Mapping Out the Methodology of Psychology Research in Turkey
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to scrutinise the
research carried out in the field of psychology in Turkey. The paper selects
the subfields of ‘educational psychology’ and ‘social psychology’ as a case and
focuses on the methodology employed in this research. 84 research studies (n=44
for educational psychology and n=40 for social psychology) were included within
the current study. Findings of the analysis have revealed that (a) the
methodological approach was predominantly based on quantitative and positivist
paradigms, (b) the methodology employed was guided to a little extent by the
purpose and questions of the research study, and (c) the implemented procedure
mostly contained cross-sectional data collection from a sample in a narrow
research setting. Findings of the current study help to shed light on and
create awareness in regards to how methodology is utilised in psychology
research by providing a detailed description of these studies.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Altheide, D. L. & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative qesearch (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage publications. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage publica-tions. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Quali-tative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hammersley, M. (1995). The politics of social research. London: Sage. LeBreton, J. M., Barksdale, C. D., Robin, J., & James, L. R. (2007). Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: indirect measurement and test faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage publi-cations. Michael, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: a critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Michell, J. (2004). The place of qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 307-319. doi: 10.1191/1478088704qp020oa Michell, J. (2003). The Quantitative Imperative: Positivism, Naive Realism and the Place of Qualitative Methods in Psychology. Theory Psychology, 13, 7-31. doi: 10.1177/0959354303013001758 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage publications. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing research, 40, 120-123. Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson. Rogers, A. G. (2000). When methods matter: Qualitative research issues in psychology. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 75-85. Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12, 6–13. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and be-havioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.