A Comparison of Secondary School Curricula in Terms of Climate Change Education in the World and Turkey

Öz

Climate Change Education (CCE) is an approach that has started to establish its own identity in recent years. Many countries have begun to integrate global climate change into their curricula according to the CCE approach, following the UNESCO call. The aim of this study is to compare the curricula of Turkey with those of other countries which cover Climate, Climate Change, and Global Warming in terms of goal (gain). The countries and states with the highest scores in PISA (2015) were selected. The data obtained in this study were collected using the document analysis method as a qualitative research method. According to the CCE approach, issues related to climate and climate change are covered using an interdisciplinary approach in Germany, USA, Australia, Canada, Spain, Republic of South Africa (RSA) and Turkey while they are covered using a disciplinary approach in Sweden. In Finland and England, both disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches are used with students. Establish a connection between local environmental issues and climate change, which is one of the components of CCE, can be found in the curricula of Finland, Sweden, Spain, Canada, Germany and RSA. In addition, comparison of the effects of climate change on the continents are made in the curricula of Finland and Australia. The topics of local effect of climate change and sustainability are cursory in the curricula of Turkey and USA. Curricula are focused on the environmental problems of the Baltic region in Finland, environmental problems in the African continent in RSA, especially water scarcity, and Australia’s ecological problems in Australia. While teaching past climate changes is a highlight of the CCE approach, only students in the UK learn how to interpret climate changes from the ice age to the present.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Comparative Education,Climate Change Education,Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development

Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Ortaokul Öğretim Programlarının İklim Değişikliği Eğitimi Yaklaşımına Göre Karşılaştırılması

Öz

İklim Değişikliği Eğitimi (İDE) son yıllarda kendi kimliğini oluşturmaya başlamış bir yaklaşımdır. Birçok ülke UNESCO’nun çağrısına uyarak küresel iklim değişikliğini, İDE yaklaşımına göre öğretim programlarına entegre etmeye başlamışlardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı PISA (2015) sınavında yüksek puan elde eden ülkelerin İklim, İklim Değişikliği, Küresel Isınma konularının verildiği ortaokul öğretim programlarını hedef (kazanım) açısından Türkiye öğretim programları ile karşılaştırmaktır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden doküman incelemesi yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. İklim ve iklim değişikliği ile ilgili konular İDE yaklaşımına uygun olarak Almanya, ABD, Avustralya, Kanada, İspanya, Güney Afrika Cumhuriyeti (GAC) ve Türkiye’de disiplinlerarası yaklaşımla verilirken İsveç’te disipliner yaklaşımla verilmektedir. Finlandiya ve İngiltere’de ise hem disipliner hem de multidisipliner dersler aracılığı ile öğrencilere aktarılmaktadır. İDE’nin bileşenlerinden biri olan “iklim değişikliğini yerel unsurlarla bütünleştirme” Finlandiya, İsveç, İspanya, Kanada, Almanya ve GAC öğretim programlarında yer alırken özellikle Finlandiya ve Avustralya’da kıtasal karşılaştırmalara da yer verilmektedir. ABD, İngiltere ve Türkiye’de ise sürdürülebilirlik konuları ve iklim değişikliğinin yerel etkileri yüzeysel olarak verilmektedir. Finlandiya’da Baltık bölgesinin çevre sorunlarına, GAC’da Afrika kıtasında yaşanan çevre sorunlarından özellikle su kıtlığına, Avustralya’da ise Avustralya’nın ekolojik sorunlarına yer verilmektedir. Geçmiş dönem iklim değişikliklerini öğretebilmek İDE yaklaşımında öne çıkan bir hususken sadece İngiltere’de öğrenciler buzul çağından günümüze kadar yaşanan iklim değişikliklerini yorumlayabilmeyi öğrenmektedirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim,İklim Değişikliği Eğitimi,Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için İklim Değişikliği Eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Alexandru, A., Ianculescu, M., Tudora, E., & Bica, O. (2013). ICT challenges and issues in climate change education. Studies in Informatics and Control, 22(4), 349-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.24846/ v22i4y201310
2. Anderson, A. (2010). Combating climate change through quality education. Washington, DC: Brookings Global Economy and Development. Anderson, A. (2012). Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 191-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475199
3. Bagoly-Simó, P. (2013). Tracing sustainability: An international comparison of ESD implementation into lower secondary education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 7(1), 95-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973408213495610
4. Bamber, P., Bullivant, A., Glover, A., King, B., & McCann, G. (2016). A comparative review of policy and practice for education for sustainable development/education for global citizenship (ESD/ GC) in teacher education across the four nations of the UK. Management in Education, 30(3), 112-120. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0892020616653179
5. Bangay, C., & Blum, N. (2010). Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda? International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.011
6. Bodlalo, L. H., Sabbaghan, M., & Jome, S. M. R. E. (2013). A comparative study in green chemistry education curriculum in America and China. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 288-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.093
7. Chang, C. H., & Pascua, L. (2017). The state of climate change education – reflections from a selection of studies around the world, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 177-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017 .1331569
8. Choi, S., Niyogi, D., Shepardson, D., & Charusombat, U. (2010). Do earth and environmental science textbooks promote middle and high school students’ conceptual development about climate change? Textbooks’ consideration of students’ misconceptions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(7), 889-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2625.1

9. Derman, M. (2015). Farklı ülkelerin ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim fen bilimleri öğretim programlarında çevre eğitiminin karşılaştırmalı incelenmesi. (Doktora Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
10. Department for Education of United Kingdom. (2013). National curriculum in England: Framework for key stages 1 to 4. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationalcurriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study/nationalcurriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study
11. Department of Basic Education Republic of South Africa. (2011). Basic Education Curriculum of South Africa. Retrieved from http://www. thutong.doe.gov.za/Home/Curriculum/tabid/257/Default.aspx
12. Erdoğan, M., Kostova, Z., & Marcinkowski, T. (2009). Components of Environmental Literacy in Elementary Science Education Curriculum in Bulgaria and Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(1), 15-26. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e678/a66bb9c66e699ea90d 99e4b724b19185a417.pdf
13. Government of Western Australia. (2015) Western Australian Curriculum, Australia. Retrieved from https://k10outline.scsa.wa. edu.au/home/teaching/curriculum-browser
14. Haslett, S. K., Skellern, A., Chilcott, M., & Longman, D. (2010). Pedagogy of Climate Change. In S. K. Haslett, D. France & S. Gedye (Eds.), Climate change education through a blended learning Google Earth exercise (pp. 112-127), Publishing Higher Education Academy.
15. Ho, L. C., & Seow, T. (2015). Teaching controversial issues in geography: Climate change education in Singaporean schools. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 314-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1064842
16. Huai-xin, Z., & Dillon, J. (2001). Education for sustainable development: A Sino-English comparative study in environmental education. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2(3), 342347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02839473
17. Johnson, R. (2011). Climate change education in K-12: Teacher preparation, understanding, needs and concerns. Slingerlands, NY: National Earth Science Teachers Association.
18. Kagawa, F., & Selby, D. (2012). Ready for the storm: Education for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 207-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475200
19. Kaya, M. F. ve Tomal, N. (2011). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programının sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitimi açısından incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 49-65. Erişim adresi: https:// dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/696392
20. Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena, Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620303466
21. Læssøe, J., Schnack, K., Breiting, S., Rolls, S., Feinstein, N., Goh, K. C., & Jensen, B. B. (2009). Climate change and sustainable development: The response from education. A Cross-National Report, International Alliance of Leading Education Institutes. University of Aarhus, Denmark. Retrieved from https://edu.au.dk/ fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/en/research/researchprogrammes/ environmentalandhealtheducation/om-dpu_institutter_institut-fordidaktik_20091208102732_cross_national-report_dec09.pdf
22. Makrakis, V., Larios, N., & Kaliantzi, G. (2012). ICT-enabled climate change education for sustainable development across the school curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 54-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0009-5
23. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2006). Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks, USA. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/educators/curriculum.html
24. Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE p ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 117-128. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620303469
25. McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2010). Rethinking climate change education. Green Teacher, (89), 17. Retrieved from https://www. humphreyfellowship.org/system/files/Rethinking%20Climate%20 Change%20Education.pdf
26. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2004). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı, 5-67. sınıflar. Erişim adresi: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
27. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı, 5-6-7-8. sınıflar. Erişim adresi: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ Programlar.aspx
28. Ministeri D’educació I Ciència &,Munidad Junta de Castilla y Leon. (2007). Disposiciones generales curriculo. Retrieved from https:// www.educa.jcyl.es/es/curriculo
29. Finnish National Board Of Education. (2004). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Retrieved from https://www.oph.fi/english/ curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education/curricula_2014
30. Ministry of Education British Columbia. (2005). The British Columbia Secondary School Curriculum, Canada. Retrieved from https:// www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/education-training/k-12/teach/ curriculum/english
31. Mochizuki, Y., & Bryan, A. (2015). Climate change education in the context of education for sustainable development: Rationale and principles. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 9(1), 4-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973408215569109
32. National Research Council. (2011). Climate change education: Goals, audiences, and strategies: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/13224
33. Nazir, J., Pedretti, E., Wallace, J., Montemurro, D., & Inwood, H. (2011). Reflections on the Canadian experience with education for climate change and sustainable development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(4), 365-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.624673
34. Niepold, F., Herring, D., & McConville, D. (2008) The role of narrative and geospatial visualization in fostering climate literate citizens. Physical Geography, 29 (6), 529-544. http://dx.doi. org/10.2747/0272-3646.29.6.529
35. Nussbaum, E. M., Owens, M. C., Sinatra, G. M., Rehmat, A. P., Cordova, J. R., Ahmad, S., Harris, F. C., & Dascalu, S. M. (2015). Losing the Lake: Simulations to promote gains in student knowledge and interest about climate change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(6), 789-811. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082016.pdf
36. Oversby, J. (2015). Teachers’ learning about climate change education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.637
37. Özata, Y. ve Özkan, M. (2013). 2013 Fen bilimleri programının 2005 fen ve teknoloji programıyla çevre konuları açısından karşılaştırılması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 237-266. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/ download/article-file/153502
38. Özkaral, T. C. (2019). Küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliği konusunun Türkiye, Kanada (Ontario) ve Hong Kong sosyal bilgiler öğretim programlarında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches. 4(8), 1-14. Erişim adresi: http://ijetsar.com/Makaleler/1487572266_1.%20 1-14%20tu%c4%9fba%20cevriye%20%c3%b6zkaral.pdf
39. Pruneau, D., Liboiron, L., Vrain, É., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2001). People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 121-138. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ661764.pdf
40. Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 429446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126096
41. Pruneau, D., Khattabi, A., & Demers, M. (2010). Challenges and possibilities in climate change education. Online Submission, 7(9), 15-24. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED514727. pdf
42. Robinson, Z. (2011). Pedagogy of Climate Change. In S. K. Haslett, D. France & S. Gedye (Eds.), Teaching climate change in higher education: barriers and opportunities (pp. 36-50). Publishing Higher Education Academy.
43. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A., & Hirsch, A. (2012). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 323-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135 04622.2011.622839
44. Srbinovski, M., Erdogan, M., & Ismaili, M. (2010). Environmental literacy in the science education curriculum in Macedonia and Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4528-4532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.725
45. Staatsinstitut für Schulqualität und Bildungsforschung München. (2009). Gymnasium Lehrplan für Bayerische. Retrieved from http:// www.isb.bayern.de/gymnasium/faecher/
46. The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). National secondary school curriculum of Sweden. Retrieved from https:// www.skolverket.se/undervisning
47. Tong, T. M. T., Shaw, R., & Takeuchi, Y. (2012). Climate disaster resilience of the education sector in Thua Thien Hue Province, Central Vietnam. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 685-709. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11069-012-0178-5
48. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development; Rio Declaration on Environment and Development; Statements of Forest Principles; the Final Text of Agreements Negotiated by Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro/Brazil: Publishing United Nations Department of Public Information. Retrieved from https:// unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000116639
49. United Nations Environment Programme. (2006). Raising awareness of climate change: A handbook for government focal points. Switzerland: Publishing UNEP/DELC. Retrieved from http:// wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8617/unep_cc_ handbook.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
50. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009a). International seminar on climate change education: report. 27-29 July 2009, Paris/France. Retrieved from http://www. unesco.org/science/doc/cc/CC_seminar_report_071209.pdf
51. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009b). Education for sustainable development and climate change. Policy Dialogue 4: ESD and Development Policy. ED– 2009/WS/10, Paris, France: Publishing UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179122
52. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Not just hot air: Putting climate change education into practice. Paris/France: Publishing UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233083
53. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization & United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Climate change starter’s guidebook: an issues guide for educational planners and practitioners. Paris/France: Publishing UNESCO/UNEP. Retrieved from (http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002111/211136E.pdf
54. United Nations Department of Public Information. (1994). Article 6: Education, training and public awareness. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York: Publishing UN. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/ conveng.pdf
55. United States Global Change Research Program. (2009). Climate literacy: the essential principles of climate science. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://cpo.noaa.gov/Portals/0/docs/ MeettheDivisions/ClimateLiteracyPoster-8_5x11_Final4-11LR.pdf
56. Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 297-309. https:// doi.org/10.5408/1.3559695
57. Yakar, H., & Karakuş, U. (2019). Investigation of the social studies curricula in Turkey (1968-2018) with regards to the climate literacy principles. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(5), 12161225. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070507
58. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9.bs). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
59. Yolcu, O. (2014). Cumhuriyetten (1923) günümüze (2013) ilköğretim birinci kademe hayat bilgisi ve fen ve teknoloji öğretim programlarının “çevre eğitimi” açısından incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.