Yeşilırmak Havzası Yukarı Mecrasında Almus Fayı Boyunca Drenajın Gelişimi

Öz

Yeşilırmak Havzası, Türkiye’de sismik olarak aktif fay zonlarından biri olan Kuzey Anadolu Fay Zonu’nda (NAFZ) bulunmaktadır. Almus Fayı da, Kuzey Anadolu Fayı’nın (NAF) bir segmentidir. Bu çalışma, Almus Fayının tektonik aktivitesinin Yeşilırmak Havzası’nın yukarı mecrasındaki drenaj gelişimine etkisini ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Akarsu uzunluğu gradyan indeksi (SL), dağ cephesi sinüositesi (Smf), fan yüksekliği (E), hipsometrik integral (Hi) ve eğri gibi morfometrik indeksler (Hi) Almus Fayı boyunca alt havzaların aşağı mecralarının, yukarı mecralarına göre tektonik olarak daha aktif olduğunu göstermektedir. Smf değeri batı kesimde 1,4, doğu kesimdeki alt havzaların ağzında 1,1’e düşmektedir. Aynı şekilde düşük E değerleri güney bölümde gözlemlenir. Bu durum çalışma alanında Almus fayı boyunca tektonik aktivitenin batıdan doğuya doğru arttığını ve kuzey kısımdaki yükselme oranının, güney kısımdan daha fazla olduğunu göstermektedir. Drenaj ağının gelişimi, yerel tektonik kademeli bir yükselme ve nemli bir iklim nedeniyle Pliyosen’de başlamış ve sonra Kuvaterner’deki tektonik hareketlerin etkisi ile devam etmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tektonik Yükselme,Drenaj Gelişimi,Almus Fayı

Evaluation of Drainage in the Upper Catchment of the Yeşilırmak River Basin Along the Almus Fault, Northern Turkey

Öz

The Yeşilırmak River Basin is located in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) which is one of the fault zones with intense seismic activity in Turkey. The Almus Fault is a segment of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF). This study aims to reveal the effect of the Almus Fault on the drainage development and morphotectonic evolution of the upper catchment of the Yeşilırmak River Basin and the relative tectonic activity of the fault. Morphometric indices such as, stream length gradient index (SL), mountain front sinuosity (Smf) and fan entrenchment (E) indicate that the downward of the sub-basins is tectonically more active than the upward which is ascribed to the tectonic activities along the Almus Fault. The Smf value is 1.4 at the west and decreases to 1.1 at the mouth of the sub-basins on the east. This indicates that the tectonic activity along the Almus fault in the study area increases from west to east and the uplift rate in the northern part is higher than the southern part of the study area. Development of the drainage network started during Pliocene due to differential uplift and a humid climate then developed under tectonic forcing during Quaternary.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tectonic Uplift,Drainage Development,Almus Fault

Kaynakça

1. Armijo, R., Meyer, B., Hubert, A., Barka, A. (1999). Propagation of the North Anatolian fault into the northern Aegean: Timing and kinematics. Geology, 27, 267–270.
2. Azor, A., Keller, E. A, Yeats, R. S. (2002). Geomorphic indicators of active fold growth: South Mountain-Oak Ridge anticline, Ventura basin, southern California. Geol Soc Am Bull, 114, 745–753.
3. Bahrami, S. (2013). Tectonic controls on the morphometry of alluvial fans around Danehkhoshk anticline, Zagros, Iran. Geomorphology, 180–181, 217–230.
4. Barka, A. (1992). The North Anatolian fault zone. Ann. Tecton. Supp l6, 164–195.
5. Bayer Altın, T., Altın, B. N., Öztürk, M. Z. (2017). Climatic and tectonic effects on terrace formation during the Late Quaternary in the upper Yeşilırmak valley, Northern Turkey. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat, 40, 123–136.
6. Bellier, O., Over, S., Poisson, A., Andrieux, J. (1997). Recent temporal change in stress state and modern stress field along the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey). Geophys. J. Inter., 131(6), 1–86.
7. Bohnhoff, M., Martínez-Garzón, P., Bulut, F., Stierle, E., Ben-Zion, Y. (2016). Maximum earthquake magnitudes along different sections of the North Anatolian fault zone. Tectonophysics, 674, 147–165.
8. Bozkurt, E., Kocyiğit, A. (1995) Almus Fault Zone: its age, total off set and relation to the North Anatolian Fault Zone. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 4, 93–104.

9. Bozkurt, E., Kocyiğit, A. (1996). The Kazova basin: an active negative flower structure on the Almus Fault Zone, a splay fault system of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 265, 239– 254.
10. Bozkurt, E. (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14 (1-3), 3–30.
11. Bull, W. B, McFadden, L. D. (1977). Tectonic geomorphology north and south of the Garlock Fault, California. In Geomorphology in Arid Regions.Proceedings at the Eighth Annual Geomorphology Symposium. [Doehering, D.O. (ed)]. State University of New York, Binghamton, pp. 115–138.
12. Bull, W. B. (1978). Geomorphic tectonic activity classes of the south front of the San Gabriel Mountains, California: U.S. Geological Survey Contract Report 14- 08-001-G-394, Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Engineering, Menlo Park Press, California.
13. Burbank, D. W., Anderson, R. S. (2001). Tectonic Geomorphology. Blackwell Science, Malden Press.
14. Chen, Y. C, Sung, Q. C, Cheng, K. Y. (2003). Along-strike variations of morphometric features in the western foothills of Taiwan: tectonic implications based on stream gradient and hypsometric analysis. Geomorphology, 56, 109–137.
15. Cox, R. T. (1994). Analysis of drainage-basin symmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from the Mississippi Embayment. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106, 571–581.
16. Das, P., Let, S., Pal, S. (2013). Use of Asymmetry Indices and Stability Indices for Assessing Channel Dynamics: A Study on Kuya River, Eastern India. Journal of Engineering, Computers and Applied Sciences, 2(1), 24–31.
17. Demirbağ, E., Gökaşan, E., Oktay, F. Y., Simsek, M., Yüce, H. (1999). The last sea level changes in the Black Sea: Evidence from the seismic data. Marine Geology, 157, 249–265.
18. Dewey, J. F., Hempton, M. R., Kidd, W.S.F., Şaroğlu, F., Şengör, A.M.C. (1986). Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of eastern Anatolia-A young collision Zone. In Collision Tectonics. [Coward, M. P., Ries, A.C. (eds)]. Geological Society of London, Special Publication, 19, 3–36.
19. Dirik, K., and Göncüoğlu, M. C. (1996). Neotectonic characteristics of Central Anatolia Inter. Geol. Rev., 38, 807–817.
20. El Hamdouni, R., Irigaray, C., Fernandez, T., Chacón, J., Keller, E. A. (2008). Assessment of relative active tectonics, southwest border of Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). Geomorphology, 96, 150–173.
21. Emre, Ö., Tüysüz, O., Yıldırım, C. (2009). Uplift of Pontide orogenic belt since the late Miocene, paper presented at 2nd International Symposium on the Geology of the Black Sea Region, https://www. jmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/370ed268c7bc0d2_ek.pdf (Accessed on 16 April 2019).
22. Erkal, T. (1993). Yeşilırmak deltası ve çevresinin jeomorfolojisi. Jeomorfoloji Dergisi, 20, 13–28. Erol, O. (1983). Türkiye’nin genç tektonik ve jeomorfolojik gelişimi. Jeomorfoloji Dergisi, 11, 1–22.
23. Erol, O. (1991). The relationship between the phases of the development of the Konya-Karapinar obruks and the Pleistocene Tuz Gölü and Konya pluvial lakes, Turkey. Deniz Bilim ve Cogr. Enstitüsü Blt., 7, 5–49.
24. Fairbridge, R., Erol, O., Karaca, M., Yilmaz, Y. (1997). Background to Mid-Holocene climatic change in Anatolia and adjacent regions. In Third Millennium BC Climate Change and Old World Collapse. [Dalfes H.N.,
25. Kukla, G., Weiss. H. (eds)]. NATO ASI series, 149, pp 595–609.
26. Gelati, R. (1975). Miocene marine sequence from Lake Van eastern Turkey. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigraphia, 81, 477–490.
27. Gürbüz, A. (2009). Orientations of palaeotectonic features as a key to understanding the neotectonic block rotation of the Kocaeli peninsula, NW Turkey. International Geology Review, 51(4), 329–344.
28. Gürbüz, E., Kazancı, N., Gürbüz, A. (2015). Strike—slip faulting, topographic growth and block movements as deduced from drainage anomalies: the Yeşilırmak River basin, northern Turkey. Geomorphology, 246, 634–648.
29. Hack, J. T. (1973). Stream-profile analysis and stream–gradient index. U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1, 421–429.
30. Hare, P. W., Gardner, T. W. (1985). Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. In Tectonic geomorphology. [Morisawa M and Hack JT. (eds.)]. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Bighampton Geomorphology Symposium, Allen and Unwin, Boston.
31. Harkins, N. W, Anastasio, D. J., Pazzaglia, F. J. (2005). Tectonic geomorphology of the Red Rock fault, insights into segmentation and landscape evolution of a developing range front normal fault. Journal of Structural Geology, 27, 1925–1939.
32. Harvey, A. M. (2005). Differential effects of base-level tectonic setting and climatic change on Quaternary alluvial fans in the northern Great Basin, Nevada, USA. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 251, 117–131.
33. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; Hydro physical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56(3), 275– 370.
34. Hubert-Ferrari, A., King, G., Van Der Woerd, J., Villa, I., Altunel, E., Armijo, R. (2002). Long-term evolution of the north Anatolian fault: new constraints from its eastern termination. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 22-35.
35. Hubert-Ferrari, A., King, G., Van Der Woerd, J., Villa, I., Altunel, E., Armijo, R. (2009). Long term evolution of the North Anatolian Fault: new constraints from its termination. In Collision and Collapse at the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia Subduction Zone.[Van Hinsbergen, D. J. J, Edwards, M. A, Govers, R., (eds.)].The Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 311, 133–154.
36. Hurtrez, J. E and Lucazeau, F. (1999). Lithological control on relief and hypsometry in the Herault drainage basin (France), Comptes Rendues Acade mie des Sciences de la terre et des planets. Earth and Planetary Sciences, 328(10), 687–694.
37. Karasözen, E., Özacar, A. A., Biryol, B. C., Beck, L. S. (2014). Seismicity, focal mechanisms and active stress field around the central segment of the North Anatolian Fault in Turkey. Geophysical Journal International, 196, 405–421.
38. Jayappa, K. S., Markose, V. J., Nagoraju, M. (2012). Identification of geomorphic signatures of neotectonic activity using DEM in the Precambrian terrain of western Ghats, India. In Proceedings of International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences., 2012.XXII ISPRS Congress, XXXIX-B8, Melbourne.
39. Khalifa, A., Çakır, Z., Owen, L. A., Kaya, Ş. (2018). Morphotectonic analysis of the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 27, 110–126.
40. Kirby, E., Whipple, K. X. (2001). Quantifying differential rock-uplift rates via stream profile analysis. Geology, 29, 415–418.
41. Keçer, M., & Tüfekçi, K. (1986). Kuzey Anadolu Fayı’na bağlı olarak neotektonik dönemde oluşan Suşehri Havzası’nın evrimi. Jeomorfoloji Degisi, 14, 57–63.
42. Şengör, A. M. C., Tüysüz, O., İmren, C., Sakınç, M., Eyidoğan, H., Görür, N., Le Pichon, X., Rangin, C. (2005). The North Anatolian Fault: A new look. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, 33, 1–75.
43. Tarı, U., and Tüysüz, O. (2015). The effects of the North Anatolian Fault on the geomorphology in the Eastern Marmara Region, Northwestern Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, doi: 10.1080/09853111. 2015.1065308.
44. Topal, Ş. (2019). Evolution of relative tectonic activity along the PrieneSazlı Fault (Söke Basin, Southwest Anatolia): Insight from geomorphic indices and drainage analysis. J.Mt.Sci., 16(4), 909– 923.
45. Tüysüz, O., and Erturaç K. M. (2005). Kuzey Anadolu Fayı’nın Devrez Çayı ile Soruk Çayı arasındaki kesiminin özellikleri ve fayın morfolojik gelişimdeki etkileri. In İTÜ Avrasya Yer Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Türkiye Kuvaterner Sempozyumu, TURQUA-V, İstanbul.
46. Viseras, C., and Fernandez, J. (1994). Channel migration patterns and related sequences in some alluvial fan systems. Sedimentary Geology, 88, 201–217.
47. Wells, S. G., Bullard, T. F., Menges, T. M., Drake, P. G., Karas, P. A., Kelson, K. I., Ritte, J. B., Wesling, J. R. (1988). Regional variations in tectonic geomorphology along segmented convergent plate boundary, Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Geomorphology, 1, 239–265.
48. Westaway, R., Pringle, M. S., Yurtmen, S., Demir, T., Bridgland, D., Rowbotham, G., Maddy, D. (2003). Pliocene and Quaternary surface uplift of western Turkey: revealed by long-term river terrace sequences. Current Science, 84, 1090–1101.
49. Westaway, R., Pringle, M. S., & Yurtmen, S. (2004). Pliocene and Quaternary surface uplift of western Turkey: the Gediz River terrace staircase and the volcanism at Kula. Tectonophysics, 391, 121–169.
50. Wobus, C., Whipple, K. X., Kirby, E., Snyder, N., Johnson, J., Spyropolou, K., Crosby, B., & Sheehan, D. (2006). Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, pitfalls. In Tectonics, climate and landscape evolution. [Willett, S., Hovius, N., Brandon, M., Fisher, D. (eds.)]. Geological Society of America, AGU. Special Paper, 398, 55–74.
51. Yıldırım, C., Schildgen, T. F., Echtler, H., Melnick, D., Strecker, M. R. (2011). Late Neogene and active orogenic uplift in the Central Pontides associated with the North Anatolian Fault: implications for the northern margin of the Central Anatolian Plateau, Turkey. Tectonics, 30(5), TC5005, doi: 1029/2010TC002756.
52. Yıldırım, C., Melnick, D., Ballato, P., Schildgen, T. F., Echtler, H., Erginal, A. E, Kıyak, N. G., Strecker, M. R. (2013). Differential uplift along the northern margin of the Central Anatolian Plateau: Inferences from marine terraces. Quaternary. Science Review, 81, 12–28.
53. Yıldırım, C. (2014). Relative tectonic activity assessment of the Tuz Gölü fault zone; Central Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 630, 183–192.
54. Yılmaz, A., and Yılmaz, H. (2004). Geology and structural evolution of the Tokat massif (Eastern Pontides, Turkey). Turkish J. Earth Sci., 13, 231–246.