Teachers’ Opinions About Feedback in The Education System
Öz
Purpose: In this study, the feedback in the educational system was aimed to be examined based on teacher opinions.
Design & Methodology: The study was carried out within the context of phenomenological design by adopting qualitative research method. Convenience sampling method was used. In this context, the participants of the study consist of 20 primary and secondary school teachers working in the central districts of Malatya and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. The data of the study were collected with semi-structured interviews. In the analysis of the data, content analysis technique was used.
Findings: It has been found that most of the participants pointed that feedback is needed in the educational processes. By most of the participants it was told that feedback should be given individually throughout the academic year and at the end of the academic year. Also it was found that most of the participants want that the feedback should be given by the "school principal".
Implications
& Suggestions: It is stated that the
feedback in the system is insufficient. The feedback mechanism directly affects
motivation and the feedback processes needs to be used actively in system and
new feedback mechanisms should be formed to eliminate the deficiencies.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Askew, S. ve Lodge, C., (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In Askew, S. (Ed.), Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge.
- Ayar, T. (2009). Öğretme-Öğrenme Sürecinde Geri bildirim: Dördüncü Ve Beşinci Sınıf Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerinin Görüşlerine Göre Sınıfta Geri bildirim Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
- Baydar, H. (2007). 360 Derece Geri bildirim Sistemi ve İlköğretim Okullarında Uygulama Örnekleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Black, P., ve Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5(l): 7-74.
- Bourget, B.E., (1999). Use Of Feedback By More Reflective and Less Reflective, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Virginia Üniversitesi, ABD.
- Carlson, C.R., (1979). Feedback for Learning. In Milton, O. (Eds.), On College Training. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Clarke, S., (2000). Closing the Gap Through Feedback in Formative Assessment: Effective Distance Marking in Elementary Schools in England. AERA conference 2000 New Orleans Symposium-Classroom Assessment, Learning and teaching Research from Elementary Schools in The UK.
- Çelen, B. (2010). Sanal Alıştırma Ortamlarında Doğrulayıcı Geri Bildirim Kullanılmasının Motivasyona, Akademik Başarıya ve Kalıcı Öğrenmeye Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Gilbertson, D., Witt, J.C., Singletary, L. L., & VanDerHeyden, A. (2007) Supporting teacher use of interventions: effects of response dependent performance feedback on teacher implementation of a math intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(4), 311-326.
- Hattie, J. ve Jaeger, R., (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning: A Deductive Approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5(l), 111- 122.