The Representation of Iran in the Soviet Propaganda Magazine Krokodil During and After the Islamic Revolution

Yıl 2021, , 271 - 301, 31.12.2021

Caner Çakı , Abdülhakim Bahadır Darı

https://doi.org/10.33201/iranian.1011653

Öz

The fact that Iran shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi carried out pro-Western politics during his rule prevented the establishment of close relations between the Soviet Union and Iran. On the other hand, it was not possible to establish close relations between the Soviet Union and Iran because the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was established after the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979, followed an anti-Communist policy. On the other hand, the Iranian Islamic Revolution against the Iranian shah was discussed from various perspectives in the humor magazine Krokodil of the Soviet Union. Since Krokodil was one of the leading humor magazines of the Soviet Union in terms of print count and also served as a propaganda tool for the Soviet Union, the presentation of the Iranian Islamic Revolution in Krokodil is important in that it reflects the political attitude of the Soviet Union towards the Iranian Islamic Revolution and its aftermath. In the study, it was aimed to reveal the political view of the Soviet Union towards Iran during and after the Iranian Islamic Revolution by examining the cartoons of Krokodil about Iran during and after the Iranian Islamic Revolution. For this purpose, the cartoons of Krokodil on the subject were analyzed using the semiotics method in the light of the Organon Model of the German linguist Karl Bühler. In the light of the findings obtained in the study, it was revealed that the anti-shah Iranian Islamic Revolution was presented as the liberation of Iran from the influence of the USA in the cartoons at the beginning of the revolution, while a negative perception towards Iran was tried to be formed in the cartoons published in the following period. In this way, it was concluded in this study that the Soviet humor about Iran, in particular Krokodil, was shaped directly within the framework of the Soviet Union's foreign policy towards Iran.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Iran, Propaganda, Humor, Iranian Islamic Revolution, Soviet Union

Sovyet Propaganda Dergisi Krokodil’de İran İslam Devrimi Sırası ve Sonrasında İran’ın Temsili

Öz

İran şahı Muhammed Rıza Pehlevi’nin iktidarı döneminde Batı yanlısı siyasete yönelmesi, Sovyetler Birliği ve İran arasında yakın ilişkilerin kurulmasını engellemiştir. Diğer yandan 1979 yılında gerçekleşen İran İslam Devrimi’nden sonra kurulan İran İslam Cumhuriyeti’nin Komünizm karşıtı bir politika izlemesi nedeniyle de Sovyetler Birliği ve İran arasında yakın ilişkilerin kurulması yine mümkün olmamıştır. Buna karşılık İran şahına karşı gerçekleştirilen İran İslam Devrimi’ni Sovyetler Birliği’nin mizah dergisi Krokodil çeşitli açılardan ele almıştır. Krokodil’in baskı sayısı bakımından Sovyetler Birliği’nin önde gelen mizah dergilerinden birisi olması ve aynı zamanda Sovyetler Birliği’nin propaganda aracı olarak hizmet etmesi nedeniyle Krokodil’deki İran İslam Devrimi’nin sunumu, Sovyetler Birliği’nin İran İslam Devrimi’ne ve sonrasına yönelik siyasi tutumunu yansıtması bakımında önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada Krokodil’in İran İslam Devrimi sırasında ve sonrasında İran’ı konu alan karikatürleri incelenerek, Sovyetler Birliği’nin İran İslam Devrimi ve sonrası süreçte İran’a yönelik siyasi bakışının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Krokodil’in konuya ilişkin karikatürleri, Alman dilbilimci Karl Bühler’in Organon Modeli ışığında göstergebilim yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular ışığında devrimin başlarındaki karikatürlerde şah karşıtı İran İslam Devrimi’nin İran’ın ABD’nin etkisinden kurtuluşu olarak sunulduğu buna karşılık ilerleyen süreçte yayınlanan karikatürlerde İran’a yönelik olumsuz bir algının meydana getirilmeye çalışıldığı ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bu şekilde çalışmada Krokodil özelinde İran’ı konu alan Sovyet mizahının doğrudan Sovyetler Birliği’nin İran’a yönelik dış politikası çerçevesinde şekillendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İran, Propaganda, Mizah, İran İslam Devrimi, Sovyetler Birliği

Kaynakça

• Buchan, J. (2013). The Iranian Revolution of 1979. Asian Affairs, 44(3), 418-426, https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2013.826016
• Bühler, K. (1918). Kritische musterung der neuen theorien des Satzes. Indogermanisches Jahrbuch, 6, 1-20. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2304854_2/component/file_2304853/content
• Chamberlin, W. H. (1957). The "anecdote": unrationed Soviet humor. Russian Review, 16(3), 27-34, https://doi.org/10.2307/125941
• Cherepanov, Y. (1979). Uçağını iter, Crocodile, (4), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/5n7n83h7
• Davulcu, E. (2015). 1950’li yıllarda Kayseri’de yayınlanan mizah gazeteleri ve bu gazetelerin yazılarında siyasi-idari ve ekonomik hayat. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 4(1), 14-34, https://doi.org/10.17680/akademia.v4i1.5000046296
• Dementyev, V. V. (2009). Russian anekdots of 1970s: on the material of the Soviet humorous journal “Krokodil”. Russian Journal of Communication, 2(3-4), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2009.10756750
• Efimova, B. (1979a). Deviriyor, Crocodile, (10), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/mtsceh59
• Efimova, B. (1979b). Somoza ve Şah, Crocodile, (28), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/2p8c3kyp
• Ekren, A. (2017). 1979-1995 İran-ABD ilişkileri. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 146-155, https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.309765
• Erol, E. G. (2020). Nazi Almanya’sında yayıncılık, Nazizm ideolojisinin yaydığı anti-semitist söylemlerin inşası ve kitapların propaganda amaçlı kullanımı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 34(4), 693-722, https://doi.org/10.24146/tk.818460
• Esfandiari, H. (2001). The politics of the “women’s question” in the Islamic Republic, 1979–1999. İçinde J. L. Esposito, R. K. Ramazani (Ed.), Iran at the crossroads (s. 75-92). Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07175-0_5
• Fanani, A. F. (2012). The export of Islamic revolution in Iran and its threat for the US, the Soviet Union, and Arab countries. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(1), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.18196/aiijis.2012.0001.1-13
• Golubev, A. (2020). The western observer and the western gaze in the affective management of Soviet subjectivity. Russian Social Science Review, 61(3-4), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2020.1778414
• Hunter, S. T. (1987). The Soviet Union and the Islamic Republic of Iran. İçinde, H. Malik (Ed.), Soviet-American relations with Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan (s. 244-266). Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08553-8_12
• Innis, R. E. (2020). Semiotic framing of thresholds of sense. İçinde, Between philosophy and cultural psychology (ss. 31-48). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58190-9_3
• Irfani, S. (1989). Iran-Soviet relations. Strategic Studies, 13(1), 5-8, https://www.jstor.org/stable/45181978
• Khalilzad, Z. (1984). Soviet dilemmas in Khomeini's Iran. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 38(1), 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718408444828
• Kleeman, G. (2006). Not just for fun: Using cartoons to investigate geographical issues. New Zealand Geographer, 62(2), 144-151, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2006.00057.x
• Kozin, A. (2009). “Krokodil” in transition: the case of bureaucrat cartoons. Russian Journal of Communication, 2(3-4), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2009.10756752
• Mammadov, R. (2016). “The king is dead, long live the king!”: image of the United States as the primary enemy on the pages of Krokodil from Stalin to Khrushchev. Visual Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1130591
• Mossaki, N., & Ravandi-Fadai, L. (2018). A guarded courtship: Soviet cultural diplomacy in Iran from the late 1940s to the 1960s. Iranian Studies, 51(3), 427-454, https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2018.1436402
• Olson, R. (1991). The Turkoman rebellion in Eastern Iran, 1924-5: Its consequences and the Soviet reaction. Die Welt des Islams, (2), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1570580
• Roberts, G. (2011). Moscow’s Cold War on the periphery: Soviet policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943-8. Journal of Contemporary History, 46(1), 58-81, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009410383292
• Segal, D. (1988). The Iran-Iraq war: a military analysis. Foreign Affairs, 66(5), 946-963, https://doi.org/10.2307/20043572
• Starchikov, B. (1981). Eşek arısı yuvası, Crocodile, (2), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/2p9e2a34
• Tarock, A. (2017). Russo–Iranian relations in the post-Soviet era. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 28(3), 518-537, https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2017.1347449
• Timbers, E. (1990). Legal and institutional aspects of the Iran-Contra Affair. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 20(1), 31-41, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20700112
• Uborevich-Borovsky, V. (1981). Eller çıkarma, Crocodile, (14), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/2wwvw2fz
• Yazdani, E., & Hussain, R. (2006). United States' policy towards Iran after the Islamic revolution: an Iranian perspective. International Studies, 43(3), 267-289, https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170604300302
• Zhivotova, E. & Tsvetkova, S. (1987). Tahran 86, Crocodile, (6), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/ym5mk5mr