İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu

Meral Balcı; Ceren Karagözoğlu

doi:10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938

Araştırma Makalesi

İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu

Yıl 2023, , 198 - 229, 23.02.2024

Meral Balcı , Ceren Karagözoğlu

https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938

Öz

Yasa dışı göçü önlemek amacıyla Avrupa Birliği tarafından kabul edilen hukuki düzenlemeler, gittikçe daha sert hale gelmekte ve düzenlemeler çerçevesinde gelişen uygulama alınan tedbirlerin hukuki meşruiyetini zayıflatmaktadır. Özellikle yabancıların ülkeye yasa dışı girişi veya ülkede yasa dışı kalışı meselesinin ceza hukuku araçlarıyla kontrol altında tutulmaya çalışılması birçok açıdan sorun ortaya çıkmasına neden olmaktadır. 2002 tarihli Kolaylaştırıcılar Direktifi bunun en önemli örneklerindendir. Çalışmada söz konusu Direktif kapsamında suç teşkil eden fiiller, Sınıraşan Örgütlü Suçlara Karşı Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi’ne Ek Kara, Deniz ve Hava Yoluyla Göçmen Kaçakçılığına Karşı Protokol çerçevesinde özellikle insani yardımın cezalandırılabilirliği konusu üzerinden ele alınacaktır. Göçmen kaçakçılığının ceza hukuku bakımından çerçevesinin belirlenmesinde ceza hukuku esasları ve insan hakları hukuku temelli bir yaklaşım ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır. Zira yasa dışı göçe yönelik uygulanan yaptırımların yoğunluğunun, salt devlet sınırlarının korunması perspektifiyle ele alınması, insan hakları hukuku, mülteci hukuku ve deniz hukuku başta olmak üzere devletin taraf olduğu uluslararası sözleşmelerden doğan yükümlülüklerinin ihlali ile sonuçlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla idari düzenlemelerin etkin olduğu bir alan olan göç hukukunda ceza hukuku müdahalesinin sınırlarının genişletilmemesi önem arz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yasa dışı göç, direktif, insani yardım

Kaynakça

Akbulut B, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (9. Baskı Adalet, 2022). google scholar
David Alan Sklansky, ‘Crime, Immigration, And Ad Hoc Instrumentalism’ (2012) 15(2) New Criminal Law Review 157-223. google scholar
Aliverti A, ‘Making people criminal: The role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement’ (2012) 16(4) Theoretical Criminology, 417-434. google scholar
Aljehani A, ‘The Legal Definition of the Smuggling of Migrants in Light of the Provisions of the Migrant Smuggling Protocol’ (2015) 79(2) The Journal of Criminal Law 122-137. google scholar
Allsopp J, ‘The European Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: Measuring the Impact on the Whole Community’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
A Manifesto on European Criminal Policy’ (European Criminal Policy Initiative), Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 2009 (12) 707-716. google scholar
Arsava AF, ‘AB Hukukunda Mülteci ve Göç Sorunu’, (2021) 155 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 461-477. google scholar
Aytekin İnceoğlu A, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 14(175-176) 14 Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 387-432. google scholar
Aziani A, ‘The heterogeneity of human smugglers: A Refection on The Use of Concepts in Studies on The Smuggling of Migrants’, (2021) Trends in Organized Crime <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-021-09435-w> 13 Mart 2022. google scholar
Barnes R, ‘The International Law Of The Sea And Migration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Martinus Nijhoff 2010). google scholar
Başaran T, ‘Saving Lives At Sea: Security, Law And Adverse Effects’ (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law, 365-387. google scholar
Başaran T, ‘The Saved and The Drowned: Governing Indifference in The Name of Security’ 2015 46(3) Security Dialogue, 205-220. google scholar
Baykal S/ Göçmen İ ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunun Kaynakları Bakımından Normlar Hiyerarşisi’, Prof. Dr. Erdal Onar’a Armağan (Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 2013). google scholar
Bayram MH, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Dersleri, 7. Baskı (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2022). google scholar
Bilgin AB, ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Hukukun Genel İlkeleri’ (2016) LXXIV (1) İÜHFM, 73-94. google scholar
Bostancı Bozbayındır G, ‘Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda göçmen kaçakçılığı suçu’, (2015) Disiplinlerarası Göç ve Göç Politikaları Sempozyumu, 377-405. google scholar
Carrera S/ Mitsilegas V/ Allsopp J/ Vosyliute L, Policing Humanitarianism: EU Policies Against Human Smuggling and Their Impact on Civil Society (Oxford, London 2019). google scholar
Conte C/ Vosyliute L, Crackdown on NGOs assisting refugees and other migrants, Policy Option Brief (2019). google scholar
De Massol de Rebetz R/ Ölçer P, ‘Aggravated Migrant Smuggling in a Transit Migration Context, Criminal Victimization under ECtHR Positive Obligations Case Law’ (2022) 71 Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul, 413-480. google scholar
Den Hejer M, ‘Europe beyond its Borders: Refugee and Human Rights Protection in Extraterritorial Immigration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Njhoff, 2010). google scholar
Doğan K, Göçmen Kaçakçılığı, (3. Bası, Seçkin 2021). google scholar
Duff RA, ‘A Criminal Law for Citizens’ (2010) 14(3) Theoretical Criminology, 1-13. google scholar
Ekşi N, Mahkeme Kararları Işığında Suçluların İltica Sistemi Dışında Bırakılması (Beta 2017). google scholar
Erel K, ‘Yargıtay Kararları Işığında Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2007) 71, TBB Dergisi, 264- 299. google scholar
Fekete L, Europe: Crimes of Solidarity, (2009) 50(4) Race & Class, 83-97. google scholar
Fekete L /Webber F/ Edmond-Pettitt A, Humanitarianism: the unacceptable face of solidarity, Institute of Race Relations (London 2017). google scholar
Gallagher A, ‘Human Rights and the New UN Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis’ (2001) 23(4) Human Rights Quarterly, 975-1004. google scholar Gerver M, ‘Decriminalizing People Smuggling’ 2021 8 (1) Moral Philosophy and Politics, 131-153. google scholar
Goodwin-Gill GS, ‘The Haitian Refoulement Case: A Comment’ (1994) 6(1) International Journal of Refugee Law, 103-9. google scholar
Guild E, ‘Assessing Migration Management and the Role of Criminal Law’ Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’ Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas and Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020). google scholar
Husak D, ‘The Criminal Law as Last Resort’ (2004) 24(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 207-235. google scholar
Kangal ZT, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 21 Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 221-277. google scholar
Kangal ZT, ‘Anayasal Bir Güvence Olarak Suçta ve Cezada Kanunîlik İlkesi’ (2011) 17, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, 61-106. google scholar
Karagözoğlu C, İnsan Hakları Sözleşmelerinin Ülke Dışına Uygulanabilirliği Çerçevesinde Devletin Yetkisi ve Sorumluluğu (Oniki Levha 2023). google scholar
Karagözoğlu C, ‘Non-Refoulement İlkesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uygulanması’ (2023) 43 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, (). google scholar
Kaya İ, Uluslararası Hukukta Temel Belgeler, (4. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2020). google scholar
Kızılsümer Özer D, ‘Denizden Gelen Sığınmacılar ve Uluslararası Hukuk’ (2007) 10(3) Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 75-95. google scholar
Koca M/ Üzülmez İ, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (15. Bs, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
Landry Rachel, ‘The ‘humanitarian smuggling’ of refugees Criminal offence or moral obligation?’, Refugee Studies Centre Working Papers Series No. 119 (2016). google scholar
Militello V/ Spena A, ‘Between Criminalization and Protection The Italian Way of Dealing with Migrant Smuggling and Trafficking within the European and International Context’, Transnational Crime, Ed. Valsamis Mitsilegas, (2018). google scholar
Mitsilegas V, ‘The Normative Foundations of the Criminalisation of Human Smuggling. Exploring the Fault Lines between European and International Law’ (2018) 294 Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 1-19. google scholar
Obokata T, ‘Smuggling of Human Beings from a Human Rights Perspective: Obligations of Non-State and State Actors under International Human Rights Law’ (2005) 17 (2) International Journal of Refugee Law, 394-415. google scholar
Obokata T, ‘The Legal Framework Concerning the Smuggling of Migrants at Sea under the UN Protocol on the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’, Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010). google scholar
Ocotrinillo PR, Non-criminalization of smuggled migrants (Notes on the interpretation of article 5 of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air), UNCHR (2014). google scholar
Orakhelashvili A, ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 14(3)The European Journal of International Law, 529-568. google scholar
Ouwerkerk JW, ‘Criminalisation as a Last Resort: A National Principle Under the Pressure of Europeanisation?’ (2012) 3 (3-4) New Journal of European Criminal Law, 228-241. google scholar
Önder A/ Saydam M, ‘TCK’nın 79. Maddesinde Düzenlenen Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunun Sınıraşan Örgütlü Suçlara Karşı Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi’ne Ek Kara, Deniz ve Hava Yoluyla Göçmen Kaçakçılığına Karşı Protokol Hükümleri Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi’ (2015) XIX (1-2) EÜHFD, 1-15. google scholar
Özbek VÖ/ Doğan K/ Bacaksız P, Türk Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler (Seçkin, 2022). google scholar
Pacurar A, ‘Smuggling, Detention and Expulsion of Irregular Migrants A Study on International Legal Norms, Standards and Practices’ (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law, 259-283. google scholar
Parkin J, ‘The Criminalisation of Migration in Europe’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 61 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2013). google scholar
Petzsche A, ‘Die Kriminalisierung von Vorbereitungshandlungen - Abschied vom Tatstrafrecht?’ (2019)131(3) ZSTW, 576-594. google scholar
Provera M, ‘The criminalization of irregular migration in the European Union’ CEPS Policy Brief No 80 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2015). google scholar
Rodrik D, ‘Solidarity at The Border: How The Eu and Us Criminalize Aid to Migrants’ (2021) 39(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law, 81-126. google scholar
Schloenhardt A/Jessica ED, ‘Twelve years on: revisiting the UN Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’ (2012) 61(1) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 129-156. google scholar
Spena A, ‘Human Smuggling and Irregular Immigration in the EU: From Complicity to Exploitation?’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
Spena A, ‘Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy, 635-657. google scholar
Stumpf J, ‘The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, And Sovereign Power’ 2006 56 (2) American University Law Review, 365-419. google scholar
Taşkın OE, ‘Son Çare (Ultima Ratio) Olarak Ceza Hukuku’ 2016 (59-91) Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 59-91. google scholar
Tazzioli M/Walters W, ‘Migration, solidarity and the limits of Europe’ (2019) 9(1) Global Discourse, 175-190. google scholar
Tezcan D/Erdem MR/Önok M, Teorik ve Pratik Ceza Özel Hukuku (20. Bası, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
Toluner S, Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi (5. Bası, Beta Yayınları 1996). google scholar
Topal AH, Mülteci Hukuku ve Silahlı Çatışma Kaynaklı Sığınmacılar (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
Ünver Y, Ceza Hukukunda Korunması Amaçlanan Hukuksal Değer (Seçkin Yayınevi 2003). google scholar
Van Meerbeeck J, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: From Certainty to Trust’ (2006) 41(41) European Law Review, 275-288. google scholar
Yaşar E, ‘Ceza Hukukunun İktidarı Sınırlama Fonksiyonu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2021) 156, TBB Dergisi, 33-61. google scholar
Yaşar Y/Güneş U, ‘Uluslararası Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunda ‘Maddi Menfaat Elde Etme Amacı’ Kavramı’ (2022) 28 (1) Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 240-255. google scholar
Yüksel S, ‘Procedural aspects of the European Court of Human Right’s Assessment under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Removal Cases’ (2022) 42 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 777-790. google scholar
Zedner L, ‘Is the Criminal Law Only for Citizens? A Problem at the Borders of Punishment’, Eds. Katja Franko Aas,Mary Bosworth The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion (Oxford, 2013). google scholar
Zurilia S, ‘Is that a Smuggler?: The Blurring Line between Facilitating Illegal Immigration and Providing Humanitarian Assistance at the European Borders” Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’, Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas, Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2020). google scholar
Ryan Devereaux, Scott Warren Not Guilty in Trialfor Border Humanitarian Work, INTERCEPT (Nov. 23, 2019)<https://theintercept.com/2019/11/23/scott-warren-verdict-immigration- border/> 30 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Case T-115/94, 22.01.1997, Opel Austria GmbH v Council of the European Union <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61994TJ0115:EN:PDF> 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
Case C-329/11, 06.12.2011, Alexandre Achughbabian <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62011CJ0329 28 Mart 2023 google scholar
Committee Against Torture, J.H.A. v Spain (Marine I), CAT/C/41/D/323/2007, 21.11.2008<https://www.refworld.org/cases,CAT,4a939d542.html> 12 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 59793/17, 11.12.2018, M.A. and Others v Lithuania <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188267> 26 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 51246/17, 08.07.2021, D.A. and Others v Poland <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210855> 3 Kasım 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 40503/17; 42902/17; 43643/17, 23.07.2020, M.K. and Others v Polan <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-203840< 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 41326/17, 8098/18, 8147/18, 8384/18, 10.03.2022, Shenturk and Others v Azerbaijan <https://hudoc.echr.coe.iat/eng?i=001-216016> 11 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 5560/19, 15.04.2021, K.I. v France <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209520> 14 Aralık 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165442> 2 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 27765/09, 23.02.2012, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy<http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231> 20 Haziran 2020. google scholar
ECtHR, 16643/09, 21.10.2014, Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-147702> 22 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 29681/08, 10.11.2011, Affaire Mallah v. France <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107415> 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
ECtHR, 41226/09, 14.11. 2017, Işıkırık v. Turkey Kararı, para 56-58 <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178506 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
HRC, 13.03.2020, Communication No. 3043/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Malta <https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/ Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f128%2fD%2f3043%2f2017&Lang=en> 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
HRC, 04.11.2020, Communication No. 3042/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy <https://undocs.org/en/CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017> 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
HRC, Communication No. 2343/2014, 23.07.2015, H.E.A.K. v. Denmark, CCPR/C/114/D/2343/2014 <https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,59315c5f4.html> 12 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
Inter-Am.Ct.H.R, 19.08.2014, Advisory Opinion OC- 21/14, Requested By The Argentine Republic, The Federative Republic Of Brazil, The Republic Of Paraguay And The Oriental Republic Of Uruguay (Rights And Guarantees Of Children In The Context Of Migration And/Or In Need Of International Protection) para 219, https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/resumen_seriea_21_eng.pdf, 22 Ocak 2023. google scholar
Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011) 10.11.2011) (Press Release) <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=003-3739606-4267555> 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011)) (Press Release). google scholar
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) (2012) OJ C326. google scholar
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p 137. google scholar
Convention on the High Seas, United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 450, p. 11. google scholar
International Convention on Salvage (1989), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1953.pdf., Art 10. google scholar
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1974), United Nations, Treaty Series, 1184, 1185 (p.2). google scholar
International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (1979), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1405.pdf. google scholar
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, Treaty Series, vol. 2220, p. 3. google scholar
Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2241, p. 507. google scholar
Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p 267. google scholar
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), United Nations, Treaty Series, vol.1833. google scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155, p. 331. google scholar
CCPR, General Comment No. 36, Article 6 Right of life (CCPR/C/GC/36) 3 September 2019. google scholar
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, (CMW/C/GC/5) 21 July 2022. google scholar
Criminalization of humanitarian and other support and assistance to migrants and the defence of their human rights in the EU (International Commission of Jurists, 22April 2022). google scholar
CoE, ‘Using Criminal Law To Restrict The Work Of Ngos Supporting Refugees And Other Migrants In Council Of Europe Member States, Thematic Study prepared by Dr Carla Ferstman on behalf of the Expert Council on NGO Law of the Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe’, CONF/EXP(2019)1, December 2019. google scholar
Directive 2008/115/EC, Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, OJEU, 24.12.2008 google scholar
Directive 2013/32/EU, Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of 26 June 2013 On Common Procedures For Granting And Withdrawing International Protection (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union (29.06.2013). google scholar
General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, 21 July 2022 (CMW/C/GC/5). google scholar
Human Rights Council, Human rights and international solidarity, Report of the Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity (Forty-first session 24 June- 12 July 2019) (A/HRC/41/44), 16 April 2019. google scholar
IMO, Maritime Safety Committee, Guidelines on the Treatment of Persons Rescued At Sea, Resolution MSC.167(78), 20 May 2004. google scholar
Legislative Guide for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocols Thereto (United Nations: New York, 2004). google scholar
Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, “Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants”, 2016. google scholar
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (codification), Official Journal of the European Union (23.03.2016) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32016R0399, 23 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Opening statement by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council, 9 September 2019 <https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2019/09/global-update-42nd-session-human-rights-council> 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
The Schengen acquis - Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, Official Journal of the European Communities, 22/09/2000. google scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-fifth session (Agenda item 105), Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime on the work of its first to eleventh sessions, Interpretative notes for the official records (travaux preparatoires) of the negotiation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto (A/55/383/Add.1) 3 November 2000. google scholar
UNODC, Legislative Guide For The Implementation Of The Protocol Against The Smuggling Of Migrants By Land, Sea And Air, Supplementing The United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (Part Three). google scholar
UNHCR, Background Note on the Protection of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees Rescued at Sea, 11 April 2002. google scholar
UNHCR, General legal considerations: search-and-rescue operations involving refugees and migrants at sea, November 2017 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a2e9efd4.html> 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar

The Problem of the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Aid in the Context of the 2002 European Union Directive and Framework Decision on Strengthening the Criminal Framework to Prevent the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry, Transit and Residence

Yıl 2023, , 198 - 229, 23.02.2024

Meral Balcı , Ceren Karagözoğlu

https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938

Öz

The legal regulations the European Union (EU) has adopted to prevent illegal migration are becoming increasingly harsh. The practice that has developed within the framework of the regulations weakens the legal legitimacy of the measures taken. In particular, trying to control the illegal entry or illegal stay of foreigners in a country through the tools of criminal law causes problems in many respects. The EU Council Directive 2002/90/EC, referred to here as the Facilitators Directive, is one of the most important examples of this. This study will examine the acts that constitute a criminal offense under the Facilitators Directive within the framework of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants, especially regarding the ability to punish humanitarian assistance. In determining the framework of the smuggling of migrants in terms of criminal law, this article will attempt to put forth an approach based on the principles of criminal law and human rights. The intensity of the sanctions imposed on illegal migration from the perspective of the protection of state borders results in the violation of state obligations arising from international conventions to which states are a party. Therefore, not expanding the limits of criminal law’s ability to intervene in immigration law is important, being an area where administrative regulations are effective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Illegal migration, directive, humanitarian aid

Kaynakça

Akbulut B, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (9. Baskı Adalet, 2022). google scholar
David Alan Sklansky, ‘Crime, Immigration, And Ad Hoc Instrumentalism’ (2012) 15(2) New Criminal Law Review 157-223. google scholar
Aliverti A, ‘Making people criminal: The role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement’ (2012) 16(4) Theoretical Criminology, 417-434. google scholar
Aljehani A, ‘The Legal Definition of the Smuggling of Migrants in Light of the Provisions of the Migrant Smuggling Protocol’ (2015) 79(2) The Journal of Criminal Law 122-137. google scholar
Allsopp J, ‘The European Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: Measuring the Impact on the Whole Community’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
A Manifesto on European Criminal Policy’ (European Criminal Policy Initiative), Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 2009 (12) 707-716. google scholar
Arsava AF, ‘AB Hukukunda Mülteci ve Göç Sorunu’, (2021) 155 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 461-477. google scholar
Aytekin İnceoğlu A, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 14(175-176) 14 Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 387-432. google scholar
Aziani A, ‘The heterogeneity of human smugglers: A Refection on The Use of Concepts in Studies on The Smuggling of Migrants’, (2021) Trends in Organized Crime <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-021-09435-w> 13 Mart 2022. google scholar
Barnes R, ‘The International Law Of The Sea And Migration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Martinus Nijhoff 2010). google scholar
Başaran T, ‘Saving Lives At Sea: Security, Law And Adverse Effects’ (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law, 365-387. google scholar
Başaran T, ‘The Saved and The Drowned: Governing Indifference in The Name of Security’ 2015 46(3) Security Dialogue, 205-220. google scholar
Baykal S/ Göçmen İ ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunun Kaynakları Bakımından Normlar Hiyerarşisi’, Prof. Dr. Erdal Onar’a Armağan (Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 2013). google scholar
Bayram MH, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Dersleri, 7. Baskı (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2022). google scholar
Bilgin AB, ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Hukukun Genel İlkeleri’ (2016) LXXIV (1) İÜHFM, 73-94. google scholar
Bostancı Bozbayındır G, ‘Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda göçmen kaçakçılığı suçu’, (2015) Disiplinlerarası Göç ve Göç Politikaları Sempozyumu, 377-405. google scholar
Carrera S/ Mitsilegas V/ Allsopp J/ Vosyliute L, Policing Humanitarianism: EU Policies Against Human Smuggling and Their Impact on Civil Society (Oxford, London 2019). google scholar
Conte C/ Vosyliute L, Crackdown on NGOs assisting refugees and other migrants, Policy Option Brief (2019). google scholar
De Massol de Rebetz R/ Ölçer P, ‘Aggravated Migrant Smuggling in a Transit Migration Context, Criminal Victimization under ECtHR Positive Obligations Case Law’ (2022) 71 Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul, 413-480. google scholar
Den Hejer M, ‘Europe beyond its Borders: Refugee and Human Rights Protection in Extraterritorial Immigration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Njhoff, 2010). google scholar
Doğan K, Göçmen Kaçakçılığı, (3. Bası, Seçkin 2021). google scholar
Duff RA, ‘A Criminal Law for Citizens’ (2010) 14(3) Theoretical Criminology, 1-13. google scholar
Ekşi N, Mahkeme Kararları Işığında Suçluların İltica Sistemi Dışında Bırakılması (Beta 2017). google scholar
Erel K, ‘Yargıtay Kararları Işığında Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2007) 71, TBB Dergisi, 264- 299. google scholar
Fekete L, Europe: Crimes of Solidarity, (2009) 50(4) Race & Class, 83-97. google scholar
Fekete L /Webber F/ Edmond-Pettitt A, Humanitarianism: the unacceptable face of solidarity, Institute of Race Relations (London 2017). google scholar
Gallagher A, ‘Human Rights and the New UN Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis’ (2001) 23(4) Human Rights Quarterly, 975-1004. google scholar Gerver M, ‘Decriminalizing People Smuggling’ 2021 8 (1) Moral Philosophy and Politics, 131-153. google scholar
Goodwin-Gill GS, ‘The Haitian Refoulement Case: A Comment’ (1994) 6(1) International Journal of Refugee Law, 103-9. google scholar
Guild E, ‘Assessing Migration Management and the Role of Criminal Law’ Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’ Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas and Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020). google scholar
Husak D, ‘The Criminal Law as Last Resort’ (2004) 24(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 207-235. google scholar
Kangal ZT, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 21 Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 221-277. google scholar
Kangal ZT, ‘Anayasal Bir Güvence Olarak Suçta ve Cezada Kanunîlik İlkesi’ (2011) 17, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, 61-106. google scholar
Karagözoğlu C, İnsan Hakları Sözleşmelerinin Ülke Dışına Uygulanabilirliği Çerçevesinde Devletin Yetkisi ve Sorumluluğu (Oniki Levha 2023). google scholar
Karagözoğlu C, ‘Non-Refoulement İlkesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uygulanması’ (2023) 43 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, (). google scholar
Kaya İ, Uluslararası Hukukta Temel Belgeler, (4. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2020). google scholar
Kızılsümer Özer D, ‘Denizden Gelen Sığınmacılar ve Uluslararası Hukuk’ (2007) 10(3) Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 75-95. google scholar
Koca M/ Üzülmez İ, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (15. Bs, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
Landry Rachel, ‘The ‘humanitarian smuggling’ of refugees Criminal offence or moral obligation?’, Refugee Studies Centre Working Papers Series No. 119 (2016). google scholar
Militello V/ Spena A, ‘Between Criminalization and Protection The Italian Way of Dealing with Migrant Smuggling and Trafficking within the European and International Context’, Transnational Crime, Ed. Valsamis Mitsilegas, (2018). google scholar
Mitsilegas V, ‘The Normative Foundations of the Criminalisation of Human Smuggling. Exploring the Fault Lines between European and International Law’ (2018) 294 Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 1-19. google scholar
Obokata T, ‘Smuggling of Human Beings from a Human Rights Perspective: Obligations of Non-State and State Actors under International Human Rights Law’ (2005) 17 (2) International Journal of Refugee Law, 394-415. google scholar
Obokata T, ‘The Legal Framework Concerning the Smuggling of Migrants at Sea under the UN Protocol on the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’, Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010). google scholar
Ocotrinillo PR, Non-criminalization of smuggled migrants (Notes on the interpretation of article 5 of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air), UNCHR (2014). google scholar
Orakhelashvili A, ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 14(3)The European Journal of International Law, 529-568. google scholar
Ouwerkerk JW, ‘Criminalisation as a Last Resort: A National Principle Under the Pressure of Europeanisation?’ (2012) 3 (3-4) New Journal of European Criminal Law, 228-241. google scholar
Önder A/ Saydam M, ‘TCK’nın 79. Maddesinde Düzenlenen Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunun Sınıraşan Örgütlü Suçlara Karşı Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi’ne Ek Kara, Deniz ve Hava Yoluyla Göçmen Kaçakçılığına Karşı Protokol Hükümleri Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi’ (2015) XIX (1-2) EÜHFD, 1-15. google scholar
Özbek VÖ/ Doğan K/ Bacaksız P, Türk Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler (Seçkin, 2022). google scholar
Pacurar A, ‘Smuggling, Detention and Expulsion of Irregular Migrants A Study on International Legal Norms, Standards and Practices’ (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law, 259-283. google scholar
Parkin J, ‘The Criminalisation of Migration in Europe’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 61 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2013). google scholar
Petzsche A, ‘Die Kriminalisierung von Vorbereitungshandlungen - Abschied vom Tatstrafrecht?’ (2019)131(3) ZSTW, 576-594. google scholar
Provera M, ‘The criminalization of irregular migration in the European Union’ CEPS Policy Brief No 80 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2015). google scholar
Rodrik D, ‘Solidarity at The Border: How The Eu and Us Criminalize Aid to Migrants’ (2021) 39(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law, 81-126. google scholar
Schloenhardt A/Jessica ED, ‘Twelve years on: revisiting the UN Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’ (2012) 61(1) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 129-156. google scholar
Spena A, ‘Human Smuggling and Irregular Immigration in the EU: From Complicity to Exploitation?’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
Spena A, ‘Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy, 635-657. google scholar
Stumpf J, ‘The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, And Sovereign Power’ 2006 56 (2) American University Law Review, 365-419. google scholar
Taşkın OE, ‘Son Çare (Ultima Ratio) Olarak Ceza Hukuku’ 2016 (59-91) Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 59-91. google scholar
Tazzioli M/Walters W, ‘Migration, solidarity and the limits of Europe’ (2019) 9(1) Global Discourse, 175-190. google scholar
Tezcan D/Erdem MR/Önok M, Teorik ve Pratik Ceza Özel Hukuku (20. Bası, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
Toluner S, Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi (5. Bası, Beta Yayınları 1996). google scholar
Topal AH, Mülteci Hukuku ve Silahlı Çatışma Kaynaklı Sığınmacılar (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
Ünver Y, Ceza Hukukunda Korunması Amaçlanan Hukuksal Değer (Seçkin Yayınevi 2003). google scholar
Van Meerbeeck J, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: From Certainty to Trust’ (2006) 41(41) European Law Review, 275-288. google scholar
Yaşar E, ‘Ceza Hukukunun İktidarı Sınırlama Fonksiyonu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2021) 156, TBB Dergisi, 33-61. google scholar
Yaşar Y/Güneş U, ‘Uluslararası Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunda ‘Maddi Menfaat Elde Etme Amacı’ Kavramı’ (2022) 28 (1) Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 240-255. google scholar
Yüksel S, ‘Procedural aspects of the European Court of Human Right’s Assessment under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Removal Cases’ (2022) 42 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 777-790. google scholar
Zedner L, ‘Is the Criminal Law Only for Citizens? A Problem at the Borders of Punishment’, Eds. Katja Franko Aas,Mary Bosworth The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion (Oxford, 2013). google scholar
Zurilia S, ‘Is that a Smuggler?: The Blurring Line between Facilitating Illegal Immigration and Providing Humanitarian Assistance at the European Borders” Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’, Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas, Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2020). google scholar
Ryan Devereaux, Scott Warren Not Guilty in Trialfor Border Humanitarian Work, INTERCEPT (Nov. 23, 2019)<https://theintercept.com/2019/11/23/scott-warren-verdict-immigration- border/> 30 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Case T-115/94, 22.01.1997, Opel Austria GmbH v Council of the European Union <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61994TJ0115:EN:PDF> 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
Case C-329/11, 06.12.2011, Alexandre Achughbabian <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62011CJ0329 28 Mart 2023 google scholar
Committee Against Torture, J.H.A. v Spain (Marine I), CAT/C/41/D/323/2007, 21.11.2008<https://www.refworld.org/cases,CAT,4a939d542.html> 12 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 59793/17, 11.12.2018, M.A. and Others v Lithuania <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188267> 26 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 51246/17, 08.07.2021, D.A. and Others v Poland <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210855> 3 Kasım 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 40503/17; 42902/17; 43643/17, 23.07.2020, M.K. and Others v Polan <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-203840< 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 41326/17, 8098/18, 8147/18, 8384/18, 10.03.2022, Shenturk and Others v Azerbaijan <https://hudoc.echr.coe.iat/eng?i=001-216016> 11 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 5560/19, 15.04.2021, K.I. v France <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209520> 14 Aralık 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165442> 2 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 27765/09, 23.02.2012, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy<http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231> 20 Haziran 2020. google scholar
ECtHR, 16643/09, 21.10.2014, Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-147702> 22 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 29681/08, 10.11.2011, Affaire Mallah v. France <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107415> 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
ECtHR, 41226/09, 14.11. 2017, Işıkırık v. Turkey Kararı, para 56-58 <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178506 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
HRC, 13.03.2020, Communication No. 3043/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Malta <https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/ Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f128%2fD%2f3043%2f2017&Lang=en> 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
HRC, 04.11.2020, Communication No. 3042/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy <https://undocs.org/en/CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017> 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
HRC, Communication No. 2343/2014, 23.07.2015, H.E.A.K. v. Denmark, CCPR/C/114/D/2343/2014 <https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,59315c5f4.html> 12 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
Inter-Am.Ct.H.R, 19.08.2014, Advisory Opinion OC- 21/14, Requested By The Argentine Republic, The Federative Republic Of Brazil, The Republic Of Paraguay And The Oriental Republic Of Uruguay (Rights And Guarantees Of Children In The Context Of Migration And/Or In Need Of International Protection) para 219, https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/resumen_seriea_21_eng.pdf, 22 Ocak 2023. google scholar
Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011) 10.11.2011) (Press Release) <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=003-3739606-4267555> 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011)) (Press Release). google scholar
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) (2012) OJ C326. google scholar
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p 137. google scholar
Convention on the High Seas, United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 450, p. 11. google scholar
International Convention on Salvage (1989), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1953.pdf., Art 10. google scholar
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1974), United Nations, Treaty Series, 1184, 1185 (p.2). google scholar
International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (1979), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1405.pdf. google scholar
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, Treaty Series, vol. 2220, p. 3. google scholar
Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2241, p. 507. google scholar
Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p 267. google scholar
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), United Nations, Treaty Series, vol.1833. google scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155, p. 331. google scholar
CCPR, General Comment No. 36, Article 6 Right of life (CCPR/C/GC/36) 3 September 2019. google scholar
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, (CMW/C/GC/5) 21 July 2022. google scholar
Criminalization of humanitarian and other support and assistance to migrants and the defence of their human rights in the EU (International Commission of Jurists, 22April 2022). google scholar
CoE, ‘Using Criminal Law To Restrict The Work Of Ngos Supporting Refugees And Other Migrants In Council Of Europe Member States, Thematic Study prepared by Dr Carla Ferstman on behalf of the Expert Council on NGO Law of the Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe’, CONF/EXP(2019)1, December 2019. google scholar
Directive 2008/115/EC, Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, OJEU, 24.12.2008 google scholar
Directive 2013/32/EU, Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of 26 June 2013 On Common Procedures For Granting And Withdrawing International Protection (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union (29.06.2013). google scholar
General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, 21 July 2022 (CMW/C/GC/5). google scholar
Human Rights Council, Human rights and international solidarity, Report of the Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity (Forty-first session 24 June- 12 July 2019) (A/HRC/41/44), 16 April 2019. google scholar
IMO, Maritime Safety Committee, Guidelines on the Treatment of Persons Rescued At Sea, Resolution MSC.167(78), 20 May 2004. google scholar
Legislative Guide for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocols Thereto (United Nations: New York, 2004). google scholar
Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, “Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants”, 2016. google scholar
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (codification), Official Journal of the European Union (23.03.2016) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32016R0399, 23 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
Opening statement by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council, 9 September 2019 <https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2019/09/global-update-42nd-session-human-rights-council> 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
The Schengen acquis - Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, Official Journal of the European Communities, 22/09/2000. google scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-fifth session (Agenda item 105), Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime on the work of its first to eleventh sessions, Interpretative notes for the official records (travaux preparatoires) of the negotiation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto (A/55/383/Add.1) 3 November 2000. google scholar
UNODC, Legislative Guide For The Implementation Of The Protocol Against The Smuggling Of Migrants By Land, Sea And Air, Supplementing The United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (Part Three). google scholar
UNHCR, Background Note on the Protection of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees Rescued at Sea, 11 April 2002. google scholar
UNHCR, General legal considerations: search-and-rescue operations involving refugees and migrants at sea, November 2017 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a2e9efd4.html> 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar

Toplam 117 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Kriminoloji (Diğer)
Bölüm	Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar	Meral Balcı 0000-0002-6089-0952 Ceren Karagözoğlu 0000-0003-0757-9767
Yayımlanma Tarihi	23 Şubat 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi	9 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

APA	Balcı, M., & Karagözoğlu, C. (2024). İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, 11(2), 198-229. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938
AMA	Balcı M, Karagözoğlu C. İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. Şubat 2024;11(2):198-229. doi:10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938
Chicago	Balcı, Meral, ve Ceren Karagözoğlu. “İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş Ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 Tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi Ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu”. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 11, sy. 2 (Şubat 2024): 198-229. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938.
EndNote	Balcı M, Karagözoğlu C (01 Şubat 2024) İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 11 2 198–229.
IEEE	M. Balcı ve C. Karagözoğlu, “İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu”, Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, c. 11, sy. 2, ss. 198–229, 2024, doi: 10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938.
ISNAD	Balcı, Meral - Karagözoğlu, Ceren. “İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş Ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 Tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi Ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu”. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 11/2 (Şubat 2024), 198-229. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938.
JAMA	Balcı M, Karagözoğlu C. İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. 2024;11:198–229.
MLA	Balcı, Meral ve Ceren Karagözoğlu. “İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş Ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 Tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi Ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu”. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, c. 11, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 198-29, doi:10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938.
Vancouver	Balcı M, Karagözoğlu C. İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. 2024;11(2):198-229.

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin