Araştırma Makalesi

Küreselleşmenin KİT’lerin Ekonomideki Payına Etkisi

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6 20 Kasım 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Impact of Globalization on the Economic Share of SOE’s

Abstract

Globalization refers to increasing competition with lowering border cost and higher degree of liberalization. For that reason the economic production of state is not accepted and if state intervenes to the economy it will result with imperfect competition. When globalization has gain importance around the world in 1980’s, privatization has become the most effective instrument to maintain an important volume of privatization of SOE’s after 1990’s. One of the most important criticisms on SOE’s is the inefficiency and the waste of scarce economic resources. According to the neoliberal policies that supports the inefficiency of SMO’s, privatization will decrease the size of state production and increase the efficiency which will result with higher competitiveness. The impact of globalization in the last 40 years will be analyzed with comparison of data between developed and developing countries.


Keywords

Globalization,SOE’s,Privatization,Size of the State,Efficiency

Kaynakça

  1. Abramov, A., Radygin A. ve Maria Chernova (2017). State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 3 (2017), 1-23.
  2. Armstrong, P. (2015). How improvements in SOEs can help emerging markets address their development challenges. State-owned Enterprises Commentary, Spring 2015, http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect /1299668047f4ee8bae58ff299ede9589/EB_IFC_Phil_Armstrong.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
  3. Bance, P. and G. Obermann (2015). Serving the general interest with public enterprises: new forms of governance and trends in ownership. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86, 529-534.
  4. Bernier, Luc ed. (2015). Public Enterprises Today: Missions, Performance and Governance, learning from fifteen cases, CIRIEC Collection “Social Economy & Public Economy”, No.5
  5. Bernier, L. (2014). Public enterprises as policy instruments: the importance of public entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 253-266.
  6. Büge, M.; Egeland, M.; Kowalski,P. ve Sztajerowska, M. (2013). State-owned enterprises in the global economy: Reason for concern?, CEPR’s Policy Portal, inequality. [Online] at http://voxeu.org/article/state-owned-enterprises-global-economy-reason-concern, accessed January 15th, 2017.
  7. Christiansen, H. (2011). The Size and Composition of the SOE Sector in OECD Countries. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, No. 5, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online] at http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/5kg54cwps0s3-en
  8. Clò, S., C.F. Del Bo, C. F. , Ferraris, M, Fiorio, C., Florio, M., Vandone, D. and C. Fiorio (2015). Public Enterprises in the Market for Corporate Control: recent worldwide evidence, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86, 559-583.
  9. Dewenter, K. L. & Malatesta, P. H. (1996). Public Offerings of State-Owned and Privately-Owned Enterprises: An International Comparison, http://www.afajof.org/SpringboardWebApp/userfiles/afa/file/Supplements%20and%20Data%20Sets/Appendicies%20for%20Public-Offerings%20of%20 State-Owned%20and%20Privately-Owned%20Enterprises%20An%20 International%20Comparison%20ap5080(1).pdf, accessed June 15th, 2016.
  10. Haggarty, L. ve Mary M. Shirley (1987). A New Data Base on State-Owned Enterprises, The World Bank Economic Review, 11(3), 491-513.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eminer, F. (2017). Küreselleşmenin KİT’lerin Ekonomideki Payına Etkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(6), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.356551