, Hajredin ,”The Legal and Political Grounds for, and the Influence of the Actual Situation on, the Demand of the Albanians of Kosovo for Independence”, Chicago-Kent Law Review,Vol.80,No.1,2005.
• Kut, Şule, Balkanlarda Kimlik ve Egemenlik, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul,2005.
• Lukic ,Reneo and Lynch, Alen, Europe from the Balkans to the Urals: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, A SIPRI Publication,1996.
• Makinda ,Samuel M., ‘Sovereignty and International Security: Challenges for the United Nations’, Global Governance, Vol. 2,No.2, 1996.
• Merriam, John J “ Kosovo And The Law Of Humanitarian İntervention”, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Winter,Vol. 33, No.1,2001.
• Mihaillović, Srećko, “ Kosovo: Between Co-Existence and Permenent Confilict, The Lessons of Yugoslavia, ( Ed. ) Meta Spencer, Hawort Press, NewYork,2000.
• Musgrave,Cf. Thomas, Self-Determination and National Minorities,Clarendon Pres, Oxford,1997.
• Ouguergouz , Fatsah and Tehindrazanarivelo,Djacoba Liva” The Question of Secession in Africa”, Secession: International Law Perspectives, ( Ed.)Marcelo Kohen ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ,2006.
• Pellet, Alain, “Appendix: Opinions No. 1, 2 and 3 of the Arbitration Committee of the International Conference on Yugoslavia”, EJIL, vol.3, no.1, 1992.
• Pellet, Allan “ The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee : A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples”, EJIL, vol.3,no,.1,1992.
• Perritt Henry H., Jr., “Resolving Claims When Countries Dİsİntegrate: the Challenge of Kosovo” , Chıcago-Kent Law Revıew, , Vol.80,No.1, 2005.
• Quane, Cf. Helen, The United Nations and the Evolving Right to SelfDeterniination, International & Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.47, No.3,1998.
• Radan,Peter, The Break-up of Yugoslavia and International Law, Routledge, London and New York ,2002.
• Ramcharan,B.G. ,The International Conference on The Former Yugoslavia, Official Papers, Vol.2, Kluwer Law International, The Hague,London,Boston,1997.
• Rich, Roland, “Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union”,EJIL, Vol.4,No.1,1993.
• Weller, Marc, “Kosovo’s final status”, International Affairs, Vol. 84,No.6 , 2008.
• Zagar,Mitja ,“ Yugoslavia: What Went Wrong? Constituational Aspects of The Yugoslav Crisis From The Perspective of Ethnic Conflict”, The Lessons of Yugoslavia, (Ed.) Meta Spencer, Hawort Pres, New York,2000.