Tüm Yönleriyle Eğitimde Sürdürülebilirlik Eğilimi: Türkiye’deki Çalışmalara Dair Bir Meta-Sentez Çalışması

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 1435 - 1473, 30.09.2023

Zeynep Ergün , Nurgun Gencel , Esra Kabataş Memiş

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1288310

Öz

Türkiye’de eğitim alanında yapılan makale ve tezlerin tamamının sürdürülebilirlik, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma kavramları temel alınarak incelenmesi, sürdürülebilirliğin tüm boyutlarıyla ele alınmasının amaçlandığı bu çalışmada veriler meta sentez (tematik içerik analizi) ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında eğitim öğretim konu alanında, “sürdürülebilir, sürdürülebilirlik, sürdürülebilir kalkınma, sürdürülebilir çevre, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik” anahtar kavramları bağlamında Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu Ulusal Tez Merkezi ve DergiPark veri tabanlarından ulaşılan 232 çalışma ele alınmıştır. Verilerin analizi sürecinde kodlama yapılırken çalışmanın konusu, yöntemi, veri toplama araçları, örneklemi, veri analizi teknikleri, sonuç ve önerileri incelenmiştir. İncelenen çalışmaların büyük çoğunluğunda amaçların sürdürülebilirlik konusunda tutum, algı, farkındalık ve yeterliliğinin ölçülmesi hedeflenmiş, en çok nicel yöntemin tercih edildiği görülmektedir. En çok eğitimciler örneklem grubu olarak seçilirken, 301 ila 1000 arası çalışma grubu boyutuyla çalışılmıştır. İncelenen nicel çalışmalarda en çok likert tipi anket, nitel araştırmalarda da yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler kullanılmıştır. Nicel analizlerden en fazla çıkarımsal analizler tercih edilirken, nitel analizlerden de içerik analizi tercih edilmiştir. Çalışmalara etki eden değişkenler incelendiğinde en fazla cinsiyet ve akademik başarı, etkisiz değişkenlerde ise cinsiyet tespit edilmiştir. Sürdürülebilirlik içeriğinde eğitimler verilen çalışmalarda ise inanç, tutum, algı, farkındalık, değer ve eğilimde artış olan oldukça fazla çalışma olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Müfredat inceleme, ölçek geliştirme, kurum inceleme gibi temalarda oluştuğu görülmektedir. Öneriler araştırmacılara, eğitimcilere, politikacılara ve velilere yönelik olacak şekilde gruplandırılarak sunulmuştur. Çıkan bu sonuçlardan yola çıkılarak çalışmaların eğitimcilerin ve eğitimci olmaya aday bireylerin sürdürülebilirlik bilinç ve farkındalığını ölçerek bunu gelecek nesillere ne dereceli aktarabileceklerini ortaya çıkarmaya çalıştığı söylemek mümkündür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir, Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Sürdürülebilir Çevre, Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik, Meta-sentez, Eğitim-Öğretim

The Sustainability Trend In Education in All Its Aspects: A Meta-Synthesis Investigation of Studies In Turkey

Öz

In this study, which aims to examine all of the articles and theses in the field of education in Turkey on the basis of the concepts of sustainability, environmental sustainability and sustainable development, and to address sustainability in all its dimensions, the data were analyzed by meta-synthesis (thematic content analysis). Within the scope of the research, 232 study and education subject areas accessed from the Turkish Higher Education Institution National Thesis Center and DergiPark databases were discussed in the context of the key concepts of "sustainability, sustainability, sustainable development, sustainable environment, environmental sustainability". In the data analysis process, the subject of the research, its method, data collection tools, sample, data analysis, results and suggestions were examined. In most of the studies examined, it is aimed to measure attitudes, perception, awareness and competence towards sustainability and it is seen that the most quantitative method is preferred. While the most educators are selected as the sample group, the size of the study group is between 301 and 1000. Likert-type questionnaires were used in quantitative research and semi-structured interviews were used in qualitative research. While inferential analyzes were preferred the most from quantitative analyzes, content analysis was preferred from qualitative analyzes. It has been observed that there are many studies that increase belief, attitude, perception, awareness, value and tendency in studies where trainings are given within the scope of sustainability. It is seen that there are themes such as curriculum review, scale development and institution review. Recommendations are grouped and presented to researchers, educators, politicians and parents. Based on these results, it can be said that the studies are trying to measure the awareness and awareness of educators and prospective educators about sustainability and to reveal to what extent they can transfer this to future generations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable, Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Environment, Environmental Sustainability, Meta-synthesis, Education

Kaynakça

• Alkış, S., & Öztürk, M., (2007). Sustainable development in opinions of primary student teachers and pre-service teacher education in Turkey. Geographie didaktische Forschungen, 42, 134-143.
• Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75-86. Atmaca, A. C. (2018). Determination of sustainable development awareness of science teacher candidates Unpublished Master's thesis. Necmettin Erbakan University.
• Bengtsson, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S. &Schroeder, P., (2018). Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. Sustain. Sci. 13 (6), 1533–1547. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1.
• Blasiak, R., Spijkers, J., Tokunaga, K., Pittman, J., Yagi, N., & Österblom, H. (2017). Climate change and marine fisheries: Least developed countries top global index of vulnerability. PloS one, 12(6), e0179632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179632
• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2019). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-Index and 37 different field- and citation-based metrics. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 326-356.
• Bozlağan, R. (2005). The historical background of the idea of sustainable development. In Journal of Social Policy Conferences (No. 50, pp. 1011-1028).
• Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (3), Summer, ss. 296-311.
• Future Learn, 2023. Brief history of sustainability. Accessed to:https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/sustainable-practices-in-food-service/0/steps/232799 .2023
• Hallinger, P. & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11, 2401; doi:10.3390/su11082401.
• Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic principles of sustainable development. Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper: 00-04, Tufts University, USA.
• Hermans, I. M., Reid, R. E., 2002. Developing awerness of the sustainability concept. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 16-20. DOI: 10.1080/00958960209603477
• Holmberg, J. & Sandbrook, R. (1992). Sustainable development: what ıs to be done? Making development sustainable: redefining ınstitutions, policy, and economics. (Ed. J. Holmberg). International Institute for Environment and Development, s.19-38, Washington, D. C. Island Press.
• Huang, L., Wu, W. W., & Chiu, A. (2015). Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development in Construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 201-210.
• Islam, S. M. N., Munasinghe, M. & Clarke, M. (2003). Making long-term economic growth more sustainable: evaluating the costs and benefits. Ecological Economics, 47(2-3), 1-19.
• Kaypak, S. (2011). A sustainable environment for sustainable development in the process of globalization. KMU Journal of Social and Economic Research, 13(20), 19-33.
• Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., Hopkins, C., 2016. Contributions of education for sustainable development (ESD) to quality education: a synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 10 (2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442.
• Mcgill, 2023. What is sustainability?. Accessed to: https://www.mcgill.ca/sustainability/files/sustainability/what-is-sustainability.pdf.2023
• Mula, I., Tilbury, D., Ryan, A., Mader, M., Dlouhá, J., Mader, C., ... & Alba, D. (2017). Catalysing change in higher education for sustainable development: A review of professional development initiatives for university educators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(5), 798-820.
• Oney, H. (2022). A descriptive study of qualitative research studies on environmental literacy [Unpublished Master's Thesis]. Gazi University.
• Ozdemir, A. (2007). Urban sustainability and open space networks. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(23), 3713-3720.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1. Edition). M. Bütün and S. Beşir Demir (Translated by Edt.). Mainland: Pegem Academy.
• Polat, S., Ay, O. (2016). Meta-synthesis: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(1), 52-64. [Online]: http://www.enadonline.com http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
• Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A., & Ignatius, J. (2017). Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 141-157.
• Reed, M. S., Kenter, J., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burt, T. P., Fazey, I. R., ... & Ravera, F. (2013). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. Journal of environmental management, 128, 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016
• Rodríguez Aboytes, J. G., & Barth, M. (2020). Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: a systematic literature review (1999-2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 993-1013. DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0168
• Rotondo, F., Giovanelli, L., & Ezza, A. (2023). Implementing sustainable innovation in state universities: Process and tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136163.
• Sandelowski, M., ve Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905-923.
• Sarabhai, K.V., 2015. ESD for sustainable development goals (SDGs). Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 9 (2), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0973408215600601.
• Tanç, G., Tanç , Ş:, ÇardakA. &Yağlı, İ. (2022). Examination of sustainability studies of universities in Turkey. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Outlook, 66, 83-100, https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1063261
• UNESCO Digital Library (2020). the United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark: /48223/pf0000192183.
• UNESCO, 2023. UNESCO and Sustainable Development Goals. 01/02/2023 tarihinde https://en.unesco.org/sustainabledevelopmentgoals web adresinden erişim sağlanmıştır. United Nations (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, Accessed to:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf .2023
• United Nations (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016. 06/02/2023 tarihinde https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the%20sustainable%20development%20goals%20report%202016.pdf web adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Wikipedia, (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik. Acessed to: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sürdürülebilirlik .2023
• Yalçın, A. (2022). Sustainable development goals in the 21st century: As structual examination of the social studies course curriculum in Turkey. Harran Educational Journal, 7(1), 117-149. https://doi.org/10.22596/hej.1103130
• Yalçıntaş, D., Gülmez, M. & Yaşa Özeltürkay, E. (2021). Examination of graduate theses on sustainability in Turkey with content analysis. Studies on Marketing Insight, 5(2), 50-58.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/somi/issue/67396/1022163
• Yıldırım, G. (2020). Thematic review of educational research on sustainability. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14 (33),70-106 https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.272.4